Archives for category: Common Core

So Los Angeles spent $1 billion on iPads, promising grand outcomes, closing the digital divide between rich and poor, the “civil rights issue of our time,” yada, yada, yada.

But as this blogger points out, this move was made without the most elementary planning or forethought.

Should anyone have been consulted before spending 25-year school construction bond money on iPads? Will voters ever again approve such a bond knowing that it may be diverted to an administrator’s pet project?

She asks questions that apparently never occurred to the administrators who bought the iPads:

“If the ipads stay in the classroom, how is their distribution to be managed in any way efficiently?

If in the classroom, is the physical integrity of the building sufficient to ensure everyone’s and everything’s safety?

If staying in the classroom, does that forfeit the device’s biggest potential, as substitutes for heavy, expensive, resource-intensive textbooks?

If not to stay in the classroom, how will internet access be managed among “not-wired”, very poor or chaotic homes?

How are electronics to be harnessed for education alone and not hijacked by its social, interactive component?

If not in the classroom, how to reconcile bond construction monies targeted to long-term infrastructure support, with transient instruction delivery tied to non-durable goods?

If not in the classroom, how to manage the high turnover (purportedly up to one-third) among students of some high-poverty communities? What is the implication for device-specific instruction? For physical disappearance of the devices?

When was the imperative of Common Core testing agreed upon, as it underlies the drive behind implementing the
ipad program precipitously?

When were teachers presented an honest cost:benefit analysis toward soliciting professional input regarding utility and efficacy in educating their students???

And:

“When were parents presented an honest cost:benefit analysis toward soliciting parental input regarding utility and efficacy in educating their child???

“The bottom line is: the people such massive programs with gargantuan implications affect, need to be asked first. A program of such eclipsing size and existential implications needs at the least to be tested, to be piloted and then: to be evaluated before approving or denying subsequent phases.”

“It is an incredibly uncomfortable position to feel patronized and exploited by in-house imperialists. How do these detached, possibly ulteriorly-motivated administrators know what is best in the classroom, without going into the classroom? Ask the denizens there what they need, and for some sense of the fallout.”

From California to New York, the same questions arise: why don’t the people making decisions about children and education listen to parents and educators?

In a democracy, consultation is necessary and wise. Great leaders know how to listen and are wiling to learn from their errors.

Melissa Heckler, a certified teacher and librarian, wrote the following letter to the New York State Board of Regents. She feels sorry for Dr. King. She wonders why the Regents selected as state commissioner someone with so little experience as a teacher or administrator. She doesn’t blame him for his present predicament. She blames the Regents, who selected someone so young and so inexperienced, so lacking in the wisdom that comes with maturity. After Dr. King made a hash of his first parent forum in Poughkeepsie, first lecturing parents for over an hour, then interrupting parents who tried to express their views, the meeting descended into chaos, and King canceled the other four events he had announced. The Regents determined that they had to back their Commissioner, no matter how inept and arrogant he is, so they have now announced that there will be 16 such parent meetings across the state, but Dr. King will be accompanied by one or more Regents at each meeting. Maybe they will bring a stopwatch to cut him off when he goes into lecture mode. Oddly enough, the Regents did not include New York City, where 1/3 of the state’s students are enrolled, in their list of parent meetings.

To: The Board of Regents

From: A N.Y. State certified School Librarian and N.Y. State certified K-6 state certified Teacher
Re: The Commissioner of Education
October 20, 2013
To my way of thinking you have done a terrible disservice to Dr. John King by putting him in a leadership position for which he is not yet qualified. I did not expect to feel compassion for this young man with whom so many, including me, disagree, knowing that his policies harm children and education. With his lack of experience, he is not even qualified to be a principal or superintendent in any New York public school. Yet, you appointed him to lead those of us who arehighly qualified for the positions we hold. John King might have had, and might yet have, a brilliant career in education, but he is not yet a veteran, highly qualified educator. How you could do this to such a capable young person is beyond imagining. He may speak eloquently, even brilliantly, in a lecture, but he clearly has not developed the communication skills to respond to teachers, administrators, or parents when they express deep concerns about his policies. What he lacks, in a word, is wisdom.
I struggle to understand how you appointed, and continue to support, as the Commissioner of Education a man who has so little teaching experience and none in the public schools. He, as far as I know, never achieved tenure in the public school sector as a teacher or administrator. How could Dr. King be remotely qualified to guide and lead educators without the required experience? He may be extremely bright, and put on a fast track to become an administrator, but that does not mean he has achieved the experience and wisdom to guide teachers and communicate effectively with those who challenge his policies. As a senior teacher, I am appalled by his recent behavior in Poughkeepsie. It is embarrassing to our profession to have someone at the helm of education react so defensively and dismissively to parents who were clearly anguished by what they witnessed happening to their formerly school loving children. I hold each of you responsible for appointing a man whose policies have harmed children, their families, and teachers. Why compassion for him? He clearly didn’t know how to handle this challenging situation because he was not adequately prepared and was put by each one in an untenable position.
The appointment of such a singularly unqualified individual as New York’s educational leader begs the question: How much do you understand of the long, hard path to becoming a highly qualified teacher or a wise administrator? In my forty years plus in education, as a teacher, librarian, and parent, I have witnessed all kinds of teachers. The singular qualities that define all great teachers: They are life long learners and passionate in discovering the unique methods for reaching and teaching every child. The best senior teachers often look back and reflect on what they did not know as young teachers. Although beginning teachers may be outstanding, it takes years to become a seasoned, veteran teacher— able to single out the exact learning/teaching approaches that will best inspire a love of learning and activate each student’s potential. No single curriculum fits every student’s needs; it takes constant professional development and education (not training) to hone these skills. As any beginning professional— doctors, lawyers, accountants and a host of others— needs years to develop wide ranging professional intelligence, so, too, does the teaching profession require years to develop an ability to reach and support all kinds of minds and communicate compassionately and knowledgeably with the families we serve.
Would you give your children medicine for which there is no research? That is what you are doing with the forced implementation of the Common Core State Standards. They were not developed with the expertise of educators or child development professionals. Are there good, even excellent, points in these standards? Yes. The way to develop a sound foundation for what is good in them, is to include teachers, administrators, and child development experts (pediatricians, psychologists, psychiatrists) in their development. What has been pointed out repeatedly, and pointedly ignored, is that the U.S. does not have an achievement gap, it has POVERTY gap. With one broad brush you have painted all schools as failing schools and implemented programs for which there is NO research. You have actually lowered education standard and achievement in many schools once filled with excellent creative teaching; worse, you are destroying schools in impoverished areas that could actually use some of the billions spent on the CCSS, to implement researched programs and hire qualified teachers.
I remain hopeful you will listen to the public outcry from teachers, administrators, parents, and students and rescind your policies and begin the long hard road to addressing the real problems facing education: poverty, class size, the financial crisis in New York education caused by the 2% tax cap and unfunded, unresearched mandates. If you believe in every student’s right to a high quality educational experience that will address unique learning needs, then your actions must prove it. It you want to preserve the career of this young man, Dr. John King, then remove him and let him get the experience and wisdom that you require of all New York State educators. You have done him a disservice, harmed children, and undermined the teaching profession by placing him in this position.
Sincerely,
Melissa A. Heckler, MS ECE, MLS
Cross River, New York

I received a copy of this statement by Regent Cashin, which was released to the media this morning. Unlike most members of New York’s Board of Regents, Dr. Cashin is an experienced educator, who was a teacher, principal, and supervisor over a long career:

Dr. Cashin wrote:

“Statement by Regent Cashin
Monday, October 21, 2013

“I did not want this moment to pass us by without referring to what has been going on throughout the state. The Common Core has not had a successful implementation. The teachers have been telling us for years that parts of the Common Core are not developmentally appropriate. We did not listen to them. The Common Core is not a papal encyclical nor is it infallible. The best curriculum and the best standards are always pliable, more like a living document, rather than something that is static and fixed. We need to listen to our teachers and develop a committee of practitioners who can make appropriate changes in these standards.

“The second issue of grave concern to me is setting the cut scores for the upcoming Regents exams. We do not want to repeat what we did on the 3-8 exams that demoralized our students, teachers and parents by setting the cut scores too high. I suggest we take an average of the last three years of the Regents exams and set the cut score near that average. We have not listened to parents, teachers and our children. We need to start listening to them and acting on their input. Only then will we win them back.”

New York principal Carol Burris here explains that Commissioner John King is obsessed by test scores and that he has no clue about the meaning or purpose of education. Districts across the state are expected to purchase a book that will indoctrinate them into King’s particular obsession. He truly can’t understand why parents and educators do not share his love of test scores. Of course, he draws the line where his own children are concerned. They attend a Montessori school that is not driven by data.

Data are for Other People’s Children.

Commissioner King and the New York Board of Regents have scheduled 16 events around the state to tell parents how terrific the Common Core is, how good they should feel about their child’s failing grade on the Common Core tests, and how overall magnificent the State Education Department is. There are 12 hearings and four televised presentations. No hearings are scheduled for Néw York City, although parents there (including potential troublemakers) can always watch on TV.

Here is a statement by the Grassroots Education Movement and Change the Stakes:

STATEMENT: NYC Parents Deserve to be Heard

October 22, 2013 · by Grassroots Education Movement

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Contact: changethestakes@gmail.com

New York City Public School Parents Deserve to be Heard by Education Commissioner John King

New York City – It is unacceptable that State Education Commissioner John B. King, Jr. and the State Board of Regents are planning to hold a series of 12 forums across the state to meet with parents and educators to discuss the Common Core Standards and other education reforms, yet not a single forum will be held in New York City. NYC’s one million public school students account for a third of the state’s total public school enrollment. Change the Stakes calls on state legislators who represent NYC students, their parents and their teachers to demand that the Board of Regents schedule a public forum in each of the five boroughs. These forums must offer meaningful public discussion in which education officials acknowledge and respond to questions and concerns rather than dismissing them or explaining them away.

The Regents scheduled the forums, along with four additional events to be broadcast on public television, after Commissioner King abruptly cancelled four state-sponsored PTA town hall meetings after parents responded angrily at being given little time to speak at an event in Poughkeepsie. King later alleged that the meeting was “co-opted by special interests whose stated goal is to ‘dominate’ the questions and manipulate the forum.” The newly scheduled forums will undoubtedly be much more tightly controlled than the original large, town hall meetings.

King’s outrageous statement about “special interests” and the shutting down of public debate are indicative of a much larger problem: New York State education officials, from the governor on down, have completely disregarded the genuine, sincere and deeply-felt concerns of parents about what is in the best interests of our children. It is demeaning, demoralizing and downright undemocratic to attempt to silence parents, teachers, principals and others who, day in and day out, witness the harmful effects on children of poorly formulated and rashly implemented state education policies.

Commissioner King: The public school parents and educators of NYC deserve to be heard.

According to an October 18th press release from the State Education Department:

The first forum will be held in the Albany City School District on October 24. Other locations for the forums are Rochester, Westchester, Suffolk County (2), Nassau County (2), Schroon Lake, Binghamton, Amherst, Syracuse, and Jamestown.
The four PBS televised forums will be in Syracuse -WCNY (November 7), Plattsburgh-WCFE (November 20), Binghamton- WSKG (date tba) and Rochester- WXXI (December 3). King said more PBS forums will be scheduled.
###

Change the Stakes (changethestakes.org) is a group of parents and educators working to reduce the harm caused by high stakes-testing, which we believe must be replaced by valid forms of student, teacher, and school assessment.

__,_._,___

This mother has adapted a question that she says appears in her child’s homework assignment. Is she exaggerating? If you have a child in this grade, please chime in.

“Second grade question: If Jack and Jill go up the hill, and a bucket of olives is $5.00 then how much tapenade can John concoct with boughten oil. (Actually not far off from actual 2nd grade math homework – infer that Jack=John, understand the archaic past tense form of buy, be inspired to look up the word ‘tapenade’, find a tapenade recipe, estimate the amount of olives in a bucket, then solve – assuming that Jack/John had five dollars.) It integrates skills (sure it does) – as if you were a 24 year graduate student intern at the food network.

“Frustrating in the extreme doesn’t begin to describe this nonsense. Parents have been posting their kids homework all over Facebook. The questions/problems are absurd. The only aim is to make all the teachers take expensive training, sell expensive computer systems, and make everyone feel inadequate.

“This emperor has no clothes, none of this is proven to produce results. It is an expensive and damaging program.”

Wendy Lecker, who is a civil rights lawyer, writes here that the Common Core standards have been rolled out without any forethought.

Children are being tested on materials they have never been taught.

States do not have a curriculum that aligns with the Common Core standards.

The federally-funded tests are being developed independent of the curriculum, which does not exist.

Teachers are not prepared.

Students are not prepared.

Yet the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, Jeb Bush, Bobby Jindal, Arne Duncan, and other corporate thought-leaders say: Full speed ahead! We cannot delay! Now! Now! Now!

Lecker concludes:

The Common Core requires massive investments in textbooks, tests, training, and technology. Money is spent on the Common Core experiment at the expense of strategies with a long track record of success, such as high-quality preschool, small class size, wraparound services and extra help for at-risk children.

The benefits of the Common Core are speculative at best. A New York comparison of the 2013 Common Core tests, the previous standards and college completion rates, revealed that the previous standards were better predictors of college readiness. Moreover, the evidence is clear that neither tests nor standards raise achievement. Countries with national standards fare no better than those without, and states with higher standards do no better than states with lower ones. In states with consistent standards, achievement varies widely. The difference in achievement lies in those resources that states are now foregoing to pay for the Common Core.

As for justice, schools serving our most vulnerable students suffer most from a narrow test-based curriculum. A new report in New York reveals that poor children and children of color are least likely to be in schools with libraries, art and music rooms, science, and AP classes. Expanded Common Core testing will disproportionately harm our neediest children.

It is time to ask policy-makers why they made our children guinea pigs in the rush to impose the not-ready-for-prime-time Common Core.

 

Faced with a widespread parent rebellion against the Common Core testing, the New York Board of Regents declared they have no intention of making any changes. It’s full steam ahead!

Stay tuned. Rough waters, unseen obstacles, captain not at the helm.

The blog known as Perdido Street notes that Merryl Tisch, the chancellor of New York’s Board of Regents, took control after her hand-picked State Commissioner John King stumbled. Tisch announced 16 parent forums to explain and build support for the Common Core. There will be no back-tracking! The Regents will not be moved, no matter how much parents or teachers object to their plans to rush the implementation and testing of the Common Core.

Perdido Street notes that Tim Daly, now running Michelle Rhee’s New Teacher Project (now called TNTP, as in “The New Teacher Project”), likens all opposition to the Common Core as Tea Party-inspired. This, of course, is a smear intended to silence those who think that the state and the nation should move with all deliberate speed, not simply plunge ahead without forethought.

What is it about the Common Core that makes for so much heat and so little light?

We have noted in the past that David Coleman, the architect of the Common Core, served as treasurer of Michelle Rhee’s StudentsFirst during its first year of operation. Another member of her three-person board was Jason Zimba, who wrote the Common Core math standards. (Zimba is a professor at Bennington College, where Coleman’s mother is president.) The third person on Rhee’s board was an employee of David Coleman’s Student Achievement Partners.

What is the synergy between Common Core and Michelle Rhee’s campaign to destroy teacher tenure and collective bargaining and to promote charters and vouchers? Is Common Core developmentally inappropriate on purpose? Is it intended to make American students look bad?

I hope we will learn more about the relationship between Coleman and Rhee. I hope to learn what part of her agenda he supported and did not support during the time she started to collect millions to advance her attack on teachers and public education.

Alright, boys and girls, time for a standardized test.

Sharpen your #2 pencils.

There is a time limit. There will be no accommodations for those with disabilities.

If you do well, your teacher gets a bonus.

If you fail, your teacher will be fired and your school will be closed.

Here is the test.

Good luck!