Heather Cox Richardson writes about the supine behavior of Republicans in the House of Representatives, as they worship at the shrine of Trump. The Senate passed a bipartisan bill to fund Ukraine, Taiwan, and Israel: 22 Republican Senators voted for it, openly defying the Orange Menace. But in the House, Speaker Mike Johnson says he won’t allow the bill to come to a vote because it is likely to pass. Johnson is collaborating with Trump who is collaborating with the enemies of freedom (aka Putin).
She writes:
History is watching,” President Joe Biden said this afternoon. He warned “Republicans in Congress who think they can oppose funding for Ukraine and not be held accountable” that “[f]ailure to support Ukraine at this critical moment will never be forgotten.”
At about 5:00 this morning, the Senate passed a $95 billion national security supplemental bill, providing funding for Ukraine, Israel, Taiwan, and humanitarian aid to Gaza. Most of the money in the measure will stay in the United States, paying defense contractors to restock the matériel the U.S. sends to Ukraine.
The vote was 70–29 and was strongly bipartisan. Twenty-two Republicans joined Democrats in support of the bill, overcoming the opposition of far-right Republicans.
The measure went to the House of Representatives, where House speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) said he will not take it up, even though his far-right supporters acknowledged that a majority of the representatives supported it and that if it did come to the floor, it would pass.
Yesterday, House Intelligence Committee chair Mike Turner (R-OH)—who had just returned from his third trip to Ukraine, where he told President Volodymyr Zelensky that reinforcements were coming—told Politico’sRachel Bade: “We have to get this done…. This is no longer an issue of, ‘When do we support Ukraine?’ If we do not move, this will be abandoning Ukraine.”
“The speaker will need to bring it to the floor,” Turner said. “You’re either for or against the authoritarian governments invading democratic countries.… You’re either for or against the killing of innocent civilians. You’re either for or against Russia reconstituting the Soviet Union.”
Today, Biden spoke to the press to “call on the Speaker to let the full House speak its mind and not allow a minority of the most extreme voices in the House to block this bill even from being voted on—even from being voted on. This is a critical act for the House to move. It needs to move.”
Bipartisan support for Ukraine “sends a clear message to Ukrainians and to our partners and to our allies around the world: America can be trusted, America can be relied upon, and America stands up for freedom,” he said. “We stand strong for our allies. We never bow down to anyone, and certainly not to Vladimir Putin.”
“Supporting this bill is standing up to Putin. Opposing it is playing into Putin’s hands.”
“The stakes were already high for American security before this bill was passed in the Senate last night,” Biden said. “But in recent days, those stakes have risen. And that’s because the former President has sent a dangerous and shockingly, frankly, un-American signal to the world” Biden said, referring to Trump’s statement on Saturday night that he would “encourage [Russia] to do whatever the hell they want” to countries that are part of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO)—the 75-year-old collective security organization that spans North America and Europe—but are not devoting 2% of the gross domestic product to their militaries.
Trump’s invitation to Putin to invade our NATO allies was “dumb,…shameful,…dangerous, [and] un-American,” Biden said. “When America gives its word, it means something. When we make a commitment, we keep it. And NATO is a sacred commitment.” NATO, Biden said, is “the alliance that protects America and the world.”
“[O]ur adversaries have long sought to create cracks in the Alliance. The greatest hope of all those who wish America harm is for NATO to fall apart. And you can be sure that they all cheered when they heard [what] Donald Trump…said.”
“Our nation stands at…an inflection point in history…where the decisions we make now are going to determine the course of our future for decades to come. This is one of those moments.
And I say to the House members, House Republicans: You’ve got to decide. Are you going to stand up for freedom, or are you going to side with terror and tyranny? Are you going to stand with Ukraine, or are you going to stand with Putin? Will we stand with America or…with Trump?”
“Republicans and Democrats in the Senate came together to send a message of unity to the world. It’s time for the House Republicans to do the same thing: to pass this bill immediately, to stand for decency, stand for democracy, to stand up to a so-called leader hellbent on weakening American security,” Biden said.
“And I mean this sincerely: History is watching. History is watching.”
But instead of taking up the supplemental national security bill tonight, House speaker Johnson took advantage of the fact that Representative Steve Scalise (R-LA) has returned to Washington after a stem cell transplant to battle his multiple myeloma and that Judy Chu (D-CA) is absent because she has Covid to make a second attempt to impeach Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas for “high crimes and misdemeanors” for his oversight of the southern border of the United States.
Republicans voted to impeach Mayorkas by a vote of 214 to 213. The vote catered to far-right Republicans, but impeachment will go nowhere in the Senate.
“History will not look kindly on House Republicans for their blatant act of unconstitutional partisanship that has targeted an honorable public servant in order to play petty political games,” Biden said in a statement. He called on the House to pass the border security measure Republicans killed last week on Trump’s orders, and to pass the national security supplemental bill.
House minority leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY) has said he will use every possible tool to force a vote on the national security supplemental bill. In contrast, as Biden noted, House Republicans are taking their cue from former president Trump, who does not want aid to Ukraine to pass and who last night demonstrated that he is trying to consolidate his power over the party by installing hand-picked loyalists, including his daughter-in-law, Lara Trump, who is married to his son Eric, at the head of the Republican National Committee (RNC).
This move is likely due in part to outgoing RNC chair Ronna McDaniel’s having said the RNC could not pay Trump’s legal bills once he declared himself a presidential candidate. After his political action committees dropped $50 million on legal fees last year, he could likely use another pipeline, and even closer loyalists might give him one.
In addition, Trump probably recognizes that he might well lose the protective legal bulwark of the Trump Organization when Judge Arthur Engoron hands down his verdict in Trump’s $370 million civil fraud trial. New York attorney general Letitia James is seeking not only monetary penalties but also a ban on Trump’s ability to conduct business in the New York real estate industry. In that event, the RNC could become a base of operations for Trump if he succeeds in taking it over entirely.
But it is not clear that all Republican lawmakers will follow him into that takeover, as his demands from the party not only put it out of step with the majority of the American people but also now clearly threaten to blow up global security. “Our base cannot possibly know what’s at stake at the level that any well-briefed U.S. senator should know about what’s at stake if Putin wins,” Senator Thom Tillis (R-NC) told his colleagues as he urged them to vote for the national security supplemental bill.
Politicians should recognize that Trump’s determination to win doesn’t help them much: it is all about him and does not extend to any down-ballot races.
Indeed, the attempt of a Republican minority to impose its will on the majority of Americans appears to be sparking a backlash. In today’s election in New York’s Third Congressional District to replace indicted serial liar George Santos, a loyal Trump Republican, voters chose Democrat Tom Suozzi by about 8 points. CNN’s Dana Bash tonight said voters had told her they voted against the Republican candidate because Republicans, on Trump’s orders, killed the bipartisan border deal. The shift both cuts down the Republican majority in the House and suggests that going into 2024, suburban swing voters are breaking for Democrats.
As Trump tries to complete his takeover of the formerly grand old Republican Party, its members have to decide whether to capitulate.
History is watching.

A question on the way the House works: If conservatives can kick out McCarthy with one person beginning the dissent, why could not the moderate republicans kick out this Johnson? Must there be a speaker in order for the House to get anything done? Should Johnson be investigated? What if he is on Putin’s payroll?
LikeLike
Your first mistake is to assume there are any moderate Republicans
LikeLike
I refer to the ones men above who want to find Ukraine.
LikeLike
Fund
LikeLike
Reminds me of one of my favorite lines from Dr. Strangelove.
President Muffley: I will not go down in history as the greatest mass murderer since Adolf Hilter!
General Turgidson: Perhaps it might be better, Mr. President, if you were more concerned with the American people than with your image in the history books!
LikeLike
Democrats should continue to call the GOP out for its hypocrisy. Both the failed border deal and unwillingness to fund Ukraine are putting the US under a greater threat to national security. Democratic messaging should build on Biden’s criticism of Trump. What the extremists in the House are doing is “un-American.”
LikeLike
First the Republicans in the House said they wouldn’t agree to fund defense appropriations unless it was linked to border security.
Then the Senate agreed on a tough border bill that included everything the Republicans want.
Then Trump said don’t pass it. I plan to campaign on the issue of open borders.
So the GOP in the House caved.
Now that the Senate passed the defense bill, supported by 22 Republicans including the leadership, Mike Johnson says he won’t bring it to the floor of the House for a vote because it doesn’t include border security.
Also, he doesn’t want to offend Trump who opposes aid to Ukraine.
Why does Trump oppose aid to Ukraine?
One guess.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Good question, Diane: Why does Trump oppose aid to Ukraine?
We know the answer: That dump works for Putin, not the American people and democracy.
LikeLike
History is watching (but, not commenting on) men like Republican Tim Michels? He ran against Tony Evers in Wisconsin. When Michels was a trustee of his parents foundation, it funded Veritas Society. Politico posted a story yesterday about the intersection of Veritas Society, Near Intelligence (a data gathering firm), Wisconsin Right to Life and, information-gathering operations focused on individuals visiting Planned Parenthood Clinics.
Michels is in favor of universal school choice (no income limits), he is against same sex marriage and he is anti-abortion. Sites describe him as Catholic and a graduate of the “top rated Catholic college”, St. Norbert College.
If politicized, powerful, right wing Catholics achieve their agenda, Americans should expect that any rights they are able keep will be conferred on them by the theocracy of the Catholic Church.
LikeLike
Linda writes: *”If politicized, powerful, right wing Catholics achieve their agenda, Americans should expect that any rights they are able keep will be conferred on them by the theocracy of the Catholic.”
I seriously doubt it. Actually, from my own culture-watching, I think most of those who call themselves Catholics (like Leo) or even Christians (fill in the blank) merely use that term to run rhetorical interference for their own totalitarian ambitions.
But again, in your note you squeeze together your idea of “Catholics”, and even right-wing, etc., Catholics, with “the Catholic Church,” and even with its theology, which BTW is not ONLY about abortion or the other social issues that hit the headlines so much in this country. From our past conversations here, my guess is that the coverall, again, is anti-religious and anti-Catholic bias, which holds them all together quite well, thank you, if you don’t want to understand the HUGE difference.
The other thing is, would you have even mentioned a “Catholic education” if he were someone from another faith tradition? And if so, on what basis?
Moreover, let me AGAIN mention a little inuendo I sense in your notes, based on my past experience of having read them. That is, that Catholic schools provide competitive secular curricula and even college-prep education in their high schools . . . far and away from many of the upstart (by comparison) evangelical “church schools” that are wholly doctrinaire, and even anti-science (though my guess is that even those are not ALL that way).
Neither Catholic high schools nor Catholic schools of higher education can be lumped together or thought to be merely Catholic doctrinal mills for closed minds, as you seem to imply here and in your many other notes–that would be REALLY wrong. Please correct me if I am wrong about your thinking here–I do wish I were.
Though associated with the Catholic Church in many ways, however, Catholic schools traditionally offer a wonderfully complex liberal arts, science, mathematics, law, and history curricula that have nothing to do with proselytizing Catholic or even Christian doctrine (as you seem to think) and are also “up there” with our finest higher-level educational institutions.
Finally, in the broader picture, if anyone understands the centuries of thinking that went into what is still generally referred to as “the western tradition,” you would understand that it is impossible to fully understand that history, particularly of differentiating movements of mind that came before the scientific revolution and that had a large place in its run-up, without understanding the Church’s contributions to that thinking. The Catholic Church RIGHTLY gets a lot of flak. However, the bigger picture still holds a greater and more foundational reality of historical contributions.
Suggested here, FWIW: one cannot unwrap the history of the Catholic Church from what remains qualified about “the Western tradition” without a cut-and-paste view of a biased history as such. CBK
LikeLike
Linda is on some kind of weird crusade against Catholics and Catholicism in general. She doesn’t grok basic facts like, for example, that Catholics are Christians, that the Pope is a liberal social democrat, that Catholic schools tend to have very high academic quality, that MANY Catholics are progressive about many issues, including gay marriage and marriage of priests. It’s a waste of time to try to engage Linda on this topic. I find her posts to be totally out there in bizarroland.
LikeLike
Hi Bob: What you said. I only check in once in a while here; but as before, when I see Linda spread that same inuendo, ignorance, and set of undifferentiated cxxp, I at least want to “go to print” here with some context and push back.
BTW, if you see “Mr. Jones” (there is a nice surprise there, also) compare some of the political/philosophical narrative (so nicely put in the movie) with that YouTube video you posted here recently of Putin’s philosopher . . . the comparative takeaway is stunning and points to the central difference between living with the interior desecration of nihilism (Putin) and with a consciousness permeated with reasonable hope. Thanks again for posting that video. CBK
LikeLike
Putin just announced that he supports Biden. On par with his pledge that he would not invade Ukraine.
Never forget that he was a career KGB agent. A specialist in lying and disinformation.
LikeLike
Diane Putin says he supports Biden? HaHaHaHa! CBK
LikeLike
Yes. SOOOOOOO unintentionally funny. Putin really thinks that Americans are idiots.
Valdimir: Liar, liar pants on fire.
Trump: Moscow’s Asset [Who] Governed America (MAGA), aka Putin’s dog, aka Putin’s useful idiot.
I would say that Putin will back Trump until he doesn’t but that’s obvious given this is Putin’s way with everyone. Stalinist that he his, Putin will turn on a dime and devour his former stooge if he sees some possible gain in it or merely for fun. But that he has done that now, in this instance, there’s not a snowball’s chance in Mikey Johnson and Pence the Dense’s imaginary hell that that’s true.
LikeLike
So here, I think, was his calculation: At this point, so many people are saying (accurately) that Trump is Putin’s dog, and this is generally viewed so unfavorably, that it is in Putin’s interest to put out this disinformation IN ORDER TO HELP TRUMP AND HURT BIDEN. Now, let’s see if the American press simply laps up and repeats Putin’s disinformation.
LikeLike
Diane and all It’s a classic case of calling a bluff . . . Biden called the House’s bluff by accepting the border bill. So, they just try something else exposing their more nefarious motivations, or just not playing fair.
Also, it’s not the first time in history that Ukraine has been starved to death by a Russian totalitarian. . . Stalin was responsible for the great famine experiment where grain was the means; and now, through Traitor Trump, Putin’s Useful Idiot, the anti-American Americans want to starve Ukraine of funding to support themselves from being taken over by a “Russia” whose history of totalitarian starvation “rings” back to the 30’s.
BTW, again, is anyone on the trail of who is being intimidated (scared witless) by Trump supporters (e.g., SCOTUS?), and who is intimidating, into supporting such treasonous activities by oath-taking governmental representatives of democracy and “The People”? CBK
LikeLike
CBK,
In case you haven’t seen it, watch “Mr.Jones,” a true story about a Welsh journalist who reported on the Ukrainian famine at a time when the NY Times’ Moscow correspondent was Walter Duranty, an admirer of Stalin.
Also Robert Conquest’s book “The Great Fsmine.”
LikeLike
Hello Diane: I saw “Mr. Jones” yesterday . . . a stunner . . . and saved it. Thanks for responding. CBK
LikeLike
Thanks for the recommendation!
LikeLike