Archives for category: Education Industry

Reporter Colin Woodard’s brilliant exposé of the profitable ties between Jeb Bush, Maine’s Governor Paul LePage, and the online industry won the prestigious George Polk award for reporting in 2012.

If you have not read it, do so now. You will be an informed citizen.

More about this great journalist:

Colin Woodard, an award-winning author
and journalist who writes for Washington
Monthly, The Christian Science Monitor,
and The Chronicle of Higher Education.
He is currently State and National Affairs
Writer for the Portland Press Herald /
Maine Sunday Telegram, where he
received a 2012 George Polk Award for
his investigative reporting. A native of
Maine, he has reported from more than
fifty foreign countries and six continents,
and lived for more than four years in
Eastern Europe.

He is the author of the New England
bestseller The Lobster Coast: Rebels,
Rusticators, and the Struggle for a
Forgotten Frontier (Viking Press, 2004),
a cultural and environmental history of
coastal Maine; Ocean’s End: Travels
Through Endangered Seas (Basic Books,
2000), a narrative non-fiction account of
the deterioration of the world’s oceans;
and The Republic of Pirates: Being The
True And Surprising Story Of The
Caribbean Pirates And The Man Who
Brought Them Down , on which the
forthcoming NBC series “Crossbones” is
based.

His fourth book, American Nations: A
History of the Eleven Rival Regional
Cultures of North America (Viking, 2011)
was named one of the Best Books of 2011
by the editors of The New Republic and
The Globalist and won the 2012 Maine
Literary Award for Non-Fiction.

He lives in midcoast Maine.

This is a letter from a kindergarten teacher in Las Vegas, Nevada, to her state legislators. Nevada has the lowest graduation rate in the nation, lower even than the District of Columbia. As she explains in her post, the schools of Las Vegas are underfunded, and the needs of the children are huge. Please read and remember: Everything you need about school reform may be learned from a kindergarten teacher.

The session has begun and I’m worried. What worries me?

FUNDING

Money. People say money should not matter in education but it does. Money buys stuff and staff. Bottom line: Schools are an expenditure. You get what you pay for.

There is a public school funding unfairness in the state – the Nevada Plan. Frankly, Vegas money needs to stay in Vegas. Our children and public schools need the money. I don’t want to see other schools in Nevada starve, but it’s only fair that the tax dollars made with the labor in my community come back the the families and children in my community. We are last in funding in a state last in funding. And we pay everyone else’s bills?

85% of the total state revenue comes from Vegas. 75% of Nevada’s students and teachers live in Vegas. Only 50% of the general fund comes back to Vegas schools. There is something very unfair about this formula.

Isn’t a student in Vegas worth just as much as a student in Eureaka?

REFORM

I’m worried about the scary reform movement. I have had 6 principals in 12 years, 6 reading programs, 3 math programs, taught 3 different grade levels, and taught at 3 different schools. Reform implies that teachers are not willing to change or are stuck in bad habits. Frankly, I have whiplash.

Screaming reform at 17,000+ teachers in Vegas who experience constant change is …. Ridiculous. Our community only has 50% of the teachers it had 5 years ago anyhow. In a profession with high turnover – in a community as transient as Vegas – who are you demanding reform from? The few that are left? Dumb and a waste of time.

We need security, retention, and better working conditions. Some consistency and balance would be nice. I would like to see some work to KEEP good teachers because we are driving them off.

STANDARDIZED TESTS

25 years ago … During my undergraduate studies the professor who was teaching me about tests said this: Standardized tests are racially and culturally biased. Nothing has changed.

He also said: Be careful what you assess because it will drive your instruction. When we place such high pressure on standardized test scores – we are going to force everyone to teach to the test.

What if the test will not get students ready for life or academic success? A, B, C, D multiple choice questions are not measuring authentic life skills. We all know people who test well who lack skills in other areas.

Currently, I spend 75% of my instructional time testing or preparing for testing. My students are 5 years old and I only see them 2 hours a day. It’s too much. I’m not even teaching anymore.

I’m wondering why my community that is predominantly minority insists on testing our children with biased standardized assessments? Traditionally – these tests have been unfair to minority groups.

We are basing how our students are doing based SOLELY on this kind of assessment. There is no balance in this. Teachers will be evaluated ONLY on these scores and this is fair? We will turnaround our schools, develop charters, and sell more schools to Edison because of these biased scores?

States that have been using these standardized tests for years are now moving to OUTLAW their use at all. Standardized tests do not test higher level thinking skills. Real life skill is not measured by them. Innovation, invention, synthesis, analysis, and creativty are not measured by these types of tests.

There is no balance when you place so much pressure on one type of assessment.

Something is wrong when you can tell how many schools will be privatized by test scores -and you can also predict scores based on race.

Sadly race and poverty are brothers and sisters.

POVERTY

The research says: Household income is the leading indicator of how well students will do academically.

My students are poor. I have homeless students. I have a revolving door. Four students did not come back after winter break – they just disappeared. This is normal. My school has a 75% turnover. My school has a high ELL population. My school has 85% free and reduced lunch students.

Guess what? My school has NOT qualified for TITLE funds because there are so many other schools in the district that are at 95% to 100%. I guess my school is considered normal in Vegas.

Teachers are rowing the boat as fast as we can – but the boat has a hole!

CORPORATIONS

While I’m busy tutoring, furthering my education, and working — the wolf has been in the hen house!

I’m calling out the wolf!

Charter school corporations do no better than public schools. They do not take the high needs students. They are not regulated like public schools. They are resegregating our population by race and interest – sometimes religious interest. Tax payer funds are being misused. Yep – misused. Charters are more expensive and with few exceptions no more effective than public schools. This charter experiment is failing across the nation. Nevada does not need to participate in this movement until it proves to be working someplace.

Using tax payer money to fund someone fancy smancy private school idea aka charter schools – is no good.

Now there is legislation to “empower” parents to pull the trigger and turn their neighborhood school into a charter? I can think of so many different ways to empower parents. Killing public schools is a horrible mistake.

Edison claimed it would make money and fix failing schools. It hasn’t. It won’t. Yet these corporate hybrids expand and continue to receive additional money. Someone is making money – not students or teachers. From my point of view, Edison is an investment scam. Joke on the tax payer.

Giving money to a corporation to run a school – is money that is not spent on kids.

Teach for America claims it will give our schools the best and brightest to teach at-risk for two or three years. TFA come untrained and are placed in the hardest areas and expected to know after 6 weeks of intense training what to do? What could go wrong? I guess this is why so few make it through the first year and it’s a very rare person who stays in the classroom for a career. Tourist teachers?

Inexperienced and untrained teachers – are not worth the three or four times the money it will take to hire through TFA.

Elaine Wynn spent A LOT of her own money and her friend’s money to obtain some board seats for TFA friendly board members. I would question – WHY?

The New Teacher Project is a Michelle Rhee non-profit. Michelle Rhee controlled her students with duct tape when she had her own classroom. Then she became an adminstrator who fired teachers on TV. Now she makes money telling governors how to unionbust and get rid of veteran teachers. Students First lurks around waiting for opportunities in Nevada. They invested heavily in campaigns – for extreme conservatives.

I’m not sure why people listen to this foul Rhee woman or any of her banter? She is cruel and making money. Not unlike Ann Coulter.

These privatizing vultures all have one thing in common – promises they can NOT keep because it’s quick fixes and not research based. And they are earning a lot of money. I’m not a fan of privatizing or spending money on someone or a corporation which is NOT effective.

To get at those education dollars — we need our schools and kids to appear to fail right?

FAILING

Someone explain to me please why Nevada needs a High School Math Proficiency Test that is the third hardest in the nation?

We fund last in the nation – but expect our children to test at the highest levels? Then scream because a high number drop out or do not receive a diploma?

It’s a known fact that you can graduate just fine with a Nevada education – you just need to move to another state your senior year if you can NOT pass the math proficiency. We export our seniors?

We fail most of our kids and no one is questioning the RIGOR of the test? I’m questioning the actual validity of every measurement tool I’ve seen. The tests are — BAD tests.

I’ve challenged every school board member to take the math proficiency – and pass. No takers yet.

The “math” proficiency is actually a very technical reading test – word problems. Statistics, proabability, algebra, geometry – all couched in word problems.

Why would this be a problem? 60,000 language learners? Do you think the large number of kids who are not receiving a diploma are primarily second language students who fail the so-called “math” test which is actually a reading English test? It is not adminstered in Spanish.

EARLY INTERVENTION

Speaking of failing ….

My students fail on the first day of school. Yep. Kindergarten. My students are two to three years behind the nation on the first day of their public school experience. Before the public school teacher ever sees the child – they are behind the nation.

Kindergarten is not mandatory in Nevada. Vegas still has a large number of half day Kindergarten programs. We are supposed to compete with the rest of the nation that invests in early intervention and compete with parents who are placing their children in preschool at age two?

30% of Kindergarten students fail. And go to first grade. They are behind and stay behind. At-risk kids in half day programs, class sizes between 30 to 40, racing to catch-up to the nation who began 3 years ago.

We aren’t failing them in high school; Kids fail before the public schools even know their name.

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

60,000 identified ELL students. “Identified” because this depends on self identifying when parents enroll their child. For whatever reason, parents may or may not check the right box on the form.

I have a Master’s degree in Teaching English as a Second Language. Research shows it takes students 5 to 10 years to develop the academic language ability to be successful. We are not supporting students so it might even be longer.

Studies show that it would take $175 million to support our language learning students in Vegas properly. $50 million would be the bare minimum.

I’ll say it — $14 million? $10 million? I guess if your name is Sandoval you don’t want to be the only Governor with a significant number of ELL students and give them NOTHING.

Our kids have real needs that are not being met.

MISSION STATEMENT

The reason the business model fails public schools is — mission statement.

Business is about making money – the mission statement is about the bottom line.

Public schools are about helping citizens – all people, the mission statement is about a literate democracy.

Public schools are always going to be an expenditure and investment.

When we try to use only data and scores from a biased measuring tool to evaluate our students and teachers like a business – we will get a privatizing business result.

My students are more than a test score. I am more than a collection of their test scores. My craft is an art more than a science. Hard to measure but still valuable. Learning will still take place in my classroom – even if I never give another test.

POWER

Teachers have very little power. All I have is e-mail. I have worked non-stop since the last legislative session to get to know as many legislators as I could and educate my community. I’m the alarm in my own frenzied way

I’m worried.

I see too much willingness to sell our public schools instead of invest in them. We are giving money to snake oil salesmen instead of getting it to the classroom and kids. It’s wasting our precious limited funds.

I believe we are damaging our kids with excessive data collection and testing. We are failing everyone and I’m questioning this – WHY?

I’m worried about disadvantaged kids.

I’m worried about money. I don’t understand why I live in a state that is so rich in money and gold — and we can’t even fund our schools? What does this say about my state?

And I’m worried about Democrats. Yep. It was Democrats last session who did the damage. Why do Democrats follow the extreme right wing logic when it comes to public schools? Stand Up. We believe in a free public education for everyone. It’s worth protecting and fighting for.

We aren’t here to collect money for our next election by selling public schools down the river in a canoe with a hole and a frantic screaming kindergarten teacher!

Do what is right this time around.

Angie Sullivan

Justin Hamilton, who recently stepped down as Arne Duncan’s press secretary, has accepted an executive position at Rupert Murdoch’s Amplify. This division, headed by Joel Klein, sells technology to the schools.

This is funny, because last May I had a Twitter debate with Justin about the role of entrepreneurs in education. I didn’t see much good coming from injecting the profit motive into schooling, and Justin disagreed. He landed in the right place for him.

Coach Bob Sikes in Florida knows how phony that state’s A-F grading system is. (This was confirmed recently by Matt Di Carlo of the Shanker Institute, who pointed out that the state changed the system to improve the results.)

Now he finds that Oklahoma State Superintendent Janet Barresi is copying the Jeb Bush playbook.

This is hardly surprising because she is a member of the Jeb Bush group of rightwing state superintendents called “Chiefs for Change.”

Barresi wants Oklahoma to grade its schools with a simple-minded A-F grade, just like Jeb Bush did. If Jeb did it, it must be right. Remember the “Florida miracle”?

Unfortunately a group of Oklahoma researchers examined her proposal and sharply criticized it.

No problem for Barresi. She has been going around the state telling people that the researchers have recanted their views. Except they haven’t.

Before Barresi was elected superintendent, she was a speech pathologist. In 1984, she became a dentist. Later, she opened Oklahoma City’s first charter school and served on the board of another charter school. She is a big supporter of privatization.

 

 

These days, parents and educators often feel powerless in the face of the powerful forces that are steamrolling them.

In Indiana, two moms started a campaign against he Common Core standards. They started with small groups, then organized large ones, and eventually made their voices heard in the state legislature.

The battle is far from over, but hey made an important point. This is still a democracy. Two informed citizens can make a difference.

A reader sent the following information about the planned destruction of public education in Indianapolis:

Unfortunately the Neighborhoods of Educational Opportunity/Indianapolis Mayor’s Office plan (NEO) presentation which has been made public is just the tip of the iceberg. There is a well documented, more detailed plan that select groups (The Mind Trust, Stand for Children, Teach for America, The New Teacher Project) are meeting about in private and making plans while they await the possible receipt of a Bloomberg grant of $5 mil to get this plan off the ground in Indianapolis.
This plan will not be publicly unveiled in Indianapolis until it is a done deal.

Certain members of the Indianapolis Board of School Commissioners were strategically placed there by the powers that be to weaken Indianapolis Public Schools and prime it for takeover.
Also, watch legislation in Indiana. The Mayor’s office is slowly taking powers away from other branches of government. For example, they now have oversight of four former IPS schools taken over under Tony Bennett’s watch.

There is legislation pending that would allow those schools to become “independent” schools at the end of the takeover period.

We now have a parent trigger law.

There is also legislation which would remove the involvement/oversight of the city county council in approving new Charter schools.

Another bill takes a funding source from public schools (proceeds from auctioned properties due to non-payment of taxes) and gives it to Mayor-sponsored charter schools.

Other legislation forces the sale or lease of closed public schools to Charter schools and other private entities.

All of this collusion is no accident. If you happen to believe it is a bunch of coincidental things, non-related, happening all at the same time, then I feel sorry for you.

The Sacramento school board is rushing to shut down 11 elementary schools. That’s 20 percent of the elementary schools run by the Sacramento City Unified School District.

The process has been indefensible. Board members and the Superintendent have short-circuited the usual decision making process on school closure in order to jam these through. The California Department of Education recommends a 6 month process, which includes formation of a citizen advisory committee. But the district has given just five weeks between announcing the list of schools on the chopping block, and the final vote on Thursday. There is no citizen committee.

The fierce urgency of now requires immediate action, and no democratic process whatever.

The district has wildly exaggerated the under-enrollment numbers at these schools, cherry-picked numbers regarding costs and revenue, and refused to take into account the impact that displacing so many students will have on enrollment–as students leave the district for charter schools and other districts. Charter operators are already checking out some campuses, eager to take them over. The superintendent is a graduate of the Broad Academy, which suggests that the mass closure is more about about ideology than cost savings or efficiency.

This is an outrage.

Why don’t they hold hearings?

The lights are going out on public schools in city after city because some billionaire thinks it is a good idea.

Some smart and sophisticated young activists in the Hmong and Latino communities have organized to fight this plan. Listen to them here.

Are there no public-spirited citizens on the Sacramento school board? Don’t they feel a civic obligation to protect public education against privatization?

If I had to choose one post each day that was a must-read, this would be it.

Bruce Baker of Rutgers has followed the evolution of the charter movement.

He initially thought they might be a source of innovation, as their advocates promised.

But over time, he has observed a systematic pattern of cream skimming, where charters pick the best students and leave the toughest cases for public schools.

Although he recognizes that some charters have resisted the temptation to win at all costs, he now concludes that the sector has become parasitic, harming public schools by skimming the students that make the charters look good.

“Parent trigger” is a zombie policy. It has never transformed a single school. It has no evidence. It is a slogan pretending to be a policy. It is the quintessence of a corporate power grab.

In the wake of the Newtown massacre, no decent person should utter the words “parent trigger.”

But in Florida, Coach Bob Sikes alerts his readers to the return of the “parent trigger” legislation that failed to pass last year. It failed because–no matter how hard Jeb Bush and Michelle Rhee promoted it–every parent group in Florida opposed it. Somehow the PTAs understood that “parent empowerment” would benefit the corporations running charter schools, not their children.

Jeb Bush vowed to bring it back, and here it comes. Only here is an interesting turn of events. One of the sponsors is a Republican legislator who was not friendly to charters last year. Coach Bob wonders if her change of heart has anything to do with the campaign contributions doled out by the for-profit charter corporations.

By the way, he doesn’t mention it here, but Frank Biden is an executive with the for-profit Mavericks charter chain cited in his post. Frank is the brother of Joe Biden.

This just arrived in my email box:

LAUSD: Follow The Money by Joseph K

Mensaje se repite en Español)
I have to do this my way. You tell me what you know, and I’ll confirm. I’ll keep you in the right direction if I can, but that’s all. Just… follow the money.

-Deep Throat, “All the President’s Men” (1976) 

If you want to know the direction LAUSD School Board President Monica Garcia and new candidate Kate Anderson want to take the Los Angeles School District after the upcoming election, then follow the money. In this case following the money isn’t difficult because there is just so damn much of it. Start with an astounding quarter of a million dollars by Eli Broad, Superintendent Deasy’s mentor and puppet master, and another quarter million by fellow billionaire, Latino media magnate A. Jerrold Perenchio, formerly of Univision. Together they pushed “their” Coalition for School Reform’s coffers to $1.5 million. Then Mayor Villaraigosa who, along with Broad, was instrumental in bringing Deasy to LAUSD, called in the really big gun by brokering a deal with New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg, who contributed an additional million dollars for the Coalition -money education historian Diane Ravitch called “repugnant and an affront to democracy.”

What qualifies Bloomberg to buy a Board of Education three thousand miles distant? In New York with the help of the Gates Foundation, he closed more than 150 “failing schools” replacing them with smaller schools and charter schools. Sixty percent of these “new and improved” smaller elementary and middle schools now have lower passing rates than the schools they replaced. Just 38% of the students at elementary and middle schools created by the Bloomberg administration passed the reading exams, compared with 47% of students citywide. Former NYC School Chancellor Joel Klein, who raised proficiency rates by dramatically lowering expectations, pitched in another $25,000.
http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/bloomberg-new-schools-failed-thousands-city-students-article-1.1119406#ixzz2LC0W0ylq
 

Bloomberg’s schools share this attribute with Villaraigosa’s Partnership for Los Angeles Schools (PLAS), which have been a dismal failure. Roosevelt High School was divided into seven small schools in the name of “improvement” in 2007. Only one of the seven principals had previous experience as a principal. In 2009, Roosevelt teachers gave Villaraigosa and PLAS an “F” because they saw no improvement. Now in 2013, many school and community members are in open revolt. Enrollment has plummeted. The LA Weekly, citing API scores, noted that Roosevelt made Compton Unified look like the “district of the freaking month.” 

Mayor Villaraigosa called Bloomberg, “the most important voice in education reform today” – education deform is more like it. The Coalition for School Reform may as well be in Deasy’s pocketbook. Megan Chernin is a major backer and the former head of charter operator LA’s Promise as is Steven Prough, the current head, who contributed $10,000 personally. How good is L.A.’s Promise in keeping its promises? In 2010, 91% of West Adams Prep students were not proficient in English and 82% were not proficient in math. Manuel Arts, which L.A.’s Promise had also “promised” to turn into a Garden of Eden had astoundingly high non-proficiency rates of 97% and 90% respectively in 2010. Their achievement rates seem inversely proportional to the glossiness of their marketing brochures.

Jaimie Alter Lynton donated $100,000 to the Coalition. She, like Chernin, is on the board of Deasy’s fundraising nonprofit group. Lynton also launched L.A. School Report which is basically dedicated to extolling and promoting Deasy and electing both Anderson and Garcia while simultaneously denouncing the teachers’ union as the protector of pedophiles. 

Kate Anderson has called Deasy “the best superintendent this district has had in decades” and wants to make all schools as “great” as New West Charter School. New West is 62% white and Asian, 24% Latino, and 12% Black. Only 11% of its students are on free or reduced lunches. It boasts not a single English Language learner in the entire school. Special education statistics are unavailable for some mysterious reason. Let’s make all schools just like New West Charter School. 

You want to know about Garcia and Anderson? Just follow the money. 

Joseph K. is a 27-year veteran of LAUSD, a former mentor teacher twice named a Johns Hopkins University Teaching Fellow. He teaches the old-fashioned way – by ignoring standardized test scores. Instead of teaching bubbling, he tries to instill a love of knowledge and learning in his students and for this reason will probably be allowed to continue teaching for fifteen more minutes.

If you or someone you know has been targeted and are in the process of being dismissed and need legal defense, get in touch: 
 
 
En Español
 
Tengo que hacer esto a mi manera. Tú me dices lo que sabes, y yo voy a confirmar. Te voy a mantener en la dirección correcta si puedo, pero eso es todo. Sólo … seguir el dinero.
-Deep Throat, “Todos los hombres del presidente” (1976)
Si desea conocer la dirección de la Junta Escolar de LAUSD Mónica García, y el presidente nuevo candidato Kate Anderson quiere tomar el Los Angeles Distrito Escolar después de las próximas elecciones, a continuación, seguir el dinero. En este caso, después de que el dinero no es difícil porque no es tan condenadamente mucho. Comience con un sorprendente cuarto de millón de dólares por Eli Broad, mentor Superintendente Deasy y titiritero, y otro cuarto de millón por el multimillonario hombre, magnate de los medios latinos A. Jerrold Perenchio, antes de Univision. Juntos empujaron “su” Coalición para las arcas de reforma escolar a $ 1,5 millones. A continuación, el alcalde Villaraigosa, quien junto con Broad, fue instrumental en traer a Deasy LAUSD, llamado en la pistola muy grande por negociar un acuerdo con New York el alcalde Michael Bloomberg, quien contribuyó con un adicional de millón de dólares por la Coalición de dinero educación Diane Ravitch historiador llamó a esto “repugnante y una afrenta a la democracia”.
¿Qué califica Bloomberg para comprar una Board of Education tres mil millas distante? En Nueva York, con la ayuda de la Fundación Gates, cerró más de 150 “escuelas fracasadas” sustituyéndolas por las escuelas más pequeñas y las escuelas charter. El sesenta por ciento de estos “nuevos y mejorados” más pequeñas escuelas primarias y secundarias ahora tienen menores tasas de aprobación que las escuelas a las que sustituyen. Sólo el 38% de los estudiantes de las escuelas primarias e intermedias creadas por la administración Bloomberg aprobó los exámenes de lectura, en comparación con el 47% de los estudiantes de toda la ciudad. El ex NYC Escuela canciller Joel Klein, que elevó las tasas de aptitud por bajar drásticamente las expectativas, lanzó otros $ 25.000.
Escuelas de Bloomberg comparten este atributo con la Asociación de Villaraigosa de Los Angeles Schools (PLAS), que han sido un fracaso total. Roosevelt High School fue dividido en siete escuelas pequeñas en el nombre de la “mejora” en 2007. Sólo uno de los siete directores tenían experiencia previa como directora. En 2009, los maestros de Roosevelt dio Villaraigosa y PLAS una “F” porque veían ninguna mejora. Ahora, en 2013, muchos miembros de la escuela y de la comunidad están en rebelión abierta. La inscripción ha caído en picado. LA Weekly, citando resultados del API, señaló que Roosevelt hizo Compton aspecto unificado como el “distrito del mes maldito.”
Alcalde Villaraigosa llamó Bloomberg, “la voz más importante en la reforma de la educación de hoy” – deformar la educación es más parecido. La Coalición para la Reforma Escolar puede también ser en cartera Deasy. Megan Chernin es un importante patrocinador y el ex jefe de la Promesa carta operador de Los Angeles como es Steven Prough, el actual jefe, quien contribuyó con $ 10.000 personalmente. ¿Qué tan buena es la promesa de Los Ángeles en mantener sus promesas? En 2010, el 91% de los estudiantes de West Adams Prep no eran competentes en Inglés y el 82% no eran competentes en matemáticas. Manuel Artes, que Promise Los Ángeles también había “prometido” para convertirse en un Jardín del Edén tenía asombrosamente altos de competencia no las tasas de 97% y 90% respectivamente en 2010. Sus tasas de rendimiento parecen inversamente proporcional al brillo de folletos de marketing.
Jaimie Alter Lynton donó 100.000 dólares a la Coalición. Ella, al igual Chernin, está en la junta de recaudación de fondos sin fines de lucro grupo Deasy. Lynton también lanzó Reporte de LA Escuela, que es básicamente dedicado a exaltar y promover Deasy y elegir a Anderson y García y al mismo tiempo denunciar el sindicato de maestros como el protector de los pedófilos.
Kate Anderson ha llamado Deasy “el mejor superintendente de este distrito ha tenido en las últimas décadas” y quiere que todas las escuelas como “grande” como Escuela Nueva Carta de Occidente. New West es el 62% de blancos y asiáticos, latinos 24% y el 12% Negro. Sólo el 11% de sus estudiantes son de almuerzos gratis oa precio reducido. No cuenta con un solo estudiante de Inglés en toda la escuela. Estadísticas de educación especial no están disponibles, por alguna razón misteriosa. Vamos a hacer todas las escuelas al igual que la Escuela Nueva Carta de Occidente.
¿Quieres saber acerca de García y Anderson? Sólo tienes que seguir el dinero.
Joseph K. es un veterano de 27 años de LAUSD, un maestro mentor ex dos veces nombrado Johns Hopkins University Teaching Fellow. Él enseña la manera pasada de moda – haciendo caso omiso de las puntuaciones de las pruebas estandarizadas. En lugar de enseñar burbujeante, trata de inculcar un amor por el conocimiento y el aprendizaje en sus estudiantes y por esta razón probablemente se le permitirá continuar enseñando durante quince minutos más.
Si usted o alguien que usted conoce ha sido blanco de ataques y están en proceso de ser despedido y la necesidad de defensa legal, póngase en contacto: