Robyn Dixon and other staff of The Washington Post wrote a stunning account of the “new Russia” that Putin is determined to create. It’s worth subscribing to read it in full. The “new Russia” is militaristic; dissent is forbidden; women are encouraged to have eight children; LGBT people and symbols are stigmatized; Stalin is revered.
Here are some excerpts from an important and upsetting article:
Vladimir Putin is positioning Russia as America’s most dangerous and aggressive enemy, and transforming his country in ways that stand to make it a bitter adversary of the West for decades to come.
Over more than six months, The Washington Post examined the profound changes sweeping Russia as Putin has used his war in Ukraine to cement his authoritarian grip on power.
The Russian leader is militarizing his society and infusing it with patriotic fervor, reshaping the education system, condemning scientists as traitors, promoting a new Orthodox religiosity and retrograde roles for women, and conditioning a new generation of youth to view the West as a mortal enemy in a fight for Russia’s very survival…
Russia’s leader-for-life is working to restore his country’s global power of the Soviet era — not as a Communist bulwark but as a champion of Orthodox Christian values and an opponent of liberal freedoms in permanent conflict with the West, in a world redivided by big powers into spheres of influence where authoritarianism is an accepted alternative to democracy. Flouting global norms and thumbing his nose at international institutions, Putin is forging military partnerships with other totalitarian regimes that also view the United States as a threat, including China, Iran and North Korea.
The new Russia claims to defend Orthodox values against Western cultural influences.
In November 2022, Putin signed a decree defining Orthodox values, puritanical morality and the rejection of LGBTQ+ identity as crucial to Russia’s national security. Putin has outlined a messianic mission to save the world from what he calls a decadent, permissive West, an approach he hopes will resonate in socially conservative nations in the Global South. The highly politicized judicial system and media heavily controlled by the Kremlin are being used to crack down on nightclubs and parties, and new patriotic mandates are being imposed on artists, filmmakers and cultural institutions.
The new Russia is militarizing society and indoctrinating a new generation of patriots.
Harnessing the war in Ukraine, Putin has engineered a deeply militarized society, rewarding war veterans and their children with places in higher education; introducing military training in schools; and elevating those involved in the war into leadership roles. Telegram channels tell women how to be good soldiers’ wives (by not complaining or crying); schoolchildren make drone fins, trench candles and custom socks for soldiers with amputed limbs. The education system has been imbued with patriotic fervor. Liberal humanities programs are shut down in favor of programs that promote nationalist ideology, and partnerships with Western schools have been canceled.
The new Russia is glorifying Stalin and rewriting history to whitewash Soviet crimes
Some people who had close contact with Putin in his early years as president described his fervent mission to rebuild Russia as a superpower and his admiration not only for imperial czars but also for the Soviet dictator and wartime leader Joseph Stalin, who engineered the Great Terror, the purges of the mid-to-late 1930s, sent millions to the gulag system of prisons and forced labor camps, and had about 800,000 people executed for political reasons. At least 95 of the 110 Stalin monuments in Russia were erected during Putin’s time as leader.
The new Russia is crushing all dissent and restricting personal freedoms.
Putin has squashed the political opposition in Russia making protests illegal, criminalizing criticism of the war, and designating liberal nongovernmental organizations and independent media, journalists, writers, lawyers and activists as foreign agents, undesirable organizations, extremists or terrorists. Hundreds of political activists have been jailed. Tens of thousands of Russians have fled in a historic exodus, with some worried they would be cut off from the world by sanctions, some afraid of being conscripted and sent to the front, and others fearing they would be persecuted for opposing Putin or the war.
Robyn Dixon goes into detail in another article that is part of the series “Remastering Russia.”
MOSCOW — As Vladimir Putin persists in his bloody campaign to conquer Ukraine, the Russian leader is directing an equally momentous transformation at home — re-engineering his country into a regressive, militarized society that views the West as its mortal enemy.
Putin’s inauguration on Tuesday for a fifth term will not only mark his 25-year-long grip on power but also showcase Russia’s shift into what pro-Kremlin commentators call a “revolutionary power,” set on upending the global order, making its own rules, and demanding that totalitarian autocracy be respected as a legitimate alternative to democracy in a world redivided by big powers into spheres of influence…
To carry out this transformation, the Kremlin is:
- Forging an ultraconservative, puritanical society mobilized against liberal freedoms and especially hostile to gay and transgender people, in which family policy and social welfare spending boost traditional Orthodox values.
- Reshaping education at all levels to indoctrinate a new generation of turbo-patriot youth, with textbooks rewritten to reflect Kremlin propaganda, patriotic curriculums set by the state and, from September, compulsory military lessons taught by soldiers called “Basics of Security and Protection of the Motherland,” which will include training on handling Kalashnikov assault rifles, grenades and drones.
- Sterilizing cultural life with blacklists of liberal or antiwar performers, directors, writers and artists, and with new nationalistic mandates for museums and filmmakers.
- Mobilizing zealous pro-war activism under the brutal Z symbol, which was initially painted on the side of Russian tanks invading Ukraine but has since spread to government buildings, posters, schools and orchestrated demonstrations.
- Rolling back women’s rights with a torrent of propaganda about the need to give birth — young and often — and by curbing ease of access to abortions, and charging feminist activists and liberal female journalists with terrorism, extremism, discrediting the military and other offenses.
- Rewriting history to celebrate Joseph Stalin, the Soviet dictator who sent millions to the gulag, through at least 95 of the 110 monuments in Russia erected during Putin’s time as leader. Meanwhile, Memorial, a human rights group that exposed Stalin’s crimes and shared the 2022 Nobel Peace Prize, was shut down and its pacificist co-chairman Oleg Orlov, 71, jailed.
- Accusing scientists of treason; equating criticism of the war or of Putin with terrorism or extremism; and building a new, militarized elite of “warriors and workers” willing to take up arms, redraw international boundaries and violate global norms on orders of Russia’s strongman ruler.
“They’re trying to develop this scientific Putinism as a basis of propaganda, as a basis of ideology, as a basis of historical education,” said Andrei Kolesnikov, a senior fellow at the Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center. “They need an obedient new generation — indoctrinated robots in an ideological sense — supporting Putin, supporting his ideas, supporting this militarization of consciousness.”
Kolesnikov, speaking in an interview in Moscow, added: “They need cannon fodder for the future…”
As he fractures global ties and girds his nation for a forever war with the West, riot police in Russia are raiding nightclubs and private parties, beating up guests and prosecuting gay bar owners. Russians have been jailed or fined for wearing rainbow earrings or displaying rainbow flags. Dissidents who were imprisoned in Soviet times are once again behind bars — this time for denouncing the war.
The Kremlin has defended the crackdown as responding to popular demand…
“In Russian families, many of our grandmothers and great-grandmothers had seven or eight children, and even more. Let’s preserve and revive these wonderful traditions,” Putin said in a November speech dedicated to “a thousand-year, eternal Russia.”
The emphasis is on a special and powerful state dominated by Putin, on centuries-old Russian self-reliance and stoicism, and the sacrifice of individual rights to the regime. Men give their lives in war or work. Women should give their bodies by birthing children.

Russia has been an autocratic, despotic nation since the boyars of the Middle Ages, serfdom ended only in name, the oligarchs roots go back centuries, the Orthodox Church is an arm of the despots, Putin is a modern Peter the Great, and will be replaced by another autocrat, the few voices for democracy, for example, the Decembrists g were crushed… sadly, this is little hope of any change
LikeLiked by 1 person
why did you skip over the regime of Lenin and Stalin, and the glorious communist revolution? Too many dead bodies?
LikeLike
Lenin’s regime was a disgrace. Stalin’s was even worse. These people completely derailed Socialism until it emerged again in Social Democratic Europe, which has THE HAPPIEST PEOPLE ON THE PLANET.
LikeLike
Past tense, Putin the Horrible has already turned Russia into a militarist authoritarian state for many years.
LikeLike
Just continuing in a long tradition…from the medieval Bo yard to the tsars to the communists, only the names have changed
LikeLike
Alexander Duggin meets Joseph Stalin. There is a certain irony here. The most strident language directed at autocratic, socialist Russia came from the American reglious right. The argument was against “godless” communism. Now the philosophical descendants of that anti-communist group is solidly behind American politicians who seek to pave the way for Putin’s success. I guess communism with a god is OK.
LikeLike
I wouldn’t consider Russia to be a “communist” nation. For decades now it has been an oligarchic capitalistic country.
And the complaints I see registered in the articles can easily be applied to the regressive xtian theocrats and our foreign policies.
LikeLike
hard to tell the pigs from the men.
LikeLike
The pigs have a more advanced moral compass, and that’s saying something.
LikeLike
As you, having been raised, like me, on a farm would know.
LikeLike
I grew up on an Animal Farm
LikeLike
“The new Russia is crushing all dissent and restricting personal freedoms.” So is the new US. Just take a look at the student protests against Israel’s slaughter of the Palestinians. The protests are mischaracterized by the national media as being antisemitic, even though many of the students participating are Jewish. An antisemitism law has been passed by congress so that protestors who don’t support Israel’s policies can be arrested. Tik Tok has been banned so that young people can’t gain access to videos that are sympathetic to the Palestinians.
The new Russia is militarizing society and indoctrinating a new generation of patriots. The media needs to make up its mind in regards to Russian support for the invasion of Ukraine. Do Russian’s hate this war and are being forced to fight through conscription or have they been brainwashed by Putin and are volunteering due to patriotic fervor?
In international polls conducted by US polling agencies the US is seen as the country that is the biggest threat to world peace by an overwhelming margin. This is a fact that is rarely discussed in Western media outlets such as the Washington Post. If Russia is so horrible, and we’re so good, why didn’t they get chosen as the number one threat by the rest of the world?
LikeLike
YEP!
LikeLike
“If Russia is so horrible, and we’re so good, why didn’t they get chosen as the number one threat by the rest of the world?”
Gee, I don’t know. Maybe because the Russians have lied, constantly and consistently, for centuries? Or because Russia seems “peaceful” because truth tellers are eradicated?
We let our people speak openly. We have inevitable disagreements which we mostly don’t hide.
Look at those peaceful, united Russians! They seem so happy!
Until you look behind the curtain, and see the blood and the corpses.
Don’t parrot the Russian party line. Remember Russians lie, and have always lied. In that part of the world, the truth has always been too dangerous to share with the peasants. Point them to the West, because god knows, you don’t want them asking questions about their own country.
LikeLike
I’m not parroting the Russian party line. I’m parroting Noam Chomsky. My comment on opinion polls is from a 2015 interview he did with euronews. In this interview he makes the case that the US is the worst terrorist state in the world, making references to Obama’s drone campaign throughout the world.
LikeLike
I greatly admired Chomsky’s work in linguistics, though I must say, he is a terrible writer. But on Russia and Ukraine his is mostly off the rails. Completely kooky. His this a matter of his advanced age? Possibly.
LikeLike
There’s a difference?
LikeLike
Hi Bob, Chomsky’s position on Ukraine is that Putin’s invasion was illegal and outrageous and that the US should support Ukraine in it’s war effort. I was surprised to find that this was his position. He doesn’t think they can win, but we should support them if they have the will to fight. I disagree with him on this point. I think a peace settlement is the best possible outcome that can happen in this horrible situation.
LikeLike
Yes, abject surrender is SO much cleaner, right?
And they talk about Chamberlain…
LikeLike
Chomsky changed his position without acknowledging that he did. I suspect that he reacted to a great outcry against his initial support of the Russian position.
LikeLike
Big shock.
LikeLike
And Chomsky still argues for a negotiated “solution” with Russia. F that. No negotiation with the terrorist invaders! No surrender until Russia is out of every square nanometer of Ukraine, including Crimea and the Donbas.
LikeLike
Negotiation with a proven imperialist and liar is no negotiation at all.
LikeLike
exactly, jsr
LikeLike
I get this position, but it could come at a great loss of life. Sunk costs are sunk costs, even human life, but it would be a shame if after years of this, all parties end up backing a negotiated solution.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Pull the other. It’s got bells on.
ROFL!!!!
LikeLike
“No negotiation with the terrorist invaders!”-I think this decision should be decided by the Ukrainian people, since they are the ones who have to suffer the horrors of this war. If the Ukrainian people decide that they’ve had enough and the best possible outcome is a peace settlement, they should be allowed to enter into one.
LikeLike
There were some few Russian-leading Russian speakers in Ukraine before Russia’s illegal invasion. Now, forget it. The Ukrainians are sick of having their cities flattened and their grandmothers and children raped by the Russian invaders. To a person, they will have a long, long, long memory of these depredations. If there were any Russian-leaning Ukrainians, those, with very, very, very few exceptions, are now history. Putin has made sure of that. Just as he made sure of the expansion of NATO. Exactly the opposite of what this bloody Chekist moron, anti-gay, sexist, imperialist, autocratic, murderous cretin wanted.
LikeLike
Ultimately, sadly, Ukraine is not going to win this war.
LikeLike
Yeah, well that’s what people said about North Vietnam and Afghanistan.
LikeLike
If there is a lesson to be learned from recent military history, it is that smaller nations can and do win in situations where a truly motivated country fights using asymmetric warfare. Slava Ukraini! Heroyam slava!
LikeLike
There’s a reason that Germans did all they could to surrender to Americans, and not Russians, as Berlin fell.
LikeLiked by 1 person
yup
LikeLike
Your support for this evil bastard given the terrible stuff he has done is truly appalling and shocking, Art “Smart.”
LikeLike
Who is responsible for those horrors? One person. Vladimir Putin. Not the West. Not the United States. Not the Ukrainians. Not little green men from Alpha Draconis. Putin. This was his war of choice. Every death and every casualty is because of a decision that HE AND HE ALONE MADE. And he could stop it all now. He chooses not to do so because he is monstrous.
LikeLike
Yeah, I don’t see that happening
LikeLike
I don’t support Putin or the Russian invasion of Ukraine Bob. I don’t think Ukraine can win this war and if that’s the case the only rational choice is for them to sign a peace settlement with Russia. Ukraine just lowered the age of conscription in Ukraine from 27 to 25 and eliminated some exemptions. This will only add 50,000 troops and Zelenskyy said they needed 500,000. The NYTs just did a story on thousands of Ukrainians leaving the country to dodge the draft. Many have died trying to swim across the border. How on earth can they win this war if they aren’t able to replenish their troops?
LikeLike
Some people recognize conflicts that must be handled.
Some bury their heads in the sand and hope it would all just go away.
It won’t.
But I guess losing Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia would be just fine to you.
LikeLiked by 1 person
jsrtheta: I think the importance of truth and freedom . . . that most of us in the US grew up with, exists as a sub- or semi-conscious, quasi-foundational, background of thought. . . which means that most, if not all, will not recognize what either freedom or truth really are until both are gone.
It’s like this: It’s only when you travel to another country for the first time that you realize what it means to live in the United States.
Only with truth and freedom, you cannot just get on a plane to “go back home” and get truth and freedom back as normative to one’s political and social order. CBK
LikeLike
Brittany Griner has become a patriot after returning from 10 months detention in a Russian prison.
LikeLike
I have been to England and The Netherlands.
I found no shortage of truth or freedom. In fact, I never should have left England.
LikeLike
Hello jsrtheta: I don’t know you, and I’ve not read everything you have written here or elsewhere; however, I have noticed a marked habit for missing the point?
So let me clarify: First, it’s a given that visiting other countries gives one a comparative reference on any one of a number of differences, cultural and otherwise. (If I need to enumerate, just go away.)
As example, however, a “given”: Many universities have programs for students to spend months (at least) in another country expressly for this broadening comparative experience as a part of their education. The people’s regard for England’s history of the monarchy, in your instance, is a great difference from here in the US. (Or maybe you didn’t notice.)
Second, and even more to the point of focusing on truth and freedom, I guess from your note that you have not visited Russia (or its subsidiaries), North Korea, Iran, or any country that has “minders” or that harbors gangs that kill its journalists, e.g., Mexico.
In any country, however, including ours (the USA), self-imposed stupid is as self-imposed stupid does. CBK
LikeLike
You have certainly said something.
What, I neither know nor care.
LikeLike
jrtheta: But you keep reading this blog? Do you know duplicity when you see it, or rather DO it? Also, you do have a way of proving the points you say you object to. CBK
LikeLike
As I said before…
LikeLike
jsrtheta: The nicest thing I can say about that is that, commonly, but not always, what comes from people’s mouths is usually closer to their brain than what comes from their lower orifices. CBK
LikeLike
Here’s a little difference, Artsmart. Here, our president does not arrest dissidents and ship them off to Siberia where they are doused with water and then put outside in sub-zero weather for a “walk.” Or have them thrown out of windows. Or have them arrested simply for holding up an blank piece of paper and then having them fired from their jobs. Or poison them with nerve agents. As does your hero Tsar Vladimir the Defenestrator.
LikeLike
Bob: I get the feeling reading some of these “folks” on this blog that they really do not know the radical difference between democracy (and its leaders) and oligarchies, fascist states, or more generally authoritarians of totalitarian regimes.
Go back to school, you “folks,” and then come back to talk about what you don’t know now. (And to be clear, I do not mean Bob.) CBK
LikeLike
I would have liked to have seen Putin taken out decades ago. He is the worst thing that happened to Russia since Lenin, Stalin, and all the other communist murderers. His grandfather was the well-loved cook of Lenin and Stalin; I’m sure he sat at his grandfather’s knee hearing about the glory days of the United Soviet Socialist States of Russia. Communism has failed everywhere it has been tried, but commies never learn.
I do think countries need to worry about birthrate. In countries with a Ponzi scheme for a social security system, we need a certain number of people to support those retiring. When social security started, there were around 7-9 workers to support each retiree; now, it is getting close to two. It is unsustainable.
In fact democrats use our failing birthrate as an excuse to open the borders to illegal aliens, instead of encouraging Americans to enjoy the gift of family.
Maybe the readers of this blog are part of the Abolish the Family crowd with Sophie Lewis, I don’t know. Poor Sophie believes that if we abolish the family, we will be able to usher in a communist utopia. Sad and wrong. She is a wackadoodle for sure.
LikeLike
Social Security is NOT a Ponzi scheme, not even close. A Ponzi scheme is fraud, a criminal act. SS is open to public scrutiny, it has checks and balances. SS has made its payments on time for about 80 years, year after year. It is the trust fund, NOT SS ITSELF, that may be depleted in the 2030s, IF nothing is done. The Congress could easily fix the shortfall in the trust find by raising the cap on the SS wage tax…problem solved. Even if the trust fund were to be depleted, SS could still make 75% of the monthly payments.
Even Alan Greenspan has said that there is an easy fix to the trust fund shortfall.
LikeLike
Nothing will be done, and I disagree; it is a Ponzi scheme.
LikeLike
So, what is your brilliant Repugnican proposition, Ms. Hardt? To privatize Social Security? To do away with it? Do you have so little historical knowledge or memory as not to understand what it was like for elderly people before Social Security? Do you want to turn back the clock to that time, too? Do you not, like most Repugnican leaders, give a damn about what happens to the vast majority of old folks?
LikeLike
Every year, I think about how George Bush wanted to put the money collected for social security into a 401K for every American, starting in 2000. Of course, politicians couldn’t rob it, or be used as a political cudgel, so the democrats hated it. He was going to let people of a certain age stay on it, or choose to have a private plan. So 24 years later here we are with Social Security in trouble and most people don’t have a savings.
LikeLike
So what happens when a person lives a long time and the 401K runs out? Put them out on the street as elderly homeless?
LikeLike
Social Security pays for life. Some die early, and some live long, so all are covered. And as Joe Jersey said above, if the cap on paying into Social Security were removed and, for the wealthy, there were a cap on Social Security payments, then the problem would be solved, wouldn’t it? But that would violate a fundamental Repugnican principle: that predatory capitalist masters should be allowed to keep every penny they can squeeze out of the rest of us.
LikeLike
I’ve been hearing “Social Security is in trouble” my whole life, and I’m 72.
Pull the other one, it’s got bells on.
LikeLike
Repugnicans claim to be Christian and pro life, but they support shooting asylum seekers (something Trump ordered his Secretary of Homeland Security to do), allowing mothers to die of sepsis because they cannot abort DEAD FETUSES, ending Social Security as we know it, not providing food aid to children in families suffering from food insecurity, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah. THEY ARE SO FULL OF SHIT.
LikeLike
A cop or a teacher can easily make over the $168,000 cap? ARE YOU FREAKING SERIOUS? Easily? Again, what planet do you live on. The average cop in the US makes 65K a year. There might be a tiny number of big city police chiefs who make 168K a year, but don’t be asinine. You know that what you said is simply false. Easily. Repugnicans seem to have learned from Glorious Leader that when in an argument, you simply make shit up.
LikeLike
Bob, you are unhinged. I live in Las Vegas and cops and teachers can make around 80+ thousand a year. My point, which you ignored is that democrats pull names like Musk and Gates out of their ass when, in fact MANY middle-class families make 168,000 dollars and are subject to a tax increase. It’s dishonest.
you strike me as a hateful person, who has a stagnant, mean mind. Have a nice day.
LikeLike
Here’s your Glorious Leader for you, JH:
Putin and Trump: A Backgrounder | Bob Shepherd | Praxis (wordpress.com)
LikeLike
A married couple where one is a cop and one is a teacher have the potential to make 168,000 a year, bear in Las Vegas. My husband and I, two IBEW electricians make that amount.
Now that I know you are a socialist and so, your religion is Marxism. It is useless to engage with you. If you still believe that Marx was right after, Lenin, Stalin, Mao, Kim, Pol Pot, Chavez, etc. all led to mass murder, then you are hopeless and only a cult deprogrammer can help you.
Yours is the religion of the lazy and covetous.
LikeLike
(19) Facebook
For Jacqui
LikeLike
Another
(19) Facebook
LikeLike
Another
(19) Facebook
LikeLike
For 2024, the Social Security tax limit is $168,600. Those who make more than $168,600, do not pay SS tax on the part of their salary that is over the $168,600 cap.
Such people as Bill Gates and Elon Musk. Make them pay more and problem solved.
Jacqui does not know the difference between SS and the SS Trust fund. A Ponzi scheme is fraud that benefits Mr. Ponzi and nobody else. SS benefits millions of seniors every year for decades. SS is in good shape and delivering benefits without delay for generations, it’s the trust fund that needs to be tweaked. SS even increases its payments on a yearly basis. Sometimes the increase is minimal and many times the increase in payments is more generous.
LikeLike
Thank you, Joe, for that brilliant analysis. Unfortunately, ideologues like Ms. Hardt never listen to reason.
LikeLike
A cop and a teacher can easily make over 168,000 cap, so it is interesting that you mention billionaires like Gates and Musk, but who you really want to tax are the cop and teacher, the middle class. That’s fine, but don’t hide hehide the “millionaires and billionaires” line, it’s pathetic.
LikeLike
Hey Jacqui, what public school teacher is making over $168,600!??? Where?
LikeLike
Hardt disagrees. With no rationale (because there is none). She just has her own imaginary, alternative facts universe that she prefers to inhabit.
LikeLike
She is, like Repugnicans generally these days, immune to reason–to rational argument.
Don’t look up, Jacqui!
LikeLike
P.S. I’m talking about a MARRIED couple where one is a cop and one is a teacher aka FAMILY.
LikeLike
Putin is the hand picked successor of Boris Yeltsin. When Yeltsin ran for reelection in 1996 he had very low approval ratings and the communist running against him was predicted to win the election. Clinton backed Yeltsin. “The American president, Bill Clinton, also committed himself to the campaign. American advisors were sent, on instruction from the White House, to join the campaign team of the sitting Russian president to teach new electoral techniques. Several European governments also showed their support for Yeltsin. French Prime Minister Alain Juppé visited Moscow on February 14, the day Yeltsin’s candidacy was announced, and said he hoped the election campaign would be “an opportunity to highlight the achievements of President Yeltsin’s reform policy”. On the same day, German Chancellor Helmut Kohl visited Moscow, where he presented Yeltsin as “an absolutely reliable partner who has always respected his commitments”.[132]” Clinton also freed up some money so that Yeltsin could pay Russian pensions, so the US govt. played a big part in the appointment of Putin.
LikeLike
Jacquilenhardt–
1)Soc sec is an insurance plan, not an investment plan. When you pay your premium, it goes right out the door to current claims, not into a lockbox with your name on it.
2)Yes, the program has to be adjusted periodically due to increasing longevity as well as decreasing birth rate. [Adjusted for those reasons in ’83 and ’93; due again.] However, a significant secondary factor: 45 yrs of stagnating wages, dating to when wages were decoupled from productivity.
3)Illegal aliens actually increase revenues by a few % each year due to the unfair situation: they pay in, but can’t collect. However, the main issue here is the 3rd most significant for social security: sharp decline in legal immigration. This is due to refusal of congress to overhaul pathways to legal citizenship + failure to increase caps as economy has expanded. Last time was 30 yrs ago; economy has tripled in size since then.
LikeLike
Thank you, Ginny. It is so nice to read a response by an informed and sane person as opposed to this ideological swill from Repugnicans.
LikeLike
Illegal immigrants suppress wages. Fact
LikeLike
Immigrants take jobs that most Americans don’t want. Cleaning hotel rooms, working in the kitchen of a restaurant or as a busboy, agricultural work in the hot sun, slaughterhouses, gardening. There are many such jobs that are hard work with low pay. Immigrants take these jobs. Would you?
LikeLike
You picked the wrong person to say that to. I did those jobs. My first job was picking tomatoes, peaches, cherries, and apples. I worked in an apple barn. I did landscaping, and I cleaned houses, apartments, and hotels. My MOM supported my family as a single mother by cleaning hotels and homes. My brothers and I helped her when we got out of school. It is a bald-faced LIE that Americans won’t do those jobs. Illegal immigration suppresses wages and raises the cost of housing. It is astounding that anyone believes that Democrats are for “the little guy.”
LikeLike
Undocumented immigration is not “illegal.” It’s a civil, not a criminal offense. So get that right.
And again, all the studies of this show that the net effect of undocumented immigration is a 1 percent INCREASE in the number of jobs available for American citizens.
LikeLike
No one is buying your B.S. All caps, Bob.
LikeLike
I just stated the facts. You can do some actual study and learn these things yourself. I have posted the relevant studies here many, many, many times. And the fact that undocumented immigration is not “illegal” but a civil matter is just the law. You might not like this. But it is the law. Again, learn something before you write about it.
LikeLike
There have been many studies of this by economists. The net result of the undocumented immigration is about a 1 percent INCREASE in the number of jobs for American citizens. Reichwingers like Jacqui are never going to hear this economic FACT on the Reichwing media. They buy things and so create demand, which creates jobs JUST LIKE EVERYONE ELSE. And they create small businesses that employ both immigrants and citizens AT TEN TIMES THE PER CAPITA RATE THAT CITIZENS DO. Jacqui is just parroting falsehoods she heard from Tucker Carlson or Sean Hannity or Glorious Leader or some other propagandist.
LikeLike
To say nothing of all the money they pay into Social Security that they’ll never see a dime of.
LikeLiked by 1 person
No, they supply needed work to businesses that specifically rely on them. Many of the businesses are in “God Bless the USA!” south.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Utterly false, Jacqui. You should get out of the Reich-wing bubble and learn something.
LikeLike
In countries with a Ponzi scheme for a social security system
Clearly, you did not read or understand what Joe Jersey wrote above about Ponzi schemes.
I agree with you about Communism as it has been implemented by these totalitarian Communist in name only states.
Surely you do understand that these nation states that you mention are not Communist in the sense that Marx and Engles described–states where the workers own the means of production. You get that, right? That these are not actual Communist states, that no such state has existed?
A Middle Way: Socialism, Capitalism, and Social Democracy | Bob Shepherd | Praxis (wordpress.com)
LikeLike
Lenin and Trotsky were steeped in Communist ideology, and even with killing millions, they couldn’t make it happen, but boy did they try!!
Marx wrote about his evil ideology in the safety of libraries; He was evil as hell.
No, communism will be er happen, but lunatics will keep trying to bring theirutopia of the lazy losers about.
LikeLike
They did not try. I doubt that you have ever read a single word written by Marx.
LikeLike
And so you quite clearly are talking about matters you know nothing about, but Repugncians speak from a place of ignorance ALL THE TIME, so that is not in the least surprising. It should be renamed the Know Nothing Party v2.
LikeLike
By kleptocratic, I mean this: He is a mob boss who always gets his vig.
LikeLike
Oh, and you Repugnicans seem to have forgotten that this is an immigrant nation–that that is what post Columbian America has been all about.
LikeLike
We aren’t an “immigrant nation”. We allow immigration and we have, in the past, controlled imigration, but democraps are bleeding voters, so they need to open the floodgates.
democrats: America is an evil racist country that supports the Jeeeewwwss and you will never achieve the American Dream.
also democrats: Come in, come in, vote democrap.
LikeLike
You are totally clueless, Ms. Hardt. Clueless. Where do you think the non-native American citizens of the United States came from? ROFL. Clueless.
LikeLike
Boy, have YOU drunk the Kool Aid.
LikeLike
Hmm, if I knew your last name, I could figure out your tribe…
LikeLike
Hardt. German and/or Ashkenazic Jewish.
LikeLike
Ta.
LikeLike
Let’s see, most of the non-indigenous people in the United States today did not immigrate here, they were born here.
LikeLike
Oh look, there goes the point!
LikeLike
Don’t be disingenuous, Jacqui. You know that those who are not native Americans immigrated here or have ancestors who immigrated here. That’s where they came from. Duh.
LikeLike
He is the worst thing that happened to Russia since Lenin, Stalin, and all the other communist murderers.
Agreed. Putin, btw, is not a Communist. He is a kleptocratic Fascist.
LikeLike
Jacqui,
SS is not calculated on combined married income. Every person who receives a paycheck pays into SS on their individual income. Those making working and receiving an annual over $168,000 do not pay SS for any income over that amount. Billionaires such as Gates, Bezos, or Musk billions come from capital gains, stocks, bonds, and other assets. These are not considered income so they are not subject to SS. There is absolutely nothing wrong with SS. The “crisis” is manufactured because wall street wants that guaranteed stream of money going into their portfolios instead of to those who worked and paid into it.
LikeLike
The destruction of Social Security is the lodestar of the Republican Party.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you for the clarification. That still sounds like people making a lot less than Musk and Gates will be subject to the tax.
LikeLike
I don’t know about that. A judge tossed out Musk’s Tesla salary.
LikeLike
Oh, gee. All those poor people making $200,000 a year who would have to pay Social Security taxes on the amount above $168,000. What an enormous burden!!!
Jacqui, you make ZERO sense. Seriously. You have been listening to Reichwing television and/or radio so long that you accept without critical thought these ludicrous notions.
LikeLike
Thank you, Ms. Hemphill!
LikeLike
What democrats? Names please.
LikeLike
Putin is a real and present danger to the entire world. So dangerous as to pose an existential threat. He is also a war criminal under international indictment.
LikeLike
When Mitt Romney called Russia the biggest threat to the United States, Barrack Obama said, “The 1980s called, and they want their foreign policy back”. Barrack was always a dummy, which is probably why they won’t release his transcripts. Oh well.
what is most worrying about Russia is their penchant for invading other countries and making allies with our other enemies. Poor Biden is totally useless and not respected.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I don’t entirely agree. Barack Obama was not completely “a dummy.” He was often dumb, but he was a very good servant of the wealthy, oligarchical class in America, and they rewarded him handsomely for this. He bailed out the banks and not the homeowners. He didn’t give us Medicare for All but, rather, what had previously been known as Romneycare. He filled his cabinet with people from investment banks and other parts of Wall Street. He stepped up extra-judicial killings and surveillance of Americans. He was not progressive. But he played one on TV.
LikeLike
Who else will not release his transcripts (or his taxes)? Glorious Leader Who Shines More Orange Than Does the Sun?
Who paid to ahve someone else take his SATs? According to Mary Trump, the same Glorious Leader, cadet Bone Spurs who started with “a small loan from [his] father” [uh, of three quarters of a billion dollars].
That lying POS.
LikeLike
Mad Cow Rachel got Trumps tax returns (illegally) and they found out that…tada Trump paid his taxes.
As for lying, I have one word… Biden.
LikeLike
Trump is notorious for lying every time he opens his mouth. How is it possible that you do not know this? What planet do you live on?
LikeLike
The tax returns of former President Donald Trump, which cover the years from 2015 to 2020, were released by the House Ways and Means Committee. Here are some key points that were revealed:
Loans to his children: Trump reported making loans to his adult children and receiving interest on those loans.
Income sources: The returns showed income from various sources, including book royalties and Melania Trump’s modeling career.
Presidential salary: Trump’s presidential salary and how much of it was given to charity was disclosed. Trump has almost never given to charity. What he gave away of his presidential salary was far more than made up for by illegal emoluments that he received as president in the form of patronage to his hotels and golf courses on the part of foreign governments and individual business people seeking favors.
Business losses: The documents appear to show large pass-through losses from over 100 business entities1.
Tax payments: In 2020, the Trumps paid no federal income tax.
Foreign income: In 2020, the Trumps reported $78 million in gross income from 16 foreign countries.
Chinese income: In 2017, Trump made $6.5 million from China, though the source of these payments is not clear from the returns.
These details were not previously public and came to light after a lengthy legal battle, with Trump accusing Democrats of having “unconstitutionally released” his returns. The release of these tax returns is a significant event, as Trump is the first president since Richard Nixon to not voluntarily release his tax returns while in office.
LikeLike
Well, they found out the “audit” preventing him from releasing them didn’t exist. And Trump fought disclosure every inch of the way.
And now they’re discovering he lied about his tax liabilities with regard to Trump Tower Chicago, another money-losing move by the “stable genius”.
LikeLike
Mobsters like Trump hire accountants who are good at hiding the real sources of their income.
LikeLike
Oh, it’s much more complicated than that: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tax_returns_of_Donald_Trump
LikeLike
While Obama was a sell-out in many ways he did at least put Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan on the SCOTUS. He would have appointed a 3rd justice (Merrick Garland) if not for Mitch M. and the GOP.
At least Garland is not some far right wing hack and would have been better than Thomas or Kavanaugh.
LikeLike
Garland might not be a rightwinger, but he has done a superb job of impersonating one.
LikeLike
Are you shitting me 😂😂 Garland is the most corrupt attorney general in history.
LikeLike
Facts, please.
LikeLike
Hard to take seriously when you don’t even spell Obama’s name correctly.
LikeLike
Can’t spell his name correctly. WHAT TF are you talking about? Another clueless comment.
LikeLike
Do any of you ever stop and wonder why WaPo writes articles like this? What, specifically, do they want you to do with this “information”? Putin is thousands of miles away and he really doesn’t care about the opinion of anyone in the U.S., so this article is not really directed at Putin, it’s directed at U.S. readers.
How does reading this article make you feel? Angry? Scared? Outraged? Does it not bother you that the media control your emotions this way? And do you wonder why? If you need help understanding the role of emotions in population control, read about Orwell’s “two-minute hate”.
None of this is about Russia. Russia is – and has long been – just a convenient enemy to focus American attention away from the misdeeds of our own country and control our own population. When it suits our leaders needs, it could be – and has been – just as easily China, Iran or any other convenient scapegoat. Clean your own house. More importantly, control your own mind and emotions. Go for a week without mainstream media. Talk to real people. See what’s really going on in the world. And see how your perspective changes.
LikeLike
Dienne, would you have reacted the same way to Hitler? Don’t read about him; don’t talk about him; ignore him.
It’s bizarre to wish that people should remain ignorant of what’s happening outside their own country. The rise of a new Stalin is a very real concern to everyone who would rather not be subjugated.
LikeLike
A different perspective, if you’re open to viewpoints that contradict your worldview. https://thefloutist.substack.com/p/report-from-donbas?publication_id=112164&utm_campaign=email-post-title&r=b728d&utm_medium=email
The idea that Putin has been in power for over twenty years and he’s just now going to take over the world is ludicrous. He was quite pro-Western until the western powers spat in his face and started trying to take over his country and overthrow him. He’s just protecting his interests and getting NATO off his front door, as the U.S. would do if BRICS troops were massing all around us.
Despite what you say, I don’t worship Putin. He’s a capitalist billionaire. His views on LGBTQ issues are odious. It’s just that I find him far from the biggest threat in the world. He’s not interested in anything beyond his sphere of influence, unlike the U.S. that thinks the whole world is theirs to control.
Respond as you please, the last word is yours. I’m retiring for the evening.
LikeLike
Poor, poor Putin. The West welcomed him with open arms. Bush 2 talked about Russia joining NATO and EU. Major Westrn corporations opened shops, plants, and offices in Russia. The future looked promising for the integration of Russia into the world of free elections, markets, and democracy. But then Putin decided it was time to restore the empire of the USSR. He has bitten off parts of Ukraine and Georgia. Will the Baltic states be next?
Putin is not responding to western aggression. The west is responding to Putin’s aggression.
LikeLike
Exactly so, Diane. Dienne has it EXACTLY BACKWARD.
LikeLike
He’s interested in growing an empire, one that will pose more of a threat to the West.
Maybe that’s copacetic as far as you’re concerned, but some of us remember the last guy that got carried away like that.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I think it’s you who’s unclear on why Wapo publishes stories like this.
LikeLike
Putin actually wrote and published an essay, “On the Historical Unity of Russians and Ukrainians,” in which he lays out EXPLICITLY his imperialistic ambitions to create a “Greater Russia.” He thinks he is Vladimir Sviatoslavich, aka, Vladimir the Great. So, your protestations that he has no such intentions is of the same caliber as your adamant insistence that Putin had no intention of invading Ukraine. He has told us, in his own words, precisely what he want. He wants to turn his neighbors into Russian territory.
LikeLike
cxs: your protestation, what he wants
LikeLike
Now tell the Baltic nations that Putin has no intention of reconqueribg them.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Exactly
LikeLike
No intentions DESPITE WHAT HE HAS EXPLICITLY WRITTEN THAT HE INTENDS TO DO.
LikeLike
Oh, but BOB! He will have signed an agreement! CBK
LikeLike
Scientific Putinism? Just like “scientific racism” was made up to justify the very same kind of evil reasoning and resulting barbarous behavior, one might suppose.
How is it Putin can be Putin unless that’s what a sufficient enough selfish portion of Russian culture wants?
How is it Trump can be Trump unless that’s what a sufficient enough selfish portion of US culture wants?
How was it Hitler was Hitler unless that was what both a sufficient enough selfish portion of German culture and a sufficient enough selfish portion of US culture wanted?
In general, how is it an anti-humanity evil can be an anti-humanity evil unless that’s what a sufficient enough selfish portion of its culture wants?
LikeLike
I see what you did there; you sandwiched Trump between Putin and Hitler and Republicans between the Russian people and the German people. None of those things have ANYTHING in common. Quit demonizing your political opponents; this is America. By othering republicans to this degree you are inciting violence. Sick and wrong.
LikeLike
Show me where I said a darn thing about Republicans or political opponents. Or stop making stuff up.
LikeLike
You said “Trump supporters”, Trump is a Republican and the nominee of the Republican party. Can you read your own writing?
LikeLike
Show me where I said anything about “Trump supporters” or “Trump is a Republican.” Or, again, stop making up shiitake.
LikeLike
How else would you describe demons?
LikeLike
Hitler, Stalin, Putin, Trump, the Kims in Korea. These are all peas from the same Fascist Pod.
Are Trump and His Supporters in Fact Fascists? | Bob Shepherd | Praxis (wordpress.com)
LikeLike
Trump is a traitor, a seditionist, a draft dodger, a school cheater, a serial predator, an adjudged rapist, a serial conman, a mobster who consorts with mobsters, a malignant narcissist, an opportunist, a pathological liar, and a fake Christian. He is one of the most vile people who ever lived. And he is the candidate, again, of the Repugnican Party. That that’s so, given what he is, says it all.
LikeLike
Sheesh, Ed, I know your heart’s in the right place, but just can’t let that one pass. Putin uses fear of govt– well-justified in view of its actions– to repress his people. So did Hitler. “Selfish” is a misnomer considering the alternatives available. RE: Trump & his voters: I’ll give you something rotten in the culture is operating there. It’s a powerful brew. Selfishness describes some part of it.
LikeLike
Thanks, but it seems you’re looking at it from a behavioral point of view, which is understandable as that is the all-too-common way of thinking about things. Consider looking at it from a structural point of view, where, as I said, in general, a sufficient enough selfish portion of a culture wants the behavior, wants the evil. Culture provides the structure for the behavior/evil to develop and eventually show up in the first place. Putin, Trump, Hitler… individuals using to advantage the sufficient enough selfish portion of their respective cultures because evil says there is something in it for them by accommodating evil’s behavior. They are concerned chiefly with their own personal profit or pleasure. Otherwise, there never would have been Putin, Trump, Hitler or any other such evil always out to disrupt the potential for peace and the survival of humanity.
As for my heart, kindly leave that to me.
LikeLike
Or, maybe they do it because they don’t want to be killed.
Just a thought.
LikeLike
Ed Johnson– Yes, sorry, a careless cliche that comes across as patronizing. Was just surprised as that was the first comment of yours I didn’t 100% agree with. I think I get what you mean by a structural POV. It’s always more comforting to imagine the variable individuals making up society, but the structural– systemic– effects are the bottom line. Sobering, that.
LikeLike
I really noticed this in the corporate world. When something was really FUBAR, it was typically blamed on individuals when it was a structural problem. So, so common. As every good business consultant knows. But C-level folks hate to hear this. They always think their system is just hunky-dory.
LikeLike
Bob: Right you are. However, and not so ironically, a system is generalized to hold a good account of needed order; while the details of applications (by individual persons) of any system, can be skewed . . . and either inadvertently or intentionally.
Systems are by nature generalized (“all things being equal”, press the button); while in applications, all things can easily NOT be equal and in most cases, are not; and so, in every case, applications occur in history, which is notable for its non-systematic comportment. And so, good applications commonly occur by some intelligent person being wise enough to bring that one last insight into the ever-detailed situation that well connects the general with the specific.
Taking that into account, if this be true, then this also is why planes need pilots, cars need drivers, and children need teachers who are also intelligent persons with good (systematic) training, but who also have their fingers on the pulse of individuality that one finds in a classroom–except and unless children become robots. CBK
LikeLike
So, kids today are depressed and committing suicide at historic rates. Do we blame teacher x? Or to we blame a system that piles standardized testing that will make or break them–determine things like retention of graduation–on top of the traditional end-of-year classroom examinations?
The press finds that after book x is published, it is full of errors in fact. Do we blame editor y, who was responsible for this book, or do we blame a system that has cut the fact-checking budget from P&Ls with less than 200K in expected revenues?
We find that salespeople have been putting false “data” into the CRM (Customer Resource Management) system. Do we blame the salespeople, or do we blame a system structured so that the value of salespeople on the job market lies in what they know and have NOT shared with their employers’ CRM systems?
A study finds that a hospital has over-classified patients as inpatient when they could easily have been treated as ambulatory outpatients when insurance reimbursements for outpatients are set far lower than for inpatients.
That kind of thing. People want to blame individuals, but the system being used is what is causing the problem. As a consultant, one sees this all the time. And often it is well known within the organization or company but isn’t spoken of. It’s a dirty little secret of the business or organization.
LikeLike
Hi Bob: Blame? If I understand your questioning (which I am not sure of), then I say that I am not talking about “whose to blame.” I am talking about the relationship between systems and their historical implementation in concrete real-time, which is often itself misunderstood, e.g., by the people who push for driverless cars.
My point is that a system can be great, but badly implemented for several “reasons.” And if good, it can be mis-“blamed” because of bad implementation instead of for its real qualifications.
But can a system be badly developed? Of course. Like driverless cars which are built not only on bad physics but also metaphysics (the real relationship between general systems and their implementation in real-time is never completely identical without the “all things being the same” qualifier in play).
And in some cases, good and intelligent “people” are great at working well anyway, from within a bad system. . . making Shinola from sxxt, as it were. Teachers try to do that all of the time, in my experience . . . as others here have attested to. In some sense, they make true heroes of themselves; but in another sense, one also wonders about the perpetuation of the sxxt situation, though one person standing against “the system” is a prescription for going insane and for losing one’s other interests to it.
My point, however, about a well developed system being implemented badly, was drawn from another experience . . . of teachers who were so sick of some new fad coming down the line so often that they were set to sabotage any new system regardless of its potential for enabling creativity by excellent teachers from within it. (I wouldn’t “blame” them? except that, in such cases, it’s the students who can also suffer. So there’s that.)
The relationship between general systems and their applications, however, stands as a theoretical overview. CBK
LikeLike
I think that you meant who’s, not whose, to blame.
Again, I don’t know how much clearer I can be about this: Throughout my career, first in teaching, then in NGOs, then in educational publishing, then as a business consultant, and then in teaching again, I have seen, over and over and over and over again individuals being blamed for problems that were actually due to a faulty SYSTEM. Fix the system, the problems with the individuals go away. This is a routine occurrence. People have a tendency to blame people. They often don’t think systemically. This is where consultants can play a really important and real role. They can map the system and show how it is creating the problems.
LikeLike
Bob: Well said. I was just extending your view to take in other ways things can go right or wrong. But I see nothing “off” about your last note. Falsely Shifting guilt is nothing new to human relationships.
To extend it further, one cannot get to the facts of any particular situation of “blame,” without getting into the “weeds” of that situation. CBK
LikeLike
I was involved for a while with a nationwide group Sociotechnical Systems consultants who did precisely this. People implement new systems, commonly, without first think clearly and carefully about the social consequences of those systems, which can be severe. One sees this technological hubris on the part of C-level folks ALL THE TIME. Then, when something goes wrong, they don’t blame their system. They blame individual people. Rather than admit that they and their system are at fault.
LikeLike
A lot of quality control and lean consulting is about this very thing–going into a place and finding the problems with the system–the bottlenecks, the redundancies, the perverse incentives, and eliminating those.
LikeLike
Here’s another clear example: Employers sometimes implement systems that require the use of GANTT and PERT charts by managers to map processes, identify bottlenecks, allocate resources, and prepare and manage budgets. But often the sheer amount of time spent by the manager maintaining these complex charts takes away from his or her time spent actually managing/interacting with employees, which in turn leads to a decline in work quality. The fault lies not with the manager for not properly supervising his or her staff but with a system that places requirements on the manager that make doing that supervision impossible. Same is true of non-teaching-duties piled by the bucketloads on teachers. It’s not that Joe or Mary or Hector or whoever is a bad teacher; it’s that he or she doesn’t have the time to devote to the actual teaching.
LikeLike
Bob. As I said, all good analysis. . . . except that teachers (or any one in an equivalent situation) CAN sabotage an otherwise good system and for a myriad of “reasons” or for no reason at all. That was all I was saying. What you seem to be saying is that people who hold the most power can ill-use that power similarly. Is there a strawman situation going on here on your part? CBK
LikeLike
What strawman did I present? I am not following you. And I am precisely NOT saying that “people . . . can ill-use . . . power,” though that is sometimes the case. I am saying that more often than not, if you scratch what looks to be a problem with a person or persons in an organization, it turns out actually to be a problem with the system in which they are acting. So, I am saying exactly the opposite of what you are suggesting.
LikeLike
Bob: As I read your note, though in different language, you are not saying “exactly the opposite.” People in power can ill-use their power . . .you say: “though it’s sometimes the case.” THAT’s ALL I AM SAYING.
You write: “I am saying that more often than not, if you scratch what looks to be a problem with a person or persons in an organization, it turns out actually to be a problem with the system in which they are acting. So, I am saying exactly the opposite of what you are suggesting.”
I think you are right, but would add your own qualifier to what you say: that “it’s sometimes,” or even often in your experience, “the case,” but it would take much more knowledge on your or my part to claim the truth of “more often than not.” Neither you nor I know that. And if it were true, it would be that those behind the system (with power) would be the bearers of “blame.”
The hint of a strawman down the road is the “sound” of the suggestion (to me in your note) of an extreme in the making: that system, when you “scratch the surface,” is really always bad, and that teachers are always in the right and never sabotage programs or just fail to understand them well.
But without well developed systems rightly applied, we are back in the dark ages. That very idea is an invitation to anarchy. If I am wrong in this, the I am glad to stand corrected. CBK
LikeLike
In my teaching life and my business and ngo lives, when something was wrong, it was typically because of a systemic problem and typically a problem that management was not addressing through blindness or hubris.
LikeLike
Bob: Is it Roy and some others here, or someone else who writes, with you, about “going underground” in the face of bad systematics in education.
But the greater WE have been great about making distinctions while the idea of integrative systems, on principle, suffers from it’s own oxymoronic situation . . . insofar as the people who work with them don’t want to account for the reality of the unsystematic elements in the nature of the universe and of the idea of open-endedness. CBK
LikeLike
Suppose that there is a hole in the roof and that people are dealing with that by mopping the floor. Well, the usual situation is the same. They deal twith individual employees (mopping up) when the problem is the system those people are working in (the roof in need of repair). Fix the systemic issue that is causing the behavior, and the problem with particular people goes away.
LikeLike
I don’t know what your point is , Bob. There’s no conflict here as I see it, but you apparently do. Since I don’t know what is missing, however, I cannot comment more. CBK
LikeLike
Good people in bad systems
It’s analogous to David Rosenhan’s sane people in insane places
LikeLike
I really need to start proofing carefully before hitting the Send button. I have a new, smaller keyboard, and I make a lot of typos on it.
LikeLike
What Ed wrote about selfish people was at first eye-opening to me, too, but then I thought it made a lot of sense, because people who are not in groups that have been historically marginalized or targeted for discrimination and hate tend to feel uplifted at being in the preferred and priviledged group and/or not care about how people in the other groups are effected. It also resonated because it reminded me of what German Martin Niemöller, a Lutheran pastor, who initially supported Hitler but later spoke out against him and was sent to Dachau concentration camp, wrote after World War II:
“First they came for the Communists
And I did not speak out
Because I was not a Communist
Then they came for the Socialists
And I did not speak out
Because I was not a Socialist
Then they came for the trade unionists
And I did not speak out
Because I was not a trade unionist
Then they came for the Jews
And I did not speak out
Because I was not a Jew
Then they came for me
And there was no one left
To speak out for me”
LikeLiked by 1 person
BOB: Reply in moderation. CBK
LikeLike
The juxtaposition of these two blogs speaks volumes. There (at least) three kinds of Republicans: Trump wannabees. Silent. Retired.
Missouri is going down a rabbit hole with the rest, but we say often “at least our Governor has no aspirations to be like trump or be president.” Desantis, Abbott, and the rest. The Putin story is a cautionary tale for Texas, Florida, and the U.S. Then there are the representatives like ours who mostly want nothing to do with trump. They are republicans. But do they speak out? Why is it only after they retire we learn they have been seething for years and are embarrassed.
The debate above is informative on many levels – and as scary. I hate the play the “what if” card but holy cow, IF Obama had done 1/100 of what trump has done, said, bullied, threatened, lied, a revolving door cabinet… AND MET WITH PUTIN, you all would be screaming. But trump? Oh, never mind.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Lol, O’bama told the fake President of Russia, on a hot mic to tell Vladamir that he “needed flexibility” because of the 2012 election. After O’bama was re-elected he allowed Russia to invade Crimea, with little comment. Oh well. Democrats have appeased totalitarian governments for decades.
LikeLike
Again, I agree that Obama was a TERRIBLE president (with the exception of his Supreme Court picks). He was the OPPOSITE of a progressive. He worked for the oligarchs, just like any Repugnican. DINO.
LikeLike
The last Republican president we had kissed Putin’s ass (and probably other anatomical er, features), Kim Jong Un’s butt, Orban’s nether regions, and “fell in love” (sic) with the dictator of China…
I’m sorry, what were you saying? Your gaffes shout louder than your words. Makes it hard to hear you…
LikeLike
You missed the point completely. Or better yet, you made my case. Did the republicans jump all over President Obama for whatever his Russia statement was? Well good – THEN WHY AREN’T THEY ALL OVER trump for his putin worship?
LikeLike
He ALLOWED Russia to invade Crimea?
Is there no limit to how low you can go?
LikeLike
tRump admires and emulates authoritarian leaders like Putin, has already let us know that he plans to be a dictator on day one and he has a list of lots of things that he said he’ll do then, so if (God forbid) he wins, I think we can expect to see much of what Putin’s doing in Russia happening here as well. And since no dictator in history has ever given up that much power after just a single day, I think he’ll claim it for life. (His niece said that every day after the first day he’d say is still day one…)
LikeLike
Trump’s niece spills details about ex-president’s dictator talk: ‘how he’s always behaved’
Donald Trump’s “vermin” remark and other comments that echo those of past dictators are no accident, and they are not new territory for the former president, his own niece said on Saturday.
Mary Trump, herself a psychologist who has frequently criticized the actions of her uncle, appeared on CNN Newsroom with Jim Acosta, where she was asked about “the Don’s” statement that he would only be “a dictator” on “day one” of his presidency.
“We need to take Donald at his word to a certain point,” Mary Trump said. “We can ignore the second half of that. Dictators don’t stop being dictators. And he has every intention of destroying American democracy, and we need to be clear why. It’s entirely for his own benefit. Nothing about this is ideological.”
She added that, in Trump’s mind, “every day from then on will be day one.”
“He has no intention of stopping. He knows why he needs to get back into the White House. Those reasons won’t disappear on a day two or day 100. So, we have to take this threat incredibly seriously.”
https://www.rawstory.com/mary-trump-on-dictator-talk/
LikeLike
Given the utter nonsense about Putin and Trump from a couple commenters, above, it’s worthwhile, I think, revisiting the autobiographies and relationship between these two men (I use that term extremely loosely). Even more informed commenters might benefit from this review:
Putin and Trump: A Backgrounder | Bob Shepherd | Praxis (wordpress.com)
LikeLike