Archives for category: Parents

This parent activist in Chicago says that parents have good ideas about how to improve the schools but Mayor Rahm Emanuel won’t meet with them.

Parents in New York City say the same about Mayor Bloomberg.

Why won’t the mayor listen to the most informed and most committed stakeholders of all? Not the business community, not the entrepreneurs, but the parents of the children?

It would cost more than the city has which is a nearly 1 billion dollar deficit! Parent groups have proposed plans that would increase art and gym, support after school programs and allow more opportunity for hands-on learning, but CPS and the mayor emphatically refuse to discuss the future of our children’s education with parents. Rahm’s only solution is to impose a longer school day with no additional funding and essentially let schools try to figure out how to make it work, while secretly hoping schools fail so he can close them and create more charters.

Our education leaders are in love with ideas that are proven not to work and they ignore evidence that their preferred strategies don’t work.

After a decade of No Child Left Behind, Congress won’t admit that it failed. There are still many millions of children left behind–not “no child”–yet Congress can’t bring itself to ditch its failed program. 

Every day brings new evidence that the policies of Race to the Top are hardly different from those of NCLB. They rely on the same strategies of testing, punishment, and choice, with an added dollop of privatization. Why is a Democratic administration so devoted to a Republican policy agenda? Why is a Democratic administration even more devoted to privatization than NCLB?

If we ever come to our senses, there is a better way. Our policymakers decided to treat schools as totally separate from society, to ignore the social and economic conditions that affect student performance. This is wrong. Here is a nice summary of policies that have worked wherever they were tried, but are ignored by our leaders. The formula is simple: Improve the lives of children, and their academic performance will improve.

When will they wake up? When will Arne Duncan and President Obama and the governors and legislators and state chiefs and mayors wake up? When will Stand for Children start standing for children? When will StudentsFirst actually put students first, not teachers last? When will the education reformers realize that schools and society are intertwined?

A new book that explains how demanding parents ruin their children’s lives with unbearable pressure to be the best at everything:

An antidote to the Tiger Mom complex.

Every year, as part of its customer service, the New York City Department of Education asks parents what they would like to see changed.

Every year since the question has been asked, parents have chosen as their top priority: Reducing class size.

In 2007, when the survey was initiated, the Mayor minimized parent concerns by lumping together all other choices as if they were one, to say that parents had many concerns.

This year, when the Department presented its slide show of the results, it left “class size” out of the slide.

Wonder why.

The Huffington Post article linked in the first sentence is nearly an exact copy of the post on the NYC Parent blog in the second link.

Thanks to Leonie Haimson, parent advocate, who is a tiger on the subject of class size.

We know from studies and reports that online charter schools provide inferior education.

We know that they have lower graduation rates and lower test scores than brick-and-mortar schools.

We know that they have high attrition rates, as students enroll and leave within a year or two.

We know that children enrolled in virtual charter schools do not have the opportunity to interact on a regular basis with other children of their age or have face-to-face interaction with live teachers. We know that they will not develop the social skills that come from such interchange.

We know why they are a growing business: They make millions for their sponsors.

So why do parents continue to enroll their children in institutions with such a bad track record?

Here is the answer: The demand for virtual schools is a sure indicator of the dumbing down of the American public and the triumph of American capitalism at its greediest.

Indiana is one of the states where the governor and the state commissioner of education seem determined to put public education out of business. They are implementing vouchers, expanding charters, and given the green light to for-profit online charter schools. They do not have a shred of evidence that any of this will improve the education of children in Indiana, but that doesn’t slow them down. They are in love with the ideology of choice and competition and the glories of the marketplace, and that’s the end of the discussion. Plenty of entrepreneurs will get rich off taxpayers’ dollars in Indiana.

Fortunately, there is strong resistance from parents and educators in Northeast Indiana. When I spoke in Indiana last fall, I met some of the parent leaders. They were in despair about the destructive policies being pushed through the legislature. I am glad to say that they organized and are speaking out. They can serve as a model for other concerned citizens.

They have drafted a statement in opposition to what Governor Mitch Daniels and State Superintendent Tony Bennett are doing. They not only oppose these harmful policies, but they offer a platform describing the positive steps that must be taken to save public education in the state of Indiana.

Congratulations to these courageous, thoughtful, and concerned citizens of Indiana!

I hope that others will take this statement of principles and adapt it to their own community and state. Help it go viral, as the Texas anti-high-stakes testing resolution has gone viral. Join with your friends and neighbors to awaken the American public to support good education policies that strengthen our public schools and our democracy.

Gotta love these parents. Here is a brilliant comment to an earlier blog about parent power. What will Gates and Broad and the U.S. Department of Education and the governors and state legislatures do when parents get engaged and angry? What will they do when parents rise up and say, “Enough is enough,” as parents in New York City did today? How will they defend themselves when parents demand an end to the use and misuse of their children?

Parents are the key here.  Unfortunately, parents tend to be invested in their own children’s education and that does not translate into a national movement yet.  Many parents are still ardent supporters of a data driven, educational model whether the numbers tell them something useful or not. The outrage is not universal, by far, as not every state, city, or local district has embraced the testing culture to the same extent.  It will come as we all jump on the common core bandwagon.  When parents throughout the country start to grumble, the political machinery will start to crumble.  I wonder how long powerful foundations and corporations will be able to control the agenda.  They can’t possibly be totally staffed by people who can afford elite private education for their children.  Will they sell out their own children?

The forces promoting the obsession with standardized testing and data are powerful, but they cannot hold back a tide of informed and committed parents. Once parents realize what is happening to their children, their teachers, and their schools, once they see how the quality of education is being eroded by data mania, once they understand that they are sacrificing their own children to the giant data-crunching machine, game over.

Rule of the day, the month, the week, the year, the decade, the century: Do not do unto other people’s children what you would not do to your own.

Diane

Reporter Jaisal Noor has created a gripping radio documentary about the fight to save neighborhood schools.

He lets the “reformers” have their say. They want to close down the so-called failing schools and replace them with new schools that won’t be failing schools, at least not for a few years. Then they too can be closed and another new school can be opened.

The closing schools serve minority students. They are overcrowded and underresourced. They must be closed. So say the officials.

Jaisal Noor listens to students, teachers, and parents. What a novel idea.

The officials don’t hear students, teachers, or parents. They know what’s best for everyone. And what’s best is to close their school.

Diane