Archives for category: Budget Cuts

Do you want to know what it really means to put students first?

It doesn’t mean making millions of dollars to promote privatization. It doesn’t mean speaking to corporate titans. It doesn’t mean fighting to strip teachers of all rights and privileges.

This is what it means. It means joining the Moral Monday protests in North Carolina. It means fighting for your students when legislators cut the budget and programs and seek to privatize the schools.

To the teacher who wrote this post, it means: I am ready to be arrested and go to jail for my students. That’s putting students first.

She writes:

Today, June 17, 2013, North Carolinians gathered for the seventh “Moral Monday” protest at the North Carolina Legislative Building. Since late May, thousands have protested the General Assembly’s ultra-conservative agenda and over 450 people have been arrested as part of a growing wave of non-violent civil disobedience. Holly Marie Jordan is a public school teacher from Durham who was arrested as part of today’s protest. Her testimony is below:

As a public school teacher in North Carolina—not an “outsider” that Governer McCrory alleges is at the helm of the Moral Monday protests, but an educator grounded in and devoted to the community of Durham—I am ardent to stand up for the future of my students by getting arrested at Moral Monday.

When I came out of college straight into teaching seven years ago, I believed that teaching English was going to be about, well, teaching English. I thought that my task was to impart in my students a love of, or at least a less fervent dislike for, Shakespeare and To Kill a Mockingbird. Within a few short weeks I learned how mistaken I was. Sure, there was still room for Boo and the Bard, but teaching was really about providing stability, respect, and compassion to teenagers desperate to learn in a system that was failing them. It was about talking to K about why he shouldn’t drop out. It was about visiting J in the hospital after her miscarriage. It was about tutoring 15-year-old T so he could move past a fifth grade reading level. Because that was what my students needed, that’s what teaching became for me. It is what teaching means for thousands of teachers, counselors, teaching assistants, and other public school workers across the state, as we prepare our students for successful futures, not just academically, but in every way. We work long past our salaried hours to create instruction that challenges our students to grow as critical thinkers. We advise clubs where our students can express themselves. We coach sports to promote health and self-discipline. We counsel the crying, laugh with the happy, protect the bullied, and motivate the discouraged. We are honest with our students about their struggles and successes, and about our own. We do all this not for professional gain but because we firmly believe that these children are worth everything we can give them. We do it because what we teachers want is no different than what our students need.

What the General Assembly wants, however, is in stark contrast to what the children of North Carolina need. In their pursuit to destroy public education via budgets that cut funding, school vouchers that favor private companies, and the elimination of master’s degree pay, the legislature shows how little they care about the quality and longevity of those educating our kids. I am a seventh year teacher whose pay is frozen at the second year rung of the pay scale, in the state with the 4th worst teacher pay in the country. I have seen dozens of excellent teachers move on to other professions or other states so they could sustain themselves and their families. At my school, students regularly ask new teachers “will you be here next year?” because they are so used to our terrible turnover rates.

It’s not just education legislation that is bent on destroying our most vulnerable communities through persistent instability. The General Assembly is curbing voting rights, letting unemployment benefits expire, and repealing the Racial Justice Act, all while giving tax breaks to corporate giants. My students aren’t naïve. They know that their communities are being marginalized. Last year, a student at our school was murdered. In the weeks that followed, my students and I cried out in anguish and anger and asked the toughest questions one could imagine: Why did this student end up where he was? What could any of us have done? How can we keep this from happening again? Our teenagers know to ask these critical questions, but the leaders in Raleigh have failed to ask them: How do we make sure justice is served for all North Carolinians? How do we transform struggling communities into havens of health and stability? My students create solutions, like organizing a march to the early voting polls and memorial for their classmate. Meanwhile, politicians ignore humanity and count capital.

Next school year, as I always have in the past, I will tell my students every day that they are important and loved. What I wish I could tell them is that the people in power agreed—that our General Assembly believes in their futures just like I do. Unfortunately, it’s unlikely I’ll be able to do that. I will get to tell them, however, that thousands of North Carolinians testified to their worth during the Moral Mondays, and that a movement that believes in them is coming. This movement is not the work of “outside agitators,” as the Governor believes, but the best and bravest that our state has to offer. It’s a movement led by and fighting for the well-being of 9.7 million insiders—the people of North Carolina who desire a healthy, sustainable future in our state for generations to come.

Holly Jordan has been a resident of Durham and an English teacher at Hillside High School for the past seven years. She is a National Board Certified Teacher and a member of NCAE and People’s Durham.

Steve Zimmer, the school board member who beat back a multi-million dollar campaign to defeat him just a few months ago, spoke to his fellow members of the Los Angeles school board at their meeting yesterday.

He talked about the importance of class size. He demolished the claim that teachers want to reduce class size for their own benefit. He explained patiently and eloquently why class size matters.

This is the full hearing.

http://lausd.granicus.com/MediaPlayer.php?clip_id=58
To watch Steve Zimmer educate the public about class size, skip to:
05:36:50 – 05:42:50
He is simply wonderful.

Philadelphia, which has been under state control for a dozen years, has a massive deficit. Governor Corbettt imposed draconian budget cuts when he took office.

The state’s solution to Philadelphia’s fiscal crisis: strip the schools bare. Lay off thousands of teachers, gut the arts and sports, libraries and guidance counselors. This hurts students. Which suburb would tolerate the gutting of its public schools?

That is not “shared sacrifice,” as Daniel Denvir explains in this article.

He writes:

“The School District is demanding $133 million in labor concessions to plug its $304 million budget gap. That’s more than twice as much as it requested from the city, and $13 million more than what it’s seeking from the state — which cut nearly $1 billion from school funding statewide (that’s you, Gov. Tom Corbett) despite its constitutional obligation to fund public education and, critically, its direct control of city schools for the past decade.”

And more:

“Philadelphia teachers are paid 19 percent less than their counterparts in suburban Bucks and Montgomery counties — counterparts who typically work in schools with less violence and less need. Relentless teacher-bashing paints incompetent educators as the root of big-city school woes, and offers high-stakes standardized tests and union-busting as the only solutions. But this is backwards: It is the failure to value teaching as a first-class profession that makes recruiting and retaining good educators a bigger problem than firing the bad ones. Lower pay will make it all the more difficult for Philly.”

A secret poll conducted on behalf of the Pennsylvania Republican Party found that Governor Tom Corbett is highly unpopular and likely to lose to his Democratic challenger.

Corbett’s biggest vulnerability is on education issues, which voters of both parties consider important. The poll recommends that the governor can improve his image on education issues by attacking the teachers’ unions.

Sixty-three percent of voters across the state disapprove of Corbett’s handling of education issues.

Most voters recognize that the problems of Philadelphia’s schools cannot be solved by Philadelphia alone.

91% believe that the Philadelphia public schools face an extremely serious funding problem.

62% of voters say that the state should provide greater funding to Philadelphia, as compared to 24% who say the district should declare bankruptcy, or 7% who say it should sell bonds.

The pollsters say that the governor should insist on such reforms as 1) allowing public schools to assign and transfer employees based on performance, not seniority; 2) allowing principals more say in hiring teachers for their schools; 3) no more automatic pay raises for years of service or degrees or certification. These are very popular with voters, who also believe that new funding should be tied to adopting these changes. Teacher union supporters agree with the first two, but not the third.

Most voters believe (despite the absence of any evidence) that these three reforms will improve education in the Philadelphia public schools while getting costs under control.

Some voters told the pollsters that these reforms would help “get bad teachers out of the classroom.”

Perhaps influenced by Rhee-style propaganda in recent years, voters think that the intense concentration of poverty and segregation in Philadelphia’s schools, as well as years of harsh budget cuts, can be cured by eliminating seniority and curbing the influence of the teachers’ union.

The pollsters conclude that Corbett can substantially improve his image as an “education reformer” and as someone who leads the battle for “change” by fighting the union.

The pollsters say that education is the wedge issue that Corbett can use to reverse his sagging approval ratings.

This commentary was written by a retired superintendent of schools.

Pennsylvania’s Tragic Betrayal of its Public Schools

By Joseph Batory, Former Superintendent of Schools, Upper Darby School District, Drexel Hill, PA

With regard to the inadequate funding of Philadelphia Public Schools, the city’s politicians have been and continue to lacking in political courage and moral fiber. Far too many of them are much too self-serving and most of them do not even understand what the fiscal insanity that continues to cripple the schools and the children of their city.

Likewise, the recent array of superintendents has each been far too meek and without the commitment to confront the system’s financial deficiencies.

But the worst villain of all has been the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. In the early 1990’s, Pennsylvania government consciously destroyed its Equalized Subsidy for Basic Education (ESBE) formula. That method of State funding once used to bridge the wide gaps between poorer and more affluent school districts. The ESBE formula each year had utilized factors of community wealth and pupil population to drive out annual subsidies to school systems that were both objective and fair. Unfortunately, the growing costs of this ESBE formula to the state budget caused its ultimate demise as cowardly politicians prioritized re-election agendas instead of the common good.

Since the removal of the ESBE formula by the Pennsylvania legislature, billions of dollars have been denied to school districts across the Commonwealth.

When the ESBE formula was dropped, many impoverished school systems received only a fraction of what the ESBE formula would have generated. Without a funding formula, this has gone on year after year. This has created havoc at the local level.

State politicians have also violated the Pennsylvania Constitution which mandates that the Commonwealth “maintain and support a thorough and efficient system of public education” and they’ve been in denial for many years like they had no part in this incompetency.

Over the years, there have been numerous and diverse education coalitions across Pennsylvania that rose up against the betrayal of schools and children by a bipartisan political establishment without conscience.

Tragically, unlike many other states nationally, Pennsylvania courts—whether as a matter of political control or apathy— have consistently dismissed challenges to the Commonwealth’s obvious inadequate funding of schools. Almost all states pay a larger percentage of overall public education costs than Pennsylvania. The Commonwealth’s approximate rank is 45 out of 50 in the nation on this measure. On average, other states contribute 47% of total education funding, but in 2006 (sadly…the most recent statistics available), Pennsylvania contributed only 36% (National Center for Education Statistics) as its share of public education funding statewide. To counter this reality, Harrisburg’s political “spin doctors” work overtime to obfuscate the issues, assassinate dissenters and confuse the public.

The last Philadelphia superintendent who tried to fight for the rights of the city’s children was David Hornbeck. He publicly decried the State’s lack of any adequate financial commitment to its public schools. For daring to do this, he was politically executed and run out of office. Small wonder that his superintendent successors just ran with whatever funds the political establishment granted them rather than advocating the educational needs of school children.

As a superintendent of schools during the 1990’s in nearby Upper Darby, I also fought with State politicians of both parties daring to suggest publicly that they were ignoring their Constitutional responsibility and hurting the neediest schools and children via insufficient school funding. Most of these politicians denied any funding inadequacies regularly telling constituents that school districts like Philadelphia and my District in Upper Darby had plenty of money.

Ironically, on November 15, 2007, The Philadelphia Inquirer, published a page one independent report from the GoodSchoolsPa organization validating the terrible betrayal of Pennsylvania’s public schools and the children they serve for a long period of years by its state politicians.

Here are some of the findings of that study : Pennsylvania was currently underfunding public education by $4.8 billion. And Pennsylvania ranked 45th among the 50 states in the percentage of school funding that comes from the State. This analysis noted that to correct the situation by equalizing what is spent for each student in Pennsylvania and allowing the state’s poorer public schools to just “catch up” to the statewide adequate cost per pupil, many school districts in Pennsylvania were entitled to money. In that context, Philadelphia’s public schools were owed $1 billion from the state and Upper Darby (my old school district) was entitled to $54 million.

Hard to believe things could get any worse. But now we have the tyrannical reign of Governor Tom Corbett. The Harrisburg political buzzword of “fiscal responsibility” is an absurd concept in the context of the education our young people. Money has always mattered in business and industry and government whenever America has been serious about anything! Saving a dollar now on underfunding schools in Pennsylvania will very likely result in spending exponentially more dollars in the future when a more undereducated population is contributing less to the economy and/or filling up the prisons. Governor Corbett’s theoretically conservative policy can be more accurately described as fiscal irresponsibility.

The Commonwealth’s political betrayal of public schools is a national disgrace. It is a legacy of infamy!

Ken Previti, a retired teacher, has been watching the evolution of school “reform,” and he wonders when the public will catch on to the schemes and fear-mongering. What is it all about? Sell-sell-sell.

Just doing what business does. Monetizing the children.

Pennsylvania blogger Yinzercation reviews the state budget and notes that the legislators are fine with cutting the arts, kindergarten, libraries, books, supplies, and teachers, but they won’t touch the numerous tax breaks available to corporate interests.

This is a good post because it not only bemoans the loss of essential services in schools but lays out specific budget items favoring corporate interests that could be used to provide good education.

Clearly the legislators are doing exactly what they want to do: Cutting schools to the bone, wrecking public education, while assuring that those who fatten their campaign coffers make money.

Philadelphia has had a disastrous year of school closings, budget cuts, and a report recommending privatization of large numbers of public schools. Now, as parent activist Helen Gym reports, the situation is even more dire after massive layoffs. The state of Pennsylvania and the mayor of Philadelphia seem content to let private corporations take over public education  in the city. This is an ominous sign, not only for Pennsylvania, but for other urban districts. This is purposeful abandonment of a basic public function.
Gym writes:
For those watching Philadelphia’s tragic schools situation from afar, hope you might consider a few pieces from Parents United for Public Education.
 
Topping off a dreadful year that saw 24 school closings, and the stripping away of all educational supports from schools (guidance counselors, arts, music, sports, extracurriculuars, librarians, no books and supplies), last week the District laid off an unprecedented 3,783 staff members out of little more than 19,000 staff members, nearly 1 in 5 personnel.
 
Parents United’s response: This is not a school: http://parentsunitedphila.com/2013/06/07/this-isnt-a-school-parents-united-statement-on-district-layoffs/
 
Last night Mayor Nutter appeared on “All In with Chris Hayes” about the Philadelphia budget. Not only did the Mayor, who heads up the controversial US Conference of Mayors, make a miserable case for Philadelphia schools, he made a feeble case for public ed and raised questions about whether public money should go to public schools. Read our response here: http://parentsunitedphila.com/2013/06/11/is-this-our-mayor-2/
 
Thanks for sharing!
 
Helen

 
Helen Gym
Parents United for Public Education

Parents United for Public Education is an all-volunteer collective of public school parents working to put schools and classrooms first in budgets and budget priorities. 

Numbers don’t begin to tell the story. Nearly 4,000 employees of the Philadelphia public school district learned that their jobs had been terminated.

The Teacher Action Group of Philadelphia is gathering photos to put a human face on an inhumane decision. Each one has a story. They are real people, not numbers.

Harvey Scribner is a teacher in Philadelphia. He got his pink slip over the weekend. He was broken-hearted.

He knows that no one cares.

But he needed to say what he did in his four years as a teacher and why his school should not be destroyed:

“Since coming to the District I found equipment when there was none, I created curriculum when there was nothing, I did without when we needed supplies, I broke up fights, I sent kids to class when they wandered the halls, I worked two summer programs and took the extra step to complete training when the District did not think it was needed. For the last four years I have struggled, alongside the most courageous and honorable people I have ever worked with, to teach the students, feed the students, clothe the students, protect the students, and lead the students. For this dedication, and for the dedication of my brothers and sisters in education, we are now rewarded with this?

A District that lets us go, a union that shrugs its shoulders, a city that sleeps, a state that remains deaf, a federal system that demands more and offers less. The real crime is to the neighborhood’s and blocks in Philadelphia that cry out for something better, to anyone that would hear and that sound is lost in the overwhelming symphony of thundering apathy on all sides.

I realize that there are always forces beyond my control, but know that if you break up our team at Crossroads, you will damage one of the few systems in the School District of Philadelphia that is actually working. We are strong because of the integration of our curriculum, the dedication of our small but determined band of educators, and because we have the proper leadership to carry us through. I understand that every school and employee will claim the same, but we are truly different. If you break us up now, you will lose one small program that is making a profound impact on the fabric of our city.”