Archives for category: Testing

This was a good panel discussion on Chris Hayes’ show on MSNBC about the redesign of the SAT.

What came through clearly is that the SAT–like all standardized tests–favors those who are the haves of society, those who have family income and family education.

Chris refers to a recent study (which I will say more about on Monday) showing that the kids who took the SAT or ACT did no better in college than those who were admitted without taking those tests.

High school grades actually predict college success better than the college entry exams.

The most surprising panelist was from Kaplan Test Prep, who seems incredibly happy about the redesign of the SAT, as it offers new worlds to conquer. He defended the SAT on grounds that admission to college is basically an elitist activity, and everyone wants to get whatever edge they can while competing for coveted slots in selective colleges or programs.

Everyone agreed that the SAT is graded on a curve, and those who have the most will end up on the right side of the curve.

Bertis Downs is a great supporter of public education who lives in Athens, Georgia, and sends his daughter to Clarke Central High School. He is also a valued director of the Network for Public Education.

In this post, he thanks President Obama for recognizing the great things happening in his local high school. But he invites the President to visit Athens and see what his policies are doing to the school.

He writes:

“The policies currently promoted by your Department of Education are actually hurting– not helping– schools like ours. It is clear we will reduce schools’ efficacy if public education remains fixated on tests that only measure limited concepts – tests that regularly relegate less advantaged children into the “bottom half” and limit their access to broader education.

“Why does the law distill the interactions of our teachers and students over the course of a year into a high-stakes multiple choice test? Is this really a valid system of accountability for teachers, based so heavily on their students’ test scores? If so, why are so many public school parents, teachers and students pushing back against it? And why aren’t the private schools insisting on it?

“In my daughter’s English class at Clarke Central, students engage the works of Plato and learn to discern and make philosophical arguments about abstract concepts like piety; they read Hemingway and learn how to engage questions such as whether a protagonist’s moral code can be attributed to the author. You cannot pick “A, B, C, or D” for such things, or if you can, then the entire experience is trivialized. Of course assessments are a necessary part of any educational process, to help guide, inform and improve instruction, but the high-stakes test-and-punish regime now in place is not doing that.

“Choices” like “prep academies” on the public dime make a diverse population like Clarke Central’s increasingly rare, and the No Excuses model schools serve poor and minority populations almost exclusively. Since we know that concentrated poverty so often correlates with low standardized test scores, why is such over-testing and misuse of testing so central to current policy focus? Is that where your education policy is taking us–toward a de facto two-track system with schools for well-to-do students and other schools for those from poverty? Your speeches do not suggest any of this, especially when you talk about “opportunity for all,” ”great teachers,” and “setting high standards.” But current policies, accompanied by the sweet-sounding elixir of “choice,” are reducing the ability of skilled and effective teachers to really teach. Surely you must recognize that privatized models of competition conflict with American education’s historic commitment to empower each child to reach his or her highest potential, a commitment based on educators working together in collaboration as a team.”

Guy Brandenburg here reproduces the listing of anti-testing news from FairTest, an organization that has been ringing the alarm bells about standardized testing for years.

If you want to see the explosion of test boycotts, opt outs, and rollbacks, read the FairTest update.

A wonderful article appeared in today’s New York Times about the SAT. While the letters columns and the talking heads were discoursing on the meaning of the redesign of the SAT, Jennifer Finney Boylan, recounted her own tortured experience taking the SAT. She offers no hope that the changes are anything more than cosmetic.

Her view:

“All in all, the changes are intended to make SAT scores more accurately mirror the grades a student gets in school.

“The thing is, though, there already is something that accurately mirrors the grades a student gets in school. Namely: the grades a student gets in school. A better way of revising the SAT, from what I can see, would be to do away with it once and for all.

“The SAT is a mind-numbing, stress-inducing ritual of torture. The College Board can change the test all it likes, but no single exam, given on a single day, should determine anyone’s fate. The fact that we have been using this test to perform exactly this function for generations now is a national scandal.

“The problems with the test are well known. It measures memorization, not intelligence. It favors the rich, who can afford preparatory crash courses. It freaks students out so completely that they cannot even think.”

Even David Coleman acknowledges that high school grades are a better predictor of college success than the SAT.

Why do colleges need the SAT? The SAT will continue to reward the kids whose parents have the most money and education, as well as those who can afford to pay the most for SAT tutors. They happen to be the same families.

When she read that parents in New York are planning an Opt-Out rally on March 29, this reader sent the following poem:

“Way to go NEW YORK ! BRAVEHEART of our Nation!

“I Opted Out in Texas by resigning. As an educator, I could no longer violate my professional ethics or my conscience and participate in a state school system that abuses children. I felt that I was being manipulated and “used” to abuse children in order to support an immoral cause. It was creating emotional distress for me just as it is the children. I wrote this piece to express my protest. I hope you are not offended by my frankness. I am an Aspie, so I have an excuse for telling the truth:

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

“We Should Have Listened to the Lorax !!!

It came in so boldly in very plain sight
That no one reacted with outrage or fright.

The teachers all worked it to lift children’s scores
too busy to notice their role shift to wh – – – – .

They followed directives and put it to use,
so how could they know they were causing abuse.

It called itself “common” and bragged without shame,
That all kids would need it to be just the same.

To measure the contents of what children learn
came methods of strictness all callous and stern.

It claimed to have rigor to help kids succeed,
but most could not see underneath was all GREED.

It first made a difference and upted some scores
but then it continued with more more and more.

The children were sweet and so nice and polite
They all were submissive without any fight.

They did it to please those they trust to know right.
They did it in spite of their bindings so tight.

They suffered in silence and gave their best try
They never complained or even asked “why”?

…..but some did cry.

Their innocence plundered their self now askew,
They hardened completely while no one even knew.

Their spirits were taken their childhood replaced
A new breed of children – a much meaner race.

Now where are those sadists who made up such rules
to torture young children with cruel cunning ruse?

They’re safe in their castles no thoughts of that time,
When children were maimed by their heinous crime.

Our nation is dying this loss is too great
The end of our children will be our last fate.

The Lorax was trying to speak for the trees.
I speak for children….begging….on my knees.

Please notice the children are having distress
Don’t let them suffer the harm from this mess.

This hidden agenda is well on it’s way
to make a Police State….that’s all I can say.

…and now I’ve gone away.”

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Illustrated signed copies are available: fairyprincess78704@gmail.com

In the ongoing debate between Tom Loveless of Brookings and Andreas Schleicher of the OECD, score one for Loveless.

Loveless has steadfastly maintained that the astonishing scores from Shanghai are almost meaningless because of the missing students.

At a conference in Great Britain, Schleicher admitted that about a quarter of the children in Shanghai were not sampled for the PISA exam.  Yet he continued to maintain that the children of menial workers in Shanghai know more than the children of professionals in other countries.

Now if only he could produce a scintilla of evidence that the PISA rankings foretell the economic future of any country tested.

Maybe he might explain how it is that the U.S. is the most powerful economy in the world despite the fact that its students have persistently scored about average in the international league tables or even in the bottom quarter over the past 50 years.

Peter Greene teaches high school in Pennsylvania so naturally he is very interested in the redesign of the SAT.

So, in a well-used journalistic tradition, Greene assumes the voice of David Coleman–president of the College Board–to explain the reasoning behind the changes.

This is his conclusion. You get the drift. Open the link and read it all.

“Yes, the SAT was a biased test. It still is– but now it’s biased the right way. My way. We’ve got the CCSS and the SAT lined up. Next we’ll get your three-year-olds properly rigorized, and once that’s happening colleges won’t be able to keep from becoming the proper vocational training centers they’re supposed to be. Quality of life? Quality of life comes from money, baby. Education has something to do with a greater understanding of our world and our humanity and how we make sense of them, how we express our deepest connections to each other and the universe in a process of discovery, expression and wonder that continues our whole life? You’re killing me.

“Look, an educated person is one who can do well the tests assigned by his betters, can fulfill a useful job for the corporations that hire him, and will behave properly for the government that rules him. If you wanted something more out of life than that, you should have arranged to be rich. In the meantime, enjoy the new SAT.”

John Thompson, an experienced teacher and historian, is convinced that Common Core will die unless there is a moratorium on high-stakes testing.

The early returns from states that have tested the “rigorous” Common Core show high failure rates, especially among poor and minority youth.

Thompson writes:

Real world, there are only so many hours in a day, and time is running out on the opportunity to supply materials, training and, above all, the supports that low-income students will need to meet Common Core standards. Soon, we will face the logistical, political, and legal consequences of denying high school diplomas to students because they failed Common Core and “Common Core-type” graduation examinations, without having an opportunity to be taught Common Core or “Common Core-type” material.

How will we respond to failure rates of 50-60-70% of more among the neediest students?

But that’s not all.

Using the Common Core test results to evaluate teachers is causing massive demoralization among teachers.

The rush to implement Common Core–without proper preparation of students or teachers, with appropriate materials, without a massive investment in instruction–has caused a perfect storm of hostility, pushback, and resentment among both parents and educators.

Students are being hurt by this reckless experiment.

I won’t name names, but I will say that I recently heard a major national figure in education candidly state that “the Common Core is dead.”

Maybe yes, maybe no.

Maybe, like a chicken whose neck was wrung off, it is still running around in circles, unaware that it is dead.

To date, the course corrections have been phony.

The standards must be decoupled from the tests.

Teachers should not be evaluated by scores on tests that do not reflect their skill as teachers, but do reflect who was in their classroom.

The standards must be thoroughly reviewed by expert practitioners in every state, including early childhood educators and specialists in teaching children with disabilities.

Otherwise, the Common Core indeed will be a footnote in history.

You have to see this film: “Rise Above the Mark.”

It was produced and written by educators and friends of public education in West Lafayette, Indiana.

It is professional, compelling, and honest about the challenges facing children, schools and teachers today.

The team interviewed Pasi Sahlberg, Linda Darling-Hammond, Marc Tucker, me, and others. But more importantly, the film interviews teachers, students, parents, and principals. It shows how today’s policies are crushing teachers and driving them out of teaching.

I saw the movie at a public showing at Butler University in Indianapolis. It is powerful.

You can go to riseabovethemark.com and find out how you can sign up for a copy of the film and show it at your school and to your community.

See it.

You will be glad you did.

Another third-grade teacher weighs in on the damage that politicians and legislators and testing corporations are doing to children:

 

Forget all of our methods classes in college. Forget developmental learning. Forget that children are not all the same. Every word above is true. I too am a third grade teacher. Or perhaps I should say I am now a third grade test administrator.

Education is no longer recognizable. There is very little time for teaching. We can no longer encourage children to think through issues and come to conclusions. They must have only the conclusion that is on the test(s). Students are now afraid to take any risks which is what all our great thinkers and innovators do. They are afraid it won’t be the correct choice on the test.

I have been a student, a parent and a teacher. This is a situation in which no one thrives. Not even the lucky students that test well and naturally. There is no time to challenge them to be lifelong learners, only test passers. Once they get to real life, and must perform at a job, sadly they will learn that no one gets paid to pass tests. We are raising a generation of students that hate school and we are giving them very little in the way of skills to navigate life.

And finally, I have to say, I don’t know who is writing these so called tests but I can tell you they don’t seem as if they have been in a classroom for a while. I have taught third grade for 20 years. These measures are not developmentally appropriate . The only purpose I can see is to separate the fortunate from the unfortunate. I can’t wait to see how sad our drop out rate is when these kids have learned that they are not successful because a test said so. We know from research that boys, especially African American boys, will quit trying if they see no way to succeed. Shamefully, we are setting ourselves up for a disaster. Why won’t anyone listen to the educators? Why have politicians begun running our schools, our curriculum, and our future? The people voting to enact these absurd tests haven’t been in a classroom in a very long time. How does that give them the knowledge to impact our future in such a drastic way?

I won’t quit. Someone has to be there for these kids. But the state of North Carolina is not helping their students and have demoralized their educators. Every day I go to see those smiling faces and everyday I have hope that things will change before it’s to late. You can be sure I will do my research when I vote and I encourage others to do so as well.