Archives for category: Network for Public Education

Anthony Cody is excited about the April conference of the Network for Public Education, and he explains why here.

 

He writes:

 

“There is less than a month to go before the third annual Network for Public Education conference in Raleigh, North Carolina. These are always special events, but this year will be especially significant because of the focus on civil rights. The full conference schedule is online now here. Here are some of the key parts of the conference that will make it so memorable:

 

“Reverend Barber’s keynote. The Rev. Barber will open the conference on Saturday morning with a keynote that will connect the issues of education to the fight for civil rights and social justice. Rev. Barber has been a leader of the Moral Monday campaign, which has staged repeated acts of civil disobedience in the state capital, protesting for worker rights, voting rights and social justice. I heard Rev. Barber speak a couple of years ago and his speech alone is worth traveling across the country for.

 
NPE Movie night! On Friday, April 15, from 7 to 9 pm, there will be a special event showcasing some of the best new films focused on education issues. Many of the creators of the films will be on hand to introduce their work. Laurie Gabriel will share a clip from her film, Healing Our Schools. Dawn O’Keeffe will share GO PUBLIC!, Bill Baykan and Michael Elliott will share some short segments they have been working on, and we will also have scenes from Good Morning Mission Hill and the new film exposing the Gulen charter school scandal, Killing Ed.

 
Unsung heroes: School Librarians! Susan Polos, Sara Stevenson and Sara Sayigh will lead a discussion described this way: “School librarians have been the canary in the public education coal mine. The first department to lose funding and staffing in the wave of “reforms” and the emphasis on testing, we are often experienced teacher leaders in our communities. We speak up for children and offer access to books, literacy, and information technology skills. We believe in inquiry, student privacy, the right to access all points of view, free reading (contrary to Common Core), and we represent an inconvenient truth that threatens those who wish to narrow curriculum and turn schools into test factories.”

 
A Conversation About School Choice. Mercedes Schneider’s upcoming book will focus on the well-honed strategy of “school choice.” For this conversation she will be joined by journalist Andrea Gabor, and New Orleans parent activist Ashana Bigard.

 
Testing and Justice: Growing Gaps, Shrinking Opportunities. For years we have been told that a focus on test score data would somehow reduce inequities. This amazing panel includes Alan Aja, Yohuru Williams and Carol Burris, who will share insights that show just how counterproductive our focus on test scores has been.

 
T-E-S-T, not P-L-A-Y, is a Four-Letter Word: Putting the Young Child and the Teacher at the Center of Education Reform: We will hear from some more of my heroes: Susan Ochshorn, Denisha Jones, Nancy Carlson-Paige and Michelle Gunderson. This session will be a powerhouse. An excerpt from the description: “Little black boys are being suspended and expelled from preschool in record numbers. In the attempt to eradicate achievement gaps and get children ready for school, education policies have wreaked havoc with their development. Play and recess have virtually disappeared from the kindergarten, which is now “the new first grade.” Children are being assessed as young as four, and face high-stakes tests at the tender age of six. Demands of the Common Core have banished the kind of rich curriculum, with hands-on exploration and collaboration, which produces creative, productive, citizens of our democracy.”

 
NPE’s Teacher Evaluation Study: This one will be really newsworthy, as we will release a new report that we have been working on with a team of ten teachers and administrators around the country. We surveyed close to 3000 educators last fall, asking detailed questions about the impact recent changes to the evaluation process. The results will confirm what those of us working in schools know — these evaluations are having a very bad affect, and are driving down morale and wasting huge amounts of time. Teachers were not consulted when these policies were developed, but we will make sure their voices are heard here.

 
BATs on Cultural Competence: Gus Morales, Denisha Jones and Marla Kilfoyle will share some important ideas about this crucial topic. As the description states: “meeting the needs of all students means developing cultural competence. Saving public education means dealing with the racism from the past and present so that we have something worth fighting for in the future.

 
Bob Herbert’s keynote: Former New York Times columnist Bob Herbert has authored an incredible book, which Diane Ravitch called “the most important book of the year.” Diane writes: “Bob Herbert’s new book Losing Our Way: An Intimate Portrait of a Troubled America is one of the most important, most compelling books that I have read in many years. For those of us who have felt that something has gone seriously wrong in our country, Herbert connects the dots. He provides a carefully documented, well-written account of what went wrong and why. As he pulls together a sweeping narrative, he weaves it through the personal accounts of individuals whose stories are emblematic and heartbreaking.”

 
Edushyster in conversation with Peter Cunningham: Sharp-witted blogger Jennifer Berkshire will engage in a “spirited conversation” with Cunningham, who served as Arne Duncan’s press secretary for many years, and now runs corporate ed reform’s $12 million blog, The Education Post. Bring popcorn, this should be good.

 
Jesse Hagopian and Karran Harper Royal. Two incredible leaders from opposite sides of the country — Jesse Hagopian from Seattle, and Karran Harper Royal from New Orleans — will share the stage and talk about their work, and where our movement is headed.

 
Hundreds of the nation’s most passionate defenders of public education gathered in one spot! The best thing about these conferences is the chance to connect with readers of my blog, and other activists from around the country. I hope that if you are reading this, I get to meet YOU!

 

Register here.

 

 

Tomorrow the US Senate will vote on the appointment of John King as Secretary of Education. He failed as the Commissioner of Education in Néw York. His rapid adoption of Common Core and teacher evaluation based on test scores led to a massive parent opt out. He battled parents to impose his agenda. He is no different from Arne Duncan.

The Network for Public Education urges you to contact your senators and be heard.

The Network for Public Education is now legally constituted as two organizations.
The Network is a c(3), which means it is a charitable organization. Any donations are tax-deductible. Carol Burris is the executive director. It published the 50-state report judging states by their support for children, teachers, and public schools.

 

C3 Donation link:
http://networkforpubliceducation.org/about-npe/donate/

 

Or:
The Network for Public Education

PO BOX 150266

Kew Gardens, NY 11415-0266

 
The other organization is the NPE Action Fund. It is political. It endorses candidates and lobbies for legislative changes. Donations are not tax-deductible. It is recognized by the IRS as a c(4). Robin Hiller is the executive director.

 
Here is the snail mail address for the c(4):

 
NPE Action

P.O. Box 44200

Tucson, AZ 85733

 
Here is the donation page link:
http://npeaction.org/2016/02/19/donate/

 

 

 

As Julian Vasquez Heilig notes in his new article in The Nation, public policy groups have recently gotten into the business of ranking states by criteria that reflect their own political or ideological biases.

 

Thus, the far-right ALEC rates states by their willingness to privatize public schools and to lower standards for teachers, because ALEC believes in privatization and the elimination of government regulations. StudentsFirst put out a state report card that ranked states by similar criteria, the ones that reflected Michelle Rhee’s policy preferences: reducing the rights and status of teachers, promoting charters and vouchers, and–no surprise–Louisiana and Florida came out as best in the nation, although these states are usually noted for their low quality of education. The Brookings Institution has recently ranked districts by their embrace of school choice, not surprising because the director of research for the George W. Bush administration–Grover Whitehurst–created the report card. The conservative Thomas B. Fordham Institute and the journal Education Next have their report cards, too, giving plaudits to states that prioritize privatization and rigorous tests.

 

Heilig, who is a member of the board of directors of NPE, contrasted these report cards–all emanating from rightwing sources–with the NPE 50-state (plus DC) report card:

 

NPE’s report card evaluates all 50 states and the District of Columbia according to six research-based criteria: support of high-stakes testing, professionalization of teaching, resistance to privatization, equity in school finance, spending taxpayer resources wisely and student chance for success.

 

The bad news is that most states are not doing very well. NPE were tough graders as no state received more than a “C”. However, the new NPE report card isn’t distracting us with a pleasing facade covering up a lack of what’s important.

 

Understanding that the closing of the achievement gap in our nation considerably slowed during the No Child Left Behind era of testing and accountability, NPE did not prioritize performance on standardized exams for students or high-stakes testing evaluating teacher performance.

Contrary to previous report cards, NPE agreed with the American Educational Research Association and rewarded states with demanding certification requirements, lower attrition, higher pay, and the support of teachers with certification and experience.

Instead of an emphasis on top-down, private control, and privatization, NPE’s report card rewarded states that protect neighborhood community schools and disallow the use of public money for private and religious schools.

 

NPE’s report also gave “high grades to states that implemented the most adequate and equitable funding” across communities. Equitable funding in the Student First report cards, in contrast, means that charter schools received funding priority—including resources for facilities that corporations or individuals would ultimately own even though the property was purchased by the public (as is the case in Arizona).

 

NPE’s report card prioritized investments in community-based solutions, including Pre-K and class size reduction—reforms that make the gold standard in the research literature in terms of student success.

 

The NPE report card also included measures of child poverty and school segregation across states—“chance for success” metrics that neither ALEC nor Students First included in recent report cards.

 

– See more at: http://www.progressive.org/pss/most-state-education-report-cards-miss-critical-ingredients#sthash.CwetviuY.dpuf

 

If you open this link, you can see every state’s report card. This shows which states value their public schools. It shows which states resist privatization, which states finance their public schools adequately and equitably, which states encourage teacher professionalism, which states promote opportunity for all students.

 

Read about your state. It is on one page. Share it with your elected officials and school leaders.

 

The most important goal of the NPE report is to get the public and policymakers to understand what matters most in improving schools.

 

Our nation has pursued failed market-based policies for 15 years. It is time to do what works, based on evidence and experience.

I am re-posting this article because I neglected to insert the correct link on the first go-round.

 

It is an excellent job of reporting by Kristina Rizga, who has been writing about education for several years and spent four years embedded in a high school in San Francisco, which became an excellent book titled “Mission High.”

 

The purpose of the NPE report card is to change the conversation about how to rate schools. The important point is to hold states and districts accountable for making sure schools have the resources they need to be successful with their students. If they underfund the schools, if they focus too much on high-stakes testing, if they divert precious resources to privatization via charters and vouchers, they are not valuing public education.

 

And that is the point: Which states value public education? Which have resisted the fads and terrible policies pushed by the federal government?

 

The NPE report stands in sharp contrast to reports by ALEC, StudentsFirst, and the recent Brookings report giving stars to states that embrace privatization. We value public education. We think it is a pillar of our democracy. We expect states to prioritize public education, not to cut the budget of public schools or lower their standards for teachers and treat them poorly.

 

 

As Carol Burris and I were on the train to Washington, DC, to release the NPE report card, we had a phone conversation with Kristina Rizga of Mother Jones. Here is the article that resulted.

 

Rizga is no ordinary journalist. She recently published an excellent book called “Mission High,” about the four years she spent embedded at a so-called “failing school” in California, where extraordinary teachers and an excellent principal were performing daily miracles for kids from many countries. She knows schools.

Dear Friends,

This year’s Network for Public Education Conference in Raleigh, North Carolina, on April 16-17 will be a unique opportunity to show a strong and united front in the battle to promote and defend our public schools.

We’ll hear from exciting keynote speakers such as NPE Founder Diane Ravitch, the Rev. William Barber, and Bob Herbert. Workshops will be run by activists doing the work as we address our theme: And Justice for All: Strengthening Public Education for Each Child.

If you have not registered, please do so now while our Early Bird special is still on. Register here.

Do you need financial help in order to attend? Apply for our limited scholarships here.

If you cannot attend make a tax deductible donation to our scholarship fund here. Just scroll down to sponsor an advocate.

Do you want to present a workshop? We would love to hear your idea. To apply to present go here.

Diane needs you. Public Education needs you. And most important of all, our students need you.

Visit our new website and join our new Facebook page. Make a tax deductible donation. Get a friend to join NPE. We have exciting plans for 2016 as we continue to fight for public education. But we cannot succeed without your help.

Thanks for all you do and I hope to see you in Raleigh!

Carol

This article by Andrew Ujifusa in Education Week is a good summary of where the opt out movement stands today. In addition, it describes the Network for Public Education’s 50-state report card, which will be released in D.C. on February 2 at the National Press Club at 1:30 pm. If you are in the area, plan to attend and learn which states support and value public education.

 

 

Ujifusa writes:

 

 

Activists driving the resistance to state exams are attempting to build on their state-level momentum over the past year, while also venturing into a new political landscape that will test whether the energy behind their initial victories will last.

 
And they say they’re forging ahead with their plans regardless of how much support they get from traditional education advocacy groups, including teachers’ unions.

 
Several leaders within the so-called testing opt-out movement, which has gained considerable traction in New York and also found a foothold in states like Colorado and Connecticut, say they will continue to push parents to refuse to allow their children to take standardized exams, particularly state tests, for as long as it’s necessary.

 
They’ll stop, they say, when states adopt accountability policies that prevent tests from being used to rank, sort, and impose what opponents consider unfair consequences on students, teachers, and schools.

 
Some groups also are looking to extend their influence beyond testing fights to push in states for higher and more equitable levels of school funding and changes to K-12 governance to increase what they say is more local and more democratic control.

The Chicago Sun-Times published an article with astonishing news. The Chicago Teachers Union gives money to groups that support public education, including the Network for Public Education.

 

NPE has used the contribution from CTU to give scholarships to parents, students, and educators to attend our annual national conferences, as well as to fund the development of a state-by-state report card that will be released on February 10, evaluating the states by their support for their public schools.

 

I pointed out to the reporter that CTU’s support for allies of public education must be seen in the context of billionaires who allot hundreds of millions of dollars every single year to privatize public education. It is not a fair fight, to be sure.

 

I wish the teachers’ unions and other civic-minded groups had many millions more to invest in pushing back against privatization, union busting, and high-stakes testing and fighting for early childhood education, equitable funding, smaller classes, and well-prepared teachers.