Archives for category: New Orleans

The Laura and John Arnold Foundation in Houston made a gift of $25 million to a group called New Schools for New Orleans to create and expand more high performing charter schools in that much touted city.

John Arnold made a fortune as a trader at Enron.

The hype surrounding New Orleans is so commonplace that many struggling urban districts are told that they should switch to an all-charter model so they could be as successful as New Orleans.

Mercedes Schneider looked at the latest publication of New Schools for New Orleans and recognized the presentation as a slick PR document, with colorful graphs and dramatic claims. But, she writes, none of it is true. New Orleans is a low-performing district in a low-performing state.

New Orleans has a higher proportion of students in privately-managed charters than any other district in the nation. Most get poor ratings. Research on Reforms says that 79% of the charters in the Recovery School District were graded D or F by the state. The Cowen Institute, a big supporter of charters, reported that 66% of the charters were rated D or F (see p. 7 of this report).

But New Orleans will get more. Major national chains want to get in or get more.

New Orleans will be our first city with fully privatized schools.

I posted a few days ago about a panel discussion in New York City where Paul Vallas made this startling statement: “We’re losing the communications game because we don’t have a good message to communicate.”

He spoke bluntly of the “testing industrial complex.”

Here Valerie Strauss briefly reviews Vallas’ role in Chicago, Philadelphia, and New Orleans, where testing and privatization were key elements of his reforms. It is difficult to see any of those districts today as a template for reform of the nation’s schools. Chicago is in dire straits, As is Philadelphia, and the only thing sustaining the myth of New Orleans is a massive disinformation campaign by the funders of privatization.

I know Paul Vallas and there was a time about a decade ago when I thought he was the most promising leader of school reform in the nation. I was impressed by his energy and his quick intellect.

Because he is so smart, I hold out hope that he might be the first of the “reform” A-team to see the light, as I did around 2005.

By his remarks at the forum cited in the links, he recognizes that teacher evaluation by formula is a mess. From his Philadelphia experience he may have learned that privatization is no solution. He inaugurated the nation’s most extensive experiment in privatization a decade ago, and it failed.

Now Vallas has another chance to get it right, this time in Bridgeport, Connecticut, a small district compared to his previous assignments.

Will he lead the way away from the failed status quo? Will he be first to renounce the failed status quo?

A proposal to turn the public schools of York, Pennsylvania, into an all charter district was overwhelmingly rejected.

Do you think someone told them that the Néw Orleans Recovery School District is the lowest rated district in Louisiana?

Mike Deshotels is an experienced Louisiana educator and currently a blogger about education in his state. His blog is called Louisiana Educator.

He read a blog by Andy Smarick on the Education Next website and found it superficial and inaccurate. Smarick has worked for various Republican administrations and conservative think tanks and once served on the board of a KIPP school. Smarick would like to see public education turned over to the private sector.

Deshotels says that Smarick is wrong to use the Recovery School District as a model. It is actually a failing district. The most amazing feature of the RSD is that so many people, like Smarick, believe the hype and spin about it.

He explains the facts about the RSD here:

“A blog by Andy Smarick in Education Next describing the Louisiana Recovery School District as a good model for the new Tennessee Achievement School District has to be a joke. Either that or Smarick is one of the most misinformed education commentators I have ever seen. I live in Louisiana and I have watched the operation of the Louisiana RSD, and I find that Smarick is totally wrong on almost every point he tries to make. I feel compelled to point out a few of his misstatements.

Smarick likens the current education reform movement to a big Play. He claims that the formation of the Louisiana Recovery School District was the “high point” in the play of education reform. If that’s the case then the play is going to be a flop!

Here are the facts: The RSD in New Orleans was allowed to take over a broad cross section of schools including schools that were performing just below the state average at the time. Many of the students captured by the RSD in the takeover were pretty good students with parents who supported them properly. Many others were minimally supported by their parents and community.

Out of the 70 or so schools formed by the RSD in New Orleans, only a few succeeded in recruiting the most motivated students. All the rest continued to be low performers. But the cheerleaders for the RSD, like Smarick, only talk about the few schools that have done slightly above average by using now well known selection and culling techniques. So using the state grading scale (which is seriously flawed but which was pushed by the reformers Smarick has praised) only 5 schools in the New Orleans RSD are now rated as “B”. There are no “A”s in the RSD. There are only three “C”’s and all the rest D or F. In fact 87% of the RSD New Orleans schools at last count were rated D or F, with the F’s predominating. But it gets worse.

Soon after taking over the bulk of New Orleans schools the Recovery District started taking over low performing schools in Baton Rouge, Shreveport and a couple of rural Parishes. Those have been run by the RSD for 5 years now. All of them are now rated F and on average are doing worse than before they were taken over. They are performing so poorly that the State has taken them over from their charter operators and no longer releases the letter grades for most of them, using the excuse that it would be premature to publish their letter grades because they are in the process of being reorganized. By the way, that’s also how the state covers up the poor performance of some of the New Orleans schools.

Smarick makes the assertion that the RSD is not really run by the state, but just answers to the state. He could not be further from the truth. In fact, except for the small handful of charters in New Orleans that were able to cream the best students, all of the other charters and direct run RSD schools are totally controlled by the state. The state has now built such a large bureaucracy to run the RSD in the Baton Rouge area, that it has taken over a whole school building to house their administrators. But that was no problem since the parents had withdrawn so many of the students that the RSD ended up with a vacant building that originally belonged to the local school board. Now the parents in Baton Rouge are running a petition to have the building returned to the East Baton Rouge school system which has experienced major growth through transfers back from the RSD.

It would be very sad if the Tennessee Achievement District were to follow the example of the Louisiana Recovery District. It is also sad that Smarick is allowed to publish his totally inaccurate analysis.

Michael Deshotels

This article shows how the Broad Foundation has shifted gears. It used to train school boards to its way of thinking (it trained the Atlanta school board, for example, to believe that metrics and data matter more than anything les).

Now it send school boards on tours to selected sites.

The Syracuse superintendent, a product of the unaccredited Broad Superintendents Academy, leads her school board to meetings around the nation to learn about the Broad style. In this case, they are in New Orleans, the Mecca of privatization. You can be sure that no one will tell them that at least two-thirds of the New Orleans charters are academically unacceptable, even in the reports of their supporters at the Cowen Institute at Tulane.

Parents in New Orleans are likely to learn that their child is enrolled in an F school. Under federal law, they have a right to transfer to a higher-performing school.

But here is New Orleans’ dirty little secret: Most of he choices available to parents are also F rated schools.

This stunning article takes you inside the story that has been mythologized in the national media.

Consider this:

“More than seven years into the New Orleans choice experiment, documents and interviews reveal the schools are so academically anemic that the RSD fell short in its attempts to comply with federal policy requiring school districts to offer higher quality alternatives to students in failing schools.

“If every student in a failing school wanted to transfer,” said Gabriela Fighetti, RSD’s executive director of enrollment, “we would not be able to guarantee them a slot.”

“Dozens of public records reviewed by The Lens show RSD officials last summer grossly underestimated the number of failing schools it oversees. One week, City Park Academy was offered as a destination for countless students eligible for transfer through the federal choice program. The next, it was identified as a failing school required to offer alternatives to its own students.”

Meanwhile, many states and districts plan to copy New Orleans, which has been overhyped to the media.

This just arrived in the morning email

It is a question for a multiple-choice test.

Write your own.

Here goes:

I am part of a small group of educators (hoping to grow teacher and parent awareness – via our facebook page: https://www.facebook.com/pages/NJ-Educators-United-to-Protect-Public-Education/350194368424508 – where – among other articles – we have been transcribing and posting YouTube “homerun” statements that you have made via speaking venues).

Anyway, here are my simple thoughts and a sample standardized question:
————————————————————-
Does history repeat itself? You bet!

http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2010/01/duncan-katrina-was-the-best-thing-for-new-orleans-schools/
http://uftelections2010.blogspot.com/2010/02/mike-fiorillo-on-duncans-katrina.html

“The following paragraphs are in response to a post at GothamSchools after Sect’y of Education Arne Duncan remarked that ___________ was the “best thing” for the __________ school.

‘This despicable statement by Duncan represents a common motif among Democrats and Republicans alike, and validates Naomi Klein’s Shock Doctrine thesis, namely, that ruling elites create or opportunistically use crises to implement policies that would otherwise be blocked. In the case of New Orleans, it’s the wholesale privatization of the school system, with the schools being turned over to large charter school chains…Where were these people when the urban schools were suffering from decades of neglect and under-investment? They certainly weren’t teaching in them, or sending their children to them. Why are they only now proclaiming their “passion” for education, which is based solely on their lust to dominate and control them, driven by an agenda that, PR rhetoric aside, is about their will to power and profit?’”

Proposed Standardized Test Question: Take out the words “Katrina” and “New Orleans” from the above excerpt and fill in the blank:

a.) State Takeover; Camden
b.) School Closings; Chicago
c.) All of the above

While I am a believer in optimism in the face of difficulty, the reformers have taken this to a new, unholy level:

I always tried to turn every disaster into an opportunity.
— John D. Rockefeller

Mike Deshotels is one of Louisiana’s tireless bloggers who demand old-fashioned things like honesty and integrity.

In this post, Mike says that the Oprah show on Steve Barr’s takeover of a New Orleans high school inadvertently reveals charter secrets of success.

Barr no longer runs Green Dot. He had some financial issues a few years back. Needless to say, Barr is not an educator. He is part of that new breed called edu-entrepreneur.

If one believes that test scores and graduation rates–no matter how they are obtained–are all that matters, then Barr has some strategies that work, but not so much for the students.

Louisiana is the state most dedicated to wiping out public education and the teaching profession, under the leadership of Governor Bobby Jindal and state commissioner John White. Jindal and White are doing whatever they can to privatize public education with vouchers, charters, and a program to outsource as much as possible of the funding dedicated in the state constitution to the maintenance of public education.

As I have learned from many friends in that state, the governor does not like dissent. When people disagree with his policies, they risk losing their job. In conversations, I have been told again and again, “Don’t mention my name. Please.”

No matter how authoritarian or dictatorial the government may be, there are always a few brave souls who feel compelled to speak up. Some are bloggers. Some are researchers. Some are both. They are smart, they are strong, they are courageous. They can’t tolerate lies, spin, and meanness. They believe the government has an obligation to support the general well-being of the people, not to serve the corporations that fund political campaigns.

And so in this post, I want to salute the bloggers and researchers who have kept alive free speech and free inquiry and the public’s right to know what is happening in their state.

I add their names to the honor roll as champions of American public education.

In no particular order, they are:

Mike Deshotels, who blogs at Louisiana Educator. He has formed a group called Defenders of Public Education.

Research on Reforms, which has been trying to bring evidence to bear on the many false claims about a Louisiana or New Orleans “miracle.” In particular, I applaud the work of Barbara Ferguson, Charles Hatfield, and Raynard Sanders, who have maintained high standards of research in their work.

Lance Hill, who is a tireless advocate for social justice and the children and teachers of New Orleans. Lance brought me to New Orleans in 2010 to speak at Dillard University, where I met many brave researchers, parents, and teachers.

Educators for All, a group of researchers and parents who remain anonymous, but have used public information to exposé public lies about the schools.

Crazy Crawfish, a blogger who uses wit and research to exposé the manipulation of data by the State Education Department.

Mercedes Schneider, a <;;a href="http://“>;;blogger who is fearless in skewering the powerful. She has a Ph.D. In statistics but chooses to teach high school in her native state.

Tom Aswell at Louisiana Voice, a blogger who writes about “graft, lies, and politics: a monument to corruption,” in Louisiana and never runs out of material. He is an invaluable resource as Jindal finds ingenious ways to sell off or give away public assets to powerful corporations. When Tom turns to education, he sees right through Jindal’s smoke and mirrors, the same raid on the public treasury.

I feel honored to have met these brave men and women and i am privileged to post their work here. When the day comes that people of the state see how they have been hoodwinked by their elected officials, they will owe a debt of gratitude to those I honor now. And when that day arrives, no one will be fearful of speaking out and using their own names.