Archives for category: New York City

The most amazing thing about Anthony Weiner is that he is still running for mayor of New York City despite the revelations about his tawdry behavior. Maybe he will drop out because his poll numbers have plummeted in the last few days. Maybe he already has, and I haven’t heard the news.

It is upsetting to hear the “man on the street” say that he doesn’t care about Weiner’s behavior because it is personal and has no bearing on his fitness to serve.

If a teacher or a principal did what Weiner did, they would be fired.

Imagine if he were mayor. Would he continue sending lewd photos of himself to women he never met? He would be in full charge of the schools and 1.1 million children. Would he set a high moral standard for those who work in the schools?

Weiner continues to campaign because he has no shame. He believes that a majority of voters are also shameless and will forgive him his every trespass of what we once thought was a moral code. The moral code is not law. It is a basic sense of decency.

Shame is important in a civilized society. Shame is the recognition that certain behaviors are wrong even if they are not illegal.

As for Elliott Spitzer, who resigned the governorship in disgrace after being caught patronizing prostitutes, don’t get me started! He is running for City Comptroller, a position that requires a leader of unimpeachable integrity.

New York City politics feels like a Gong Show right now.

Arthur Goldstein, who teaches English language learners in a high school in Néw York City, realized he is missing out on the way to get very rich in Mayor Bloomberg’s education system.

Certainly not by teaching because the mayor doesn’t care for teachers.

It is not by teaching in a charter but by operating a charter like Eva and Geoffrey. The teachers turn over rapidly but the CEOs do very well indeed.

They have figured out that the secret to success is not accepting many ELLs or kids with disabilities.

Works like a charm.

Michael Brocoum recounts his experience as a New York City public school teacher:

“I was a teacher at the Bayard Rustin High School for the Humanities in NYC from 1990 – 2010 and taught before at several other schools in NYC. I also taught Economics as an adjunct at the State Univ. of NY at Farmingdale before that (1975-77).

“BRHS was an excellent school with students opting to attend that didn’t make it into Stuyvesant. Also students that were accepted opted to attend BRHS because of its reputation. A significant number of students were children of diplomats. In other words, well fed and motivated students, involved parents, great staff with great results.

“Some students went on to Ivy League schools, one of mine is a reporter on NBC Evening News, another won a film award from an NYC program rewarding student’s creativity (I don’t recall specific details). Overall a very good school by any standard.

“Then Mayor Bloomberg became, well, mayor. Worse still he gained absolute control and the whole situation was made even worse when Bill Gates decided he wanted to fund a small school movement. There is a lot to explain but not interested reliving all that happened. Simply put we were sent the most difficult and needy students, not violent for the most part, but students reading at 5th or 6th grade levels and also far behind in math skills.

“To make a long story short, good school at the beginning of Bloomberg’s mayoralty, closure near the end of it. I retired in disgust. By the way, Bill Gates admitted his small school program was a failure. He walked away harmless and we were left “holding the bag”.

Arthur Goldstein reviews StudentsFirst’s charge that Mayor Bloomberg and his Department of Education were assigning poorly-rated teachers to high-minority schools.

It is mildly amusing to imagine that StudentsFirst and Mayor Bloomberg are adversaries, as Goldstein points out. They have a shared interest in demonizing teachers, demanding that they be held accountable for test scores, no matter what other factors are at work.

As Goldstein writes:

“I didn’t realize these schools were dispensing more U-ratings, but it’s fairly easy to guess why. For one thing, there is a direct correlation between low-SES and school closings. Schools with high percentages of high needs kids tend not to get high test scores and are therefore considered failing. It’s the school’s fault the kids have learning disabilities, and it’s the school’s fault the kids can’t speak English. No excuses. Just because the kid arrived from the Dominican Republic four days ago, that’s no reason he can’t write that essay about American history.”

New York City parent activist Natalie Green Giles saw an uncanny resemblance between the Hunger Games and the city’s education policies.

She writes:

The Hunger Games in the NYC Public Schools

June 2013

By Natalie Green Giles

We have just finished the annual rite of our Hunger Games here in our New York City public schools. Our games go on for six days, not counting the weeks (in some cases months) of prep to get ready for them. The reaping, as always, selected all of our third through eighth grade public school students, from our 32 districts, some as young as seven years old. We parents hope it doesn’t get younger, but the ominous signs are starting to point that way.

Families know the drill at this point, but it has been getting worse. The Capitol–City Hall and the DOE in coercion with the Albany education leaders and lawmakers–must have felt rumbles of rebellion and decided that it wasn’t enough to just use our children as pawns in the political game of legacy-making and privatization: this year they went and up’ed the challenge and made the games harder, knowing that the tributes and their coaches (teachers) wouldn’t have enough time or the right tools to train, and that some kids would have a much harder time surviving in this arena. They, of course, had to make sure that the whole world could see the Capitol’s power, authority, and ability to control and humiliate, so they still made sure they could fire the teachers based on the scores of the tributes (even though by now we all know the metrics are based on a terribly flawed methodology). They try to make these scores public so that we can cheer for the top performers and deride the low scorers. The Capitol also makes sure we know that they will come and shut down a schools if not enough of its kids survive the arena with a passing score. It’s a way of keeping us standardized and conformist. It’s an easy way for them to keep track of us, just giving everyone a number. We wouldn’t want society to start nurturing creative and independent thinkers who might cause a rebellion in the future.

Once again, the careers from District 2 showed off their lifelong training; we heard recently how the majority of rising kindergartners getting the gifted and talented seats came from that esteemed district. We already knew that the fourth graders and seventh graders from the wealthier district often had a lot of private coaching, but many families now spoke of hiring tutors and sending their four-year-olds to test prep programs, just to be sure their kids were armed as best as they could be. You can’t blame them. The competition is fierce in the arena, and we know not everyone can win. There are just so many seats available in the good schools, especially in the good middle and high schools.

Then there are the gamesmakers. They go by the name of Pearson. Beware of them. They are being paid tens of millions of dollars alone this year from the testing contracts they have signed with the Capitol, and they are ready to put in whatever obstacles are necessary if it looks like the children are getting too comfortable. Starting fires, creating fierce mutant animals, or turning down the temperature to freezing in the arena? That’s nothing. Now they have ramped up what was a 180-minute test to 270 minutes—three straight days of 90 concentrated minutes (bathroom breaks are discouraged), reading passage after passage after passage, sometimes throwing in crazy stories about pineapples and hares. It could drive a tribute to the point of madness. Or worse—it could make them hate reading and writing with all those boring passages that don’t reflect life in their own district and with everything out of context. And to really trip us up, they make mistakes in their scoring. They sometimes tell kids who performed well that they didn’t make the cut. Who knows what last minute perils those gamesmakers at Pearson will throw in for the upcoming tests? Who knows what dangers await our children? Not even the Capitol, it seems.

And yes, all of Panem watches and reads about the games, but we are not actually allowed to ever see the tests or know what the correct answers are (or know what our children got wrong). But the games nonetheless are a political spectator sport, and media companies benefit mightily, as newspapers and other media outlets cover the drama of the arena and everything leading up to it. And when the final scores come out? That’s the real feeding frenzy. But no one media company benefits as much as Rupert Murdoch’s. He has a subsidiary called Wireless Generation. Check them out.

We parents want to rebel but we don’t know how. We suffer every year along with our chosen children, but go along with it because we are forced into believing that the Capitol knows what’s best—more so than even parents and educators. So we acquiesce and let our children go without real learning for weeks and months while they get prepped for battle. We let our children endure the days of testing, with all the stress and pressure and anxiety it causes. And then we watch as our children lose even more instructional time after it’s all over, because their teachers are then taken away to grade the tests for days at a time. (Oh—and by the way– the schools now have to pay the bill for the coverage while their teachers are away.) A few families were brave enough to “opt out” of testing this year—keeping their kids out of the arena or telling them not to fight when they got there (i.e., leave the test blank)—but we’ve heard that there will be severe consequences for those kids and their schools. But maybe it’s time for us to be brave. Maybe it’s time to fight against what we know is just plain wrong. Before it gets even worse. Before the games are scheduled for more than six days a year.

Think about it–when the stakes are so high and so misguided that our children’s educational reality begins to mirror a dystopian fantasy, what do we really have to lose?

When New York State Comptroller Tom Di Napoli informed Eva Moskowitz’s Success Academy charter chain of his intention to audit its financial records, the corporation sued to block the audit of public funds on grounds it was unconstitutional.

According to the story in a legal journal,

“Success Academy claims that a 2009 ruling by New York’s highest court found the Legislature overstepped its bounds by passing legislation in 2005 that authorized the comptroller to audit charter schools.
“Despite fine-tuning in 2010 that resurrected the audits, they’re still unconstitutional, Success Academy claims.”

In fact, Di Napoli has audited other charters based on the change in the law in 2010 that was written specifically to authorize the Comptroller to audit the use of public funds.

In one of Success Academy’s letters to the Comptroller, it asserts that the comptroller lacked the authority to conduct such audits under the state constitution, which authorizes reviews “of any political subdivision of the state” – which charter schools are not.”

Not being “a political subdivision of the state” is another way of saying that the charter corporation is a private contractor, NOT a public school. This has been the standard line of charters across the nation to evade state labor laws and other laws that apply to public schools but not to private contractors.

Eva Moskowitz’s Success Academy charter schools (originally called Harlem Success Academy) have been ruthless in grabbing public school space from existing schools and crowding their “hosts” out.

Currently they are involved in taking space from a Harlem public school dedicated to children with special needs.

Moskowitz has several fabulously wealthy hedge fund managers on her board. It is a shame that they are unwilling to contribute the money to buy or lease space for their charter, instead of pushing out the city’s neediest students.

Leonie Haimson, who is undoubtedly New York City’s most outspoken and energetic education activist, wrote a terrific critique of the New York Times’ editorial defending the Bloomberg era of education misrule.

The editorial, as she correctly notes, is a defense of the tired and failed status quo of the past dozen years.

It reads as if it had been written by “the City Hall PR machine.”

Haimson points out that  the Times ran an editorial very critical of Bloomberg’s stale education ideas on May 19, but this one appears to have been written by a different person.

Should the Bloomberg policies continue, as the Times suggests?

Almost every student in the New York City public schools attended a school system ruled by Mayor Bloomberg.

After 12 years, where is the success?

As the Times’ editorial points out, only 22% of the students who graduated in 2012 were “college-ready,” as judged by the State Education Department’s standards.

And every year, more schools are marked for closure because they are “failing.”

Isn’t all of this on Bloomberg’s watch?

Isn’t it time to hold him accountable for such paltry results?

As we have often noted on this blog, accountability is only for the little people–the teachers in the classroom, not for the mayor or the chancellor or the deputy chancellors or the legion of other well-paid administrators who make the decisions.

 

 

This letter froma teacher was written in response to the post by Marc Epstein on Big Lie Journalism in NYC:

“I began teaching nine years ago,after careers in law and business. There is a profound irony in analyzing the consequences of the so-called Bloomberg business model. While I’ve only taught during the Bloomberg tenure, I’ve seen pervasive mismanagement in my school ( and have heard similar anecdotes from teachers at other schools). The purchasing model for school supplies(books, computers,software) seems at best inept and more likely corrupt. Our school routinely overpays for supplies that are less than optimal. As for hiring incompetent,corrupt teachers, I dont think, as Mr Epstein suggests, that can be blamed on the mayor. It seems to be a combination of principals, who lack the skill sets to select,interview, and hire the best candidates,coupled with an archaic and convoluted human resources system that is baffling and counter-productive to finding the best teachers.

“If the NYC school system were a corporate entity, I would strongly urge the board to file for bankruptcy and bring in a team of turn around experts to work in concert with educators to build the best system that our current collective current knowledge allows for. Build it from scratch, much like Louis Gerstner did at iconic IBM,
The culpability for the sad state of NYC schools should be shared by the politicians, unions, teachers, administrators, and vendors.
The bankers and corporations are drooling over the prospects of privatizing education and the profound financial windfall that will accrue to those lined up to reap it (see,e.g. Joel Klein)

“The question is who can and will step up and represent the real stakeholders in this growing drama-the kids and their parents.”

The Néw York Times editorial board gave its opinion of what the next mayor must do about education, and its opinion is woefully uninformed by contact with the real world of students, teachers, principals, and parents.

Bear in mind that only 22% of NYC voters want more of the Bloomberg school reform style.

The Times thinks he might have listened a bit more to parents, although it was a central tenet of the mayor’s rule never to listen to parents.

The Times looks forward to the installation of the new, harder, more rigorous Common Core, while acknowledging that most students now are not graduating “college ready.” No need to explain or even consider how more students will succeed as tests get harder.

The Times notes the mayor’s rush to close down many schools, and thinks most of those schools deserved to die. It brazenly compares the low graduation rate at a school marked for closure, from which students and teachers have fled, to a brand-new, well-resourced small school.

The Times notes the controversy over co-location of charters into public schools, which some call “education apartheid,” and the Times thinks this is a problem only in a few “extreme” cases. The Times gives no thought to the consequence of having two public-funded school systems, one of which is free to kick out slow learners and behavioral problems while excluding children with high needs.

The best thing about the editorial is the comments that follow, most of which attempt to inject a smidgen of reality into the Times’ world.