Archives for category: Supporting public schools

The Texas legislature is starting a new session and once again Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick (former rightwing talk show host) will lead a fight for vouchers.

 

Once again, legislators from rural and urban districts–Republicans and Democrats–will combine to defend their community’s public schools. This year, the state launched the failed policy of giving every school a single letter grade, and now educators realize that these measures are invalid and are setting them up for privatization.

 

Imagine if your child came home from school with a report card and it contained only a single letter grade. As a parent, you would be furious. No child is only one dimension; no child can be reduced to an  or B or C or D or F. How much more absurd it is to attach a single letter grade to a complex institution like a school, staffed by many people, and subject to decisions made by the superintendent, the state education department, and the legislature.

 

Educators in North Texas see that the letter grades stigmatize their schools, damage their communities, and are intended to create demand for vouchers. There is zero validity, zero research, zero evidence for letter grades for schools.

 

“With the new legislative session starting Tuesday, educators from 60 North Texas districts united Monday to fight school vouchers and a new statewide grading system they say serves only to vilify public schools.
Frustration among school leaders has been mounting since provisional A-F grades were released Friday.
On Monday, area superintendents and trustees gathered in Garland to tell lawmakers that the grading system is flawed and that they are worried it is just a gimmick to get support for school vouchers or similar options.

 

“Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick has said school choice, which could include voucher-like tax credits or similar options, is among his top priorities for this session so families have the ability to leave failing schools.
But the area’s school leaders said such efforts would only siphon money from public schools and hurt children most in need because they don’t have the transportation and other means to take advantage of such options. Only affluent families, many of whom aren’t in public schools now, would benefit, they said.
“This is subsidies for the rich. … A equals affluent. F equals free and reduced,” Terrell ISD Superintendent Micheal French said, referring to the likelihood of poor students remaining in struggling schools that would be labeled failures.

 

“The provisional grades released last week were a first look at the state’s new school accountability system that takes effect in 2018. Lawmakers required the Texas Education Agency to release a sneak peek of how schools would have scored, just before they returned to Austin for the legislative session.
“That timing only reinforced educators’ fears that the new A-F system is politically motivated.
“Monday’s group represented 60 of the 80 districts in the TEA’s Region X, which includes Collin, Dallas, Ellis, Kaufman and Rockwall among its 10 counties. Combined, the districts represent 15.5 percent of Texas’ public school students.”

 

Pastors for Texas Children–an extraordinary group of religious leaders from across the state–is in the thick of the fight on behalf of public schools, fighting vouchers.

 

 

Randi Weingarten, president of the  AFT, gave the following speech at the National Press Club in Washington, D.C., on January 9:

 

 

 

Eight years ago, I spoke at the Press Club as the newly elected AFT President. At that time, President Obama was inheriting the worst economic crisis since the Great Depression. America was losing 750,000 jobs a month. Next week, President-elect Trump will inherit a different economy, one that has added an average of 200,000 jobs every month for a record 75 straight months. While we still have a long way to go to combat social and economic inequality—and to address the effects of deindustrialization, globalization and automation, it’s wrong not to acknowledge the real progress of the last eight years.

 

Today we face a very different crisis. Voters have lost confidence in our institutions, and that confidence is lowered still by the distorted reality created by fake news. Our country is intensely polarized. And for the second time this century, more Americans – nearly 3 million more, in the case of Secretary Clinton—voted for a candidate who will not be their president.

 

So what can we do to address, head on, the deep anger and distrust so many Americans feel?

 

I believe–

 

whether one wants a less polarized environment…

…whether one wants a skilled workforce and more middle class jobs…

…whether one wants pluralism and democracy…

…whether one wants diversity and tolerance…

…or whether one just wants children to thrive and be joyful…

 

—the answer always starts with a powerful, purposeful public education.

 

The End of the Education Wars

 

And we have the opportunity to provide that education. After years of education being a battleground; after No Child Left Behind and Race to the Top and the tyranny of testing; Congress and the country, Republicans and Democrats alike, took on and moved past the education wars.

 

I was in the Senate gallery in December 2015 listening to Senator Lamar Alexander and Senator Patty Murray, two folks who don’t often agree, agree about what was needed: pass the Every Student Succeeds Act, or ESSA. Senator Alexander, who marveled at the remarkable consensus around ESSA, said at the time: “We have created an environment that I believe will unleash a flood of excellence in student achievement, state by state and community by community.”

 

Eighty-five senators, 359 Representatives, the National Governors Association, the Council of Chief State School Officers, the School Superintendents Association, civil rights groups, many parents across the country including the PTA, our brothers and sisters in the NEA, and the people I represent in the AFT, cheered what President Obama called a Christmas miracle.

 

So, despite the extraordinary political divisions in the country, and after the damaging failures of policies like NCLB, we finally reached a strong bipartisan consensus on a way forward to improve public education in America.   The AFT worked hard to shift the focus away from testing back to teaching, to push school decision-making back to states and communities, and to direct federal funds to the public schools that educate the kids who need the most.

 

That consensus- that fundamental reform of education policy is why K-12 education—as important as it is—wasn’t a major issue in the presidential campaign, the subject of not one debate question.

 

Well, it’s becoming an issue now.  On Wednesday, the Senate Education Committee will hold its first hearing to consider Betsy DeVos’ nomination.

 

Instead of nominating an education secretary who sees her mission as strengthening public schools and implementing the blueprint Democrats and Republicans crafted and cheered, Donald Trump has decided to ignore the will of the people and has chosen the most anti-public education nominee in the history of the department.  Betsy DeVos lacks the qualifications and experience to serve as secretary of education. Her drive to privatize education is demonstrably destructive to public schools and to the educational success of all of our children.

 

If DeVos is confirmed; if she shatters this hard-won consensus; if she reignites the education wars it will demonstrate, that her ultimate goal is to undermine public schools. The schools that 90 percent of American children attend. It should come as no surprise that we are steadfast in opposing her nomination, and equally steadfast in our continuing work to advance reforms that will make a positive difference in the lives and success of children.

 

The Purpose of Public Education

 

Obviously, not all schools work as well as we’d like. Many “failing” schools have themselves been failed—by flawed policies, budget cuts, and a tacit acceptance of inequality. When parents send their children somewhere other than the local public school, it’s not because they believe the private market is the best way to deliver education or that their child will benefit from a longer bus ride. It’s most often because their local school is underresourced, is not safe enough or is otherwise struggling.

 

It’s our obligation, as a society, to provide all families with access to great neighborhood public schools—in every neighborhood in America. This must be a viable choice.

 

So how do we accomplish this?

 

In a world with more bullying and less tolerance, it starts by providing a safe, welcoming environment. This is not just a nice sentiment—there is a growing body of research showing the connection between a supportive school environment and student achievement.

 

And instead of fixating on tests—we must fixate on the whole child. Educating the whole child is not based on sanctions—it’s rooted in joy. And while technology is important, the goal of education is not digital, it’s personal. It’s not for-profit—it’s equitably funded. And it’s not one-size-fits-all—it meets students’ individual needs and aspirations.

 

Just as we came together to transform federal education policy, it’s time–guided by our innovation, our experience and our collective wisdom of what works, to work together to build that system of great neighborhood public schools. That rests on four pillars: promoting children’s well-being, supporting powerful learning, building teacher capacity, and fostering cultures of collaboration.

Promoting Children’s Well-Being

 

Let’s start with children’s well-being. We need to meet kids where they are, and that means recognizing that fully half of all public-school students live in poverty. The many effects of poverty—hunger, toxic stress, and untreated medical conditions are terrible in and of themselves, but they also hurt children’s ability to learn and thrive. Poverty is not an excuse for low expectations; it is a reality that must be acknowledged and confronted.

 

Educators and community partners are taking steps to meaningfully address the effects of poverty.

 

Community schools, like the Community Health Academy of the Heights, or CHAH, help meet students’ physical, emotional and social needs—needs that left unmet, are barriers to learning. CHAH is located in northern Manhattan. Nearly all of its 650 students live in poverty. Nearly one-third are English language learners.

 

CHAH provides vision screening for every student and free glasses to the nearly 200 who need them. Think about that. Kids were struggling to learn because they had headaches, or couldn’t see the board. What they needed were glasses.

 

CHAH stays open until 9:30 at night to offer adults GED and ESL classes, as well physical fitness and health classes. CHAH has a food pantry and a parent resource center. And it offers a full-service community clinic, with more than 6,000 enrolled members.

 

All 245 middle schoolers receive annual mental health screenings. Students also have access to social workers and a full-time psychologist.

 

All of this bolsters student achievement. CHAH reduced the number students reading at level 1, the lowest level, by 37 percent between 2013 and 2016. During that same period, the percentage of students reading at the highest levels rose 24 percent.

 

CHAH proves that great results are possible when you focus on the well-being of the child, the child’s family and the child’s community. And this is not an isolated example; schools in Austin, Cincinnati and dozens of other communities have taken similar approaches with similar results. And that allows teachers and their kids to focus on the second pillar: powerful learning.

 

Engaging in Powerful Learning

 

We set high expectations for our public schools, as we should—to develop students academically, prepare young people for work, equip them to be good citizens, and enable them to lead fulfilling lives. None of this is accomplished by requiring students to memorize information and regurgitate it on standardized tests.

 

It’s about powerful learning; learning that engages students and inspires them to tackle complex concepts and difficult material. Students learn when they collaborate in teams on innovative projects. They learn when they are interested and excited, when they are exposed to music and art, theater and robotics. They learn in environments that are safe and welcoming, with restorative justice practices that encourage responsibility and reduce discriminatory discipline. They learn in environments that cultivate critical thinking, collaboration, creativity, and joy. They learn when class sizes are small enough to do all this.

 

The effects of powerful learning aren’t revealed by a test score. They’re evident in student engagement and confidence. They’re evident in the skills and knowledge students demonstrate on real-world assessments. They’re evident in how well students are prepared to thrive in a challenging, changing world.

 

Powerful learning is achievable and sustainable. One way is through project-based instruction. That’s when kids take on a long-term, real-life problem. They investigate. They strategize. They share responsibility. And they build resilience, initiative, and agility.

 

That’s also what happens in David Sherrin’s international law class at Harvest Collegiate High School, in New York City. Students don’t just memorize facts. They select defendants, choose witnesses, write affidavits and create exhibits. And the grand finale: they go to a Brooklyn courthouse and hold a mock trial of a perpetrator of the Rwandan genocide. That’s powerful learning.

 

Another area where we see such powerful learning is in career and technical education, or CTE.

 

While campaigning, Donald Trump said, “vocational training is a great thing—we don’t do it anymore!”[i]

 

Actually, Donald, we do.

 

And we’ve been fighting for over a decade to do even more.

 

Take the Toledo Technology Academy, in Ohio, where students are offered a chance to develop their STEM skills with local businesses, including a little outfit called General Motors. The director of manufacturing at GM said of TTA students, “they do as well as interns we bring in from places like Purdue and the University of Michigan.”

 

The AFT has devoted resources to incubate even more CTE programs across the country. Whether it’s connecting students with Peoria businesses to secure internships or partnering with Pittsburgh’s fire, police and EMS services to train high school students, CTE is part of the DNA of the AFT.

 

We’re glad the president-elect shares our desire to expand this work.

 

Building Capacity

 

Focusing on well-being and powerful learning gives our kids what they need most. But we can’t achieve powerful learning without a powerful conduit—their teacher.

 

We know how much teachers do to help children reach their potential. But what about helping teachers reach their full potential? That’s why building capacity is our third pillar.

 

Becoming an accomplished teacher takes time and support. And dignity and respect. Building teachers’ capacity begins long before they take charge of their own classrooms, and it should never end.

 

Take the San Francisco Teacher Residency program. Teachers in San Francisco’s highest- need schools start with a year-long residency alongside an accomplished teacher. The program has led to higher teacher retention and a diverse teaching corps reflective of the community it serves.

 

In Meriden, Connecticut, support never stops. They’ve got everything, from a New Teacher Induction Program for the rookies to the Meriden Teachers Sharing Success program for veterans.

Students benefit from this investment in their teachers. The district has seen a 62 percent decline in suspensions and an 89 percent decline in expulsions. And Meriden beats Connecticut’s average growth on the state English and math tests.

 

Building capacity is a shared responsibility. And unions are a crucial partner. AFT locals use their advocacy and collective bargaining to help teachers continuously hone their craft and build our profession. And a recent study found that highly-unionized districts have more rigorous and robust tenure processes.[ii]

 

Speaking of tenure, the AFT has worked with willing partners to ensure it is neither a cloak for incompetence nor an excuse for principals not to manage—but a guarantee of fairness and due process. With the recent surge in bigotry and hate, a teachers’ ability to stand up for her students and herself is more important than ever.
Far from being against evaluations, the AFT has fought for evaluation systems that support both teacher growth and student learning. With our Innovation Fund and a federal grant, 11 AFT locals and their districts took a hard look at evaluation. We learned that evaluation systems built through labor-management partnerships, that center on growth and improvement instead of punishment, consistently benefit students. That’s why we fought for ESSA to end federally-mandated, test-driven evaluation. And that’s why we support locally-driven evaluations with multiple, meaningful measures.

 

Fostering Collaboration and Community Collaboration

 

And the glue that binds everything else together is the fourth pillar: collaboration.

 

Rather than fix and fund struggling schools, too often in the last two decades, the response has been to privatize, to pauperize, to disrupt. Let’s be clear: In the wealthiest country in the world, 23 states still spend less on K12 education than they did before the 2008 recession. “Disruption” may be in vogue in business schools, but disrupting—rather than fixing– struggling schools has come to mean mass firings, school closures, and district or state takeovers.

 

These approaches are disruptive alright, but they are not effective–especially when it comes to improving student outcomes. As the president of a teachers union and the former president of the largest local union in the world, I can attest that, in education, if you set out looking for a fight, you’ll find one. But you probably won’t find a solution.

 

You don’t hear as much about the many quiet successes that result from educators and administrators working together to improve student achievement and well-being.

 

In the southern suburbs of Los Angeles, the ABC Unified School District and its teacher union have an intentional and purposeful collaboration to improve their schools. District personnel are paired with a union counterpart. They meet frequently, attend trainings together and hold an annual retreat. When there is a decision to be made—they make it collaboratively.

 

The results speak for themselves. ABC Unified performed better than the state as a whole, with Latino students, African-American students and students from low-income families performing much better than their counterparts in the state. Again, this is not isolated. A 2015 study of more than 300 Miami-Dade public schools found that high-quality teacher collaboration—giving teachers the time and space to work with each other—increased student achievement.[iii]

 

And we need to collaborate more broadly: the entire school community: with teachers, paraprofessionals, school counselors, bus drivers, school nurses and administrators; schools with parents; schools with community partners. Parents and students must see neighborhood public schools as their schools. That means creating environments that respect and value their voice and input rather than discourage them.

 

A great example is Chicago’s Parent Mentor Program, through which parents are trained to help out in overcrowded classrooms to work with struggling students one-on-one. Parents learn how to help not only their child but all the children in the community.

 

So too are parent-teacher home visit programs, such as those in Baltimore and St. Paul. Teachers visit students’ families at the beginning of the school year and again later on, to talk about the family’s hopes and dreams for their child, and share any concerns or questions. Results include increased parent involvement in school life, more positive behavioral outcomes, and increased student achievement. And teachers report greater job satisfaction.

 

Encouraging this kind of partnership is why the Alliance to Reclaim Our Schools—AROS—was formed. AROS is a national alliance of parents, young people, community and labor organizations including the AFT and many of our locals, fighting to reclaim the promise of public education as the gateway to a strong democracy and racial and economic justice.

 

On January 19, AROS will mobilize tens of thousands of people in hundreds of communities to protect our students from the bigotry and hatred that have been unleashed in this incendiary period. We will stand up for our Dreamers and other youth fearful of deportation. And we will stand up for strong public schools and the very institution of public education.

 

 

ESSA: The New Education Federalism

 

When you see a neighborhood public school that’s working anywhere in the country, you see these four pillars I’ve described. They’re not one-size-fits-all; they’re tailored to different communities and needs. And they’re not a magic elixir—they need to be funded and supported. One thing they don’t need is a change in federal law—that already happened with ESSA. ESSA creates the potential to put these pillars in place, although it doesn’t guarantee it.

 

The frontier in education has moved from Washington to state capitols, districts and school communities. This doesn’t mean that the federal government has no role. We still need it to promote equity by funding schools that serve disadvantaged children and protecting the civil rights of all children, still vitally important 60 years after the landmark Brown decision.

 

But ESSA quelled the education wars, and enabled our shared attention to turn to what works… collaboration… and capacity building… and powerful learning… and the well-being of all children. Practical concepts that are scalable and sustainable. That Republicans and Democrats can support. And that red states and blue states, rural, suburban, and urban schools can implement with the right investment and management.

 

One speech cannot encompass everything we need to do for children, families and communities. We need to fight for a living wage, for retirement security, for affordable and accessible healthcare and college, and for universal preK, to name a few. And you can be sure we’ll continue to fight for those.

 

But the passage of ESSA has created a moment of opportunity to use these four pillars to help make every neighborhood public school a place that parents would want to send their kids, educators want to work and kids want to be.

 

 

Betsy DeVos and the Attack on Public Education

 

So as Republicans and Democrats, parents and teachers, all came together around ESSA, where was Betsy DeVos?

 

She was working in Michigan to undermine public schools and to divide communities. And now—she’s poised to swing her Michigan wrecking ball all across America.

 

If Donald Trump wanted an ideologue, he found one. DeVos’ involvement in education has been to bankroll efforts to destabilize, defund and privatize public schools. She hasn’t taught in a public school. She hasn’t served on a school board. She never attended public school—nor did she send her kids to one. She’s a lobbyist—but she is not an educator.

 

One wonders why she was nominated. Well, like a lot of Donald Trump’s cabinet choices, she’s a billionaire with an agenda. As she herself boasted: “my family is the single biggest contributor to the Republican National Committee—we expect a return on our investment.” By the way, those investments do not exempt her from the ethics disclosures required of all cabinet nominees. Frankly, her failure to disclose should delay her hearing.

 

In 2000, DeVos and her husband bankrolled a multimillion-dollar ballot initiative to create private school vouchers in Michigan. Voters rejected it by more than a 2-to-1 margin. No surprise, as the evidence over a quarter century shows that vouchers have failed to improve student achievement significantly or consistently.

 

That’s when she shifted her focus to diverting tax-payer dollars from neighborhood public schools to for-profit charter schools.

 

And give her her due. Over the last 15 years, Michigan has become America’s Wild Wild West of for-profit charter schools. Eighty percent of Michigan’s charter schools are for-profit.

 

Yes, give her her due… but don’t give her responsibility. Here’s why:

 

When the option was to bolster underfunded public schools—she fought instead for a tax cut for the rich.

 

When the option was to support neighborhood public schools—she disparaged public education and fought to divert taxpayer dollars to for-profit charters.

 

When the option was to strengthen charter schools with real accountability—she fought for NO accountability. No accountability even in cases like the Detroit charter schools that closed just days after the deadline to get state funding—leaving students scrambling to find a new school, but the charter operators still profiting.

 

She’s devoted millions to elect her friends and punish her enemies, and, at every critical moment, she has tried to take the public out of public education.

 

What is the result of all this? Student performance has declined across Michigan. Nearly half of all its charter schools ranked among the bottom of American schools.

 

Just look at the yearlong investigation by the Detroit Free Press which revealed rampant problems in the state’s for-profit charter schools—corruption, cronyism, poor performance and lack of accountability.

 

That’s Ms. DeVos’ legacy.

 

Walk the Walk

 

Back when I taught Tamika and her classmates at Clara Barton High School in Brooklyn, they would say, “You can’t just talk the talk; you’ve got to walk the walk.” For a secretary of education, that means doing all you can to strengthen and improve public education. To do that, you have to first experience it… and be willing to walk the walk.

 

To that end, I extend both a challenge and an invitation to Ms. DeVos. Spend some time in public schools. There is no substitute for seeing firsthand what works in our public schools, or for seeing the indefensible conditions too many students and teachers endure.

 

Come to some of the places AFT members are working their hearts out for our students. Come to rural McDowell County, West Virginia, a county where many voted for Donald Trump. A county where the AFT is leading a public-private partnership to improve the public schools and health outcomes in this county that is the eighth-poorest in the country. Join me at Harvest or CHAH, or Toledo Technology Academy or in Meriden, Corpus Christi, ABC or Miami. Spend a day or two in a class for severely disabled students. Before you try to do what you did in Michigan to the rest of the country, see firsthand the potential and promise of public education.

 

The Trump administration can follow the will of the people, and walk the path laid out by Congress a year ago.

 

Or they can follow the destructive dogmas of the past, and reignite the education wars.

 

Let’s be clear, if they do the latter, communities across this country, will stand up and defend their public schools and our children. Like hundreds of thousands have done so far in open letters and petitions. Like AROS will on January 19.

 

Whatever this new administration does, we will be walking the walk for great neighborhood schools by investing and supporting the four pillars I’ve described today.

Using the AFT Innovation Fund to kick-start community school projects and investments in CTE literally from coast-to-coast.

 

Building the capacity of educators through AFT’s Share My Lesson, the largest free website of teaching resources in America with more than one million users.

 

Fostering collaboration through collective bargaining and labor-management partnerships, and working with parents, civil rights and community groups.

We are walking the walk. Across America, we are living our values and protecting our kids.

[i] http://www.slate.com/articles/life/schooled/2016/12/the_damage_donald_trump_could_do_to_public_education.html

[ii] https://ourfuture.org/20151208/study-finds-unions-improve-teacher-quality-high-school-dropout-rates

[iii] https://learningforward.org/docs/default-source/jsd-october-2015/high-quality-collaboration-benefits-teachers-and-students.pdf

The Network for Public Education and the NPE Action Fund has created a toolkit for citizens to use to protest the confirmation of a totally unqualified person for Secretary of Education. Billionaire Betsy is a lobbyist for vouchers and charters. She has wrecked the schools of her home state. Do not let her ruin the nation’s public schools. Resist!

 

Please use the toolkit to let your Senators know that you oppose her confirmation.

Sue Legg is a retired educator who now directs the education program of the Florida League of Women Voters.  The LWV has been very critical of the privatization movement in Florida, documenting the scams, frauds, conflicts of interest, and harm to public education.

 

Legg says that opponents of privatization must strategize and develop their own public relations ideas.

 

She writes:

 

“I am working on a set of ‘headlines’ and slogans that communicate the immediacy of the need to preserve our public schools. What do we value about our public schools? What are the threats to public education? Which solutions do we propose?

“Can we come up with short, single sentences that encapsulate a need or something you value. Then we can refer people to more in depth analyses and ways to respond.

“Let’s see:

“Vouchers segregate, not integrate schools.
Vouches for the poor pay for poor quality schools.
Vouchers help the rich get richer.
Private schools get public money with no strings attached.
OR

 

Public schools innovate, charters stagnate.
Public schools invite students in; charters counsel them out.
Charters profit from students; public schools invest in them.
When housing patterns limit access to quality education, fix it!
OR

School choice means all schools are under funded.
Teaching, not testing helps students learn.
We need more time, not more testing.
School choice is a distraction not an option to improve learning.
“You get the idea. Send me your captions and communication strategies. We will hone them and use them to target issues. We will discuss these at the League’s Orlando leadership conference in January.”

 

Make your suggestions here, and I will be sure Sue gets them.

 

A reader in Ohio named Chiara left the following succinct comment:

It’s maybe a good time to be a public school supporter🙂

Ed reform has embraced DeVos/Trump.

The “agnostics” are marginalized and irrelevant- the privatization zealots are now “the movement”. They don’t even discuss public schools anymore- they fight over when privatization should be regulated or unregulated.

It’s a huge opportunity. They’ve abandoned 90% of schools and it’s such an echo chamber they don’t even see it.

So privatization will have 100 Senators, The President, the USDOE, hundreds of House members and 10% of students and families.

Public schools will have no representation or advocates at the federal level, but public schools will have 90% of students and families. Just think about how nuts that is and you see the opportunity.

There’s an opening for some entity or group(s) to represent the interests of 90% of children and families. That COULD be new people with appealing and practical ideas that actually BENEFIT existing public schools. Imagine that! 🙂

Join the Network for Public Education and help us support public schools.  We can help you find your state and/or local group that shares your passion to preserve public schools as a foundation of our democracy.

Rev. Charles Foster Johnson has organized strong resistance to the vouchers touted by the most powerful elected official in Texas, not the governor, but the Lieutenant Governor Dan Patrick, a former talk show host. Rev. Johnson is leader to Pastors for Texas Children, which has 2,000 members across the state. They are united in their opposition to vouchers and their support for public schools. Year after year, they have defeated vouchers in the legislature, and they are gearing up to fight them again. You can read more about his and his organization here, at “Reporting Texas.”

 

I am happy to place Rev. Johnson and Pastors for Texas Children on the blog’s honor roll for their stalwart defense of public schools, of the children of Texas, of religious liberty, and of the principle of separation of church and state.

 

 

Johnson, 59, is the Fort Worth-based executive director of Pastors for Texas Children, a network of about 2,000 church leaders around the state who work to support pubic schools.

 

Johnson and his group have emerged as chief adversaries of Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick. Patrick champions a breed of education reform forged around vouchers — which steer money from public schools to parents to pay private school tuition.

 

“The lieutenant governor said, a couple of weeks ago, he’ll keep bringing it up until it passes,” Foster told the pastors, who were gathered for a meeting of Texas Baptists Committed in Waco. “It’s up to us to stop him.”

 

In his baritone southern drawl, Johnson told the pastors that vouchers siphon funds from schools in low-income neighborhoods and violate the separation of church and state enshrined in the First Amendment. School vouchers contradict God’s law of religious liberty, he said, by providing government support for religion.

 

The organization’s mission is twofold: To advocate for public education with state lawmakers and to mobilize individual churches to support public schools by providing services such as student mentoring and teacher appreciation events.

 

Members have linked dozens of churches with public schools, met with more than 100 lawmakers since the organization’s inception in 2013, and published dozens of anti-school voucher editorials in newspapers across Texas.

Rosann Tung is a parent in the Boston Public Schools and is director of research and policy at the Annenberg Institute for School Reform. In this article, she connects the meaning of the successful campaign to block the expansion of charter schools in Massachusetts and the present moment, where public schools across the nation are under threat. The parent-teacher victory over the out-of-state billionaires was a resounding affirmation of public support for public schools. Please open the article to see the links to sources. Tung’s article is a good reminder of the importance of joining with allies in your district, town, city, or state. Every region has an organization that is supporting public education and opposing privatization. For help in finding your allies, contact the Network for Public Education.

 

Tung writes:

 

On November 8, Massachusetts voters decided to keep the charter school cap by voting “no” on Ballot Question 2, with only 16 (mostly wealthy) towns out of 351 voting “yes.” School committees in over 200 districts passed resolutions against Question 2, because communities want local control over their schools and understand that the charter industry forces them to run two parallel school systems, one of which is not fully accountable to the community.

 

The ballot proposal would have allowed up to twelve new Commonwealth charter schools each year indefinitely. In addition, the proposal would have removed limits on the amount of money that districts can be required to pass through to charter schools, enabling situations in which charter school growth could eventually cause the collapse of urban public school districts due to loss of revenue. Raising the charter cap would have bled our districts of resources necessary for early education, engaging course offerings, and professional development, and crippled the system’s ability to improve public, accountable schools for all students.

 

Not all charter schools exacerbate inequities, but lifting the charter cap would have allowed the creation of more charters that do widen the opportunity gap for students historically marginalized by unequal systems – especially schools that are run by for-profit corporations or charter management chains, that lack transparency and accountability in their governance, or that follow practices such as inequitable enrollment, punitive discipline policies, or excessive focus on raising standardized test scores. Choosing to keep the charter school cap was a win for equity in our state’s public school system.

 

Given the election of Donald Trump as our next president, we need to use this win to continue the strong advocacy for equitable and accountable public schools that the No on Question 2 supporters organized. During the fight for Question 2, charter proponents raised over $26 million to support their cause, primarily from “dark money,” out-of-state, and corporate donors. The aims of these donors are aligned with those of our president-elect; Trump promises to further privatize public schools and reduce government’s role in public education. While Trump’s education platform lacks specifics and details, we know that he has promised to divert $20 billion from school districts and perhaps even eliminate the federal Department of Education.

 

Building on the grassroots victory over Massachusetts Question 2, we need to ensure that his administration’s policies do not succeed in: dismantling federal oversight for students’ rights to quality education; further privatizing public education through private and parochial school vouchers and the expansion of charter school chains dominated by large corporate interests; and traumatizing students of color and immigrant students through a culture of intolerance and government-sanctioned racism and xenophobia.

 

Given Trump’s nomination of Betsy DeVos, a pro-voucher billionaire, as Secretary of Education, the Trump administration will likely allocate Title I dollars to “school choice,” which includes a voucher program for students to attend private and parochial schools and the creation of more charter and magnet schools. This “portability” could reverse what 62 percent of Massachusetts residents just voted for – keeping funds in traditional public schools. Trump’s approach to improving schools through a market-based, competitive approach will reduce the ability of public schools and systems to improve due to funding and resource shortfalls. And it will widen the opportunity gap, since a disproportionate number of Massachusetts’ charter schools have zero tolerance discipline policies and disproportionately low enrollment of English language learners.

 

In the aftermath of Trump’s election, many educators have led emotional classroom discussions to help students process their reactions, which include sadness, fear, rage, and uncertainty. Students who are Muslim, LGBTQ, immigrant, undocumented, Latino, female, and/or of color describe anxiety over their civil rights and their futures in this country. Superintendents in urban districts around the country have tried to reassure students and families with public letters and offers of support and counseling. Now more than ever, under a Trump administration, we must provide civic education that promotes critical consciousness, teaches about structural inequality, and empowers students to voice their concerns, organize, and advocate for humane and equitable policies.

 

In the next four years, with Trump as president and with a Republican Congress, we must continue to demand inclusive, transparent, and accountable public schools that serve each community’s distinct needs and desires, rather than quasi-public, unaccountable charter schools and private schools. We must ensure that our public schools create greater opportunity for all of our students, especially those most marginalized by our inequitable systems.

 

 

 

 

Here is a great article in The New Republic by staff writer Graham Vyse, asking the crucial question, “Can Democrats Save Public Education from Trump and DeVos?” It acknowledges that the Democrats paved the way for the school choice agenda of the far-right by touting privately managed charter schools for the past eight years.

 

So the question now is whether Democrats will really fight for public education or will they continue the pretense that privately managed charter schools are “public?” Will they continue to endorse charters and oppose vouchers? Can you be half-pregnant?

 

As the Democrats aped the Republicans on key social issues, like education, they lost their unique identity. Now there are only 14 states with Democratic governors. If they keep pretending to be Republicans, there will be even fewer.

 

Andrew Cuomo of New York has used the same language as Trump, referring to community public schools as a “government monopoly,” and he endorsed legislation to compel the city of New York to give free space to charters, even those that are able to pay rent, like Eva Moskowitz’s fabulously wealthy charter chain. Dannell Molloy has been a champion for charter schools in Connecticut and gives them preference over public schools. Jerry Brown in California opened two charter schools when he was mayor of Oakland, and he recently vetoed legislation to ban for-profit charter schools.

 

Will they fight the privatization agenda, now that it is the Trump agenda?

After a hard-fought election that produced a narrow margin of victory, State Attorney General Roy Cooper was elected the next Governor of North Carolina. Pat McCrory, current governor and Tea Party hero, conceded defeat.

 

Education was the leading issue for Roy Cooper. He railed against the actions of McCrory and the legislature, and he was elected even as the state voted for Trump. Maybe that’s a lesson for Democratic candidates in other states. Supporting public schools is wise and politically powerful.

 

This is what Governor-elect Cooper says on his website:

 

We need to make education a priority. Governor McCrory has prioritized huge tax giveaways to big corporations and those at the top while he cut teaching assistants and failed to provide the resources our children need and to pay our teachers what they deserve.

 

We have to give more pay and respect to teachers, and to treat them as the professionals they are. Among the top priorities are increasing teacher pay, reversing cuts to textbooks and school buses, and stopping teacher assistant lay-offs.

 

Teachers will ultimately know we respect them when our policy reflects our rhetoric. Reinstating a teaching fellows program to attract the best and brightest, providing opportunities for teachers to improve their skills as professionals, and making sure their kids are healthy and ready to learn in the classroom are vital.

 

North Carolina already ranks 46th in the country and last in the Southeast in per-pupil expenditures for public schools. Many good teachers are leaving for other states for better jobs, and class size has increased. That’s causing parents to lose faith in public schools and undermining North Carolina’s best jobs recruiting tool, our education system.

 

Similarly, I oppose vouchers that drain money from public schools. I support strong standards and openness for all schools, particularly charter schools. While some charters are strong, we see troubling trends, such as a re-segregation of the student population, or misuse of state funds without a way to make the wrongdoers reimburse taxpayers. We need to manage the number of charter schools to ensure we don’t damage public education and we need to better measure charter schools so we can utilize good ideas in all schools.

 

We must support early childhood education as well as our great universities and community colleges. Our approach to quality education must be comprehensive.

 

Here is his education agenda.

After listening to the debate between Duke Professor Helen Ladd and Harvard Professor Marty West about the funding of our schools (“Getting Our Money’s Worth“), a reader sent this comment:

 

I don’t understand why we’re not talking more about the great things our teachers are doing in spite of being under funded. What don’t our schools have? My goddaughter asked for a ream of copy paper for Christmas a couple of years ago! Her whiteboard is actually plastic shower stall wall material that can’t be cleaned. She works in the Boston area.

 

Our schools are giving our students wonderful, whole child educations. They’re winning awards for the wonderful things they do with parents, students and other community members but we rarely talk about it.

 

What do the almighty (all richy) charters have – facilities in good repair with great technology, small classes, resources we can’t even dream about? That’s what I hear is the case for many charters. Where does that money come from? Do they save so much by not paying certified teachers that they can afford all those amenities or do they get tax deductible gifts from afar? How much more money does all their splendor take? Can community public schools get some from the same places? How about just enough for small classes?

 

Proud of public schools
Mary