Archives for category: Testing

Kenneth Bernstein recently retired as a high school teacher of government.

He regularly blogs as Teacherken at the Daily Kos, which is how I met him. He is–and I hesitate to write this–an almost saintly man, deeply devoted to students, teaching, education, and the betterment of humanity.

In this article, written in the journal of the American Association of University Professors, Ken explains to the professoriate that the students of the NCLB generation are woefully unprepared for the intellectual demands of college. The piece appeared in Academe and the original is here. Kudos to Academe for publishing Ken’s important article.

Please do not blame their teachers, he writes. Their teachers were compelled by federal policy to teach to tests that discouraged critical thinking. Even bright students in AP classes, like those he taught, were rewarded for bad writing. Bad writing is expected, promoted, demanded by the AP exams, which determine the reputation of high schools.

This is unquestionably the most remarkable and powerful piece that Ken Bernstein has written. Please read it.

Bookends: On the very first day this blog started, April 24, 2012, I posted a description of a college professor’s reaction to the NCLB generation.

An administrator in Louisiana writes about how the Jindal administration tries to strike fear in the hearts of all educators while boasting of their great success.

Dear Bridget, here is my advice: “Illegitimi non carborundum.”

Be there when their pathetic regime is toppled by the good and great citizens of Louisiana.

Bridget writes:

It definitely is getting more and more difficult for teachers to stay. As an administrator, I see the panic on their faces as the date of the state test looms closer each day. Here in Louisiana, our jobs are tied directly to their VAM score, which over-rides any evaluation score given to them by our team. As administrators, we do our best to help to empower them with information and resources, but it will never be enough. Our governor has set us up for failure. I often think about returning to my special education classroom to finish out my last five years before retiring. Then I realize there may not be a retirement system left in five years. The joke is on me. After dedicating my life to teaching, I will probably not have anything to show for it except memories and/ or nightmares. My starting salary years ago was around $13,000 a year. I definitely didn’t get into this career for the money. Thanks to this blog I stick it out. I now have a place to stay abreast of what is happening across our nation. Don’t know how long I can last… one day at a time. I agree with Jesse that it is unfair to leave in the middle of the school year.

 

I was invited by the Bill Moyers’ show to write the section on education for President Obama’s State of the Union address. Not to write what I think ke WILL say, but what I think he SHOULD say.

Read it here
and please add your comment.

NCLB is a disaster. The absurd idea that 100% of all students would be proficient simply by testing them every year and firing their teachers and principals and closing their schools is now exposed as a great fantasy.

Do waivers help? Or are they just another way to fasten the federal noose and pave the way for privatization?

This reader reflects:

“As a mother, educator and someone who worked on a state waiver for NCLB, I often felt like I was doing the devil’s work. I do NOT agree with standardized testing as the primary measure of a school, student, or teachers effectiveness. I also know that the NCLB rules of 100% of all students performing on grade level by 2014 was wildly unrealistic. Sadly what I have discovered is, at least in my state of Maine, there is a sense of hopelessness & helplessness among educators with regard to their ability to impact any of this. I disagree. It’s time that teachers make their voices heard, and take back the reigns of their profession. Which is the exact reason why I elected to get involved in the NCLB waiver process in my state. It was a glimmer of hope that perhaps all of this hoopla over standardized testing would be diminished over time.”

A reader shares her experience grading tests.

I am not a teacher, but I admire them. I attended public schools in CA in the 1950s. Our class size was around the 20’s. We were integrated. We did fine. I am absolutely opposed to standardized tests. I used to grade the old TX TAAS tests. I heard the comments about “Ghetto children.” I’ve worked for 2 testing companies and they cheat like Lance Armstrong. No randomized sample selection, they falsify data, they increase one portion of the data (minority data) without increasing the whole sample size. And, no one monitors them. They are accountable to no one. No one checks their data or their test results. These are the tests you are teaching to. These are the tests they are closing schools for. These are the tests they are eliminating Arts programs for. (pls. pardon my hanging preps)

Texas Republicans are hearing from their constituents–in the grocery store, at the barber, wherever they go.

People think that testing in Texas is out of control.

The last state commissioner Robert Scott said so. He called the testing obsession a “vampire,” sucking the life out of education.

More than 80% of local school boards agree.

Elected officials have to listen.

They cut $5.4 billion from the school budget but managed to find $500 million to pay Pearson.

Superintendents are sick of it. School boards are sick of it. Parents are fed up. Students hate it.

Put a stake through the heart of the vampire.

Glenda Ritz, the new State Superintendent of Public Instruction in Indiana, thrashed reform idol Tony Bennett last November. She received more votes than anyone else on the ballot except the Attorney General (she ran ahead of the governor).

Tony Bennett, who famously supports free-market solutions to education problems, is an advocate for charters and vouchers, for evaluating teachers by test scores, and for for-profit online corporations and charters. Tony Bennett is one of the nation’s loudest supporters of the Common Core.

Ritz is a Democrat; Bennett is a Republican.

Ritz was supported by a curious coalition: by parents and educators who disliked Bennett’s privatizing policies and his punitive treatment of teachers. She was also supported by Tea Party enthusiasts who dislike national standards and saw the Common Core as an effort by the federal government to impose national standards and tests.

Some Republican legislators in Indiana want to withdraw the state’s support for Common Core. Now they will have a state superintendent who agrees with them.

The politics of the Common Core are interesting indeed. And they will become even more interesting in the next few years as states are required to come up with the money for implementation, new technology, new materials, and professional development.

The Forward Institute sent me their latest study of charter school performance compared to public schools in Milwaukee. Here is the takeaway: There is no significant difference between the performance of public schools and charter schools. However, public schools in Milwaukee are more successful with the poorest students than are charter schools. None of this matters to Governor Scott Walker and the Republican-dominated legislature, which is intent of privatizing more schools, regardless of evidence.

 

Here is a link and a synopsis:

 

http://forwardinstitutewi.org/2012/12/19/milwaukee-and-racine-dpi-report-card-scores-and-poverty-and-about-those-growth-scores/

Milwaukee and statewide school districts show a significant correlation between the level of Economic Disadvantage and Report Card scores. The higher the level of poverty, the lower the Report Card scores. The plot also shows charter schools at the lowest income levels having lower scores than their public school counterparts – consistent with the statewide data. There is a difference in the data, however – one not addressed by charter school advocates.

In the statewide data, charter schools have a significantly higher percentage of low-income enrollment than public schools (43.6% Charters, 32.7% Public). In Milwaukee, public schools have a greater percentage of low-income enrollment than charter schools (88.5% Charters, 95% Public). (Low income is defined in this study as schools with ED enrollment higher than 48.9%. Middle income is ED enrollment of 30.4% to less than 48.9%. High income is ED enrollment less than 30.4%).

Based on the statewide outcome, we would have expected Milwaukee charter schools to perform better on the Report Cards in the lowest income group than public schools – having a lower percentage of high poverty schools. That is not the case. Figure 3 shows that in the middle and low-income groups, charter schools scored lower than public schools in Milwaukee.

At the very least, based on the standard deviation, charter schools scored no better than public schools in Milwaukee. This would suggest that in spite of MPS traditional public schools having more schools with high ED enrollment than charter schools, they are still scoring no worse than their non-traditional charter school counterparts.

The data does not support the claim that Milwaukee Charter schools outperform traditional public schools. At the very least, the difference is not statistically significant. At the most, the mean Report Card scores indicate that Milwaukee Public Schools are outperforming their Charter School counterparts – particularly in the schools of highest poverty. In Racine, the highest poverty RUSD schools are performing on a par with statewide Charter Schools, and only slightly lower than statewide Public Schools.

*Note – Our data considers any non-traditional charter school as defined by DPI as a “Charter.” This includes non-instrumentality and instrumentality (but non-traditional) schools.

Diana Rogers, a regular reader of the blog, writes about her experience and her school:

I’ve worked for twenty years in a district that has a wonderful staff. There have been a few unsuitable teachers throughout the years, and the administration had no trouble identifying them and getting rid of them; a few others who just needed a bit of guidance were mentored and became better teachers.

I know I have become a better teacher each year, and I have worked hard at becoming better–taken 65 semester hours of post-graduate work, attended numerous workshops and seminars, read professional books and journals. But more important, I learned from my students and their parents, and from my colleagues. I did not “peak” after a few years, but got better and better each year at understanding my students, being able to explain material to them in ways they could grasp and retain, and at knowing how to bring parents into the teaching team as their children’s biggest supporters.

I have done everything I have been asked to do. And so have the other teachers I know. I don’t see all these “bad” teachers that are always being talked about in the media. But in recent years we have been asked to do not only the stupid, but the downright impossible, and even the harmful. Yes we are getting demoralized, attacked from all sides by non-educators who think they understand education better than professional educators. On the whole, teachers are idealistic strivers who try to do everything they can to help their students succeed. I see this every day.

And now we have to waste time on endless testing, data compilation, test preparation, and changing our curriculum to align to the Common Core.

We have to worry about our contracted pensions being taken away from us.

We have to spend enormous amounts of time assembling a portfolio of evidence to prove that we are good teachers, and are even told not to expect to be rated as excellent as we were in the past and as our administrators know we are.

This time could certainly be better spent polishing and improving our lessons, researching materials and methods, or giving feedback to students. Even though I take stacks of work home nightly and spend a huge chunk of the weekend and much of my vacation time on grading, preparation, and other school-related work, there are still only so many hours in a day, and they are not enough to do what I am required to do without adequate resources or support.

The conditions teachers work under are not the fault of school administrators any more than that of the teachers. Administrators endure the same unreasonable pressures of impossible demands, unfair evaluations and limited resources as teachers do. They are caught up in the same effort to do what is being asked of them when what is being asked is not reasonable or right.

Schools will not become better if people like me and the many fine, experienced teachers I know are driven out by impossible demands, abuse, and loss of job and retirement security.

I want to believe that sensible thinkers will prevail and that the tide in this insidious madness of false “reform” will turn.

I cannot understand why there is not recognition and enormous public outcry against the dismantling of public education in our country.

I’m hoping that the harm being done by those whose interests are not the welfare of our country and its children will finally be understood and that people of good faith in the general public and in our government (if there are any left there who are not controlled by big money) will do what is needed to save public education before it is too late.

Bill Gates wrote an editorial in the Wall Street Journal last week about how to solve all the world’s biggest problems.

The answer he said was: Measurement.

This writer, Cathy O’Neill, disagrees. It is not that measurement is unimportant but that measurement is not neutral.

What matters most is who decides what to measure.

Most researchers in education recognize that value-added measurement has serious flaws and unintended consequences.

The teachers whose students produce the highest gains may be teachers who spend every class period doing drills for the test.

The teachers whose students see the smallest gains may have students who don’t speak English or who are gifted and at the top.

If you understand the limitations of the measure–the standardized tests–then you will be reluctant to let them determine which children are considered smart, which teachers get a bonus, which teachers are fired, and which schools will close.