Archives for category: Tennessee

This from a reader in Tennessee. Be sure to open the links and see the hilarious cartoons:

“This week, two separate Fire Kevin Huffman FB pages went up:

1. https://www.facebook.com/RemoveKevinHuffman?fref=ts

(Check out the cupcake cartoon posted today. 🙂

2. https://www.facebook.com/TdoeCommissionerKevinHuffmanHasToGo

Also, a new petition started by some West Tennessee moms (called the Momma Bears) is up and running:

http://www.change.org/petitions/stop-hurting-our-schools-remove-kevin-huffman-as-the-appointed-tn-commissioner-of-education

One statewide group, Standing Together 4 Strong Community Schools, highlighted a letter to Governor Haslam written by one of the Momma Bears:

Momma Bear and West TN Moms Stand Up to Haslam

Numbers on the two FB pages and the petition are growing steadily and quickly!!”

In Tennessee as in Texas and elsewhere, when the moms get angry and get organized, the corporate reformers run for the hills.

Angela Danovi’s mother taught in the Memphis public schools for 29 years. She just retired.

Angela knows how many lives her mother changed, how many daily acts of kindness shaped her students.

And she knows that William Sanders, the statistician who invented value-added modeling or VAM, has never been able to create a measure that would accurately reflect what her mother accomplished.

This is what she sent me:

Dear Diane,

My mother retired today. I am both sad and pleased. Yesterday, I wrote the following piece on my facebook page as the daughter of a single parent who taught school in Memphis City Schools. I wanted to share my post with you.

This evening, my mom will be retired from Memphis City Schools after 29 consecutive years. She also taught in Arkansas and Mississippi as well as worked as a daycare director prior to working for MCS. Yes, I’m going to go political now. As you can imagine, I have found the “ed reform” movement highly and personally offensive. The paycheck she brought home financed me to do ballet, play sports, go to camp, go to UT (University of Tennessee). In turn, I have assisted in teaching ballet, assisted in coaching sports, had the opportunity to walk on as a shot put thrower at UT, worked for 8 summers as a camp counselor, and ended up receiving 2 degrees in the environmental sciences and now serve as a projects manager for a nonprofit. Yet, somehow being the daughter of a single parent teacher has in many people’s minds disqualified me from having a credible opinion or legitimate argument on the matter. I just want to say, I have read the original paper on the Tennessee Value Added Assessment Model that was originally written in 1984 and unabashedly touted from my alma mater! The authors were statisticians, not educators, and their original model was applied to three elementary schools in East Tennessee, which is a very very different scenario from an urban high school setting! Yet, even in the original model each teacher’s “value added score” was based on at least 6 different variables per student, resulting in over 180 variables to determine the “value” a single teacher in a single classroom in a given year added to those students’ experience. Over the last 30 years this model has been expanded and increased in complexity to include every conceivable educational environment including special ed and high schools where teachers see their students less than 1 hour per day or less than 1/24th of their day or less than 4% of each day in a student’s life! Yet this model has been applied towards firing and destroying the lives and families of professional educators. Meanwhile, numerous articles have been published statistically and scientifically demonstrating the inherent flaws, misuse, and abuse of this model. I have argued that the variables that are input for climate and weather models are less complex and rely on fewer and more stable variables to predict or measure outcomes than what has been inputted into the value added education models!

The last few years I was deeply concerned that my mother was one tweaked evaluation formula and one set of tweaked test scores away from being named a “lemon” and on her way out the door. Teachers, especially teachers who have worked in the settings in which my mom has worked, have become demonized as moochers, takers, and a boil of society turning out products useless for today’s economy. However, I have been with my mom when meeting her former students who were working for Memphis Police, Memphis fire, construction, professional managers for Starbucks, workers in dry cleaners, workers in Walgreens, and others in a myriad of locations and professions earning paychecks, contributing to the tax base, and making the Memphis and Shelby County area businesses and organizations run every day. When you hear Bill Gates, Bill Clinton, Michelle Rhee, Oprah, representatives of the Walton Family Foundation, and others talk about “ineffective” teachers or having only “highly effective” teachers in the classroom what those people are really saying is career educators are not worthy to be in the classroom today. They are saying people who are educators and their families are not worthy of a stable paycheck, health insurance, sick leave, or a retirement in their personal and professional lives. To be clear, these issues, along with due process, are what teachers’ “unions” (which if you can’t strike it’s hardly a union) and professional associations were fighting for. This uncertainty coupled with constant professional attack is not a way for any individual or family to have to live.

My mother was lucky, in this emerging Ed Reform movement, to have landed at a school that tested well. She could have easily been at a different school in a different part of town working with an entirely different population of students who came from even far more adverse backgrounds, and she could have just as easily been “evaluated” at the bottom rather than top. She definitely taught in those schools, just not at a time when those kids were being tested and those scores being perversely used against the teacher in the classroom, or in other words, likely the only person in those students’ lives who had educationally accomplished what the ed reformers say we are expecting and demanding all students to accomplish regardless of any other circumstances.

I am proud of what my mother accomplished in her time in teaching in Memphis City Schools. I saw her teach to classrooms filled with the urban youth of Memphis. I listened to her tell stories of teaching girls in high schools who have escaped from countries of war and famine to hold a pencil for the first time and try to navigate the high school educational system when they had never before been to school. A statistician such as William Sanders, one of the originators of the Value Added Model, may not find a very high value in the body of work or the thousands of students my mother taught based on those students’ ultimate educational attainment or their paychecks or the paychecks of their children, but she has certainly had a profound an immense impact (for many years in un airconditioned classrooms) on the city of Memphis and the students of Memphis.

Thanks,
Angela Danovi

http://www.angeladanovi.com

A reader posted this comment:

 

I am a teacher in TN. I have 6 years of experience and a masters degree, and I don’t make even 40k a year. Our district already has a performance incentive program – the top level of merit pay, which I did earn last year, was $2,000 – about $1600 after taxes. Insulting. In fact, many teachers earned it. So what are they doing for this year? Raising the qualifications to make it harder for teachers to earn it because they didn’t want to give out so much $$.

Yesterday I received an email from Huffman – I think it was sent to all educators in TN through a listserve. I was so, very, very very very very tempted to reply to it and say just what someone said above – “Dear Mr. Huffman, I think it’s only fair that you too tie your salary to a measurement of our evaluation of your performance in office, and not receive any further raises unless warranted.”
But I didn’t, because I value my job. Unlike him.

When Kevin Huffman was sworn in as state commissioner in Tennessee, he was offered a salary of $200,000 a year, 11% more than his predecessor.

Granted that he believes experience and degrees are worthless, wouldn’t an elemental sense of fairness compel him to cut his own salary, having cut salaries of teachers across the state? After all, a teacher with a masters and a doctorate and 20 years experience will make less than $60,000.

Who provides greater value?

A teacher in Tennessee reacts to the state board’s decision to reduce her future pay for investing in an advanced degree:

After teaching in East TN for 20 years as a special educator, I decided to get my Ph.D. because I wanted to learn more about teaching reading. I am in the final stages of my dissertation and am sick at the thought that I will not be able to pay off my student loan of $15,000. (I worked full-time and paid for the rest of it by teaching art classes, selling stained glass and working extra jobs during the summer and on nights I didn’t go to classes. I am 60 and guess I will be working until I drop dead at this rate.

State Commissioner Kevin Huffman persuaded the Tennessee State board of Education that teachers should not be paid more for advanced degrees.

The state board agreed that less education is better than more. Tennessee doesn’t want teachers to be too educated. They might ask too many questions.

Dumb is good in Tennessee.

In his relentless effort to raise teacher quality in Tennessee, Kevin Huffman will cut the salaries of most new teachers.

The ax will fall most heavily on teachers who get an advanced degree.

You see, the way to improve teacher quality is to remove any incentive for additional education. If it can’t raise test scores, why bother?

Huffman got a law degree, but maybe that doesn’t count. He worked for Teach for America and was its communications director before becoming Commissioner in Tennessee. Maybe that’s what really counts.

A teacher in Cheatham County, Tennessee, sent me this article about the unusual exodus of teachers from the county’s schools. Twenty-five percent of the staff have resigned in the past year, including the football coach and the basketball coach (whose teams had good seasons).

There is a local school board meeting tonight to hear all sides. Parents and citizens should show up and get involved. Learn what is happening in your local schools.

A reader shared the following story about a student in Tennessee, where StudentsFirst named an outspoken anti-gay legislator as its “Reformer of the Year.”

“11-year old takes on Michelle Rhee and Students First over endorsing “Don’t Say Gay” lawmaker endorsement. ”

“I am Marcel Neergaard, and I am 11 years old. This year I was homeschooled for sixth grade because of severe bullying. If I had gone back to public school, there is a great possibility that I would have taken my own life. That possibility would have grown if a certain bill introduced in my home state of Tennessee had passed into law. This bill was known as the “don’t say gay” bill. Though that bill never became a law, Oak Ridge’s own representative, John Ragan, introduced a new version of the Classroom Protection Act. It is the “don’t say gay” bill, just more homophobic. While he crafted this horrifying bill, he received an award. I wrote a petition to take a stand against this.”

Gary Rubinstein came across an article in which Tennessee State Commissioner Kevin Huffman boasted about the merit pay scheme he was proposing and derided the leader of the Memphis teachers’ union for expressing caution about the program. Gary decided to take a closer look at the merit pay program and concluded that the union leader’s concern was well placed. Teachers would receive $2,000 to sign up and would receive another $5,000 only if they got the required gains.

I am constantly amazed that policymakers pay no attention at all to the evidence on merit pay. It has failed again and again. The most spectacular failure was in Nashville, where teachers were offered a bonus of $15,000 to produce higher test scores. There was a control group and an experimental group. After three years, there was no significant difference in the test scores of the two groups. Merit pay also failed in New York City and in Chicago.

Merit pay is faith-based policy.