Andy Borowitz has words of wisdom for Democrats and Never Trumpers. Do not despair. Prepare. Big electoral wins breed hubris, overconfidence, overreach. Or, pride goeth before a fall.
Maybe you’ve been asking yourself:
1. “How could Donald Trump have won 51 percent of the popular vote?”
2. “How hard is it to immigrate to New Zealand?”
3. “What the actual f..k?”
Fair questions.
Let’s try a thought experiment. Could Tuesday’s election results have been any worse?
Well, what if, instead of 51 percent, the Republican nominee had won 59 percent? Or 61 percent? And what if he had won 49 states?
Those aren’t hypotheticals. Those were the results of the 1972 and 1984 landslides that reelected Richard Nixon and Ronald Reagan.
With thumping victories like those, what could possibly go wrong for the winners?
If history’s any guide, some nasty surprises await Donald Trump.
In 1972, the Democratic presidential nominee, George McGovern, won just 37.5 percent of the vote, carrying only Massachusetts and the District of Columbia for a total of 17 Electoral College votes. He didn’t even win his home state, South Dakota.
In 1984, Democrat Walter Mondale did carry his native Minnesota, but that was as good as it got for him. In the Electoral College, he fared even worse than McGovern, with a whopping 13 votes.
In the aftermath of these thrashings, the Democratic Party lay in smoldering ruins, and Republicans looked like indestructible conquerors.
Now, some might argue that those GOP victories, though statistically more resounding than Trump’s, weren’t nearly as alarming, because he’s a criminal and wannabe autocrat.
But Trump’s heinousness shouldn’t make us nostalgic for Nixon and Reagan. They were also criminals—albeit unindicted ones. And they were up to all manner of autocratic shit—until they got caught.
The Watergate scandal was only one small part of the sprawling criminal enterprise that Nixon directed from the Oval Office in order to subvert democracy. For his part, Reagan’s contribution to the annals of presidential crime, Iran-Contra, broke myriad laws and violated Constitutional norms.
The hubris engendered by both men’s landslides propelled them to reckless behavior in their second terms—behavior that came back to haunt them. Nixon was forced to resign the presidency; Reagan was lucky to escape impeachment.

After the Watergate scandal forced Richard Nixon from office, this bumper sticker helped Massachusetts voters brag that they handed him his only Electoral College loss in 1972.
Of course, Trump would be justified in believing that no matter how reckless he becomes, he’ll never pay a price. He’s already been impeached—twice—only to be acquitted by his Republican toadies in the Senate. And now that the right-wing supermajority of the Supreme Court has adorned him with an immunity idol, he’ll likely feel free to commit crimes that Nixon and Reagan could only dream of. Who’ll stop him from using his vast power to persecute his voluminous list of enemies?
Well, the enemy most likely to thwart Trump in his second term might be one who isn’t on his list: himself. The seeds of Trump’s downfall may reside in two promises he made to win this election: the mass deportation of immigrants and the elimination of inflation.
Trump’s concept of a plan to deport 20 million immigrants is as destined for success as were two of his other brainchildren, Trump University and Trump Steaks. The US doesn’t have anything approaching the law-enforcement capacity to realize this xenophobic fever dream.
And as for Trump’s war on inflation, the skyrocketing prices caused by his proposed tariffs will make Americans nostalgic for pandemic-era price-gouging on Charmin.
It’s possible that Trump’s 24/7 disinformation machine, led by Batman villains Rupert Murdoch, Tucker Carlson, and Elon Musk, will prevent his MAGA followers from ever discovering that 20 million immigrants didn’t go anywhere. And it’s possible that if inflation spikes, he’ll find a scapegoat for that. (Nancy Pelosi? Dr. Fauci? Taylor Swift?)
And, yes, it’s possible that Trump will somehow accomplish his goal of becoming America’s Kim Jong Un, and our democracy will go belly-up like the Trump Taj Mahal casino in Atlantic City.
But I wouldn’t bet on it. I tend to agree with the British politician Enoch Powell (1912-1998), who observed that all political careers end in failure. I doubt that Trump, with his signature blend of inattention, impulsiveness, and incompetence, will avoid that fate.
And when the ketchup hits the fan, the MAGA movement may suddenly appear far more fragmented and fractious than it does this week. You can already see the cracks. Two towering ignoramuses like Marjorie Taylor Greene and Lauren Boebert should be BFFs, but they despise each other—the only policy of theirs I agree with.
If things really go south, expect MAGA Republicans to devour each other as hungrily as the worm who feasted on RFK Jr.’s brain—and that, my friends, will be worth binge-watching. I’m stocking up on popcorn now before Trumpflation makes it unaffordable.

Marjorie Taylor Greene (L), wishing a space laser would strike Lauren Boebert (R). (Win McNamee/Getty Images)
One parting thought. Post-election, the mainstream media’s hyperbolic reassessment of Trump—apparently, he’s now a political genius in a league with Talleyrand and Metternich—has been nauseating. It’s also insanely short-sighted. Again, a look at the not-so-distant past is instructive.
In 1984, after Reagan romped to victory with 59 percent of the popular vote and 525 electoral votes, Reaganism was universally declared an unstoppable juggernaut. But only two years later, in the 1986 midterms, Democrats proved the pundits wrong: they regained control of both the House and Senate for the first time since 1980. Those majorities enabled them to slam the brakes on Ronnie’s right-wing agenda, block the Supreme Court nomination of Robert Bork, and investigate Iran-Contra.
The lesson of the 1986 midterms is clear: the game’s far from over and there’s everything to play for. If we want to stem the tide of autocracy and kleptocracy, restore women’s rights and protect the most vulnerable, we don’t have the luxury of despair. The work starts now.

There is a great deal of conventional wisdom here. Trump has one approach to business: Bring everything down and collect the spoils. The problem is that there are about 50 million people in this country who seem willing to give to Trump until it hurts. It’s roughly the same bunch that have made televangelism so prosperous. It is also obvious that all of Trump’s minions have figured this out as well. Trump doesn’t measure wins and losses the way the rest of the establishment does. We keep using his failed businesses as examples of Trump’s incompetence, yet he remains a very wealthy man with tentacles happily in all sorts of criminality. Yes, the country will have an opportunity to recover somewhat in 2026, but Trump has learned that he will have enough support in Congress to skate by as he uses his immunity to do basically whatever he wants. If he hasn’t had a heart attack by 2028, he will then fend off any legal accountability using his ill gotten gains to pay attorneys while playing golf. Nixon didn’t have FOX News and Special Counsel Walsh discovered Reagan was too far gone to hold to account. We are where we are because too many of us define winning by keeping score, while many of the Republicans simply enjoy standing on the rubble they leave behind.
LikeLike
Trump is like a Mafia Don, keeping his rank in line through fear and domination.
LikeLike
“Trump is like a Mafia Don”
In more ways than one.
And I’m sure their paths crossed more than a few times. If you’re in the real estate development business in NYC…
LikeLike
I wish I were as sanguine as Borowitz, but I’m not, even though my car sported one of those Massachusetts bumpah sticahs.
Living by the coast, when I go to the beach the first bit of information I check is what time high tide is. It saves moving your chair, blanket, cooler and umbrella under duress when the ocean begins to lap around your ankles, carrying away your flip-flops. I fear what’s coming is a king tide, an astronomical high tide, that may crash past the beach and inundate the parking lot and the road beyond as well.
So I offer you Olga Lautman’s post; Lautman knows from autocracy.
https://open.substack.com/pub/olgalautman/p/now-that-america-elected-a-dictator?r=1cllq&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=email
LikeLike
“even though my car sported one of those Massachusetts bumpah sticahs.”
Spoken like a true Bay State denizen! 🙂
Reminds me of the good times when I lived there! My oldest was born in Worcester. . . oops. . . Wustah.
LikeLike
Now I know why we’re kindred spirits, Duane.
LikeLiked by 1 person
No matter how I try to find the positive, my thoughts are very similar to your thoughts Christine. If all the levers of power are controlled, Trump has the power to follow Putin’s playbook. No more protests, fair elections… the military will use its force on citizens- Trump states as such and even Miley and Kelly felt obligated to point out how dangerous he is to democracy.
LikeLike
. . . all very comforting and nicely said. There is a short-term, however (remembering Hitler laying waste to Europe and almost a whole civilization of Jews), and the long-term, where the genocide and war in Gaza have their roots in Hitler’s way of doing things.
For my own thinking, which is far from as comprehensive as I would like, both parties, big business, and especially those who have been involved in education for the last 50 years, should get out that popcorn and start watching that old movie: “While you were sleeping.”
For another moment of supreme contribution by a comedian to civil life in the United States, Jon Stewart as much as said this: because the other side (the GOP and Maga) are mean, careless, a bunch of neanderthal bullies, use unfair tactics, and have adopted NO so called “guardrails” so to get their way regardless, then let us do the same.
Basically, the devil in the other side sets the rules, and so everyone else must follow. Let me know if you can figure out what’s missing from this picture. CBK
LikeLike
“Let me know. . . what’s missing. . . .”
Democrats with spines and cojones.
LikeLike
Duane–yes, but you forgot Republicans who could have stopped this whole thing long ago. CBK
LikeLike
No doubt, but the two aren’t mutually exclusive, both exist at the same time in space.
LikeLike
Duane: My point exactly, which is why I mentioned it. CBK
LikeLiked by 1 person
Good morning Diane and everyone,
Time to stop crying and complaining and actually DO something!!! Sure, cry into your pillow. Go get a massage and then get active. Don’t let fear and lethargy get the better of you!! I can think of many things we can do. Every generation has had to fight for something. Why do we think we are any different? We have spoiled ourselves into complacency. Stop thinking you are defeated from the beginning!!
LikeLike
TRUMP FAILS TO WIN MAJORITY OF WE THE PEOPLE VOTE — HAS NO “MANDATE”
The results of the presidential vote show that Trump failed to win a majority and that the majority of Americans voted either for Kamala Harris or someone else to be President.
The results show that Trump got only 49.9% of the vote, and Harris won 48.2, which is only a narrow win. Republicans have praised the election as being fair and honest.
The result of Trump’s narrow win is that the U.S. is divided in half again and that there will be strong opposition to Trump’s policies from the Blue States and in the courts, regardless of who Trump appoints to head federal agencies.
This is basically a repeat of what happened in 2016 when Trump lost the We the People vote by more than 3 million and only squeaked into the White House because of the Electoral College vote.
That resulted in virtually nothing being accomplished during Trump’s first two years in office, and then in 2018 The People voted to give Democrats control of the House of Representatives, and so the remaining two years of Trump’s presidency resulted in not much being accomplished.
The next two years are going to be years of conflict, turmoil, and political fighting, which creates the opportunity for America’s enemies to take advantage of the situation and gain control of regions around the world.
Newsweek reports that Putin’s personal intelligence aide, Nikolai Patrushev, declared that Trump has “obligations” to Putin that Trump is now “obliged to fulfill.”
Trump’s choosing outrageous people like Gaetz, Kennedy, and Hegseth isn’t just “Trump being Trump” — it is Trump fulfilling his obligations to Putin by carrying out Putin’s plan to make America’s government and our military forces dysfunctional, giving Putin all the opportunity he needs to achieve his military and political goals in Ukraine, in the Republic of Georgia, and in Syria while America is in CHAOS.
Putin is likely also planning to invade Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia, and Moldavia, knowing that European NATO nations won’t go to war without the support of the United States, which Trump will withhold. NATO will be ended, and Russia will be free to take over its entire post-World War II empire and eventually all of Europe.
THE QUESTION IS — Are there enough members of Congress who have the backbone and the love of America to stand up to Trump, to not allow “recess appointments” of Trump’s hand-picked Putin heads of our government departments?
https://www.thenation.com/article/politics/donald-trump-vote-margin-narrowed/
LikeLike
Thanks for pointing out that the tRump got less than 50% of the votes cast. Beat me to the punch.
“The next two years are going to be years of conflict, turmoil, and political fighting, which creates the opportunity for America’s enemies to take advantage of the situation and gain control of regions around the world.”
I sure hope the Dims do everything possible to obstruct, deny, and otherwise hinder the xtian fundie’s agenda of which the tRump is the leading spokesperson but I am not holding my breath. Will it be more of the go along to get along play nice? I know what history tells us.
And by the second part of your statement do you mean Israel? Or does the Russian bear so scare you that you think Putin will invade NATO countries?
LikeLike
Re: ‘Don’t Blame Me. I’m from Massachusetts.’ I am, and I remember not long after the 1972 election, Gore Vidal spoke at Boston’s historic Faneuil Hall. He told the audience that their state’s being the only one to reject Nixon didn’t emanate from some unique-to-the-Bay-State higher moral plane. No, he told us, it was that since the founding, Mass. had been the most corrupt state in the nation. “And you know a crook when you see one.”
LikeLike
William,
Massachusetts is hardly the most corrupt in the nation, but it is also the most educated.
LikeLike
Diane and All: Below is a complete but relatively brief article from a weekly newsletter, NOEMA which, despite the article’s name, is relevant to the “what do we do” thoughts for voters, though in a more serious mode. All copied below: CBK
How To Soul-Search as a Losing Party
Deliberative citizens’ assemblies can reach outside the like-minded bubble.
Nathan Gardels, Noema Editor-in-Chief
The problem in a two-party system is that the rancor and partisan passions of electoral campaigns push voters into zero-sum camps. In reality, people’s views are nuanced. If disaggregated from the rigidity of this procrustean platform, their choices would reflect that.
After the Trumpist triumph, Democrats are rightly “soul-searching” to discover where they went wrong so they can once again compete for power down the road. If, in this process, they insist on defending their losing propositions defined by the zero-sum terms of the election, form political action committees on that basis for the next battle and limit their reflections within the bubble of the like-minded, they will only confirm what they thought they knew and lose even more traction with the body politic.
To reach out of the bubble and search for their soul among the public at large, the Democrats should organize a series of citizens’ assemblies or other deliberative forms of listening at scale precisely in order to discover the nuanced concerns of the average citizen, unaligned with the neat divisions of partisanship, and be responsive on that basis.Deliberative Democracy
These deliberative practices are not focus groups that survey the already-formed opinions of voters. They are nonpartisan gatherings of citizens, online or in person, indicative of the public as a whole in terms of race, gender, region, education level, etc. They are convened with professional moderators in a neutral space, “islands of goodwill” outside the electoral arena and its partisan ploys. Pro and con positions on a given issue are posited, verified information is presented and, like in a jury trial, expert witnesses are called to answer questions and provide context.
Decades of experience with this process around the world by the Deliberative Democracy Lab at Stanford University has consistently shown that, once informed and empathetically exposed to the concerns of others, participants move from previously held dispositions toward a consensus. Citizens’ assemblies in Ireland on abortion and in France on climate policies after the “yellow vest” protests have shown a similar result: Consensus can be reached on even the most flammable issues.
In recent years, the European Commission has convened deliberative citizens’ panels on issues ranging from “tackling hatred in society” and energy efficiency to food waste, and even committed to “embed deliberative democracy in EU policymaking” on an ongoing basis. In September, the Democratic Odyssey project of the European University Institute organized the first “transnational citizens’ assembly” at the birthplace of democracy in Athens.
Subscribe to Noema in print
Taiwan has pioneered a participatory platform for listening to the public at scale to reach rough consensus on a range of issues from whether to allow Uber to operate in Taipei to the legalities of adoption for same-sex couples. When she was digital minister, Audrey Tang invented the vTaiwan online platform, which engages thousands of citizens at a time to weigh in on social issues or policy propositions. In essence, as each participant formulates a position on an issue, others chime in with their own versions. Extreme positions fall to the margins with minimal support, and the more consensus views aggregate in the middle. In turn, legislators and parties formulate policies in full knowledge of where the public stands.Beyond Zero-Sum Camps
One can imagine what such deliberative practices might reveal not only for soul-searching among the Democrats but also about the nuances among those who voted for the Trump camp in the recent election.
It might reveal that many agree with same-sex marriage and other LGBTQ concerns, but oppose pre-adolescent hormone treatment and favor parental control over school authorities when it comes to a child’s gender identification.
It might reveal that many want to severely tighten border control and deport illegal immigrants who are convicted criminals, but oppose race-profiled traffic stops or raids on factories and fields to root out the undocumented and oppose ending DACA, which protects childhood arrivals brought to the U.S. by their parents on no volition of their own.
It might reveal that most people believe climate change is real and are not deniers, but are angry that the costs of the green energy transition fall unfairly on the less well-off who can’t afford Teslas or rising gas prices because of more stringent fuel-efficiency standards.Public Consensus May Yield A Divided Party
Paradoxically, this search for public consensus through disaggregation might well not unify the Democrats, but divide them. The emergence of a “common-sense” wing that departs from the ideological dispositions of a “woke wing” would seem an organic development.
That eventuality should not be seen as somehow kowtowing to the Trump agenda to garner votes in the next election. It should be seen as affirming liberal values in a way that listens to very real public concerns instead of ceding a response to them to the illiberal forces in society.
Share your thoughts with us. Email feedback@noemamag.com.
You can now listen to Noema articles via Noa, as well as read them! Just look for the “🎧 Listen” icons on our homepage.
LikeLike