Two scholars–Kimberlé Crenshaw and Jason Stanley–explain why Trump is censoring exhibits at the Smithsonian. He has also imposed censorship of signage and exhibits at other federal sites, including national parks. He has enlisted the U.S. Department of Educatuon to organize rightwing groups to create a “patriotic” civics course.
- Kimberlé Crenshaw is an American civil rights advocate and a scholar of critical race theory. She is a professor at the UCLA School of Law and Columbia Law School, where she specializes in race and gender issues
- Jason Stanley is the Bissell-Heyd Chair in American Studies in the Munk School of Global Affairs & Public Policy at the University of Toronto and the author of Erasing History: How Fascists Rewrite the Past to Control the Future
Trump and his far-right cabal are l trying to revise history and memory. Unless he abolishes or rigs future elections, all this tinhorn fascist censorship will be swept away by his successors. He will rightly be judged, when that day comes, as the closest thing this country has ever seen to having a dictator. He will be portrayed in the Smithsonian and the textbooks as a buffoon and a tyrant.
This article appeared in The Guardian. Please open the link to read the entire article.
Crenshaw and Stanley write:
In a letter sent to Smithsonian secretary, Lonnie G Bunch III, on 12 August, the Trump administration announced its plan to replace all Smithsonian exhibits deemed as “divisive” or “ideological” with descriptions deemed as “historical” and “constructive”. On 21 August, just nine days later, the White House published a list of said offending fixtures – the majority of which include exhibits, programming and artwork that highlight the Black, Latino and LGBTQ+ perspectives on the American project. Included in his bill of particulars was an exhibit that rightly depicts Benjamin Franklin as an enslaver, an art installation that acknowledges race as a social construct and a display that highlights racist voter suppression measures, among others.
The assault on the Smithsonian comes wrapped, as it were, as part of a broader attack on democracy, scenes of which we see playing out every day. The federal occupation of Washington DC, the crackdown on free speech on campus, the targeting of Trump’s political opponents, the gerrymandering of democracy – these are interwoven elements of the same structural assault. So with many fires burning across the nation, concerned citizens who are answering the call to fight the destruction of democracy may regard his attack on history and memory as a mere skirmish, a distraction from the herculean struggle against fascism unfolding in the US. But this is a mistake. Trump’s attack on American museums, education and memory, along with his weaponization of racialized resentment to package his authoritarian sympathies as mere patriotism, is a critical dimension of his fascist aims. The fight for democracy cannot avoid it, nor its racial conditions of possibility.
Fascism always has a central cultural component, because it relies on the construction of a mythic past. The mythic past is central to fascism because it enables and empowers a sense of grievance by a dominant racial or ethnic group whose consent is crucial to the sustainability of the project. In Maga world, the mythic past was pure, innocent and unsullied by women or Black leaders. In this kind of politics, the nation was once great, a byproduct of the great achievements of the men in the dominant racial group. In short, the assault on the Smithsonian and, more broadly, against truthful history and critical reflection is part of the broader fascist attack on democracy.
From this vantage point, racial equality is a threat to the story of the nation’s greatness because only the men of the dominant group can be great. To represent the nation’s founding figures as flawed, as any accurate history would do, is perceived, in this politics, as a kind of treason.
The success of the fascist dismantling of democracy is predicated on the widespread systematic failure to see the larger picture. The anti-woke assault that is a key pillar of Trumpism is part of that failure, partly due to the racial blinders and enduring ambivalence of too many in positions of leadership in the media and elsewhere. Those who sign on to the attack on “wokeness” but regard themselves as opponents of the other elements of the fascist assault are under the mistaken assumption that these projects can be disaggregated. In fact, the dismantling of democracy and of racial justice are symbiotically entangled. To support one is to give cover for the others.
It is no coincidence that this ‘proper’ ideology Trump exposes is constitutive of a more well-known strand of fascism – nazism
It is clear that the Trump administration understands this relationship and fully weaponizes racist appeals as a foundational piece of its fascist agenda. And if this was once the quiet part, it is now pronounced out loud in official government documents. In an executive order issued on 27 March 2025 titled “Restoring Truth and Sanity to American History”, Trump reveals that his mandate to ban “improper ideologies” targets core commitments repudiating a scientific racism that historically naturalized racial hierarchy thereby neutralizing resistance. According to Trump, the problem with the Smithsonian American Art Museum’s exhibit The Shape of Power: Stories of Race and American Sculpture was that it promoted the idea that “race is a human invention”.
The understanding that race is a social construct as opposed to a biological fact is perhaps the most fundamental advance in repudiating enslavement, genocide and segregation. Rejecting the idea that racial inequality is natural or pre-ordained – a claim that grounded enslavement and dispossession in America – forms the cornerstone of the modern commitment to a fully inclusive democracy. Trump’s declaration that this cornerstone is “improper” is an effort to turn the clock back, upending the entire American postwar project. It is no coincidence that this “proper” ideology Trump exposes is constitutive of a more well-known strand of fascism – nazism. How else can we understand why Maya Angelou was purged from the Naval Academy library while Adolf Hitler remains?
The fight against fascism in the US must be as robust in its embrace of racial equality as Trump’s embrace of outdated ideas about race and racism. The defense of memory, of truthful history, of telling the whole American story rather than ascribing agency in history to the deeds of “great men” is vital to the American democratic project. A pro-democratic education fosters the agency of its citizens by teaching about social movements that overturned entrenched hierarchies which blocked democratic equality and imposed racial tyranny. The story of how ordinary Americans lived and struggled and remade America is essential knowledge in developing and sustaining a multiracial democracy. The Smithsonian has been a vital institution in making this knowledge accessible to the masses. The National Museum of the American Latino and the National Museum of the American Indian, for example, provide artifacts and perspectives about the nation’s westward expansion that challenge the myth of unoccupied territory and manifest destiny. The National Museum of African American History and Culture brings forward the global scale of enslavement as well as its infusion across national institutions, culture and politics.

The success of organ transplantation refutes the assertion that there is a substantial difference between people of different so-called races or gender. In life and death surgeries that involve organ transplants what matters is compatibility which can occur across various subgroups that have nothing to do with skin color, gender or sexual orientation. If these right wing bigots had paid attention in science class, they would know better. Instead, they reject science and latch onto antiquated falsehoods on presumed “natural superiority” of white men.
LikeLiked by 1 person
This “superiority” complex the human race has had from the beginning of time is the bases of all wars, domination of one group of people over another, religious persecutions, etc. The list goes on and on. The “white man” superiority complex over the people of color is so deep seated that it blinds people to the realities of life. This complex blinds people such as Trump that cannot recognize that he is not superior to anyone. In many ways, quite the opposite.
It is not just the “white man superiority complex”. It Japanese vs the Chinese or Chinese vs the Japanese. The English vs the French or German or Italian. Catholics vs Protestants. Name it and there will be a superiority complex.
Trump and his minions have taken the Superiority Complex” to a newer higher level of hate. I do not believe it has anything to do with forgetting what was learned or not learned in the high school science class. It is something that is engrained in people like Trump by this parents, mainly his father. This complex is passed down from generation to generation so that it will never change and get better until that chain is broken between generations. It will never change until the world is rid of people like Trump, Putin, Netuanyahu, etc.
LikeLike
Having worked with people from all over the world, I can confirm that the US is not alone in vilifying “the other.” People from other countries bring their prejudice and irrational judgments about some other groups as well. As a teacher, it was my job to help students see that prejudice often comes from a lack of understanding about “the other” and cultural traditions of bias. It is sick that our leadership is weaponizing division and prejudice.
LikeLiked by 1 person
The motif of this Trump crowd is hate. You are defined and motivated by hate. The more you hate, the higher you rank.
LikeLike
“The understanding that race is a social construct as opposed to a biological fact is perhaps the most fundamental advance in repudiating enslavement, genocide and segregation. Rejecting the idea that racial inequality is natural or pre-ordained – a claim that grounded enslavement and dispossession in America – forms the cornerstone of the modern commitment to a fully inclusive democracy. “
The fact is, for most of man’s history, visible ethnic and cultural differences have defined certain conflicts that are mostly economic and often of colonial or conquest origin. I think of the Norman conquest and its hostility to Celtic culture, the hostility to ethnic Chinese workers brought by the English to Malaysia—I could go on forever—but you get the idea. Until we solve the problem of vast differences in standard of living, I see no end to it.
LikeLiked by 1 person
While everyone has the right to worship as they wish, religion, or I should say how some people fanatically perceive their religion, is responsible for so much death and destruction throughout history.
LikeLike
Very true. And these cultural differences are often exacerbated by the economic favoritism shown by the ruling class.
LikeLike
“The understanding that race is a social construct as opposed to a biological fact is perhaps the most fundamental…” No, it isn’t fundamental. One can perfectly well think of race as a biological fact and repudiate enslavement, genocide and segregation. Both of these are imperfect constructs contained within the concept of race. Insisting on a binary choice between the two constructs is neither persuasive nor user-friendly toward the cause of equal treatment under the law. The problem is in the idea that “racial inequality is natural or pre-ordained”: it doesn’t follow from either definition.
I find it much easier to conceive of racism as one of the many varieties of tribalism. There’s your original basis for “us vs them”: assigning negative characteristics to anyone who looks (or thinks or acts) differently from what one is accustomed to. Then using that as justification for mistreating them.
This I agree with wholeheartedly: “A pro-democratic education fosters the agency of its citizens by teaching about social movements that overturned entrenched hierarchies.”
LikeLike
I’ve been in France & Italy for 2 months & have been to multiple museums or exhibitions where I’ve seen numerous things that caused me to think that they would never be allowed in any of the Smithsonian museums under our current authoritarian regime. Over here, they don’t try to erase the negatives of their history, they highlight them so as to learn from their & others’ mistakes. The Holocaust, The Inquisition, the abuses of the Monarchies & the Clergy over the centuries, the rise of Fascism, climate change, etc. Let’s hope that if we survive past this regime, history will be truthful & fearless enough to accurately paint just how corrupt & miserable Trump & his henchmen have been. Maybe Americans will learn from their mistakes & not let a “Trump” happen again. Or not.
LikeLike
Yes! The Big Lie is to suppress history.
LikeLike