We knew about RFK Jr. and his brain worm. We learned about his escapade with a dead bear cub that he found in the woods, put in his car, and dumped in Central Park as a joke. Weird. We also learned recently that he sold dope when he was a student at Harvard (The Atlantic published a story by author Kurt Andersen saying that RFK sold him cocaine and that Bobby was a heroin addict from ages 15 to 29). Last week, he teamed up with Trump, who advocated as recently as 2022 that drug dealers should be executed. Odd.
Now we learn in The New York Times that years ago, RFK Jr. sawed the head off a dead whale and brought it home. Weird!
It is a violation of longstanding federal law to collect parts from the carcass of a protected marine animal if there are still “soft tissues” attached.
It becomes political intrigue if the collector was Robert F. Kennedy Jr., and the severed head of a possibly protected marine mammal streamed “whale juice” down the side of the family minivan three decades ago.
On Monday, the political arm of the Center for Biological Diversity, a progressive environmental organization, called on federal authorities to investigate an episode, recounted by Mr. Kennedy’s daughter in a 2012 magazine article, in which she said Mr. Kennedy chain-sawed the head off a dead whale on a beach in Hyannis Port, Mass., bungee-corded it to their vehicle’s roof, and drove it five hours to the family home in Mount Kisco, N.Y.
“It was the rankest thing on the planet,” Kick Kennedy, then 24, told Town & Country, in the article, which described Mr. Kennedy as someone who likes to study animal skulls and skeletons.
The story recently resurfaced, including in an entertainment publication, The Wrap, on Sunday and in a New York Post article on Monday.
In a letter to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, which oversees marine protection, Brett Hartl, the national political director for the Center for Biological Diversity Action Fund, wrote: “There are good reasons why it is illegal for any person to collect or keep parts of any endangered species.”
“Most importantly, vital research opportunities are lost when individuals scavenge a wildlife carcass and interfere with the work of scientists. This is particularly true of marine mammals, which are some of the most difficult wildlife species in the world to study….
Mr. Kennedy, he wrote, may have violated not only the Marine Mammal Protection Act (1972) and the Endangered Species Act (1973) — two seminal marine conservation laws — but also the Lacey Act of 1900, a conservation law signed by President William McKinley that prohibits the transportation of illegally gathered wildlife, dead or alive, across state lines.
The whale has now joined a baby bear, at least one emu and a worm whose deaths have been intimately associated with Mr. Kennedy, the independent presidential candidate — and environmental lawyer — who last week joined forces with former President Donald J. Trump’s campaign.
Well, RFK Jr. may be a former environmental activist and a prominent conspiracy theorist, but he is not an animal rights activist!

I find it totally amazing that in America, in 2024, that a “wackadoodle” like RFK Jr is a candidate for President of the United States. It baffles my mind how screwed up our political system is that somebody like RFK Jr. bot is a candidate and especially how he gets ANY AIR TIME from the media. He truly is “three bricks short of a full load”, yet he has achieved the ability to be a viable candidate. Once removed from RJK Jr, is my opinion that the current system of enabling the Political Parties to select and present candidates for the most Powerful Person in the WORLD his severely broken. For a Democracy, of the people, by the people and for the people, to be successful the “best and the brightest” must have opportunity to gain the office of the President. Currently we have a bunch of “also rans” being presented.
LikeLike
“. . . yet he has achieved the ability to be a viable candidate.”
No, he didn’t achieve that. His family name carried him for a little bit, nothing more. He had no chance whatsoever to begin with, just like any other candidate that isn’t a Rethug or Dimocrap.
LikeLike
RFK Jr and his loonie ideas should serve as a PSA for illegal drug use. It’s too bad that he has a “cult following”.
LikeLike
What a horrifying story…the stuff of a dark monty python or Fireside Theatre drama.
LikeLike
Correction: Firesign Theatre. They are still around.
https://www.facebook.com/search/top?q=the%20firesign%20theatre
LikeLike
Weird and weirder!
LikeLike
The Kurt Andersen story reminds us of another thing that RFK Jr. and Trump have in common — the fact that they both received enormous, undeserved advantages because of the affirmative action for the rich and privileged that Ivy League colleges practice, whereby undeserving mediocre and primarily white applicants who have screwed up in high school are still admitted to supposedly highly selective colleges that reject students who have far better academic records and are far more deserving but don’t get in because of who their families are (or rather, who their families are not). Most beneficiaries of this affirmative action aren’t as well known (before he married Ivanka and became son-in-law to the president, Jared Kushner was barely known outside NYC). But I’m not surprised that two of them joined up in their like-minded desire for power that they have not earned, but that money can buy them.
LikeLike
Having him endorse tRump fits perfectly with the “weird” narrative. As Tim Walz said, “These people are just weird”. Not to mention the illegal aspect of his actions, the more you know about him, the stranger he becomes.
LikeLike
It is equally odd that R.F.K., Jr. who spent a good deal of his time as an environmentalist and supporter of clean water access would team up with a man whose environmental policy is “Drill, Baby, Drill.”
LikeLike
When I taught, examples of irony were always needed.
LikeLike
https://subscriber.politicopro.com/article/eenews/2024/01/30/biden-administration-oil-drilling-permits-outpace-trump-ee-00138376
LikeLike
Our timeline is beginning to make Mike Judge’s “Idiocracy” look milquetoast.
LikeLike
Is Judge the one hitting so many homeruns?
LikeLike
The entire so-called “liberal” news media is just desperate for a “gotcha” to use to smear Kamala and Tim Walz. Watch for it to begin at tonight’s joint interview – non-stop negative reporting of right wing talking points.
Today the NYT wrote a news story that they believe is absolutely of vital importance for voters to know about. Expect Kamala and Walz to be asked about it, and expect this very important and vital news story to be beat to death in dozens or hundreds of “liberal” media articles. It was written by the NYT reporter on the Kamala Harris beat to emphasize (and reassure their Republican sources) that those political reporters will be on the case digging up anything and everything that can smear Kamala and Walz.
What is this important story so newsworthy that the NYT reporter assigned to the Kamala Harris beat is reporting it as part of the Kamala/Walz narrative that they believe voters must be reminded of as often as possible.
The NYT reporter informs us of the shocking scandal that Democrat governor Wes Moore who is NOT up for re-election and who has never once SAID that he had won a bronze star has been accused of the terrible crime of not correcting the 3 people total who, over the last 15 years, erroneously stated that he did win the bronze star. Again, Wes Moore has NEVER actually publicly SAID he won the bronze star – he has has readily acknowledged that he did not! – but the accusation is that because 3 people over 15 years made that error, it was Moore “stealing valor”. And now the NYT has “proof”!
The proof is truly ridiculous. Despite the fact that Wes Moore has never told anyone that he won the bronze star nor campaigned on it, apparently the NYT found an application for a white house fellow program that he submitted when he was 27 and leaving the armed forces. While it’s not listed as an honor in the place where honors are listed, it is true that on the 2nd page, the seventh paragraph of the page long biographical narrative there is a single sentence that does say that he won two medals, including the Bronze star. Why did Wes Moore “steal valor” so badly, by including it where it’s highly unlikely to be noticed?
It turns out that his army supervisor who looked over the application TOLD him to put in that sentence about the two awards – which he did not want to do! – because the two awards had ALREADY been signed off on by everyone who needed to sign off and he would have those awards shortly, and so it was only right to include it in the application! His supervisor readily told the NYT that is what happened. It is totally plausible that Moore didn’t remember that he had added that sentence in an application at the recommendation of his military supervisor and in fact, when he got the fellowship there was no mention of him winning the bronze star in his bio. Furthermore, Moore DID receive the other medal and it does appear that he actually should have received the bronze star given the paperwork that had been submitted. The NYT is making a big deal of this by interviewing partisan Republicans who say never does anyone who is told by their commanding officer that they are getting a bronze star because all the paper work is signed ever say they are getting a bronze star until they get it. It’s just trying to manufacture a scandal based on a person who put something in an application 20 years ago which they were told by reliable folks they should do because it was true, and when it didn’t happen, never made that claim again! The NYT also tried to “scandalize” the fact that 27 year old Wes Moore did not go to the army demanding the Bronze star he had been told by the army he was getting, as if that kind of entitled behavior is the norm. What is the norm is for an unentitled kid to say “oh well, I guess I didn’t get the Bronze Star after all” and not say that he did ever again — which is exactly what Moore did.
Meanwhile, Moore graduated Phi Beta Kappa from Johns Hopkins and won a Rhodes Scholarship. He served honorable in the military with stellar reviews from his commanding officer. He thought he won the Bronze Star for a brief moment and it’s absurd to think that Moore should have assumed that a higher up officer was lying to him or badly mistaken. Moore had so many other qualifications that it is clear that the brief mention of the Bronze Star at the end of the 7th paragraph was not something he needed to highlight. He included it because a higher up military person advising him told him to.
This is not a scandal. Furthermore, this is not a scandal that has anything to do with Kamala Harris.
But the NYT’s Kamala Harris reporter says it does, because Wes Moore spoke at the DNC. And he was guilty of the same stolen valor that Tim Walz is guilty of.
These examples that are being used to smear Walz and Moore (to smear Kamala) are NOT what stolen valor means. Someone who included winning a Bronze Star in an application 20 years ago – because he was told he DID get a Bronze Star and he should include it – who did not pretend to win a Bronze Star when he learned the commanding officer was mistaken, is NOT “stealing valor”. These attacks on Democrats make a mockery of what our political system is about.
I don’t even particularly like Wes Moore, but this attempt to smear Kamala and Walz by what amounts to ridiculous swiftboating because of a single reference in 2006 application that happened at the time when he was told he was receiving the Bronze Star is NOT a scandal. The NYT is desperate. Wes Moore isn’t even running for office now, but guilt by association to undermine a Dem is the name of the game.
LikeLike
The NYT is the enemy of the people.
LikeLike
Did you even bother to read that NYT story? Do you think Wes Moore really “stole valor”? If a Republican had done what Moore did, I would genuinely not try to manipulate it into something “scandalous”. It is clear he did not “claim” he won the medal, except for a single instance of him doing so in a fellowship application BECAUSE HE WAS TOLD HE HAD BY A SUPERIOR OFFICER AND SHOULD PUT IT IN. Since Moore never made that claim again once he realized it wasn’t correct, it is not a “scandal” nor “stolen valor.”
But it would be great if he actually gets the Bronze Star that he was clearly supposed to receive and had earned.
Or maybe you think it would be better if he is arrested under the “stolen valor” act for committing such a horrendous crime on that 2006 application and thrown in jail, along with General Fenzel who told him to commit that horrible crime and steal valor. Are you also advocating for General Fenzel to be court-martialed?
I remember some high ranking soldiers and politicians wearing medals they had never earned and claiming medals they had never earned for years. Moore did not do that. He had every reason to believe he was receiving that medal for a brief moment which was the only time he claimed he had.
Once again, the NYT holds a Dem to a standard that no other person has ever been held to.
If you think it is fair and balanced to call this “stolen valor”, and Wes Moore is a fair target because he spoke at the DNC and defended Walz, then that speaks for itself. But I hope you are honest enough to recognize the difference between lying and a person who was told something was true by a reliable source 20 years ago, believed it for a minute, and once he learned it wasn’t true, never said it was true for the next 20 years! Especially when the person who mistakenly told him something was true readily acknowledges he did and was so certain it was true that only this week did he learn what he was positive would happen did not happen.
This is like John Kerry. A manufactured scandal to sow doubt about Kamala and Walz’ honesty and service.
But if you think Wes Moore deserves this attack because he did something scandalous, then that speaks for itself. I can see why you like the NYT and defend it so strongly. I am sure they appreciate your support.
LikeLike
No, I didn’t read it. I actually don’t know what you’re talking about and I don’t have the energy to find out. I just saw that it was another comment about how the NYT is the enemy of the people.
LikeLike
FLERP, read the story about Wes Moore. It’s bizarre that the nation’s leading newspaper devoted so many column inches to a non-story.
LikeLike
Agree it seems like a minor scandal. But the idea that the article is an attempt to tar Harris is goofy. They only reason Harris is mentioned is to explain why the “scandal” has become nationally newsworthy again, i.e. because Moore has been prominent lately due to his being shortlisted for veep consideration and his speech at the convention. Anyone who reads that article and gets upset because they think it’s a hit piece on Kamala Harris is just looking for reasons to get upset.
LikeLike
FLERP,
What surprised me about the Wes Moore article was that it was so long. Basically, there was nothing there. Stories like that discourage people from running for high office. If you are not perfect, don’t run. The press will expose every wart or mole.
LikeLike
NYCPSP,
I agree and disagree.
I thought the story about Wes Moore was a hit job. If you read the whole story, it was clear that his superiors recommended him for a bronze star. The recommendation was not rejected; it got lost in the shuffle. I couldn’t understand why such a lot of space for a non-story.
But I disagree that the Times is out to help Trump. They have written scathing stories about him and will do so in the future.
LikeLike
Thank you for your honesty. Now I understand why you felt it was so important that you took the time to reply to a comment about an article you had never read, in order to put words in my mouth that I never said.
It makes perfect sense!
As usual, I am flattered that you took the time to reply to me despite having no idea what article I am referring to! Thanks for caring!
LikeLike
No worries. Try not to get so upset about the NYT!
LikeLike
“I couldn’t understand why such a lot of space for a non-story.”
Exactly. But the byline says it all.
Reid J. Epstein “now writes about Kamala Harris’s presidential campaign.”
The reporter covering Kamala Harris RIGHT NOW devoted an extraordinary amount of column inches on a non-story about SOMEONE ELSE – a hit job on Wes Moore, a Governor who is not even running for anything this election season. Why?
The answer – the reason a reporter assigned to Kamala Harris wrote it – is made clear in the story:
“Mr. Moore’s old claim has come to light as his national profile has risen. Vice President Kamala Harris included him in the first round of candidates vetted to be her running mate — questions about the Bronze Star did not come up, Mr. Moore said, while the Harris campaign declined to comment. He also gave a prominent, well-received speech last week at his party’s convention.
And as Republicans accuse the man Ms. Harris ultimately chose as her running mate, Gov. Tim Walz of Minnesota, of exaggerating his military record, the vice president’s campaign has dispatched Mr. Moore to defend him on cable television.”
(FYI, the NYT is famous for using the passive voice — “Moore’s old claim has HAS COME TO LIGHT” (from some mysterious being on high?) to hide that this narrative is being pushed by partisan Republicans whose motives would raise doubts about its veracity. When the NYT wants to give a questionable narrative the maximum credibility – which means whenever the narrative undermines a Democrat — it hides the partisan nature of how this became a story. The story “has come to light” – as if it just conveniently did so out of the blue at the very time that Republicans wanted that narrative amplified.)
Just a little effort by the NYT reporter covering Kamala to find a story to sow a little more distrust in Kamala, to create a little more doubt that she’s trustworthy, to remind people that even the liberal NYT confirms as newsworthy that there are serious “questions” raised about Tim Walz also lying about his service. Giving legitimacy to right wing attacks against a democrat is a specialty of the NYT. Amplifying that it is important to inform the public of all the “questions raised” about Moore — but really about Walz, Kamala’s pick for VP — is swiftboating. Swiftboating Moore to make some point about Walz and by association, Kamala. Kamala’s campaign wouldn’t comment! The innuendo being that Kamala is supposed to comment because this relates to her?? Like she is the boss of the Maryland Governor?
There is no other reason for Wes Moore’s 2006 application for a fellowship to be so closely read as if the fact he included it there (because a superior officer told him to) somehow is more relevant than the fact that he NEVER said it publicly because a few months after that 2006 fellowship application was submitted he learned that the superior officer who told him to include it because the paperwork was already approved was mistaken! A non-scandal that is only newsworthy because the reporter covering Kamala could pretend there was a valid NEGATIVE news hook related to Kamala and Walz – the campaign he is covering.
This happens far too frequently to be a coincidence and that’s why so many media critics – including more conservative ones who aren’t partisans – are starting to notice.
LikeLike
“Agree it seems like a minor scandal.”
Diane Ravitch called this a “NON-STORY”. You just called it a MINOR SCANDAL.
So I don’t believe you and Diane “agree” at all.
But duly noted that you used the word “scandal”, which is your take from reading the NYT article. (Which kind of proves my point about bias.) You read the article and you believe it IS a report about a “scandal” – albeit just a “minor” scandal. You’ve rejected Diane’s point that it is a non-story because Moore did nothing at all that an unbiased person would characterize as a “scandal” — even a minor one.
You’ve rationalized why the NYT reported it — of course the NYT has a duty to report on “SCANDALS” involving politicians, even “minor” ones. It’s not the job of the NYT to cover up SCANDALS, major or minor.
But if you actually agreed with Diane’s point that it is NON-STORY and not a “minor scandal”, then you’d probably have a bit of curiosity about why the reporter assigned to cover KAMALA HARRIS wrote a non-story about a Democrat Governor and made a point of tying that Governor’s non-scandalous behavior to the non-scandalous behavior of Walz – because both their behavior supposedly “raises questions” about their honesty and their military service. Turning a positive (honorable military service) into a negative by parsing every word for the last 20 years to find a “scandal” is what the NYT does to Democrats. Over and over again.
Meanwhile real scandals – like George W. Bush’s “unusual” service and Cadet Bone Spur’s constant denigration of soldiers, except for the brief times one helps him politically, is barely reported.
LikeLike
I would love to see the media dig deeper into Trump’s avoidance of service.
LikeLike
Ma’am, please step away from the New York Times.
LikeLike
flerp!,
Try not to get so upset that I read the NYT and have an opinion on its bias. If it makes you uncomfortable that I express an opinion different than your own, go out and enjoy the day, Sir!
LikeLike
From Daily Kos:
“If you are not willing to differentiate between policies centered on “tax cuts” and that stew of authoritarian atrocities, you are not an actual journalist—and you are a bad person. Full. Stop.”
More NYT nonsense, which is noted in this article in Daily Kos:
“The NYT Again Both-Sides Fascist Extremism, Balancing Harris ‘Tax Cuts’ Against Mass Deportations“
The NYT “objective” news reporter writes: “Ms. Harris is promising a cocktail of tax cuts meant to spur home construction — which several economists said could help create supply. But she is also floating a $25,000 benefit to help first-time buyers break into the market, which many economists worry could boost demand too much, pushing home prices even higher. And both sets of policies would need to pass in Congress, which would influence their design and feasibility.
Mr. Trump’s plan is garnering even more doubt. He pledges to deport undocumented immigrants, which could cut back temporarily on housing demand but would also most likely cut into the construction work force and eventually limit new housing supply. His other ideas include lowering interest rates, something that he has no direct control over and that is poised to happen anyway.”
As the Daily Kos writer notes:
“What. I mean … I’m sorry, but what? So on one side you’ve got a concrete policy plan of “tax cuts” that’s so well within the mainstream of what politicians and economists usually reach for in these situations that you couldn’t, without naming the source of the plan, tell which party was proposing it.
And on the other side we have “Mr. Trump’s” offered plan, which is to a stage a Holocaust-scaled roundup of undocumented immigrants, putting them on trains and busses and shoving them across the border or putting them in internment camps if our neighbors can’t handle the mass of now-impoverished refugees all at once, and this will likely include American-born children because his close advisers have announced that from now on those children won’t be considered to have citizenship because screw them, that’s why, and it will definitely cause widespread chaos as entire sectors of the U.S. economy are thrown into disarray, especially when it comes to food production, home construction, and other labor-intensive work, and there is broad consensus among economists that “deport a bunch of people” doesn’t even amount to toenail clippings of a serious “housing” plan, and again all of this is premised on a Holocaust-scale hunt for, capture, imprisonment and deportation of anyone who can’t immediately produce whatever paperwork Trump’s personal collection loud white nationalists demand they show and will then challenge.
That’s the Both Sides you’re gonna do on us today. One side proposes a bog standard tax cut. Aaaand the other side proposes a white nationalism-premised pogrom that doesn’t have a think to do with “housing policy” except that when pressured for justification some f–kwit at the Institute of Fascist Ideas thought back to America’s internment camps for Japanese Americans and offered “and if we put them in camps, we can take their homes!”
And Marcy Wheeler at Empty Wheel again notes how opinion always seeps into the negative NEWS stories about Kamala written by certain NYT reporters (including the one who just wrote a long story about the supposed Wes Moore scandal)
“Michael Shear and Reid Epstein Feign Stupidity about Trump’s Decade-Long Pitch for Authoritarianism”
The Daily Kos writer sums up a problem that some folks here would prefer that Marcy Wheeler and the writer at Daily Kos SHUT UP about:
“So this is what I mean, when I propose that maybe it’s not that the Republican Party descended into overt fascism because something-something demographic changes in America or due to Sudden Onset Economic Anxiety the moment anyone other than a glowingly white dude was given the keys to the Oval Office. Maybe the Republican Party has been that way for a great many decades now, but in past decades we had editors at our nation’s top newspapers and in television studios who had the Bare Fucking Decency to treat such extremism as scandalous, outrageous, and inherently corrupt—and now we don’t.”
“Donald Trump attempted to overthrow the duly elected United States government, you know. It caused deaths inside the U.S. Capitol. Lawmakers had to run for their lives. It is perfectly acceptable, and even a moral requirement among decent people and those who profess to be patriots themselves, to treat such a man as not a serious policy thinker but a criminal menace. He is an adjudicated rapist, a tax cheat, a documented hyper-liar, a felon, the would-be benefactor of a violent attempted insurrection, and is proposing a plan that amounts to the fascist reimagining of the nation into one in which members of the opposing party are barred from government, educators and authors and librarians who distribute information contrary to party orthodoxy may face prison, and a nationwide manhunt will be conducted for the other in our midst.
If you are not willing to differentiate between policies centered on “tax cuts” and that stew of authoritarian atrocities, you are not an actual journalist—and you are a bad person. Full. Stop.”
LikeLike
Love your 12:32 PM comment, FLERP!
LikeLiked by 1 person