We first heard the term “destroy the administrative state” when Steve Bannon used it in 2015 and 2016. Bannon, a close advisor to Trump, viewed the federal government as a danger to life and liberty. Now, Trump supporters echo that language, and it still sounds bizarre. They may be relying on Social Security and Medicare, they may be drinking clean water and breathing fresh air thanks to the Environmental Protection Agency, they may enjoy daily safety and security thanks to federal regulations, but they are prepared to toss all of it overboard.
They want to get the administrative state out of our lives, except that they don’t. They want the state to control women’s bodies, to limit parental rights to seek medical care for their children, and to control what we can read and what entertainment we can see. They want frozen embryos and fetuses in utero to be declared children, with all the rights of personhood. They want women and girls to be forced to give birth, even if their pregnancy was caused by rape or uncest, even if it endangers the woman’s life, even if the fetus has fatal deficiencies.
No organization has been more influential than the Heritage Foundation in stoking hostility to the Federal government. This venerable D.C. think tank is now planning the second Trump administration.
Over the past year, Heritage gathered rightwing ideologues to draft a document called Project 2025. It is a plan for the next Trump administration.
Here is another link. The section on the federal role in education starts on page 351.
Trump’s allies believe that his ambitious goals in his first term were stymied by career bureaucrats. So they recommend that his first act must be to reorganize the civil service, removing job protections from civil servants, enabling Trump to replace civil servants with Trump loyalists. It’s worth remembering that the civil service was created to eliminate the “spoils system,” the routine practice of filling government jobs with political cronies. Every president currently has thousands of political jobs to fill, but the core functions of government are staffed by experienced civil servants who serve regardless of the party in power.
The Heritage plan would enhance the powers of the President. Every government agency would be staffed by his loyalists. The Justice Department would no longer enjoy a measure of independence; instead it would serve the President. If he wanted to use it to persecute his political enemies, he could. He could carry out his pledges to jail Hillary Clinton and the Biden family. His Justice Department, led by a Trump attorney (Jeff Clark? Robert Hur? Alina Habba?) would follow proper procedures, arrest Trump’s enemies, and charge them with something or other.
With a nearly 1,000-page “Project 2025” handbook and an “army” of Americans, the idea is to have the civic infrastructure in place on Day One to commandeer, reshape and do away with what Republicans deride as the “deep state” bureaucracy, in part by firing as many as 50,000 federal workers.
“We need to flood the zone with conservatives,” said Paul Dans, director of the 2025 Presidential Transition Project and a former Trump administration official who speaks with historical flourish about the undertaking….
The ideas contained in Heritage’s coffee table-ready book are both ambitious and parochial, a mix of longstanding conservative policies and stark, head-turning proposals that gained prominence in the Trump era.
There’s a “top to bottom overhaul” of the Department of Justice, particularly curbing its independence and ending FBI efforts to combat the spread of misinformation. It calls for stepped-up prosecution of anyone providing or distributing abortion pills by mail.
There are proposals to have the Pentagon “abolish” its recent diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives, what the project calls the “woke” agenda, and reinstate service members discharged for refusing the COVID-19 vaccine.
As Politico described it, the Project 2025 plan is the product of numerous rightwing groups that are seeking to roll back nothing less than 100 years of what they see as liberal encroachment on Washington. They want to overturn what began as Woodrow Wilson’s creation of a federal administrative elite and later grew into a vast, unaccountable and mostly liberal bureaucracy (as conservatives view it) under Franklin Roosevelt’s New Deal and Lyndon Johnson’s Great Society, numbering about two and a quarter million federal workers today. They aim to defund the Department of Justice, dismantle the FBI, break up the Department of Homeland Security and eliminate the Departments of Education and Commerce, to name just a few of their larger targets. They want to give the president complete power over quasi-independent agencies such as the Federal Communications Commission, which makes and enforces rules for television and internet companies that have been the bane of Trump’s political existence in the last few years.
And they want to ensure that what remains of this slashed-down bureaucracy is reliably MAGA conservative — not just for the next president but for a long time to come — and that the White House maintains total control of it. In an effort to implement this agenda — which relies on another Reagan-era idea, the controversial “unitary theory” of the Constitution under which Article II gives the president complete power over the federal bureaucracy — Dans has formed a committee to recruit what he calls “conservative warriors” through bar associations and state attorneys general offices and install them in general counsel offices throughout the federal bureaucracy.

And here is how they test drive their deliberate democracy destroying offensive on the ground in Florida.
“In addition to narrowing what can be taught and curtailing what FL public school teachers can discuss in their classes, the DeSantis administration’s sweeping education agenda has included wide-scale book bans; bills prohibiting gender-affirming medical care for minors; legislation barring use of a student’s preferred name and pronouns by teachers and school staff; bathroom bills that limit who can use male and female facilities; and a pilot program, the Florida Civic Seal of Excellence, a $45 million initiative that provides K-12 instructors with a $3,000 stipend for completing a 55-hour online class developed by the Christian conservative Hillsdale College and the right-wing Heritage Foundation.
They have now now taken a shot at restricting what is offered at the state’s 40 public two- and four-year colleges and universities. The first step was announced by Florida Commissioner of Higher Education Manny Diaz Jr., a DeSantis ally, who reported that Principles of Sociology was being removed from the five core classes needed for degree completion at the state’s public colleges.
Although the course will still be offered as an elective, Diaz made clear that all core classes must comply with a 2023 state law which disallows content that teaches that ‘systemic racism, sexism, oppression and privilege are inherent in the institutions of the United States’ or that insinuate that these factors play a role in ongoing economic, political or social inequities in our society.“
https://truthout.org/articles/florida-officials-cut-sociology-as-core-college-class-in-war-on-critical-thought/
LikeLiked by 1 person
Kathy,
DeSantis and his cronies are vile.
I can’t imagine offering teachers $3,000 to be indoctrinated.
LikeLike
Sounds like Putin’s Russia to me.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes, Project 2025 is the authoritarian blueprint for Christian nationalist despotism. My question, are our intelligence communities able to trace Russian oligarch money to any of these “think tanks” and other right wing organizations?
LikeLike
The GOP and their band of kleptocrats operate like a crime family. Government agencies only get in their way, protect rights, keep records and represent the interests of the people. The GOP prefers to operate in the shadows without accountability like the thugs that believe in “no body, no crime.” Dismantling government agencies would allow the GOP to operate without watchdogs. They can be free to vandalize the common good with impunity and “no records, no crime.”
Democrats made a huge mistake appointing Merrick Garland to Trump’s attempt to overturn the 2020 election. In an attempt to appear apolitical, he wasted far too much time. Now the Supreme Court will take up the case, but not until April, dangerously close to the fall election. Democrats have played right into Trump’s “delay, delay, delay” strategy.
LikeLike
In an attempt to appear apolitical, he wasted far too much time.
I no longer believe this. It looks pretty clear to me that Garland is ACTIVELY on the other side.
LikeLike
A lot of them are on the same side! Make $$$, change/enact law so that they make more money and then hold onto to the power that money has bought for them.
Yeah, I’ll probably get ranted at about this statement, but the truth matters. We’re living in The Hunger Games.
LikeLike
Agree. Consider, as an example of this, which party used the services of Jeffrey Epstein.
Answer: Both of them
LikeLike
Which political party PROSECUTED Jeffrey Epstein and which one COVERED for him?
The answer is not “both of them”. Florida Republicans let him off with a wrist slap. As far as I know, every Democrat politician avoided Epstein after his Florida crimes were revealed. Was anyone still spending time with Epstein except some apolitical academics hungry for his money and members of the royal family?
There are absolutely individual bad actors who are beloved by progressives and turn out to be corrupt frauds. Just because prosecutor Cyrus Vance Jr. was reprehensible and corrupt should not be used to demonize all of the GOOD progressives out there fighting for what it right.
So far, Leticia James and Fani Willis seem to be able to stand up to political pressure despite neither of them fitting the description of “progressives” the way the progressives once embraced Vance.
As much as I hate Vance, I wouldn’t invoke him to make some sweeping attack on “progressives”.
The real difference between Democrats and Republicans is that there are many Democrats with integrity and almost no Republicans with integrity because having integrity is actually a problem in the Republican party, and it still required in the Democrat party.
In short:
Republicans who tell the truth are drummed out of the party while Republicans who lie are elevated to leadership.
Democrats who are found to be liars are drummed out of the party, not embraced. Democrats who tell the truth are not ex-communicated.
Both parties are not the same.
Merrick Garland has bought into the right wing narrative that one must bend over backward to favor the Republicans in the name of being “fair and balanced”. He is biased the way the truly despicable NYT reporters are biased. Ask a NYT reporter and they truly believe they are incorruptible. In my opinion, Garland is the same. He acts corruptly without understanding that bending over backward to always favor the right wing is corrupt and not “fair and balanced”.
LikeLike
RT and Bob I was of the opinion that Garland wanted to build the case from the bottom up, that is, to try and convict the worker bees of the insurrection, and get them to provide more and more evidence, before getting to Queenie.
(If any MAGA read this, “worker bees” is a metaphor for the people you see on TV violating the grounds of their own Government, and Queenie is a metaphor for Trump.)
If that’s the case about Garland, however, he’s done that, but it did take too long. And I can see someone getting into the weeds and forgetting the main idea? But “actively on the other side”?
Bob: why do you think Garland is actively on the other side? CBK
LikeLike
“Administrative state”? Can you imagine the United States in the hands of Trump and the Two Steves of Miller, Bannon, and company? CBK
LikeLike
Sounds like dirty business to me:
LikeLike
Outstanding post, Diane!
LikeLike
Kevin D. Roberts, the President of the Heritage Foundation was formerly the President of the Wyoming Catholic College.
One of the drafters of Project 2025 is Roger Severino, the VP of domestic policy for Heritage, who was a Trump official in the Dept. of Health and Human Services. The Hill reported that his plan is greater restrictions on abortion. His wife heads the Judicial Crisis Network.
Under Trump, the nation is/was/becomes a theocracy and oligarchy. The two major drivers are politicized, right wing Catholics and Charles Koch.
Jefferson warned, in every country, in every age, the priest aligns with the despot.
LikeLike
So what happens under this grand plan when a progressive president sweeps all the Repugnican knuckledraggers out of the government? Fortunately, Repugnicans tend to be not that bright.
LikeLike
So he wants a Thugocracy.
These are fascist traitors.
LikeLiked by 1 person
exactly so
LikeLike
“THEY” want to replace the Constitutionally supported and monitored administrative state with an authoritarian theocracy and/or kleptocracy ruled by “the few” without that pesky Constitution and its democracy getting in their way and holding them accountable for fraud and other crimes.
Get rid of the US federal government, the oath the defend the US Constitution against all enemies foreign and domestic, the rule of law, and replace those with a mandatory loyalty oath to someone just like Traitor Trump, Putin or Kim in North Korea.
LikeLike
While most of the press is worried about the Supreme Court ruling on presidential immunity, this can be kept out of the public eye.
LikeLike
I did not realize how many gifted psychics there are here. They all know EXACTLY what people are thinking and doing without the need for messy proof.
LikeLike
I’m not smart enough to figure out what you are alluding to here. Can you please give an example of something one of those “gifted psychics” here wrote where they claim to know exactly what people are thinking and doing without the need for messy proof?
I have sometimes seen this here and other places, but I am not sure if what I see is the same as what you are referring to.
However, a right wing think tank’s plan is certainly valid evidence of what they are thinking, right? One doesn’t need to have esp when the right wing no longer feels any need to hide what they do and the media has normalized it.
LikeLike