Archives for category: Testing

Sixteen elementary school teachers in Framingham, Massachusetts, wrote an eloquent letter to parents explaining the damage that is done by high-stakes PARCC testing.

 

They write:

 

As teachers we cannot stay silent as PARCC makes its way into our classrooms.

 

In the words of Soujourner Truth at the 1851 Women’s Convention, “Where there is so much racket there must be something out of kilter.” Nationally, we’re hearing a racket about the problem of standardized tests driving instruction, knocking the process of education clearly out of kilter. Here are a few reasons why:

 

First, test prep takes time away from real instruction in reading, math, and writing. “On average we will cancel six weeks of reading and writing instruction to prepare for the tests.”

 

Second, test prep extinguishes students’ love of learning:

 

Third, standardized tests harm students who are English language learners, students with disabilities, and students with anxiety.

 

Fourth, PARCC will feed into the reform mantra that our schools and teachers are “failing.”

 

Peter Greene notes that Margaret Spellings, one of the architects of NCLB, still vigorously defends annual high-stakes testing.

Forget the parents and teachers who are fed up with non-stop testing. Forget the fact that no high-performing nation tests every child every year starting in grade 3. Spellings is not a quitter.

After reviewing Spellings’ claims, Greene writes:

“The “we can’t turn back and waste our accomplishments so far” argument is special because it is an argument used to oppose NCLB back in the day and Common Core more recently. But somehow back then the reformsters thought that new and awesome things were worth a little chaos and disorder. Now suddenly they are huge fans of inertia. It should not be news to anybody that when you are doing something that doesn’t work, you should think about not doing it any more.

“Look, some of these would be great things to say if they represented reality. But the standardized test does not become an accurate measure of a student’s entire life prospects just because you say so, and while it would be nice if the test results were used to improve education for underserved students, we’ve been at this for over a decade and it hasn’t happened yet.”

Civil right attorney Wendy Lecker chastises education leaders in Connecticut for their whole-hearted embrace of the Smarter Balanced Assessment. She contrasts her home state with the wisdom of Vermont.

Vermont’s State Board deminstrated independent judgement:

“Last week, Vermont’s State Board of Education unanimously approved a new resolution on the SBAC tests, which gives strong and informed guidance that Connecticut’s education leaders are unwilling to provide.

“Vermont’s resolution declares that while the SBAC tests “purport to measure progress towards `college and career readiness . . . the tests have not been externally validated as measuring these important attributes.”

“Accordingly, the state board resolved “until empirical studies confirm a sound relationship between performance on the SBAC and critical and valued life outcomes (“college and career-ready”), test results should not be used to make normative and consequential judgments about schools and students.”

“Vermont’s state board also resolved that until Vermont has more experience with evidence from the SBACs, “the results of the SBAC assessment will not support reliable and valid inferences about student performance, and thus should not be used as the basis for any consequential purpose.”

“Finally, honest education officials admit the SBACs have never been proven to measure “college readiness” or progress toward “college readiness,” and in fact are unreliable to measure student learning. In other words, the foundation upon which the Common Core rests is an artifice, and our children are being subjected to unproven tests. Connecticut districts have been diverting resources and time toward a testing regime without any proof that it would improve our children’s education.”

Conclusion: Vermont puts children first. Connecticut doesn’t.

We learned in the past few days that Pearson is monitoring the Twitter accounts and Facebook accounts and other social media used by America’s children. Some call it spying. Pearson expects America’s teachers and principals to help them police the children to make sure that they don’t write about or even discuss the PARCC test. (The corporation administering the Smarter Balanced Assessments is trying to exercise the same control to protect its tests.)

 

Mercedes Schneider here describes Pearson’s intrusive policy for non-native speakers of English who take the “Pearson Test of English Academic.”

 

Part of the agreement signed by the test-taker states:

 

I confirm that I have carefully reviewed the PTE Academic Test Taker Handbook, including, but not limited to, those provisions relating to testing, score cancellations, privacy policies, and the collection, processing, use and transmission to the United States of the PTE Academic test taker’s personally identifiable data (including the digital photograph, fingerprint, signature, palm-vein scan, and audio/video recording collected at the test centre) and disclosure of such data to Pearson Language Tests, its service providers, any score recipients the PTE Academic test taker selects, and others as necessary to prevent unlawful activity or as required by law.

 

Excuse me, but what is a “palm-vein scan?” Does everyone know this except me?

 

Now, there is no point just baying at the moon. If you don’t like Pearson’s policies, why not write to the man in charge, Michael Barber? In Great Britain, he is called “Sir Michael,” but in the United States we don’t recognize titles, so you may address him in the democratic style as Michael Barber, or Mr. Barber, or Mike. He is best known for his ardent faith in targets, goals, or what he calls “deliverology.”

 

Write him here:

michael.barber@pearson.com

@MichaelBarber9

 

Be candid. Tell him what you think.

 

 

The Opt Out movement is spreading like wildfire. It is led by parents, not unions, though some union locals have voted to honor the wishes of parents. Parents understand that the tests are designed to fail most children. They understand that test prep and testing are stealing time from instruction. They aren’t commanded by anyone. They are listening to their children

This message was written by Bob Schaeffer of FairTest:

Normally, FairTest sends out these news clips summaries once a week, early each Tuesday afternoon. With school standardized exam season now in full gear, however, the flow of stories about testing resistance and reform actions is accelerating rapidly. This special edition — with updates from more than half the 50 states over just three days — reports on the first, too-modest steps by policy makers across the U.S. to respond to the growing grassroots pressure for assessment reform.

As more students opt out, parents demonstrate, school board members pass resolutions and polls show strong public opposition to test misuse and overuse, we are confident that there will be many more updates by next Tuesday and in the coming weeks.

Remember that back-issues of “Testing Resistance & Reform News” are archived at: http://fairtest.org/news/other

National Revolt Against High-Stakes Testing is Growing: So Is Its Impact
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/answer-sheet/wp/2015/03/19/revolt-against-high-stakes-standardized-testing-growing-and-so-does-its-impact/

Arizona School Test Cheating Investigated
http://blogs.phoenixnewtimes.com/valleyfever/2015/03/arizona_middle_school_fudging_test_scores_investigation_reveals.php

California Tests Graded by Non-Educators
http://www.kcra.com/news/whos-grading-your-kids-assessment-test-in-california/31857614

Colorado Educators Blast Weak Education Reform Bill

Hickenlooper-Johnston testing bill blasted

Colorado Schools Need Less Testing, More Teaching
http://www.steamboattoday.com/news/2015/mar/17/our-view-less-testing-more-teaching/

Connecticut Superintendents Say Students Can Opt Out of Tests, No “Sit and Stare”
http://jonathanpelto.com/2015/03/17/victory-in-ct-parents-can-opt-students-out-of-sbac-tests-students-will-be-provided-alternative-location/

Florida Teacher Urges Parents to Stand Up Against New State Exams
http://www.actionnewsjax.com/news/news/local/clay-county-teacher-speaks-out-against-fsa/nkXyx/#__federated=1

Florida House Unanimously Endorses Small Reduction in Testing Overkill
http://www.gainesville.com/article/20150318/ARTICLES/150319542/-1/guardian

Georgia Parents Launch Opt-Out Drive
http://www.wsbtv.com/news/news/local/parents-refuse-let-children-take-standardized-test/nkZLr/

Illinois Students Opt Out of PARCC Tests
http://www.chicagotribune.com/suburbs/arlington-heights/news/ct-parcc-test-walkout-rolling-meadows-hersey-tl-20150317-story.html

Indiana State School Board Member Offers Ideas to Cut Testing Time
http://indianapublicmedia.org/stateimpact/2015/03/18/state-board-education-releases-resolution-cut-testing-time-students/

Louisiana Opt Outs Top 4,000
http://www.bayoubuzz.com/louisiana-news/new-orleans-news/item/843908-louisiana-common-core-test-opt-outs-top-4100-still-1-of-total

Maryland State Senate Votes Unanimous Approval of Test Review Commission
http://somd.com/news/headlines/2015/19199.shtml

Massachusetts Schools Deal with PARCC, Pearson and Pushback
http://www.progressive.org/news/2015/03/188048/p-parcc-pearson-and-pushback

Teachers Say PARCC Is Failing Students and Schools
http://patch.com/massachusetts/framingham/letter-editor-parcc-failing-teachers-and-students-0

Michigan Testing Politics Adds Stress for Students and Teachers

Common Core means three tests in three years for Michigan kids

Minnesota Assessment Reform Depends in Part on Federal Law Changes
http://www.dglobe.com/news/3701236-school-testing-changes-tough-sell
Minnesota Students Face Too Much Testing

http://www.southernminn.com/owatonna_peoples_press/opinion/article_a5dde418-912b-5f52-8353-3534c3a77c6d.html

Mississippi Ends Graduation Testing Requirement
http://www.clarionledger.com/story/news/2015/03/20/miss-ends-testing-requirement-diploma/25082065/

Mississippi Parents, Students Protest PARCC Tests
http://www.wjtv.com/story/28563545/parents-protest-parcc-test-in-rankin-county

New Hampshire Students Administered Wrong Smarter Balanced Assessment
http://www.unionleader.com/article/20150318/NEWS04/150319083

New Jersey Furor Over Test Privacy
http://www.northjersey.com/news/new-furor-over-n-j-tests-as-student-privacy-concerns-raised-1.1290700

Concern Mounting About Pearson’s Role in Education
http://www.phillyvoice.com/concerns-rising-over-pearson/

New Mexico Educators Block Test-Based Teacher Evaluation Bill
http://www.daily-times.com/four_corners-news/ci_27732207/new-mexico-dems-flunk-bill-put-student-test

New Mexico Teachers Not Allowed to “Disparage” Standardized Tests
http://curmudgucation.blogspot.com/2015/03/nm-defending-test.html

New York Is Testing Public Education to Death
http://www.blackagendareport.com/node/14720

New York Must Clear Up Mystery of Missing Test Items

NY State Must Clear Up Mystery of Missing Test Items

Ohio High School Students Opt Out of New Tests
http://www.cleveland.com/metro/index.ssf/2015/03/some_high_school_students_opt_out_of_new_tests_on_americas_founding_fathers_and_documents.html

Ohio School District Blasts PARCC Exam
http://www.xeniagazette.com/news/home_top/152309446/Xenia-not-thrilled-with-PARCC

Oregon Schools Begin Testing Under Protests; More Families Opt Out
http://www.pamplinmedia.com/pt/9-news/253902-123219-testing-testing-under-protest-pps-assesses-students-some-parents-opt-out

Scores From New Oregon Test Will Not Be Used on School Report Cards
http://portlandtribune.com/pt/9-news/254361-124343-bill-new-test-wont-count-on-school-report-cards-teacher-evaluations

Pennsylvania’s PARCC Tests Benefit Pearson, Not Pupils
http://www.lehighvalleylive.com/opinion/index.ssf/2015/03/letter_standardized_parcc_exam.html

Rhode Island Parents Mobilizing Against New Standardized Test
http://www.providencejournal.com/article/20150314/News/150319530

Tennessee Voters Overwhelmingly Oppose School Closings Based on Test Scores
http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/poll-tennessee-voters-overwhelmingly-agree-public-schools-should-not-be-closed-based-solely-on-state-tests-300052573.html

Texas State Senate Overwhelmingly Endorses Bill Easing Graduation Testing Requirement
http://www.statesman.com/news/news/state-regional-govt-politics/texas-senate-oks-bill-easing-testing-ultimatum-for/nkYRm/

Utah’s New Civics Test Will Waste Student Learning Time
http://www.sltrib.com/opinion/2302893-155/letter-new-civics-test-will-waste

Wisconsin Senate Endorses Suspension of School Consequences From Test Scores
http://www.greenbaypressgazette.com/story/news/education/2015/03/17/state-senate-endorses-school-test-score-delay/24909695/

No Child Left Behind Fails to Work “Miracles” — Spurs Cheating
http://theconversation.com/no-child-left-behind-fails-to-work-miracles-spurs-cheating-38620

Ditch the Test and Punish Model: AFT President
http://www.usnews.com/debate-club/does-no-child-left-behinds-testing-regime-work/ditch-the-test-and-punish-model

What if “Education Reform” Movement Got It All Wrong?
http://www.psmag.com/books-and-culture/what-if-education-reform-got-it-all-wrong-in-the-first-place

More Testing Promoted as the “Rational Solution” for Schools: That’s the Problem
http://www.forbes.com/sites/jordanshapiro/2015/03/19/more-testing-is-the-rational-solution-for-schools-thats-the-problem/

Bob Schaeffer, Public Education Director

FairTest: National Center for Fair & Open Testing

office- (239) 395-6773 fax- (239) 395-6779

mobile- (239) 699-0468
web- http://www.fairtest.org

This was forwarded by a reader: Kudos to the Cooperstown teachers for supporting the right of parents to refuse a test that is designed to fail most children:

 

The Cooperstown Central School District’s Faculty Association passed resolutions in support of test refusal and calling for the resignation of Commissioner Tisch. The resolutions were at our BOE meeting and can be heard here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pm5f9bCqacE . PDFs available on Facebook at Opt Out CNY. Thank you.

This just in: Kudos to the brave Buffalo teachers!

 

 

 
MEMO TO: All Buffalo Teachers

 

FROM: Philip Rumore, President, BTF

 

RE: BTF Opposition to Standardized Test/Opt-Out

 

The BTF Executive Committee unanimously adopted the following resolution. As you may know, various organizations across New York State and the country have adopted motions on this subject. While the ones we have seen are fine, they seemed to lack the BTF “edge”.

 

The wording was crafted to avoid giving our detractors a way of using the courts to undermine and attack us. Other locals are in the process of modifying their positions to avoid possible legal actions against them and their members.

 

This is a critical issue. While the linkage of these tests to our evaluations is of great importance, these standardized tests, in addition to not being validated and irrelevant to helping teachers teach, are brutalizing our students.

 

We can’t let that happen. We must join with parents in defense of their children – our students.

 
——————————————————————————————————————-
WHEREAS: Standardized tests presently being inflicted on our students:
have been found to be developmentally inappropriate.
do not provide timely information that can be utilized by teachers and parents to assist with each student’s education.
are shielded from public scrutiny and analysis thereby preventing educators, parents and the general public from uncovering serious and harmful inadequacies of said tests.
have not been validated, and;
WHEREAS: The Common Core standards that said standardized tests reflect, have also not been field tested or validated for their alleged purposes, and;

 

WHEREAS: Students speaking little or no English and those coming from countries where they never attended school are being cruelly subjected to said tests, and;

 

WHEREAS: Schools are being falsely classified as failing based upon New York State imposed standardized tests even though many Buffalo Public Schools have a student population where twenty (20) to forty (40) different languages are spoken, and;

 

WHEREAS: Fifty-percent (50%) of an Elementary School’s score is wrongly based upon the 3rd through 8th grade State mandated ELA standardized tests, the second 50% of an Elementary School’s score is based upon the 3rd through 8th grade Math tests in which questions require reading English and most, if not all, of a High School’s score is based upon New York State standardized tests that require reading English and;

 

WHEREAS: Students with disabilities are also being cruelly subjected to said tests, and;

 

WHEREAS: The preparation of students for said standardized tests eliminates weeks of instructional time, and;

 

WHEREAS: Some students are not intimidated by and do well on standardized tests while others fear them and do not do well, and;

 

WHEREAS: Curriculum decisions should be validated, developmentally appropriate, designed to enhance creativity, critical thinking, and also foster a student’s love of learning and a teacher’s joy of teaching and most importantly be made by practicing teachers, and;

 

WHEREAS: Assessments of student progress should be developed by teachers to provide them and parents with timely information to assist with each student’s education,

 

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED: That while educators have been advised of possible negative consequences to them if they advise parents to refuse to have their children harmed by the current High Stakes tests, Buffalo teachers will not be cowered into continuing to allow our students to be brutalized by the current High Stakes testing (junk science), but will continue to use all appropriate means to assist parents who wish to prevent which in our opinion amounts to a form of child abuse. To that end the BTF:
will continue to have a policy of opposing High Stakes standardized testing of students,
will support and provide information on its website for parents wishing to prevent their children from taking High Stakes Standardized tests,
will encourage its members to utilize the information on the BTF website to prevent their own children from taking High Stakes Standardized tests,
will defend and seek NYSUT/NEA/AFT support and defense for any member disciplined for exercising their rights to speak publicly on this issue, and;
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED: The BTF will continue to seek a Board of Education policy against “sit and stare”, and;

 

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED: The BTF will publicize this resolution to its members, the media, the Board of Regents, Buffalo Board of Education, Western New York Delegation, supportive community organizations and all persons who should receive copies, and;

 

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED: That the BTF will submit this resolution appropriately modified to the NYSUT, NEA and AFT representative assemblies.

 

 

MOVE BY: Philip Rumore, President

 

SECOND: Edith LeWin, Vice President

 

 

 

NY Teacher wrote the following comment in response to the TeachPlus survey, which said that teachers think the PARCC test is better than their own state tests. This gave me a belly laugh.

 

 

“Before the teachers were allowed to assess the tests, Teach Plus provided them with training to ensure they had the necessary background knowledge.”

 

“This training was preceded by a snack of psilocybin mushrooms laced with a generous sprinkling of lysergic acid diethylamide. Teachers were not only impressed with the quality of the PARCC items but were also mesmerized by cursors that continuously changed size, shape, and color, keyboard keys that greeted them by spelling out their name, and wallpaper in the test room that breathed as if alive.”

Leonie Haimson of Class Size Matters is a leading advocate for student privacy rights. She explains how Pearson is actually encouraging the growth of the Opt Out movement (unintentionally, of course) by monitoring students’ social media. Even though tweets and Facebook postings are public, it is kind of creepy to know that a big corporation is reading your child’s comments.

Add this to the flap over the silly story of “The Pineapple and the Hare,” known as #pineapplegate, and parents have ample reason to doubt the value of standardized tests to rank and rate their child.

Add to that the ubiquitous data mining that is embedded in the online testing, and parents should truly be alarmed.

Laura H. Chapman offered the following comments about Ohio’s shell game of assessment. Among other troublesome issues, Ohio will encourage “shared attribution” for evaluating teachers; that means that teachers who do not teach tested subjects will be assigned a rating based on the scores of students they do not teach.

 

 

Chapman writes:

 

In Ohio, the State Superintendent of Public instruction, Dr Ross, has a request in to Governor and the legislators to lighten the testing load. The “Testing Report and Recommendations” ( January 15, 2015) includes some cockamamie statements about the purposes of tests, along with some revealing stats.

 

Among these highlights are there. Ohio students in grades K-12 spend about 19.8 hours a year taking tests on average. Ohio students spend approximately 15 additional hours practicing for tests each year.

 

A chart on page 5 shows that Kindergarten students are tested for 11.3 hours on average, and grade 1 students 11.6 hours on average. These are the lowest times. Add the test prep for a total of 26.3 hours and 26. 6 hours respectively for testing. That is slightly more than the time allocation for elementary school instruction in the visual arts in the era before test-driven policies determined everything about K-12 education.

 

The highest testing times are in grade 3–28 hours, and at grade 10–28.4 hours, not counting the test prep. The spike at grade 3 is from Kasich’s guarantee–“read by grade three” or repeat the whole grade. Dr. Ross wants to cut out some of the current test time for reading (about four hours) by letting grade three teachers do those super high stakes at will, more than once if necessary, with a summer grade three test being decisive for students who have not passed muster earlier. This strikes me as a shell game, not really a reduction but an increase for students who are still learning to read.

 

This report also recommends that testing time be reduced by cutting tests for SLOs. “Eliminate the use of student learning objective (SLO) tests as part of the teacher evaluation system for grades pre-K to 3 and for teachers teaching in non-core subject areas in grades 4-12. The core areas are English language arts, mathematics, science and social studies.”

 

“Teachers teaching in grades and subject areas in which student learning objectives are no longer permitted will demonstrate student growth through the expanded use of shared attribution, although at a reduced level overall. In cases where shared attribution isn’t possible, the department will provide guidance on alternative ways of measuring growth” (p.10).”

 

This obscure language about the expansion of “shared attribution” as a way to measure student learning is not clarified by the following statement (pp. 10-11).

 

”…when no Value-Added or approved vendor assessment data is available, the department gives teachers and administrators the following advice.

 

First, educators should not test solely to collect evidence for a student learning objective. The purpose of all tests, including tests administered for purposes of complying with teacher evaluation requirements, should be to measure what the educator is teaching and what students are learning.

 

Second, to the extent possible, eliminate the use of student learning objective pre-tests. When other, pre-existing data points are available, teachers and schools should use those instead of giving a pre-test.” (pp. 10-11).

 

The convoluted reasoning and ignorance about testing is amazing. “The purpose of all tests, including tests administered for purposes of complying with teacher evaluation requirements, should be to measure what the educator is teaching and what students are learning.” Student tests are not direct measures of what teachers are teaching. Many tests document what students have or have not learned beyond school. Compliance with legislative mandates means you can ignore undisputed facts and sound reasoning about testing.

 

In the proposed policy, teachers who do not receive a VAM based on scores from PARCC tests (ELA and math) and/or tests from AIR (science and social studies) or from some other VAM-friendly standardized test from an “approved vendor” are asked to get used to the idea of “sharing scores” produced by students and teachers of subjects they do not teach and state-wide scores processed through the VAM calculations. There is no evidence these tests are instructionally sensitive, meaning suitable for teacher evaluation. The state approved tests seriously misrepresent student achievement, especially those from PARCC, because those tests assume learning of the CCSS have been in place, fully implemented, with cumulative learning from prior years.

 

SLOs and the district-approved tests for these appear to be dead (or dying) in Ohio, not because they were seriously flawed concepts from the get-go, but because those tests took longer to administer on average than others. The “loud and clear” demands for less testing are most easily met by cutting the SLO tests (those usually designed by teacher collaboration) in favor scores allocated to teachers under the banner of “shared attribution.”

 

Like many other states where governors and legislators are trying to micromanage teachers, there is an unconscionable insistence that any data point is as good as another, that tests are “objective,” and that junk science marketed as VAM is not a problem.

 

Unfortunately, all of the talk about “high quality” this and that does not extend to expectations for fair, ample, and ethical portrayals of student and teacher achievement.