Yesterday, December 7, was the 84th anniversary of Pearl Harbor Day. President Franklin D. Roosevelt said it was a day that will live in infamy. After the passage of so much time, Heather Cox Richardson sees that Pearl Harbor shines a light on our current political morass.
On the sunny Sunday morning of December 7, 1941, Messman Doris Miller had served breakfast aboard the USS West Virginia, stationed in Pearl Harbor, Hawaii, and was collecting laundry when the first of nine Japanese torpedoes hit the ship.
In the deadly confusion, Miller reported to an officer, who told him to help move the ship’s mortally wounded captain off the bridge. Unable to move him far, Miller pulled the captain to shelter. Then another officer ordered Miller to pass ammunition to him as he started up one of the two abandoned anti-aircraft guns in front of the conning tower.
Miller had not been trained to use the weapons because, as a Black man in the U.S. Navy, he was assigned to serve the white officers. But while the officer was distracted, Miller began to fire one of the guns. He fired it until he ran out of ammunition. Then he helped to move injured sailors to safety before he and the other survivors abandoned the West Virginia, which sank to the bottom of Pearl Harbor.
The next day, the United States declared war on Japan. Japan declared war on America, and on December 11, 1941, both Italy and Germany declared war on America. “The powers of the steel pact, Fascist Italy and National Socialist Germany, ever closely linked, participate from today on the side of heroic Japan against the United States of America,” Italian leader Benito Mussolini said. “We shall win.” Of course they would. Mussolini and Germany’s leader, Adolf Hitler, believed the Americans had been corrupted by Jews and Black Americans and could never conquer their own organized military machine.
The steel pact, as Mussolini called it, was the vanguard of his new political ideology. That ideology was called fascism, and he and Hitler thought it would destroy democracy once and for all.
Mussolini had been a socialist as a young man and had grown terribly frustrated at how hard it was to organize people. No matter how hard socialists tried, they seemed unable to convince ordinary people that they must rise up and take over the country’s means of production.
The efficiency of World War I inspired Mussolini. He gave up on socialism and developed a new political theory that rejected the equality that defined democracy. He came to believe that a few leaders must take a nation toward progress by directing the actions of the rest. These men must organize the people as they had been organized during wartime, ruthlessly suppressing all opposition and directing the economy so that businessmen and politicians worked together. And, logically, that select group of leaders would elevate a single man, who would become an all-powerful dictator. To weld their followers into an efficient machine, they demonized opponents into an “other” that their followers could hate.
Italy adopted fascism, and Mussolini inspired others, notably Germany’s Hitler. Those leaders came to believe that their system was the ideology of the future, and they set out to destroy the messy, inefficient democracy that stood in their way.
America fought World War II to defend democracy from fascism. And while fascism preserved hierarchies in society, democracy called on all men as equals. Of the more than 16 million Americans who served in the war, more than 1.2 million were Black American men and women, 500,000 were Latinos, and more than 550,000 Jews were part of the military. Among the many ethnic groups who fought, Indigenous Americans served at a higher percentage than any other ethnic group—more than a third of able-bodied Indigenous men between the ages of 18 and 50 joined the service—and among those 25,000 soldiers were the men who developed the famous “Code Talk,” based in tribal languages, that codebreakers never cracked.
The American president at the time, Democrat Franklin Delano Roosevelt, hammered home that the war was about the survival of democracy. Fascists insisted that they were moving their country forward fast and efficiently—claiming the trains ran on time, for example, although in reality they didn’t—but FDR constantly noted that the people in Italy and Germany were begging for food and shelter from the soldiers of democratic countries.
Ultimately, the struggle between fascism and democracy was the question of equality. Were all men really created equal as the Declaration of Independence said, or were some born to lead the rest, whom they held subservient to their will?
Democracy, FDR reminded Americans again and again, was the best possible government. Thanks to armies made up of men and women from all races and ethnicities, the Allies won the war against fascism, and it seemed that democracy would dominate the world forever.
But as the impulse of WWII pushed Americans toward a more just and inclusive society after it, those determined not to share power warned their supporters that including people of color and women as equals in society would threaten their own liberty. Those reactionary leaders rode that fear into control of our government, and gradually they chipped away the laws that protected equality. Now, once again, democracy is under attack by those who believe some people are better than others.
President Donald J. Trump and his cronies have abandoned the principles of democracy and openly embraced the hierarchical society the U.S. fought against in World War II. They have fired women, Black Americans, people of color, and LGBTQ+ Americans from positions in the government and the military and erased them from official histories. They have seized, incarcerated and deported immigrants— or rendered them to third countries to be tortured— and have sent federal agents and federal troops into Democratic-led cities to terrorize the people living there.
They have traded the rule of law for the rule of Trump, weaponizing the Department of Justice against those they perceive as enemies, pardoning loyalists convicted of crimes, and now, executing those they declare are members of drug cartels without evidence, charges, or trials. They have openly rejected the world based on shared values of equality and democracy for which Americans fought in World War II. In its place, they are building a world dominated by a small group of elites close to Trump, who are raking in vast amounts of money from their machinations.
Will we permit the destruction of American democracy on our watch?
When America came under attack before, people like Doris Miller refused to let that happen. For all that American democracy still discriminated against him, it gave him room to stand up for the concept of human equality—and he laid down his life for it. Promoted to cook after the Navy sent him on a publicity tour, Miller was assigned to a new ship, the USS Liscome Bay, which was struck by a Japanese torpedo on November 24, 1943. It sank within minutes, taking two thirds of the crew, including Miller, with it.
We hear a lot these days about how American democracy is doomed and the radical right will win. Maybe. But the beauty of our system is that it gives us people like Doris Miller.
Even better, it makes us people like Doris Miller.

As Margret Sullivan said yesterday in her substack on the future of media ; Richardson has become a major source news events She puts a historical twist on current events daily Along with Krugman and the never Trumpers at the Bulwark She and they have become an alternative to the Corporate media. Who as Krugman said near fwo decades ago wold headline the Republicans saying the Earth is flat by saying “parties disagree on shape of planet “
LikeLike
And I still need that edit button 😅
LikeLike
“The U.S. military had around 407,000 to 417,000 deaths during World War II, with figures varying slightly by source, including about 407,316 from the National WWII Museum and 416,800 from other sources, encompassing fatalities from battle, accidents, and disease, with most occurring in the European and Pacific theaters.”
Trump may already be reasonable for more deaths than the US suffered from WWII, due to how he mismanaged the 2020 pandemic, with millions more to come, and we have more than three years left for him to murder as many people as possible, since that appears to be one of his major goals.
LikeLiked by 1 person
We have to find it within ourselves to resist, challenge and continuously fight for our rights under the Trump regime. Nobody is coming to save us. We have to vote as if our lives depend on it, regardless of what roadblocks are placed in our way, because that just may be the case.
LikeLiked by 1 person
The resistance to end Trump’s MAGA Fascist movement might reach the same point that caused the colonies to violently rebel against the British Empire, the straw that broke the camel’s back, which means millions of real patriots may have to step up and risk all in combat against loyalist MAGA KKK hate cult members, who support the convicted rapist, fraud and felon.
King George had his loyalists in the colonies during the rebellion, who fought for him. When they lost and the United States was born, many fled to Canada or returned to the UK.
LikeLike
This posting is extremely misleading and is beneath the professional standards of any real historian. HCR is implying that the current U.S. military discriminates against people more than the World War II military did. No honest person who is even remotely familiar with actual history would make such an absurd claim. The types of discrimination during the years 1941-1945 against non-white people, women, and gay people simply don’t occur today; any service member who did such things would be strongly disciplined, and officers would be fired immediately.
How does Diane Ravitch – a supposed historian – fall for this HCR nonsense that no currently serving service member would believe?
LikeLike
Mike,
I saw nothing in HCR’s post that said or implied that the current U.S. military discriminates against people more than the military in 1941. The statement is patently false, as is your claim that HCR wrote it. She made a point that Doris Miller, a Black man, was not allowed to serve anywhere other than the kitchen in 1941 and consequently that he had never fired a weapon. Today, men and women of all ethnic and racial backgrounds are integrated into the armed services. I did not see a point where she said otherwise. The point of her post is that democracy is worth fighting for.
LikeLike
HCR was clearly trying to make the point that under Trump the U.S. military is more guilty of discrimination than it was during World War II. She claims that everyone at that time came together regardless of background. True to a limited point, but the military before 1948 was segregated and non-white servicemen had many fewer opportunities than they do today. Trump has not relegated non-white people, women, or gays back to the conditions of those days – not even close.
I sent this posting to eight retired officers, two whom I know for a fact are strongly anti-Trump. They all interpreted HCR’s writing like I did. As she does every day in her newsletter, she is functioning like a political activist – a blatant polemicist – rather than as a dispassionate historian. It’s no wonder that you claim not to see what HCR did here: you operate the same way. 100% polemist, 0% historian, a partisan fanatic. “I will never criticize Joe Biden.” – Diane Ravitch
There are more than enough dismaying things that Trump says and does; don’t make things up and diminish your credibility among non-fanatical people.
LikeLike
Sorry, I reread her post and I don’t agree with your interpretation.
HCR knows very well that the military was segregated during World War II. She also knows that the military today is probably the best integrated public institution in the nation.
She didn’t say anything about Pete Hegseth’s ouster of the highest ranking women in the military–such as Lisa Franchetti, an admiral who was named Chief of Naval Operations for the U.S. Navy; or Yvette M. Davids, the first woman selected to lead the Naval Academy; or Linda L. Fagan, the first female commandant of the U.S. Coast Guard.
Hegseth seems to have a problem with women in the military. Yet I am nonetheless amazed by the women in service in all branches. By those who fly combat missions. By Senator Tammy Duckeorth, who lost both legs after her helicopter was shot down in Iraq. By Amy McGrath, a Marine pilot who flew 89 combat missions. By Senator Joni Ernst, who served in Kuwait and retired as a lieutenant colonel.
I admire the military. I appreciate the way it has changed. If I were young today, I would join up.
I don’t admire the Secretary of Defense, but his behavior and attitudes do not represent the men and women he commands.
I saw nothing in HCR’s post that disparaged the military.
LikeLike
Captain Kelski, As a former Admiral of the Seventh Interdisciplinary Galactic Fleet, I feel obligated to mention that I recently consulted with several active-duty commanders, two time travelers, and one retired submarine captain who all reviewed this article and disagreed completely with your reading of it.
LikeLiked by 1 person
hCR always tells a tale couched in history. This appeals to me. For those who suggest she uses history for partisan purposes, I suggest you read the footnotes. That is what history is about. She s as always cites her sources. If you disagree, follow the sources, then disprove them or get more reliable sources.
One of the side stories of this one is the name, Doris. That is one of those names that used to be used for men, but now is rarely if ever a man’s name.
another side story is that a friend of mine just passed whose Navajo uncle was a code talker. He claimed the Navajo language was the only one the enemy never broke.
LikeLike
The story about the Navajo code talkers was true. Their code was never broken.
LikeLike