Archives for category: Romney, Mitt

I have not decided how I will vote.

I will not vote for Romney.

How I cast my vote will be decided in the next few weeks.

This teacher has decided:

I am one of the thousands of stunned teachers, and life long Democrats who was amazed by the actions taken by the current Democratic leadership in the war against teachers. I was one of the teachers who was fired, then rehired at Central Falls High School in Rhode Island.

Without warning, bad evaluation, or cold reasoning I was made the pillar and brunt of national jokes and political finger wagging.

The greatest hurt came when this president, on national news, commended the “bravery” of the superintendent when she fired the entire staff of the high school.

Without knowledge or background on the extreme level of poverty, crime, or lack of funding, President Obama called me a bad teacher.

This is the direction of the war against teachers. Along with Arne Duncan and of course the teachings of Rhee I have seen first hand the devastation caused by amateur educational reformers.

Replacement Teaching Fellows from 60 day certificate factories have lasted as little as 24 hours, some I find crying in the bathroom. Promised money disappears into administrative accounts, and the blame for kids that can’t see the light of day for the crushing poverty they live in rests with teachers.

So, for the first time since I walked the blocks for McGovern I will not vote for ta Democratic president.

By all accounts, the election of 2012 will be close.

For educators, the stakes are high.

Mitt Romney supports every kind of privatization, from charters to vouchers to full-time online schools, and he has no problem with for-profit schooling.

His agenda threatens the survival of that most basic of democratic institutions, the public school.

Educators supported President Obama when he ran in 2008. They enthusiastically embraced him as a true change agent, expecting that he would make major alterations to the noxious federal law No Child Left Behind.

But after his election, instead of calling for a major change in NCLB, he launched his Race to the Top, which builds on the flawed strategies of NCLB. Although President Obama has won the endorsement of the NEA and the AFT, many of the nation’s nearly four million teachers are discouraged by his policies. If they sit home or if they are lukewarm, he could lose the election.

We can’t let that happen.

So I am doing my part by writing a short speech that would win educators back. If he uses this speech, he would win the election. He could incorporate the following into his acceptance speech at the Convention in Charlotte or use it on a subsequent occasion:

“I want to address a few words to the nation’s hard-working teachers and principals, to its dedicated leaders and school board members. You hold the future in your hands. Your work will determine whether America is a great society, a just society and a creative society in the future.

“I know you have been disappointed in my approach to education. I know that teacher morale is at a low ebb. I know there is far too much pressure to teach to the test. That degrades the joy of learning.

“I know that most of that pressure comes from mistakes we made when we launched a ‘Race to the Top.’

“I know now we were wrong.

“Judging teachers by the test scores of their students is wrong. I understand now that this method doesn’t work. I apologize to you for letting it happen.

“You know that I have spoken out repeatedly against teaching to the test. I would not want this for my children, and you should not want it for yours or the children in your care. This is mis-education.

“Our country is now spending billons of dollars on testing and test preparation that should be spent in the classrooms of America, bringing back the 300,000 teachers who lost their jobs. reducing class sizes, restoring libraries, and providing services directly to children.

“Our nation must out-innovate the world and it won’t happen by picking a bubble on a standardized test. It will only happen if we encourage critical thinking, free inquiry, and a sense of wonder and imagination in every classroom.

“We want our students to lead the world in their love of learning. We want them to be the best in creativity. We want them to know history and foreign languages, science and mathematics, literature and geography. We want them to rexperience the liberating power of the arts. And we want them to have physical education every single day so that they are healthy and fit.

“One more thing. I realize that we were wrong to require states to allow more privately-managed schools as a condition of getting money from the Race to the Top.

“Through our mistakes, we inadvertently unleashed a movement to privatize our nation’s public schools and to turn them into for-profit centers for equity investors and technology corporations.

“This is unacceptable. Folks on the right have wanted to privatize our schools for half a century. We can’t let that happen.

“When we look around the world, we see that the top-performing nations have great public systems. We do not want to revive a dual school system in our nation’s cities, dividing up our public funds between a weakened public system and aggressive charter chains.

“And so I am directing my Secretary of Education Arne Duncan as of this day to cancel the Race to the Top. The fact is that learning is not accomplished in a “race.” Races are fine on the sports field, but not in the classroom. Learning is accomplished because of the patient effort of students, teachers, principals, parents, and communities working together.

“From this moment on, the U.S. Department of Education will dedicate its efforts to improving public education; to supporting equality of educational opportunity; to enforcing the civil rights of our students; to funding the districts where need is greatest; to strengthening the research and information that we need to upgrade our schools; and to recognizing that the primary responsibility for reform lies with the states and districts that are closest to the problems.

“Yes, we must improve public education. But we must do it in ways that make our communities and our democracy stronger. We must do it in ways that respect the dedication of our educators. And we must do it in ways that recognize that many children and families need extra help because of the burdens of poverty. We must do what we can to lift those burdens and to bring about the greatest of American goals: equality of educational opportunity.

Education Week has an article by the always well-informed Alyson Klein that speculates about Romney’s possible choice for Secretary of Education.

The possibilities include:

Jeb Bush, former Florida governor, who shaped the Romney agenda for privatization of the nation’s schools;

Tom Luna, the state superintendent in Idaho who is known for his allegiance to online corporations and his efforts to increase class size;

Joel Klein, the former chancellor of NYC, now selling technology for Rupert Murdoch, another supporter of privatization and opponent of unions, seniority and tenure;

Michelle Rhee, leader of a national campaign to remove all tenure, seniority and collective bargaining fromt teachers;

Chris Cerf, acting commission in New Jersey, who is leading Chris Christie’s push to privatize public schools in that state;

Here is the big surprise:

Arne Duncan, who is seen by Republicans as compatible with Romney’s agenda and, as the article, says, eager to stay on.

There are other names, but it is interesting to realize that at least four of the six listed here are allegedly, nominally Democrats.

This reader makes an important observation about this post and Ryan’s celebration of the free market:

What I find most interesting is that in his own life, Paul Ryan has never made much attempt to succeed in the free market. He’s worked for the government for most of his adult life, and his family money is just that, money his family made, a lot from public investment in road building.

Paul Thomas of Furman University says that educators have no political party, because no political party today supports educators.

The Republican party is downright hostile to public education and to teachers.

Romney’s education agenda calls for privatization.

It is the most radical rightwing document of any major political party in my memory (and I have a long memory).

Romney would be a disaster for American public education, for the schools that enroll almost 90% of the nation’s children.

His agenda is not conservative, because he wants to destroy a cherished part of our American tradition: free public education.

His agenda is radical.

But what of the Democrats?

Thomas nails down the Obama-Duncan routine of good cop-bad cop as well as the double-speak surrounding Race to the Top.

When the public sector unions and public education were getting a thrashing in Wisconsin in the spring of 2011, neither Obama nor Duncan showed up. Instead, they went to Miami to join with uber-privatizer Jeb Bush to celebrate a school that allegedly had been turned around by firing the staff (no reporter bothered to follow up and notice that the school in question was still on a list to be closed because it remained one of the state’s lowest performing schools even after the staff was fired).

Obama and Duncan repeatedly echo Republican themes about education, pushing charter schools, merit pay, firing teachers and principals as a “reform” strategy, etc.

It’s telling that when Romney announced his agenda, the Obama camp responded by saying, “we are doing that already, just look how much Governor Chris Christie likes our education program.” Pathetic.

I know that Obama gave a speech the other day saying all the things he should have been saying and doing for the past four years (but hasn’t). Is the change real or just more “reformer” rhetoric?

We will see. Actions speak louder than words.

I read Romney’s education agenda carefully.

You should do the same.

It’s pro-privatization.

It repeats the myth of “failing” public schools.

There is not a good word in it for public education.

Romney is avid for charter schools and vouchers.

Here is the analysis of his agenda that I wrote for the New York Review of Books.

A science teacher read the post about the textbooks used in some of Louisiana’s voucher schools. As we know, Governor Jindal is eager to pay public money to send children in Louisiana to religious schools that teach creationism as fact. So is Republican candidate Mitt Romney, who looks to Jindal as an education expert and who praises vouchers for religious schools. The teacher writes:

Hopeful Monster Theory!!!!! Since when is there any such thing outside of the creationists imagination.  The Flying Spaghetti Monster perhaps but that was created to point of the fallacious arguments made by Intelligent Design.
Romney giving Jiindal the time of day for any education position is beyond ridiculous.  This is like giving the president of Exxon the position of EPA director.

You may recall that I wrote about a “brilliant and hilarious” article that compared Mayor Rahm Emanuel and Mitt Romney and found them to be strange bedfellows.

The cartoon that illustrated the article showed them joined at the hip.

Well, if you don’t remember, please read it again. It’s funny scary.

I neglected to mention the name of the writer of the article in The Chicago Reader. His name is Ben Joravsky. (If you read the link I just inserted, you will understand the reason for this post.)

I often copy letters from readers and I am careful not to use their names because so many teachers are justly concerned about reprisals from stupid bosses.

But this writer had his name on his article and I should have mentioned it.

He is a really talented writer, and I hope he keeps writing about education.

Here’s a tip for Ben Joravsky. Follow the money. Follow the money that is promoting charter schools and for-profit virtual schools.

You remember (or maybe you don’t) the Groucho TV show. In every show, when he was interviewing people, the secret word would suddenly descend (I can’t recall why), and the studio audience loved it. The secret word when you are investigating education these days starts with a P (privatization).

You write it. I’ll read it. And I’ll never forget to give credit where credit is due!

What are the similarities between Mitt Romney and Rahm Emanuel? True, they have different party labels but their education policies are eerily alike. A writer in Chicago showed the contradictions in this brilliant and hilarious article.

Historians in the future (the future meaning maybe later this year or next, now that we live at warp speed and last week seems like 50 years ago) will puzzle out why President Obama decided to build his education program (Race to the Top) on the crumbling foundation of No Child Left Behind. They will also have to figure out why he decided to throw teachers and their unions (arguably his most ardent supporters in 2008) under the bus. And they will probably trace the trail to campaign contributions to Wall Street, which is likely to abandon him in 2012.

It’s not too late for him to change course. He could re-renergize his base. He could rekindle the love of teachers in a millisecond if he could stop the flawed ideas embedded in Race to the Top: that teachers should be judged by the test scores of their students, that federal programs created to help the poor should be turned into competitions, that public dollars should be handed over to private management as often as possible, that the federal government needs to create a data base for every student from cradle to grave, and that the best way to help students is to test them at the earliest possible age.

I get emails every day from teachers who say they are puzzled, they are angry, they are outraged by the Obama policies. They can’t vote for Romney, because he openly hates them and their unions.

Mr. President, if you or your staff read this, please take heed: Drop the Republican education policies. They haven’t worked for the past decade. They are ruining education and demoralizing teachers.

A reader tells me that Mitt Romney will be speaking at the Press Club in Baton Rouge on Monday.

I hope that journalists in Louisiana are ready to ask him some tough questions.

Ask him if he approves of using taxpayer dollars to send children to religious schools.

Ask him if he approves of spending public money to send kids to schools that teach creationism, not evolution.

Ask him if he knows that New Orleans is the next to the lowest scoring district in the state.

Ask him if he knows that 79% of the charters in New Orleans were graded either with a D or an F by the state.

Ask him if he knows that online for-profit charter schools get terrible test scores, low graduation rates, and have a high dropout rate.

Ask him if he thinks that the funding for vouchers and charters and online schools and for-profit vendors should come right out of the minimum funding for public schools.

Ask him if he has any ideas about how to help public schools, where the vast majority of children are students, because Governor Jindal does not.

And while you are at it, ask him if he knows that the NAEP test scores in reading and math for American children are the highest in American history, for every group, white, black, Hispanic, and Asian.

And be sure to ask him what he plans to do to help reduce the high cost of college (his answer: nothing, other than to hand student loans over to private banks).