Yes, Virginia, there are men and women of integrity who defend the rule of law. Yesterday, it was Danielle Sassoon, the acting U.S. Attorney for the Southern district of New York. She resigned rather than drop the case against NYC Mayor Eric Adams. Her devotion to the rule of law was greater than her allegiance to Trump, who appointed her only a month ago. Her resignation was followed by several resignations in the Public Integrity Division of the U.S. Department of Justice.
The New York Daily News today reported another principled resignation by a federal prosecutor.
One of the lead prosecutors handling the sweeping public corruption case against Mayor Adams resigned on Friday — in a searing letter to President Trump’s Department of Justice saying he wouldn’t be the “fool” who files a motion to dismiss the case based on support for the administration’s immigration objectives and not the law.
Assistant U.S. Attorney Hagan Scotten, a highly regarded prosecutor in the Southern District of New York and decorated U.S. Army veteran who served in Iraq, in his resignation letter to Trump’s acting No. 2 at the DOJ Emil Bove, said he was “entirely in agreement” with the former acting U.S. Attorney Danielle Sassoon, who resigned Thursday.
Sassoon said she could not sign off on the request to drop the charges against Adams that stemmed from what’s effectively a “quid pro quo” between the mayor and the president that included the DOJ dropping the charges in exchange for Adams getting in line with the president’s immigration policies in the nation’s largest sanctuary city.
In the letter, which was first reported by The New York Times, Scotten — who has clerked for Supreme Court Justice John Roberts and Justice Brett Kavanaugh — said some may view Bove’s “mistake” in light of their negative views of the Trump administration, which he said he did not share.
“I can even understand how a Chief Executive whose background is in business and politics might see the contemplated dismissal-with-leverage as a good, if distasteful, deal. But any assistant U.S. attorney would know that our laws and traditions do not allow using the prosecutorial power to influence other citizens, much less elected officials, in this way,” Scotten wrote.
“If no lawyer within earshot of the President is willing to give him that advice, then I expect you will eventually find someone who is enough of a fool, or enough of a coward, to file your motion. But it was never going to be me…
Scotten’s blistering resignation letter came the morning after what many have already dubbed the “Thursday night massacre” at the DOJ, echoing President Nixon’s infamous 1973 DOJ purge.
He marks the seventh DOJ staffer to resign after Trump’s former criminal defense lawyer, managing the daily functioning of the federal government’s law enforcement arm in an interim capacity, ordered the dismissal of the bombshell case against Adams set to go on trial in April.
Following the mass resignations, Reuters reported Friday that Bove had threatened to fire every member of the DOJ’s public integrity section — where the case was transferred following Sassoon’s resignation — unless someone volunteered to file the dismissal motion in Manhattan federal court, where Judge Dale Ho must approve it. According to the report, Bove gave them an hour to decide, and one ultimately stepped up.

SDNY living up to reputation
LikeLike
If those two (Bondi & Bove) wanted this filed so bad, why didn’t they file it themselves?
LikeLike
Bove – thank you auto correct.
LikeLike
This decision to drop the corruption charges against Mayor Adams is disgraceful, an obvious payoff to Adams for changing his position on immigration matters. Another principled conservative makes the case against this appalling decision in the linked essay below.
But this blog’s host and almost all of this blog’s commenters have no moral authority here. They supported the equally disgraceful pardons of Biden family members by Joe Biden just before he left office. The corruption of the justice system is a bipartisan practice.
https://www.nationalreview.com/2025/02/trump-doj-is-explicitly-political-in-dropping-case-against-mayor-adams/
LikeLike
What judge or court did Biden defy?
I completely understood his pardon of his son–far less disgraceful than Trump’s pardon of 1,500 violent insurrectionists.
Biden had a reasonable fear of putting his only son at the tender mercy of Donald Trump and Kash Patel. As a parent, I would have done the same. Hunter’s crimes would not have led to jail time if his name was Hunter Smith.
The Republicans tormented him for four years. Marjorie Taylor Greene displayed his genitals in Congress.
The special prosecutor recommended a plea deal with no jail time after investigating him for years. But Republicans wanted his scalp, nothing less.
If you were Joe Biden, what would you have done?
LikeLike
Diane: Did Marjorie Taylor Green really do that? If so, that makes her the lowlife scum of at least two centuries of U.S. History. CBK
LikeLike
Yeah, saving your son from being screwed by a corrupt president bent on vengeance is just like tanking a major prosecution of a New York mayor, who said “president” plans to use to help him. Kind of like what was done to Zelensky.
Your post is like equating shooting a pigeon with dropping a nuclear bomb.
Tell me, are you allowed outside without supervision?
LikeLike
Noone believes your false equivalency.
LikeLike
As a former state-level prosecutor, I cannot tell you how angry I am.
I was not an Assistant United States Attorney, but I knew more than a few, and I knew how seriously they took their jobs, and how devoted to the rule of law they were.
I can only hope that all those who voted for Trump now see what they are responsible for. There was never a good reason to vote for him, he clearly was a criminal who cared nothing about people or principles. But eggs were expensive, and Biden was old and retiring, and Harris was, well, at least Trump has been there before, right?
BULLSHIT! Voting is not like choosing between paint colors for the spare room. It is literally deciding what kind of country you want.
Is this what you wanted? Justice for sale? People with principles and devotion to the Constitution casually stripped of their jobs so Trump can make even more money?
You have no excuse. You also have no right to ignore the criminal in front of you. You have no right to help destroy this country, and make billionaires richer (like they don’t have enough?). You have no right to piss all over the graves of the men and women who gave their lives so you can today buy a Tesla. People who fought for voting rights and simple decency for men, women and minorities? People lost their lives fighting in wars so you could have the luxury of choosing an amusing idiot to screw up this country and sell it out from under you? Do you have to see him actually shoot someone of Fifth Avenue to get who he is?
LikeLike
Fun daydream is to imagine the judge refusing to sign off on a voluntary dismissal motion.
LikeLike
I’ve known state judges who would do that. And I can guarantee you that there are many, many judges, state and federal, who are angry and disgusted right now.
LikeLike
Judge is Dale Ho. Never been before him and I do t know much about him other than he’s very young and relatively new to the bench (appointed in 2023). His youth makes me assume he won’t be sticking his neck out. But it would be great if he refused to order the dismissal. Even better if he homed in on the apparent ethical lapses in the SDNY related to this.
LikeLike
Biden appointed him. But there’s a limit to what he can do.
LikeLike
BTW, everyone should read today’s Lawyers, Guns & Money for this:
https://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/2025/02/trump-and-competitive-authoritarianism
LikeLike
Interesting article.
LikeLike
Terrifying.
LikeLike
I find it “terrifying” as well.
All we really have left are the courts, which are iffy at best when lawsuits go all the way up to SCOTUS. And when people/organizations can’t afford the necessary lawsuits, while being up against billionaires who can and will pay whatever that takes for an unlimited number of cases, then what? (besides 4 years of pure hell for folks who genuinely care about other people and their suffering, regardless of color, gender, country of origin, income, language. etc…)
LikeLike
Remember when Republicans tried to repeal the ACA? People in wheelchairs, people with disabled children went to congress and banged on their senators’ doors. That’s what will happen again. It’s just not bad enough yet. Just wait. These Republicans who fear Trump should be fearing their own constituents. Allegiance to cult leader will fall away -poof- when it starts to affect people in ways that matter to them most.
LikeLike
Trump has thrown the rule of law out the window. He only cares about achieving his agenda by any means necessary. We are living under rule by thuggery. As much as I distrust Adams, it was difficult to watch him in a news clip from Fox where he is sitting next to the border czar, Tom Homan, talking about helping Trump round up immigrants. Adams was laughing while Homan was figuratively twisting his arm in front of the camera. Homan is a crude man who should not be given this responsibility. Nobody should be treating the undocumented this way, and we wouldn’t be in this situation if either party had the courage to work together to create serious immigration policy. We need more than another stopgap.
LikeLike
Blind partisans are all the same: justify/rationalize everything that people on their side say and do, while condemning similar acts committed by people on the other side.
LikeLike
Greg,
Please name any instance of Biden breaking the law.
Please name any instance of his refusal to obey a court order.
Please name any instance of him libeling, insulting, and defaming a judge.
How many felony convictions does he have (Trump has 34)?
Telling the truth about a traitor and a dotard is not “blind partisanship).
LikeLike