Politico reporters Liz Crampton and Andrew Atterbury report on Governor Greg Abbott’s determination to purge the Republican Party in Texas of any elected official who opposes vouchers. He managed to defeat some rural Republicans who put the needs of their communities over the demands of the governors. He has driven the state party to the extremist right by targeting moderate Republicans. He is fighting for a voucher program that will cost the state $2 billion a year by 2028 and serve mainly students already in private schools. In effect, the state would transfer billions to the mostly white, affluent kids in private schools while underfunding the public schools that enroll five million children, mostly black and brown.
Today are the runoffs that will determine whether Abbott has enough votes to pass a voucher bill. If he wins, he can deliver a plum to his wealthy and upper-middle-class supporters who send their kids to private schools.
Crampton and Atterbury write:
When nearly two dozen Republican state lawmakers defied Texas Gov. Greg Abbott to oppose a centerpiece of his agenda — the creation of a school voucher program — they knew they’d face political payback.
But Abbott’s vengeance has been ferocious, even by Texas standards.
He helped knock off seven incumbents in the Republican primary in March and is targeting a handful more contests at the end of the month by handpicking conservative challengers and collecting millions of dollars from donors in Texas and beyond. Another two anti-voucher incumbents lost even though they weren’t specifically blacklisted by Abbott.
The enormous amount of money pouring into Texas Republican primaries from national pro-school-choice groups sets a new precedent as national interests become increasingly intertwined in state legislatures. Abbott’s targeting of former allies has escalated a Republican civil war that is defining Texas politics today, all in pursuit of enacting a voucher law that stands to remake K-12 education in the nation’s second biggest state.
“It’s just so unusual for an incumbent governor to campaign against members of his own party,” John Colyandro, a Texas lobbyist and former top aide to Abbott, said in an interview. “He was the pivot around which everything turned here.”

Backed by deep-pocketed conservative figures like former Education Secretary Betsy DeVos, and Republican megadonor Jeff Yass, the school-choice movement has leveraged Republican majorities in state legislatures across the country to pass laws that provide families with lump sums to spend on private school tuition. The efforts, according to supporters, are meant to bolster parental rights by giving families the financial freedom to choose a different option for schooling their children.
Anti-voucher Republicans “thought they had a stronghold,” said Hillary Hickland, a candidate who was backed by Abbott and won her race in March. “They had this elitist air, that they know better for a community than the taxpayers, or the parents. And they were wrong.”
[Of course, it’s the height of irony to refer to the supporters of public schools as “elitists.” Abbott could not have knocked off his critics without the millions sent by out-of-state billionaires DeVos and Yass and in-state billionaires Dunn and Wilks.]
Ten states passed or expanded school-choice laws in 2023 alone. There are now 18 states that have education savings accounts, which allow parents to spend state funding on a variety of choices including private schools. Students are flocking to these programs, yet data shows that the majority of scholarships or vouchers are going to wealthier families already enrolled in private schools — not students leaving their traditional public schools.
But despite all the momentum across the country, voucher bills have repeatedly failed in Texas. That’s why Abbott and pro-school-choice advocates are continuing their big money push as early voting is underway for the primary runoffs next week. Even after knocking out a number of party defectors in March, Abbott and aligned Republicans are teetering on securing enough votes to pass school-choice when the Legislature returns with a new class in January 2025.
“We’re not counting our chickens, not stopping, not laying off,” said David Carney, a consultant with Abbott’s campaign, in an interview.
Abbott’s vendetta comes as other GOP figures are also going after fellow Republicans for perceived crimes against the party, notably Attorney General Ken Paxton’s targeting of incumbents for voting to impeach him. House Speaker Dade Phelan is among those under siege as he fights to defend his own hold on power in the runoffs next Tuesday.
In prior years, state legislature races in Texas typically cost about $250,000. But spending in some of these primaries has been upwards of $1 million, thanks to the involvement of pro-voucher interests attacking Republicans.
“We are outgunned here big time,” said Rep. DeWayne Burns, a Republican lawmaker fighting to keep in his seat representing a district encompassing Cleburne, Texas, a town on the outskirts of Dallas-Fort Worth. “This is a true David v. Goliath situation and I’m the David here.”
The negative attacks on anti-voucher Republicans financed by PACs have gone beyond school-choice and targeted the incumbents for lacking conservative bona fides on issues like guns and the border — often in false or misleading mailers, texts and advertisements.
In one example, residents of Mineral Wells, Texas received mailers paid for by Libertarian PAC Make Liberty Win going after incumbent Rep. Glenn Rogers, who lost his primary in March to an Abbott-backed challenger. That mailer accused him of being “anti-gun” and warned that “if we don’t vote Rogers out, he will only drift further left.”
Rogers, a fifth-generation rancher and veterinarian who was first elected in 2021, said that he was also accused of being soft on the border, an attack line he believes Abbott chose because that issue resonates more with voters than vouchers.
“If you tell a lie often enough, it becomes truth to a low-information voter,” Rogers said. “Unfortunately we have a lot of low-information voters. That doesn’t have anything to do with their mental ability, it has to do with them keeping up. Eventually it becomes truth in their minds.”
Although Republicans boast big majorities in both chambers and control the governorship, school-choice proposals were repeatedly swatted down in 2023, even after Abbott made them a top priority and called special sessions to address the issue. The latest proposal would have given around 40,000 students access to about $10,500 in vouchers for private schooling or $1,000 toward homeschooling.
Republicans, many from rural areas, who have long been opposed to vouchers over concerns that it would jeopardize public education funding, banded with Democrats for an unlikely alliance that proved to be a thorn in Abbott’s side. Those lawmakers were spooked by an estimate that the vouchers program would cost the state more than $2 billion annually by 2028.
“I voted for my district and I have no regrets,” said San Antonio Rep. Steve Allison, who lost his primary. “What the governor did is extremely wrong. Me and the others that he came after have been with him 100 percent of the time on every issue except this one.”
Abbott has major money on his side. Among the constellation of PACs and donations from wealthy political players dumping money into Texas elections this year, there’s Pennsylvania billionaire Yass. A major school-choice supporter, Yass personally cut a check to Abbott for $6 million last year, which the governor called the largest single donation in Texas history.
Yass has also given to PACs backing pro-voucher candidates, like the School Freedom Fund, which is affiliated with the Club for Growth and has run multi-million-dollar TV blitzes.
DeVos’ PAC, the American Federation for Children Victory Fund, has pumped $4.5 million into the races — nearly half of what the PAC has promised to spend nationwide this cycle. Of the 13 anti-school-choice lawmakers zeroed in on by the PAC, 10 candidates either lost their race or were forced into an upcoming runoff.
“If you’re a candidate or lawmaker who opposes school-choice and freedom in education — you’re a target,” Tommy Schultz, CEO of AFC, said when the fundraising organization was createdin 2023. “If you’re a champion for parents — we’ll be your shield.”
Another group, the Family Empowerment Coalition PAC, launched in June 2023 with the singular goal of defending incumbents from both parties who voted for school-choice. But the organization expanded its mission a few months later to include supporting primary challengers to incumbents who voted against the measure — and has spent at least $1.4 million this election cycle, according to data from Transparency USA, a political spending database.
Texas is just one state where the groups are getting involved. Make Liberty Win is also singling out anti-voucher Republicans in Tennessee and Ohio.
All that outside money comes on top of typical spending from big-name conservative donors in Texas, like Tim Dunn and Farris Wilks who each have donated at least $1.7 million to various lawmakers since July 2023, according to data from the Texas Ethics Commission compiled by Chrisopher Tackett, a campaign finance watchdog.
Abbott’s own PAC has donated hundreds of thousands of dollars this cycle to candidates seeking to unseat incumbents who opposed vouchers. He has handed out endorsements to challengers and shown up for appearances to back them on the campaign trail.
The Abbott campaign is projected to spend some $11 million during the primary races, including $4 million on the runoffs alone, Carney said. That’s a massive jump from the $500,000 he would typically spend for primaries, he said.
The governor touts school-choice as a means for parents to leave struggling campuses, often using districts in Houston and Dallas as punching bags. He recently pointed to Dallas schools having a resource guide about students identifying with a different gender and a Lewisville teacher dressing in drag as examples of why vouchers are needed — demonstrating how Republicans are leveraging the culture war to bolster support for vouchers.
“If you’re a parent in that situation, should you be trapped within a school district that’s focusing on issues like that?” Abbott said during a keynote address to the Texas Public Policy Foundation in March. “Of course not.”
By Abbott’s math, the Texas House is sitting at 74 votes in favor of school-choice considering who won their primary race and the candidates that reached a runoff. That count, though, would still put the House two votes shy of passing the landmark policy — upping the stakes for the runoffs.
“I came out with no ambiguity about where I stood or what I expected,” Abbott said. “If the governor puts something on the emergency item list, that means this is something that must pass. And if it doesn’t pass, there’s going to be challenges to deal with.”

I suppose it’s encouraging that this has been beaten back so many times, including across party lines. Because I can imagine a lot of people wouldn’t mind getting a check for $10,500 to defray the cost of private school. I know I wouldn’t mind it, even though it’s only a fraction of the insane amount I pay for private school.
LikeLike
If Abbott’s allies prevail in GOP primary runoffs, he will have the votes he needs to pass vouchers.
LikeLike
There is a similar rift in the Florida GOP. In Santa Rosa County the MAGA maniacs are attacking and running against the current Republican superintendent of the school district because she is not a big MAGA supporter. She is, however, a qualified and experienced administrator. M4L is running a former bilingual teacher from Texas against her. There is a third GOP candidate, a math teacher, whose platform seems to be focused on fiscal restraint. https://navarrenewspaper.com/brenda-stephens-announces-candidacy-for-santa-rosa-county-superintendent-of-schools/
LikeLike
Vouchers do not work for every student or family. Private schools DO NOT have to accept every student that steps up to their doors. Whether they have a voucher or not.
If the voucher does not cover the tuition then the student does not get in the private school. If the student is not at the top of his class academically, has a disability, has had some discipline problems, not the right religion or political party, etc., then the student does not get in the private school. Vouchers do not pay for transportation to and from private schools.
There is a long laundry list of why some students cannot get in private schools.
So, who is left behind in the public schools. Students that Abbott and his kind do not want to deal with. Students who come from the poor and disadvantaged families. Students who parents are not in the upper middle class or higher.
Abbott and his kind are segregationist. Not necessarily along race or color lines but segregationist of have and have nots.
LikeLike
A-BUTT is pushing vouchers, because he hates democracy.
Vouchers are NOT about Democracy, Public Schools ARE.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Billionaires are paying off right wing governors to embrace vouchers even though vouchers make no academic sense and will create a fiscal crisis in most states. Wealthy extremists like Yass and the Texas oilmen despise public education and want to dismantle it.
LikeLike
Indiana is a red state that wastes money on vouchers for wealthy parents. Public schools are horribly underfunded and it is illegal for teachers to strike. [I often wonder if the GOP wants uneducated people. They are more likely to vote for Trump and Republicans.]
Popularity and cost of Indiana’s voucher program surge as more wealthy families sign up
May 24, 2024
Indiana spent roughly $439 million on its voucher program for the 2023-24 school year as enrollment in private schools hit a record high, a surge driven in large part by students from wealthy families.
The figure represents a $127 million increase from the $311 million the state spent on its voucher program last year, according to the Choice Scholarship Program annual report released Friday. The number of participating students in 2023-24 increased by approximately 32% from 2022-23.
Additionally, **the number of voucher students from households making more than $150,000 soared after lawmakers last year abolished most requirements for participation and raised income eligibility to 400% of the threshold to qualify for the federal free and reduced-price lunch program.**
Nearly 8,000 students in 2023-24 came from households making between $150,000 to $200,000 annually, up from around 2,800 in 2022-23 — an increase of 183%.
And the number of voucher students from households making more than $200,000 increased roughly tenfold, from 354 students in 2022-23 to about 3,700 in 2023-24.
The number of students from those two income brackets combined who used vouchers in 2023-24 increased by 8,495, representing just over half the total growth of about 16,720 students.
Among the other income brackets, around 2,000 more students came from families making up to $50,000; an additional 2,000 came from families making between $50,000-$100,000; and the number of students from families making between $100,000 to $150,000 grew by a little more than 4,000.
Critics of the voucher program warned last year that relaxing the income eligibility requirement would effectively subsidize students from wealthier families to attend private schools. Supporters, meanwhile, said relaxing eligibility would give parents more choices in their students’ education…
LikeLike
carolmalasia: You wrote: “[I often wonder if the GOP wants uneducated people. They are more likely to vote for Trump and Republicans.]”
I think so. In our present Orwellian tribalized world, “educated people” equates to those who have gone to public school and come out with those horrible “liberal values,” . . . like understanding why it’s important for governments to have the good of “the people” in mind and so to have the power to regulate big companies to keep them from trashing the universe. Stuff like that. CBK
LikeLike
Video | Facebook
LikeLike
Bob: Thanks for posting that video. I rest my case. CBK
LikeLike
CBK,
Of course the GOP doesn’t want educated people who insist on thinking for themselves.
The GOP caters to those who reject science, who think climate change is a hoax, who think vaccines are deadly, who are afraid of books with language they don’t approve.
LikeLike
Diane: . . . a horrible tradeoff that’s not theirs to make. CBK
LikeLike
Same in our state to the north. Incredible amounts of money come from out of state to push this issue which has never really had much popular support. Some of the organizations I have logged:The Oklahoma Federation for Children – last time I checked had D.C. address. This is Betsy DeVos moneyOklahomans for Prosperity – This is Americans for Prosperity in Oklahoma which was originally founded and funded by the Bros. Koch.OCPA – an in-state organization which, in terms of policy, fucntions as ALEC in Oklahoma. There are more. I started adding up all the money once and it was eventually too big a project. I think we are in the cross-hairs because we are a smaller red state so they can use us as a starting place for their battles. Per the Law of Supply and Demand, as the amount of money available increases to pay for private schools the better private schools can be expected to increase their tuition to match the voucher amount and private options will proliferate.
LikeLike
Well, Abbott’s middle name is Wayne.
https://www.thenewstalkers.com/community/discussion/2531/list-of-killers-with-the-middle-name-of-wayne
LikeLike
RECAP from prior post: I get really angry mostly at those MAGA people who have no idea what losing freedom will mean, and who are so willing to trade their own and everyone else’s freedoms for keeping their own racism, classism, politician ambitions, religious ideologies, and especially thoughtlessness, in place. CBK
LikeLike
Marco Rubio in 2016, going on and on and on about how Trump was conning America and had a history of being a conman–of selling fake charities and universities and substandard airlines and steaks and so on.
For example.
LikeLike
Bob, that’s a great video of Rubio ripping Trump as a con man. Now he’s hoping to be VP to the grifter. Can you find it?
LikeLike
Ask and ye shall receive:
LikeLike
One of the greatest of theologians, and someone who has contemplated the problem of evil in several luminous books, such as Pilgrim at Tinker Creek and Tickets on a Prayer Wheel, Annie Dillard, observes that, “We have not yet encountered any god who is as merciful as a man who flicks a beetle over on its feet.” This characteristic–the ability to empathize with another being’s suffering enough to be moved to try to eliminate it–is what characterizes the best of us humans. But many, like Abbott or Trump or the killer known to the world as the Iceman, are so damaged emotionally that they feel none of this. There’s a name for this condition: psychopathy. A psychopath is governor of Texas. And another is the leading candidate for president in the 2024 contest.
LikeLike