Trump’s hatred of universities continues to wreak vengeance, especially on elite institutions. Columbia University was the first to feel his wrath and the first to capitulate. The administration cut off $2 billion in research grants, allegedly as punishment for Columbia’s failure to police anti-Semitism. Columbia negotiated and agreed to pay the federal government $200 million as a fine and accept a federal “monitor.”.
This agreement threatened the independence of the university.
Columbia University agreed to pay more than $200 million to settle allegations of civil rights violations from the Trump administration. It agreed to a long list of changes on campus. But one concession struck some observers as particularly troubling: an outside monitor to ensure the school complies.
To critics, the deal represents an unprecedented governmental intrusion into the affairs of a private university that could erode the independence of universities across the country. The White House has said it sees this agreement as a template for other schools that it is investigating for allegations of antisemitism and racial discrimination.
Much of the oversight will relate to diversity, equity and inclusion, as the Trump administration seeks to stamp out any effort by Columbia to increase racial diversity in its student body, faculty or staff. The monitor will also be charged with assuring that university programs do not promote “unlawful DEI goals” — a term that is not defined.
This agreement clarifies the administration’s goal: to stamp out any efforts by the university to increase racial diversity. Every appointment of a nonwhite or female faculty member will set off alarm bells. Every student who increases diversity will be suspected of being DEI.
Trump continues his unpredicted assault on Harvard, threatening to remove its accreditation, threatening to bar foreign students, withholding billions in research grants. It has been rumored in the press that Harvard is close to making a deal to pay $500 million to settle with the Trump administration.
Other colleges and universities are under investigation and subject to painful cuts. John’s Hopkins has been threatened. The latest is Duke University and its health center. What sense does it make to stop funding research on deadly diseases to punish anti-Semitism? None. Zero. Zilch.
Make no mistake: these demands and payoffs have nothing to do with anti-Semitism. if anything, they increase anti-Semitism as “the Jews” are seen as a Trump-favored, protected class and as complicit with Trump’s vicious war on DEI.
What Trump really wants is to narrow the path to higher education for students of color.
Diane Ravitch's blog 
Not sure I agree that Trump’s DEI campaign is to disadvantage the poor. In that he generally wants an uneducated society, I agree. The overarching reason for all his behavior, however, is to make space for him and for his oligarchs to make money free of accountability. When Curtis Yarvin “joked” that people who were unproductive needed to be biofuel, he might have been serious.
LikeLike
I may be wrong, but I believe that the anti-DEI campaign is meant to narrow opportunity for people of color.
LikeLike
Or, as Jonathan Swift wrote satirically, “eat the poor.”
LikeLike
To whom/where does the settlement monies go?
LikeLike
I assume the U.S. Treasury, not to Trump’s pocket.
LikeLike
Trump’s policies are against progress and opportunity for all. The GOP=Generators of poverty. They undermine everything that helps build a civil society including access to health care, science, DEI, education and following the rule of law.
LikeLike