Archives for category: Education Industry

Wendy Lecker is a civil rights attorney at the Education Law Center who is a columnist for the Hearst Connecticut Media Group.

She writes about a powerful new movement:


My 18-year “career” as a public education parent ended in June as my youngest child graduated from high school. I am witness to the profound effect my children’s teachers had on their development as students and human beings — nurturing their passions, providing life lessons, sparking their interest in subjects they had never considered, and challenging their world view.

Events this past year have shown me just how much of an effect teachers have on all of us — not just those they teach.

Those of us who have been fighting for years for strong, adequately funded, integrated public schools and against reforms that are damaging to children, communities and democracy sometimes feel like we are banging our heads against the wall.

For years we presented facts about the harm of bad education policy and the benefits of good education policy. Yet politicians ignored us and continued to push failed policies. They dismissed calls for adequate resources in impoverished schools, branding these claims as “excuses” or “maintaining the status quo.”

The media narrative has also been impervious to facts, blaming impoverished schools for “failing” children when our politicians deprive them of essential resources to serve our neediest children; and accusing public school teachers of incompetence and selfishness when students do not perform well on standardized exams that were never designed to measure school or teacher quality.

This toxic public discourse seemed unending. Until teachers across the country took to the streets last spring. Teachers in West Virginia, Oklahoma, Arizona, Colorado and Kentucky walked out of their classrooms to protest the miserable conditions in which they had to work and their students had to learn.

And the public stood with them all the way. Parents brought their children to state capitols to support their teachers, supplied food, and participated in the protests. A new Phi Delta Kappan poll reveals that 78 percent of public school parents support teacher strikes for higher pay.

Once these protests began, the media focus changed. Cameras showed deplorable conditions in impoverished classrooms, including crumbling textbooks, broken desks and chairs. Newspapers reported on the four-day school weeks in Oklahoma resulting from years of budget cuts, and the severe lack of basic educational staff and services in the states where the teachers struck. They revealed how teachers were forced to hold down second and third jobs to make ends meet.

The concerns of striking teachers extended beyond a living wage for themselves. They fought for well-funded schools, and adequate pay for all public employees. As Georgetown professor Joseph McCartin noted, “What you’re seeing is these unions acting as defenders of the public good.”

And now, voters and politicians are getting the message.

Last week, six Republican Oklahoma house members who voted against tax increases for teacher raises were ousted in primary races. Of the 19 Republicans who voted against teacher pay raises, only four will be on the ballot in November.

In Georgia, democratic gubernatorial primary winner Stacey Abrams openly declares that she doesn’t want to be Georgia’s “education governor” — she wants to be Georgia’s “public education governor.” She advocates increased investment in public schools and opposes privatization schemes that drain resources from them.

On Tuesday, Tallahassee Mayor Andrew Gillum won a surprise victory in Florida’s Democratic gubernatorial primary. Gillum credits his public school education for much of his success in life and supports increasing investments in public schools, including raising teachers’ starting salary to $50,000.

Educator David Garcia, the Democratic candidate for governor in Arizona, vowed to “end destructive privatization schemes that drain money out of classrooms, and … to invest in our teachers and classrooms once again.”

Longtime public school supporter Ben Jealous is Maryland’s Democratic gubernatorial candidate. Teachers are running for office across the nation, including a former National Teacher of the Year, Waterbury’s Jahana Hayes, who won the primary for the U.S. House of Representative in Connecticut’s fifth congressional district.

Public education, an issue usually ignored by politicians, is suddenly taking center stage in political campaigns. I attribute this conscious embrace of public education by political candidates to our teachers, who put their careers on the line to call attention to the needs of our most vulnerable students and communities.

So as this school year begins, as a parent I want to thank Stamford’s teachers for helping me raise capable, tolerant, and independent adults. As a citizen, I want to thank America’s teachers for defending a precious democratic institution, our public schools, and in the process, for giving me hope that our democracy may survive after all.

It is our job now as citizens who care about public education to support the candidates who support our public schools and our teachers.

The Gates Foundation has a new idea: it is putting $92 Million into “networks.” For the Gates Foundation, this small amount is more like a tip than an investment. The writer for “Inside Philanthropy” interviewed me, and I said that the Gates Foundation has a consistent record of failure in education policy, and it should consider investing in children’s health, an area that it actually knows something about. As you can see in this article, the writer was straining to find the good in this latest foray into education. It is still not clear what the $92 Million will do, although it’s likely to add a new layer of administrators.

Leonie Haimson, the leading education activist in New York State, is no fan of Gates’ latest foray into education.

She writes here about the latest Gates’ plan to remake public education. To read her post with all her links, go to Leonie’s Blog, https://nycpublicschoolparents.blogspot.com.


This week, Bob Hughes, appointed director of the Gates Foundation K12 division in 2016, made his first big move. He announced $92 million in grants for his new Networks of School Improvement initiative to be given to 19 organizations, collaboratives and districts. New Visions, the NYC-based organization that Hughes ran before coming to the Foundation, received the second largest grant at $14 million – to work with 75 NYC schools, as yet unidentified.

This grant was more than the amount given to the entire Baltimore system of public schools – despite New Visions’ spotty record.

Though Hughes admitted that there’s not much evidence behind the theory of network improvement, he’s determined to push forward nonetheless:

“I don’t think the research base is fully developed, and that’s one reason we’re making these investments,” said Hughes.

I suppose a lack of evidence never stopped the Gates Foundation before.

Asked by EdWeek reporter Steven Sawchuk how the results of this new initiative would be evaluated,
Hughes replied that “the foundation is still formulating its research approach.” And:

“We don’t have details for you, but we remain deeply committed to a third party evaluation of all our work and transparency about the results of those evaluations so we can enable the field to understand what we do well and what we don’t do well,” he said.

Yet it appears that The Center for Public Research and Leadership (CPRL) at Columbia Law School has already been chosen by Hughes to evaluate the program.

As the CPRL website notes, “In January 2018, CPRL received a two and one-half year grant to report on the research underlying the NSI [Networks for School Improvement] initiative and to use the research to design and conduct a formative evaluation of the initiative’s initial implementation.”

Sure enough, the Gates Foundation lists a grant for $1.9 million over 31 months to be awarded “Columbia University” for “evaluation” purposes.

The first Gates-funded CPRL study was a literature review of network impacts. The findings were described by Sawchuk this way:

A Gates-commissioned review of the research on the topic from Columbia University’s Center for Public Research and Leadership noted that there are more studies on the norms and conditions needed to support healthy networks than on how they affect K-12 outcomes; most of the 34 studies were case studies or qualitative, rather than quasi-experimental designs that sought to answer cause-and-effect questions.

CPRL is headed by Columbia Law professor James Liebman, who was appointed head of the NYC Department of Education’s Accountability Office under Joel Klein, despite the fact that he had no K12 education experience either as a teacher, administrator or researcher.

Liebman made a mess of the School Progress Reports at DOE, instituting a volatile, unstable system in which school grades wildly veered from year to year. A blog post by Professor Aaron Pallas in Edweek was memorably entitled, “Could a Monkey Do a Better Job of Predicting Which Schools Show Student Progress in English Skills than the New York City Department of Education?” Under Liebman’s direction, DOE efforts were statistically inept and I would not trust his ability to undertake a credible evaluation.

Liebman also commissioned the expensive ARIS data system, which lived up to none of its promises. It was rarely used by parents or teachers and was finally ditched in 2015 after costing the city $95 million.

In any case, I hope the Gates Foundation has not decided against commissioning an evaluation from a more experienced, credible organization like RAND. RAND recently released a highly critical analysis of the results of the Gates-funded Teacher Evaluation Initiative and before that, a skeptical evaluation of the Gates-funded Next Generation Learning Challenge schools, those that feature “personalized [online] learning.”

John F. Pane, senior scientist at RAND and the chief author of the latter study frankly pointed out to Ed Week, the evidence base for personalized learning is still “very weak.”

Hughes himself doesn’t have the greatest reputation for transparency. In 2005, he tried to suppress a Gates-funded research study that contained negative findings about the New Visions Gates-funded small schools initiative in New York City, a study that was subsequently leaked to the NY Times .

In 2007, it was revealed that New Visions threatened these small schools that they would not receive their full Gates grants unless they chose New Visions as their DOE “partnership support network” and paid the organization a fee in return.

“I thought, ‘Oh, my God, what a huge conflict of interest,'” a principal said. “We have to join their PSO and pay them for support in order to get this grant that we qualified for?”

Only time will tell, but the hints of insular cronyism in these decisions by Hughes to award grants to New Visions and to Jim Liebman’s outfit do not bode well for the future.

This is an informative overview. My question is: what’s the theory of action here? What is the strategy, what are the goals? “Networks” have a nice ring, but what is Gates trying to accomplish? How will it help students and teachers? It sounds very squishy.

Rahm Emanuel will not run again.

With Chicago enduring daunting levels of gun violence, a $36 billion public worker pension crisis and discontent in some corners of the city’s African-American population with his leadership, polls showed Emanuel faced a difficult, but not insurmountable, path to re-election.

A poll commissioned by one of Emanuel’s campaign backers and published last month showed that the mayor had backing of about 32 percent of voters in the crowded field – and a 19-point lead over his closest competitor, former police superintendent Garry McCarthy, but not enough to face avoid a runoff. The poll was conducted by New York-based Global Strategy Group.

Emanuel, a former congressman who served as chief of staff in the Obama White House and a senior aide in the Clinton White House, last faced voters in 2015, several months before the release of a controversial police shooting video of Laquan McDonald.

The Emanuel administration was forced by court order to make the video public 400 days after the fatal shooting of McDonald and several months after the mayor had won re-election. The mayor’s critics argue that Emanuel, who saw his support erode in the city’s large African-American community following the video’s release, would not have won re-election had it come out earlier.

Emanuel said he did not watch the video, which appears to show that the 17-year-old McDonald was veering away from officers when he was shot 16 times by officer Jason Van Dyke, until it was set to be publicly released.

The officer was charged with first-degree murder on the same day of the video’s release.

Emanuel made his bombshell announcement one day before jury selection was set to begin in Van Dyke’s trial.

Will Chicago finally get a mayor who cares as much about the public schools as Rahm cared about charter schools?

Will the school closings end?

Will the public get to have a role in public education and the choice of the school board?

From In the Public Interest:

1) National/Revolving Door News: A Trump official who spent his time shilling for private prisons gets a new job working for the GEO Group. “In January, Government Executive reported that Frank Lara, then the bureau’s assistant director for correctional programs, sent a memorandum with the subject line ‘increasing population levels in private contract facilities’ to agency leaders. In it, Lara tasked facility leaders with identifying inmates for transfer to private facilities, saying it would “alleviate the overcrowding at Bureau of Prisons’ institutions and maximize the effectiveness of private contracts.” A few months later, Lara announced his retirement. Earlier this month, he began working at the GEO Group as its director of operations.” Eric Young, president of the union local that represents bureau correctional officers [AFGE CPL-33], called Lara’s move, “The biggest damn conflict of interest that I’ve ever seen.”

2) National/Washington: As of Friday, 62 people were on strike at the GEO-operated Northwest Detention Center in Tacoma, activists told ThinkProgress. “On Saturday, organizers held a rally near the detention center, demanding an end to what they called retaliation by staff against the people held there. The demonstrations, which began on August 21 and will continue until September 9, have been held in prisons in Georgia, South Carolina, North Carolina, California, Ohio, Indiana, New Mexico, Florida, and Texas, according to the Incarcerated Workers Organizing Committee.” Inmates in Halifax, Nova Scotia, said, “We recognize that the staff in the jail are workers who are also facing injustice. We are asking for a more productive rehabilitative environment that supports the wellbeing of everyone in the system. These policy changes will also benefit the workers in the jail.”

Journalist Chris Hedges has weighed in on the national strike, pointing out that “prisons in America are a huge and lucrative business,” citing billion dollar corporations such as GEO Group, CoreCivic, Aramark, Global Tel Link, Corizon Health, and JPay (“a subsidiary of the telecommunications firm Securus Technologies, which is owned by the private equity firm Abry Partners.”) Private corporations “exploit prison labor in at least 40 states. In some cases these workers are paid next to nothing.”

3) National/Washington: How Big Tech Swallowed Seattle. “This has made the city seem like a model for urban revitalization, a sort of developer’s Valhalla. And yet, as cities try to crib from Seattle, the town itself is full of doubt and anger. The turbocharged growth has exacerbated traffic, despite huge investments in public transit. Housing prices have shot up faster than in any major city in the U.S. for most of the past two years. Homelessness has reached crisis levels. Formerly subdued City Council meetings routinely devolve into shouting matches. (…) All this suggests that the bragging rights of landing the deal could be quickly followed by a pit-in-the-stomach moment once residents learn what’s gone on in Amazon’s hometown. Seattle has had the ‘jubilation of great success,’ says Richard Florida, an urban studies professor at the University of Toronto. Now the city’s ‘getting punched in the face with it.’”

4) National: In a Labor Day message, AFT President Randi Weingarten points to the importance of the statehouses. “These states can serve as a check on the dangerous and reckless policies of this administration. And they’re where we’ll be able to move an agenda of investment in public education instead of austerity and privatization, to strengthen unions, to make healthcare and college more affordable, and to rebuild the middle class.” See also Unmasking the Hidden Power of Cities, a report by LAANE, In the Public Interest, and the Partnership for Working Families: “Privatization, the extraction of public wealth, increasing financialization of the economy, deregulation, and tax breaks for corporations and the wealthy translate to sweeping private control over vital public goods (i.e., education, infrastructure, clean air and water) and weaken the pillars of American democracy.”

5) National: Thom Hartmann on the dangers of privatization: “Do we really want an America where our infrastructure is merely a profit center for Mitt Romney-style investors?”

6) National: The Veterans Administration is attracting private firms pushing dubious PTSD treatments, Reveal’s Jaspar Craven and Suzanne Gordon report. “The acting assistant deputy undersecretary for health for patient care services, Dr. Marsden McGuire, warned against ‘quackery’ and medical claims ‘made falsely, with ill intent.’ He said he’s received complaints from VA psychiatrists who have been urged to adopt dubious treatments. He then recommended that the agency invest its limited resources in those treatments most likely to help.”

7) National: Teachers are leaving privately managed charter schools, both for-profit and non-profit, at an “alarming rate,” according to a new study. “Using national data from the 2011–12 Schools and Staffing Survey, they found the odds of attrition at for-profit EMOs 38 percent higher and at nonprofit CMOs 24 percent higher than at regular charter schools. They also found the odds of migration 97 percent higher for EMO teachers and 58 percent higher for CMO teachers.”

8) National: Taxpayers are subsidizing huge corporate pay gaps, a new study by the Institute for Policy Studies reports. “More than two-thirds of the top 50 federal contractors and the top 50 federal corporate subsidy recipients paid their CEO more than 100 times their median worker pay in 2017. By contrast, the U.S. president’s salary equals just five times the pay of the average federal government employee. The typical American believes CEO pay should run no more than six times average worker pay.” The Geo Group, which runs immigrant family detention centers, “took in $663 million in Justice Department and Homeland Security contracts in 2017. Geo CEO George Zoley pocketed $9.6 million that year, 271 times more than his company’s median employee pay of $35,630.”

9) National: Clare Coffey, who teaches kindergarten at a small Catholic school in the Philadelphia area, urges material support for prisoners on strike over a number of issues, including slave wages and the profit-gouging of prisoners and their families by private corporations and prison officials on telephone, visitation and electronic communication services. “We that are financially stable should provide a community kitty for those who don’t have family support on the outside. This shouldn’t just fall on one or two of us but should be a responsibility of all of us that are financially stable.” [See “Burritos or not, I’m not eating today”]

10) National: Wendy Lecker, a columnist for the Hearst Connecticut Media Group and senior attorney at the Education Law Center, writes in the New Haven Register that political support for public education and opposition to school privatization and underfunding is spreading:

“Last week, six Republican Oklahoma house members who voted against tax increases for teacher raises were ousted in primary races. Of the 19 Republicans who voted against teacher pay raises, only four will be on the ballot in November. In Georgia, democratic gubernatorial primary winner Stacey Abrams openly declares that she doesn’t want to be Georgia’s ‘education governor’—she wants to be Georgia’s ‘public education governor.’ She advocates increased investment in public schools and opposes privatization schemes that drain resources from them. On Tuesday, Tallahassee Mayor Andrew Gillum won a surprise victory in Florida’s Democratic gubernatorial primary. Gillum credits his public school education for much of his success in life and supports increasing investments in public schools, including raising teachers’ starting salary to $50,000. Educator David Garcia, the Democratic candidate for governor in Arizona, vowed to ‘end destructive privatization schemes that drain money out of classrooms, and … to invest in our teachers and classrooms once again.’ Longtime public school supporter Ben Jealous is Maryland’s Democratic gubernatorial candidate. Teachers are running for office across the nation, including a former National Teacher of the Year, Waterbury’s Jahana Hayes, who won the primary for the U.S. House of Representative in Connecticut’s fifth congressional district. Public education, an issue usually ignored by politicians, is suddenly taking center stage in political campaigns.”

11) National/International: The rolling saga of shoddy performance by large consulting firms engaged in government contracting continues. Boston-based Bain & Company has launched a “deep and extensive” internal investigation into work it did for the South African revenue service. “The company’s overhaul of the SARS operating model was blamed by senior officials testifying at the commission chaired by retired judge Robert Nugent for the destruction of the tax agency’s capacity—which contributed to the hole of about R50bn in revenue collection for 2017-18.”

12) California: The Sacramento Press Club will be hosting a debate next Tuesday, September 11, at 5 pm between the two candidates for Superintendent of Public Instruction, Tony Thurmond and Marshall Tuck. The two candidates “agree that the time has come to review California’s quarter-century-old charter school law, while disagreeing over how best to handle the impact of charter school growth on the financial health of school districts.”

13) California: The question of what was done with the $28 million proceeds from the sale of Adelanto’s correctional facility to the GEO Group has become a political football. “By fiscal year 2015, when General Fund expenses were $12.8 million versus income of only $8.2 million, the city had wiped out about $27 million in cash reserves, or nearly the entirety of the prison sale proceeds, according to Cheng.”

14) California: A troubled Salinas charter school has reopened under tighter controls after risking closure by the school board. “Trustees also installed Alberto Jaramillo, principal of Virginia Rocca Barton Elementary School within AUSD, as the eighth board member for the nonprofit Under Construction Education Network, which governs Oasis. The move was made possible by the school’s memorandum of understanding with the district, a staff report read.”

15) California: A Highland charter school has opened in a former Kmart. “Freshman Christian Dull said it appears to be working. ‘It’s definitely a different environment,’ Dull said. ‘It’s not really a school, kind of.’”

16) Colorado: Democratic gubernatorial candidate Jared Polis told a crowd in Grand Junction over the weekend that “one of the biggest potential risks to western Colorado is the privatization of public lands. Once our public lands are carved up, there’s no going back to our heritage and our way of life in western Colorado.” For more see Steven Davis’ recent book, In Defense of Public Lands: The Case Against Privatization and Transfer.

17) Florida: James Burns, an assistant professor in the Department of Teaching and Learning in Florida International University’s School of Education and Human Development, urges Floridians to stand up for public education. “Florida has long spearheaded an educational race to the bottom as a laboratory for every aspect of the radical privatization agenda in education. Charter schools operate essentially without regulation. Right to work laws have obliterated public sector unions. Teachers fear for their jobs while children stress out over oppressive testing and the threat of being held back. We as citizens have a choice about the kind of schools we want. Do we want schools that churn out compliant cogs for the machine? Or do we aspire to create and support public schools that cultivate the intellectual and affective capacity of our children who can reconstruct the world as more just and peaceful? Let’s build the schools we need.”

18) Illinois: Early last month, Gov. Rauner (R) signed HB 4508 which means any publicly owned water system in Illinois can now be targeted by profit-driven private water companies. The Citizens Utility Board (CUB) has some suggestions for What Now? “Here is what you need to know if your municipality is approached by the private companies: The power to privatize your water system lies with your local elected officials; The private water company will offer your municipality a very good price, since their customers will foot the entire bill; Ask your local elected officials to consider alternatives to privatization; Understand that publicly owned water systems will still have rate increases; Push your representatives in Congress for water infrastructure funding.”

19) Iowa: Republican Governor Kim Reynolds’ administration “has given Iowa’s for-profit Medicaid insurers a big, sloppy pay raise.” The Des Moines Register says “they have denied care to Iowans, shunned transparency, starved health care providers by refusing or delaying reimbursements and done everything they can to boost their profits while wringing more money from taxpayers.”

20) Louisiana: Nepotism cases have regularly cropped up in the Bayou State’s charter schools. But in recent years, the education department “has adopted anti-nepotism policies similar to state laws that were already on the books.”

21) Massachusetts: Maria Belen Power of Green Roots, an organization that works for environmental justice in Chelsea and surrounding communities, says Gov. Baker’s stewardship of MBTA has been a failure. “Through its push to privatize the MBTA, continued inadequate service, and lack of genuine and constructive engagement with riders, the MBTA continues to neglect communities that rely on it. (…) The Governor’s push for MBTA privatization is the wrong approach. Touted inaccurately as a sure way to save money, privatization is a profit-making opportunity for corporations who can then cut corners, provide poor service, and pass on the bill to taxpayers. Our communities need deep investment in public transportation that can provide reliable service while also ensuring fair wage union jobs for our families and friends.”

22) Michigan: A Muskegon Heights charter school is under fire for its principal having purchased $25,000 in gift cards. “The Muskegon Heights Board of Education voted 6-0 in favor of a resolution expressing its disagreement with the PSA board’s decision not to suspend Garcia. The resolution passed on Aug. 27 cited Garcia’s spending of the $25,000 on gift cards as well as the school system’s nearly $1 million deficit budget for 2017-18. Community members who spoke at the Aug. 27 meeting also called for Garcia to be suspended. The Michigan Department of Education is looking into the spending on the gift cards, and whether it violated state law, MDE Spokesman Martin Ackley said earlier.”

23) Missouri: Apparently not satisfied with their efforts to sell off Lambert International Airport (which just did very well, thank you very much, over the Labor Day weekend), the privatizers are at it again in St. Louis, this time aiming to cash in on trash collection, and getting a boost from the Post-Dispatch’s business columnist. But Paul Thompson comments “it would be far better for St. Louis to better manage the public collection, which would reduce costs and improve service,” and he’s right. For more see In the Public Interest’s report, Is Your Waste Contract Putting Your Municipality At Risk?, and check out Germà Bel and Mildred Warner’s Privatization of Solid Waste and Water Services: What Happened to Costs Savings?

24) Montana: “Dark Money,” a film about “the efforts of Montanans of all types to keep big, out-of-state, secret corporate money from controlling their politics & lives,” has just been released.

25) New Jersey: A Newark charter school network is facing charges that it improperly suspends students with disabilities “at a disproportionately high rate, violating their rights. (…) The complaint alleges that North Star Academy gave suspensions to 29 percent of students with disabilities during the 2016-17 school year. The network disputes the complaint’s allegations and says the actual figure was 22 percent.” At the Newark public schools, “just 1.3 percent of special-education students and 1.1 percent of all students were suspended in 2016-17, according to the attorney’s analysis of state data.”

26) Pennsylvania: About 150 residents packed a special meeting of the Chichester School Board to hear a proposal for a new charter school—but the applicant never showed up. “Even though Jolly was not present, residents were given the opportunity to comment. Every individual who spoke was in opposition to the charter school. ‘I am firmly opposed to a charter school going into the district,’ said Michele Lauginiger to loud applause. ‘I don’t think it’s beneficial to any of the children in our district. We, as taxpayers spend a lot of money in taxes to enhance the education the children receive here. This isn’t going to benefit anybody but outsiders who are going to reap the benefits.’”

27) Puerto Rico: At a forum on public education in Bayamon, Michael Elsen-Rooney of The Teacher Project at Columbia Journalism School tells us there was “lots of chatter and worry about the arrival of charter schools, recently made legal in PR.” Mercedes Martinez, the president of Teachers’ Federation of Puerto Rico, warned about charters in the U.S. expelling the most challenging students, citingSuccess Academy Charter Schools’ “got to go list” as an example. “Audible gasp in the crowd when she explains it.”

28) Tennessee: Randy Stamps, executive director of the Tennessee State Employees Association, takes on Terry Cowles’ zombie-like defense of the privatization of state jobs even after Gov. Bill Haslam says “Honestly, the truth is we haven’t brought up outsourcing once since that and we won’t ever again. We thought it was a great idea, the schools that wanted to use it could use it, but we made it really clear that they can make the decision not to do it. The other campuses didn’t do it as well at Martin and Chattanooga and Memphis. We get it. And we’ve moved on.” Says Stamps: “It appears as though Mr. Cowles hasn’t moved on.”

29) Texas: Texas AFT and Texas State Teachers Association are suing the Texas Education Agency and its commissioner over the handling of a law that allows school districts to let charter school operators take over struggling public school campuses. “The lawsuit says Morath ‘departed from his own agency’s rules’ in announcing a rule that ‘limits the safeguards’ the Legislature implemented to protect teachers and other employees in such takeovers. Texas AFT President Louis Malfaro says in a news release that Morath ‘made an unlawful power grab to have complete authority over approving these charter takeovers.’”

30) Texas: Public education advocate Diane Ravitch points us to an article by Glenn W. Smith, an opinion writer for the Austin American-Statesman, that “eviscerates the sinister motives behind the A-F grading of schools,” which Texas Republicans want to introduce. “This plan was promulgated by Jeb Bush and his team of privatizers,” Ravitch explains. “My home state of Texas is the home of [No Child Left Behind] accountability. Nearly 20 years after that law was passed, we are still waiting for ‘no child [to be] left behind.] Fortunately, we now have a federal law in which Congress promises that ‘Every Child’ will Succeed. More snake oil. Comply or die.”

31) Texas: Kate Ross Apartments, Waco’s oldest public housing complex, “could be torn down and rebuilt during the Waco Housing Authority‘s transition to a privatized affordable housing system.”

32) Wisconsin: Controversy remains over how much Lakeland taxpayers will have to pay for the district’s charter school operations. For charter school governance board president and Lakeland Times publisher Gregg Walker, “the proposed budget represents a win-win-win for the students, the school district and for taxpayers. Not everyone saw it that way, however. Hazelhurst resident Robert Collins raised questions both about transparency and the ultimate costs to taxpayers. Collins recounted a past school board meeting when then board member Tom Gabert said the school would likely have to tap its fund balance to pay for charter school costs because the LUHS district was at its levy limit. ‘After reading articles, I got concerned about just what is the share to the taxpayer,’ Collins said. ‘What is going to be the Lakeland area’s obligation to the taxpayer to run these two schools for three years? Before you vote whether to go ahead, the least you should expect is a budget.’ Collins said Walker told him last spring there would soon be a published budget and full transparency but that five months later he was still waiting for the budget to be printed. Collins also said Walker had promised no one’s taxes would be raised. ‘Well, I don’t know about you folks, but when he says nobody’s taxes are being raised, if you take it from the general fund, 100 percent of your contribution, where did that money come from?’ he asked the board. ‘The taxpayer. It didn’t just float down and you have a general fund. It’s already monies that have been taxed to the taxpayer.’ Those dollars would have to be diverted from other projects, Collins said.”

33) International: The Ontario government, now under Premier Doug Ford, is moving ahead with plans to privatize Toronto’s subway system. He has appointed an advisory panel. “The president of Amalgamated Transit Union Local 113, which represents TTC workers, called on Toronto residents to stand together to protect the public transit system. ‘To improve the TTC, the government should fund it properly—not break it apart,’ Frank Grimaldi said. ‘A divided system raises issues of accountability and integration while taking the first step in a slippery slope towards privatization, delays and fare hikes.’”

34) International: Eli Friedman, Associate Professor of International and Comparative Labor at Cornell ILR, reports that anti-school privatization protests in Hunan, China have been met with repression. One Twitter report said tuition is up 10 times. [Video]

35) International: Private equity groups continue to trade education companies like they’re properties on a Monopoly board. “The investment firm for Switzerland’s wealthy Jacobs family has agreed to acquire global private schools group Cognita from Bregal Investments and KKR, the partners said on Monday, without giving financial terms. (…) Cognita operates more than 70 schools in eight countries, including Britain, Singapore, Chile and Brazil, educating more than 40,000 children, a joint statement said. Cognita was formed in 2004 by private equity firm Bregal and the late Chris Woodhead, the former chief inspector of schools in England. KKR took a 50 percent stake in 2013.”

36) Revolving Door News: Harley G. Lappin, who went from being director of the Federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP) to being a member of the board of directors of CoreCivic, just cashed out some shares in the company for $397,567.53. But don’t worry, Harley still “owns 47,846 shares of the company’s stock, valued at approximately $1,219,594.54.”

37) Revolving Door News: Rikardo Hull, who spent a decade at the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission playing “a key role in helping to develop Pennsylvania’s markedly successful water regulatory climate,” is joining the National Association of Water Companies (NAWC) as its new Executive Vice President of Strategy & Regulatory Affairs.

38) Think Tanks: Nnimmo Bassey, director of the ecological think tank Health of Mother Earth Foundation (HOMEF) at the Sustainability Academy, says the oceans and coastal waterways are being privatized by commercial interests. “The creeks, rivers and swamps of the Niger delta, for example, have all be privatized by the oil companies through pollution. Our continental shelf and deep waters have been partitioned and are effectively owned by the oil companies because of the security zone (often up to 5 km radius) around their installations that are cordoned and closed to fishers, including areas with endemic fish species. So, our waters are also privatized through security cordons for unhindered extractive activities. This is a clearly objectionable privatizing of the commons.”

Legislative Issues

1) National: President Trump’s plans for privatizing the U.S. Postal Service, which he is keeping under wraps until after the midterms, are drawing opposition in Congress. H.Res.993, opposing privatization, now has 147 co-sponsors from both parties. Will he enable for-profit companies to handle first class mail?

2) Louisiana: The state, whose largest city’s school system (93% charters for New Orleans) has just been brought out of emergency administration and transferred to public control, is witnessing a tug of war between charter school interests and advocates for tighter legislative and public control. Caroline Roemer, executive director of Louisiana Association of Public Charter Schools, says there is “an alarming trend” for lawmakers to add charters to almost every education bill. “Long gone are the days that we could assume charter schools would be excluded from bills that address traditional school district issues like teacher leave, curriculum and school operations,” Roemer said. “We believe those little instances and inclusions in bills would start creating death by a thousand paper cuts.”

In the Public Interest
1939 Harrison Street, Suite 150
Oakland, CA 94612
United States

unsubscribe

Peter Greene examines in this post why education journalism is biased towards the reformy narrative.

Why do education writers call pundits in think tanks instead of teachers?

Then he analyzes a guide to sources, and the reason for bias becomes clear.

Why talk to a teacher when Reformer pundits are standing by?

Stephen Dyer writes on his blog about the utter haplessness of the charter industry in Ohio.

In 2015, Ohio won $71 Million from Arne Duncan’s Department of Education despite widespread reports of academic failure and corruption. In the past three years, only $1 Million has been allocated.

A study commissioned by the U.S. Department of Education reported that the state had no plans to improve the effectiveness of charter schools, no plans to be sure that were serving the neeediest kids.

Maybe from this mess might come some insight into the uselessness of running two parallel publicly funded school systems, one with oversight, the other without.

Taxpayers in Ohio are very patient. They don’t care what happens to their money.

Greg Windle, a journalist at The Notebook, has drawn together the many strands of the tangled web of Reformer groups in Philadelphia, as seen through the lens of a contract awarded to The New Teacher Project for principal training. TNTP, Michelle Rhee’s creation, was designed to hire new teachers. When did it develop an expertise in training principals? Were there no veteran educators, no one in the Philadelphia School System, capable of training new principals? Or were they recruiting principals who had been a teacher for a year or two?

As Windle gets deeper into the story of a contract dispute about hiring TNTP to train principals, a familiar cast of money-hungry Reform groups washes up on the beach.

“Marjorie Neff, a former School Reform Commission chair who voted against the TNTP contract to recruit and screen teachers, said that in her experience such national education vendors use an approach that is “formulaic” and doesn’t tailor well to the needs of an individual teacher or the “context” of teaching in Philadelphia, where a teacher’s needs are different than in the suburbs. Neff is a former principal at Samuel Powel Elementary and J.R. Masterman who earned a master’s degree in education from Temple University.

“They’re selling a product. From that perspective, their formula is their vested interest,” Neff said. “Their bottom line is profitability, and we need to take that into account. Is it the most effective way to do this, or is it the most profitable? I don’t think those necessarily have to be in conflict, but sometimes they are.”

“In 2017, TNTP reported that its expenses were $20 million higher than revenue. In 2016, its revenue was nearly $21 million higher than expenses, but this was entirely due to the $41 million it brought in from “all other contributions, gifts, grants” (excluding government grants). That pot includes grants from outside philanthropies, such as foundations, but also investments from venture capital firms. In 2015, the nonprofit lost $6.1 million, despite millions in outside funding.

“Shifting funding, but consistent ideology

“Bain Capital’s consulting firm has two members on the board of TNTP. Since 2009, Bain’s consulting arm has partnered with Teach for America to develop “high-impact leaders in education” by placing TFA alumni in “leadership” positions in public education. Together, TFA and Bain designed “a series of programs to inspire, prepare, match and support Teach for America alums on the path to leadership.” Bain aimed to bring leadership development practices from the private sector into public education.

“In 2012, the two organizations got together to “expand the scope of work” of their partnership — the same year that Teach for America founded School Systems Leaders to train TFA alumni to “serve at the highest levels of leadership in public school systems.”

“Matt Glickman, an employee of the Bain consulting firm and board member of TNTP, has also served on the board of the NewSchools Venture Fund. That fund has invested in free-market education reforms since 1998. The Sackler family – whose fortune is based on profits from Purdue Pharma, developer of OxyContin – decided to invest heavily in the fund.”

When will education be returned to educators?

Anyone advocating for edupreneurs should be fired. As Neff said quite well, these national vendors are in it for the money.

Laura Chapman, retired arts educator and diligent researcher, has created a partial portrait of the privatization movement.

My guess is that the privatization movement consists of a small but significant number of billionaires and several hundred of their lackeys, shills, and front groups. As you will see, it is almost impossible to tell the Republicans from the Democrats.

Laura writes:

I have been building some spreadsheets on who is funding what. There are so many interconnected initiatives that Jeb Bush and friends are part of.

For example. Bush’s projects are connected with another big reform outfit: Partners for Innovation in Education (PIE) an outfit with at least 180 affiliates (in my spreadsheet) all connected to many others and all seeking national, state, and large metro area policies that favor charter school expansion (marketed as innovative), along with Teach for America (mostly on the job training), and active interference with teacher union contracts.

The PIE website still includes a guide for “Rabble Rousers” who were given quidance on how to work on legislated policy changes to favor charters, TFA and privatizers and how to enlist active support from civic and business organizations. It is a guide for lobbying and controlling narratives about education in the press.

The 47-page PIE Rabble Rousers handbook (2010 funded by the Joyce Foundation) includes this statement about the process of changing state policy:

“Most of the groups we spoke with (about shaping state polcies) declined to involve educators on their governing boards; if they did so, those groups do not make up a majority of the governing board. The rationale was clear enough: if the goal is to be a voice for the public’s interest, educator involvement confuses that message. As one group leader explained: “Educators already have the overwhelming voice in our state capital through their various associations. If we brought the interest lobby to our meetings, our discussion would get rutted in the same issues that already complicate the public debate. Our goal is to have a conversation that looks at the issues differently, considering only the students without the adult agendas.” An even blunter explanation was: “We tell our teacher associations that when they invite our leaders to vote on their boards, we will include union representation on ours (p. 32).” http://pie-network.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/rabble-rousers.pdf

Since that 2010 publication, PIE has shifted its strategy to include carefully selected educators. Most are working in charter schools or they have been willing to be indoctrinated into PIE’s agenda. Indocrination is the correct word.

In Oakland, CA, for example, the bait for PIE’s program has been a two-year “fellowship” with $1000 for the first year, and $2000 for the second year for attendance at two-hour meetings twice monthly plus readings and research. (I could not determine if the “year” was a calendar year nine month school year). In a series of tasks, the Oakland Fellows were given preferred data about their union to think about, along with model language for changes.

There are similar programs in multiple metro areas and states, with teachers working as if hired hands of PIE, token payments or emblems of prestige by virtue of becoming “fellows” or “ambassadors.”

Here is a list of organizations and financial supporters of “teacher voice” in the PIE Network–all recruiting teachers to advocate for policies favoring TFA, charters, and dismantlying unions and more under the banner of “innovation.”

Advance Illinois “Every Student World Ready”; Chalk Board Project; Ed Allies (Minnesota); Educators for High Standards; Go Public Schools (Oakland CA); Hope Street Group (multiple states); National Network of Teachers of the Year (NNSTOY, nominated by governors of states and celebrated by the Council of Chief State School Officers); Rodel Foundation of Delaware; State Collaborative on Reforming Education (SCORE, Tennessee); Stand for Children Louisiana; Teach Strong (National, with one year “ambassadors” who lobby politicians), Educators for Excellence (in Boston, Chicago, Connecticut, Los Angeles , Minnesota, New York); Teach Plus (in California, Colorado, Illinois, Indiana, Massachusetts); and Texas Aspires.

PIE Board members are powerbrokers. Many are veterans of reformy projects to undermine public education through draconian standard-setting, exemptions for and expansions of charter schools, and killing collective bargaining by teachers.
1. Derrell Bradford, Executive VP of 50CAN, recruits state executive directors, fellows, and YouCAN advocates; known for leadership of legislated tenure reform in New Jersey.
2. Rachael Canter, Executive Dir. and co-founder of Mississippi First. Two years Teach for America; successfully lobbied for Mississippi Charter Schools Act of 2013.
3. Jonah Edelman, co-founder and CEO of Stand for Children Leadership Center and Stand For Children with affiliates in 11 states (Edelman is son of civil rights activist and lawyer Marian Wright Edelman). A political scholar (Ph.D Oxford, Yale) with deep family connections to the Democratic Party. SFC works for privatization with major funding from the Gates and Walton foundations among others. Major promoter of Read-by-Grade-Three policy.
4. Chris Korsmo, CEO of the League of Education Voters, backed by The Broad Foundation and supporters of projects to undermine teacher unions.
5. Scott Laband, President of Colorado Succeeds, coalition of business executives for corporate friendly education, including school policies that subsidize workforce preparation.
6. Patricia Levesque, CEO Foundation for Excellence. Was Jeb Bush’s Chief of Staff for education promoting corporate friendly education, six years as Staff Director for education policy in the Florida.
7. Lillian M. Lowery, Ed.D. V.P. of Ed Trust’s PreK-12 Policy, Research, and Practice, former state superintendent of schools in Maryland and state secretary of education in Delaware.
8. Nina Rees, President and CEO of National Alliance for Public Charter Schools, first Deputy Under Secretary for Innovation and Improvement, U.S. Department of Education.
9. Aimee Rogstad Guidera, former president and CEO of the Gates-funded Data Quality Campaign for enganced surveillance of K-12 school and “teacher of record” performance, with a variant tracking workforce outcomes of pre-K to post-seconfary workforce outcomes.
10. Evan Stone, Co-CEO and Co-Founder in 2010 of Educators for Excellence. Yale University thesis on No Child Left Behind in urban school systems, Master degree in teaching, Pace University.
11. Suzanne Kubach, Executive Dir. PIE Network. Appointed to California State Board of Education, former Chair of Los Angeles Charter School Board. Ph.D. in Education Policy, University of Southern California.
12. Tim Taylor, co-founder and Executive Dir. America Succeeds, founder of Colorado Succeeds, seeking corporate friendly policies.
13. Jamie Woodson, Tennessee State Collaborative on Reforming Education (SCORE), Former legislative leader for expansion of Tennessee’s public charter schools. J.D., the University of Tennessee, Knoxville.

And that is just for starters. What “innovative policies” are being marketed in your state, by whom, and why?

Bob Braun, the veteran investigative reporter who has covered New Jersey politics for many years, describes an astonishing ripoff of taxpayers.

Can you believe this? The College Board gave the SAT IN Asia in 2017, released the questions and answers, then recycled the same test in the USA in 2018.

Mercedes Schneider has the story here.