Archives for category: Testing

Students in New York recently completed a battery of tests aligned with the Common Core and developed by Pearson.

The tests remain secret though some bootleg copies have circulated. They should be released for public review.

Although educators were not allowed to disclose the test questions, Lucy Calkins of Teachers College created a website where educators could register comments about the tests. She received over 1,000 comments.

Some of them:

Many teachers complained about the emphasis on meta cognitive skills, as opposed to understanding the meaning of the text.

Another big complaint was timing. Many good students couldn’t finish their answers and ended up frustrated and defeated.

This is quite a treasure trove, written by teachers, about the tests that will be consequential for their students and their careers.

Vicki Cobb, an award-winning author of more than 90 children’s books about science, recently received a request from a test publisher to write for the new Common Core assessments. However, when she saw the guidelines, she wondered if she could do it. Will her voice disappear? Will she be compelled to write the same pap that deadens textbooks? Stay tuned.

A teacher sent this commentary about what’s happening in her city of Syracuse, New York.

She writes:

“As part of the teacher evaluation in Syracuse, our lovely union negotiated a student survey which would count as 6% of our evaluation. It’s called the Tripod survey, but I don’t know what that means. I’ve attached the directions we were given, which includes the questions for grades K-2. They have 40 questions, and when you get to 6-8, there are over 100.

While there are questions about the classroom, there are also questions about home life. How that pertains to my classroom, I don’t know. And, there are more “personal” questions the higher the grade level. I suspect that some of this information will find its way to the information cloud in the sky.

There will be name labels on each survey, which will be removed prior to collecting the completed survey. However, if it is anything like the surveys we’ve had to give to students in the past, their school ID # is still on the pages. Otherwise, why bother with name labels which will be removed? Why not just hand out surveys like you do the NY tests? I am uncomfortable with the whole thing, and really ticked off at the union which approved, sight unseen, what was going to be done.

Although my kids, all 4 of them, went to public schools in Syracuse, I fear for the future of the kids there now. Do we have any chance at all of putting a stop to what is going on? Money really is the root of all evil.”

I always hold out hope that Mike Petrilli will be the conservative who one day leaves behind his brethren and realizes that the punitive policies of No Child Left Behind and Race to the Top were a huge and costly mistake. Why do I hold out hope for Mike? I know him, and I know he is a good man. He wasn’t born with a silver spoon in his mouth. He has young children, and he will soon see how the testing monster will try to devour them and destroy their love of learning.

In his last exchange with Deborah Meier at “Bridging Differences” at Education Week, I see the glimmer of hope that I have been waiting for. Mike describes himself as a “Whole Foods Republican,” and then asserts that we are helpless to do much about poverty because we don’t know what to do. That is not a glimmer of hope, as I think we can forge poverty-reduction policies that work, as other nations have. We should not give up trying.

What gives me hope is not Mike’s sense of futility about poverty, but his proposal that states should have the authority to allow schools to opt out of the soul-deadening testing-and-accountability regime if they can show that their metrics are better than those of the federal and state governments.

Thus, he would give his consent to the New York Performance Standards Consortium, which has documented its success in graduation rates, college admission rates, and persistence in college rates. Granted, it took time to get that data. A group of schools needs a decade or more to generate the results of their program.

But think of the creativity and innovation that would be unleashed if schools were offered the freedom to opt out and select different ways to measure their success.

Good job, Mike.

Several people have asked me why I did not join them in Albany for the big rally, which drew more than 10,000 people to protest the state’s overuse and misuse of high-stakes testing.

I was invited to speak, but I declined because of health reasons. In the past couple of years, I have had severe spinal pain due to arthritis. It comes and goes. It was especially bad in May when the invitation came, and I am dealing with it now with doctor’s visits, x-rays, MRI, medication.

I wish I could have joined you in Albany. I hope you understand why I did not.

In a huge victory for students, parents, educators, and local school boards, Governor Rick Perry signed HB5, a bill that reduces the quantity of state-mandated tests. Up until the last minute, activists were fearful he might veto it. But Perry deferred to the huge public outcry against high-stakes testing.

Here is a summary by Texas Association of School Boards.

Here is a statement by TAMSA, known popularly as Moms Against Drunk Testing:

Dear TAMSA members:

Today at 12:30pm, House Bill 5 became law with Governor Perry’s signature. Texas public schools can now begin to implement the positive changes including decreasing the required End-of-Course exams from 15 to 5* and increasing flexibility for high school graduation requirements. This new law also saves Texas taxpayers millions of dollars by limiting state-mandated standardized tests.

Thank YOU for all your time and support of HB 5 over the last few months. All of your calls, emails, testimony, and energy were critical to helping this bill ultimately become law.

We want to also thank the key leadership and staff in Austin for their work on behalf of public education students in Texas: the commitment of Speaker Joe Straus for declaring education a key issue of this legislative session on Day 1; the leadership of Chairman Dan Patrick and Chairman Jimmie Don Aycock for working tirelessly to create and shepherd HB5; to Lt. Governor Dewhurst for supporting HB 5 during this process; to staff members Brandy Marty and Julie Linn for their time fielding our calls and emails on behalf of the Governor, and finally to Governor Perry for listening to his constituents and signing HB 5 into law.

Please take a minute to send an email thanking these people for supporting all of the children in our public schools:

Speaker Joe Straus, Senator Dan Patrick, Representative Jimmie Don Aycock, and staffers Brandy Marty and Julie Linn: [easy cut and paste email list]
district121.straus@house.state.tx.us; Dan.Patrick@senate.state.tx.us; Jimmie.Aycock@house.state.tx.us; brandy.marty@governor.state.tx.us; julie.linn@governor.state.tx.us

Governor Perry: http://governor.state.tx.us/contact/
Lt. Gov. Dewhurst: http://www.ltgov.state.tx.us/contact.php

Again, thank you for all you did. Have a great summer!

TAMSA

* The five EOCs included in HB 5 are: English I & English II, (combined reading and writing) Algebra I, Biology, & U.S. History. Other EOCs (Geometry, Algebra II, World Geography, World History, Chemistry, & Physics) will no longer be required for graduation (including for students that have already taken them).

TAMSA’s mission is to improve public education in Texas through the use of meaningful and effective student assessments that allow for more productive classroom instruction and more efficient use of public funds.
(Forward this email to your family and friends – ask them to join too: http://www.tamsatx.org)

Texans Advocating for Meaningful Student Assessment
TAMSA Board of Directors:
Kim Cook Susan Schultz
Susan Kellner Theresa Trevino
Dineen Majcher
Laura Yeager
Joanne Salazar

Texans Advocating for Meaningful Student Assessment | 9337B Katy Freeway, #107 | Houston | TX | 77024

Here is a puzzlement (as the king said in “The King and I”).

Is there a right way to do something that is inherently wrong?

I think that it is wrong to judge “teacher quality” by student test scores.

Doing so undermines the quality of education.

It narrows the curriculum only to what is tested.

It encourages districts and states to attempt to test subjects that cannot be assessed by standardized tests.

It encourages teaching to the tests.

It incentivizes schools, districts, and states to game the system, and many have developed clever ways to inflate their scores.

No existing test was designed for this purpose, and test publishers always caution that tests should be used only for the purpose for which they were designed.

Some desperate or unscrupulous educators will cheat to get rewards or avoid sanctions.

Campbell’s Law holds true: “The more any quantitative social indicator is used for social decision-making, the more subject it will be to corruption pressures and the more apt it will be to distort and corrupt the social processes it is intended to monitor.”

Thus, the more we use high-stakes testing, the more we corrupt what is measured. Every teacher, every administrator focuses on the scores to the exclusion of more important issues, such as the engagement of students in the arts, the health and well-being of children, and the soundness of the curriculum. They do this because their job depends on doing it.

I am not opposed to testing, if the tests are used diagnostically, to help students and teachers. I am opposed to testing that has high stakes attached to it, that rewards and punishes teachers, principals, and schools based on test scores. What we now call “accountability” is a synonym for “punishment.” I think that is wrong. Such “accountability” warps education, and I oppose it.

As I read discussions about school improvement strategies, I am struck by the obsession with data, the imposition of rubrics and targets, etc. that has taken the place of conversations about students and curriculum, about the joy of learning and love of the subject for its own sake, not for a test score.

And yet intelligent people continue to slice and dice the methods for using data to judge teacher quality.

They think there is a right way to do it. I don’t.

I think that the truly great teachers awaken a love of learning in their students. The truly great teachers reach into their students hearts and souls and change their lives. Truly great teachers don’t think about test scores. They think about making a difference in the lives of children.

I don’t think there will ever be a test or a method that measures what matters most.

I believe that the current era of test obsession will eventually collapse. It will collapse because it demoralizes teachers and has other pernicious effects. Students know it. Teachers know it. many administrators know it but are afraid to say so (I honor those who do say so and defend principle). Parents are beginning to see it. Sooner or later, those who sit in legislative halls in states and nations will understand that they are squandering money, but even worse, they are harming students and ruining American education.

That day will come. It is inevitable. And when it does, we will have the large task of reconstructing American education in ways that make sense, that restore honor to the profession of teaching, and that are truly educative for all children.

In a discussion of the expectations of the Common Core, a reader offered this observation:

“Here in Clark County Nevada we have been treated to a special pep talk by our new superintendent, a 25 year veteran of the district and a former kindergarten teacher. He stated on Jon Ralston’s show that we will have to step up to meet the Common Core standards. He bluntly stated that from his experience kindergarten would be teaching what he said were 2nd and 3rd grade concepts in his time. I am glad for his honesty, but I am sure reality will intrude on his wish that children attain and perform at levels that are developmentally inappropriate. I am not sure he is enough of a bureaucrat to know he made an admission that others should amplify. Our kids aren’t stupid, our schools aren’t failing, the tests are not appropriate.”

Anna Allanbrook, principal of the Brooklyn New School, wrote a letter to the families of the school expressing her view of the new ELA tests.

Yes, they were harder, because so many of the multiple-choice questions had more than one answer. This is simply very bad test design. Test questions should have one answer, not two or three. This is confusing to students and serves no useful purpose.

The tests were “harder” because they spanned three days. One teacher wondered why it took three days to figure out a student’s reading level. A reason the tests were longer, though not the only reason, was that they included field-test questions, and the students could not know which was which.

For the students who are struggling learners and for special education students, the tests were harder, and they were made aware of how far behind they are.

And then she asks the hardest question of all: At a time of cuts to basic services and shortages of supplies, why is there always plenty of money for testing?

Over protests by teachers and students, the Rhode Island state board of education gave state Commissioner of Education Deborah Gist a two-year contract extension.

Teachers objected to Gist’s top-down management style. Students opposed Gist’s insistence on using a standardized test as a requirement for graduation. Gist had the support of Governor Lincoln Chafee, Secretary of Education Duncan, and the business community.

Gist is a member of Jeb Bush’s ultra-conservative Chiefs for Change, which supports test-based accountability, charters, vouchers, and other market-based strategies.