Kate McGee of The Texas Tribune reported on an academic mess in Texas that turned into a national scandal. Texas A&M, one of the state’s premier universities recruited veteran journalist Kathleen McElroy to serve as Dean of Journalism at A&M. Dr. McElroy was considered a prize catch after years of experience at the New York Times and her doctorate in journalism. In addition, she is a tenured professor at the University of Texas in Austin and a graduate of Texas A&M.
A&M wooed Dr. McElroy, offered her a position with tenure, and held a celebration when she accepted.
When Texas A&M University announced last month that it had hired a director to revive its journalism school, it included the kind of fanfare usually reserved for college coaches and athletes.
The university set up maroon, silver and white balloons around a table outside its Academic Building for an official signing ceremony. It was there that Kathleen O. McElroy, a respected journalist with a long career, officially accepted the position to run the new program and teach as a tenured professor, pending approval from the Texas A&M University System Board of Regents.
McElroy, a 1981 Texas A&M graduate, was the director of the University of Texas at Austin’s School of Journalism between 2016 and 2022, where she is a tenured professor. Earlier, she spent 20 years in various editing roles at The New York Times until heading to UT-Austin to pursue her doctorate.
But apparently some conservative members of the A&M board objected to Dr. McElroy’s concern for diversity and inclusion, as well as her career at the New York Times, and the offer was whittled down to a position without tenure. Dr. McElroy withdrew her acceptance, and in the ensuing publicity, the president of the multi-campus university resigned.
McGee wrote:
After a week of turmoil over the botched hiring of a Black journalist to revive the Texas A&M University journalism department, M. Katherine Banks has resigned as the university’s president.
Mark A. Welsh III, dean of the Bush School of Government and Public Service, will serve as acting president until the Board of Regents can meet to name an interim president. Texas A&M System Chancellor John Sharp has recommended they appoint Welsh as an interim until the board can do a national search for a new president. Banks’ resignation is effective immediately.
In a letter sent to A&M System Chancellor John Sharp Thursday evening, Banks wrote, “The recent challenges regarding Dr. [Kathleen] McElroy have made it clear to me that I must retire immediately. The negative press is a distraction from the wonderful work being done here.”
The fallout over McElroy’s hiring, which has garnered national media attention, marks the culmination of Banks’ two-year tenure, which was often met with pushback from faculty and students who consistently raised concerns with the direction she was taking the university and the way in which her administration was communicating its vision.
During that time, faculty leaders have passed resolutions calling for more involvement in university decisions, and research leaders on campus raised concerns with her administration’s decision-making. She was forced to walk back the decision to abruptly end the print publication of the university’s student newspaper, The Battalion, after students and alumni protested. Her administration also faced pushback from students after the school decided to cut funding and sponsorship of an annual campus drag show, known as Draggieland. Throughout all of that, Sharp has remained supportive of Banks’ leadership.
In response to the news, McElroy told the Tribune in a text message Friday evening: “I’m deeply grateful for the groundswell of support I’ve received, especially from Aggies of all majors, and my former and current students. There’s much more I could say and will say about what has unfolded. But for now, I’ll reserve those statements for a future date.”
The latest fracas on campus that led to Banks’ resignation comes after the university’s faculty senate passed a resolution Wednesday to create a fact-finding committee into the mishandling of the hiring of McElroy. During that meeting, Banks took responsibility for the flawed hiring process but told faculty members that she did not approve changes to an offer letter that led a prospective journalism professor to walk away from negotiations amid conservative backlash to her hiring.
However, Hart Blanton, the head of the university’s department of communications and journalism who was closely involved in McElroy’s recruiting, said in a statement Friday that Banks interfered with the hiring process early on and that race was a factor in university officials’ decision to water down the job offer…
McElroy, an experienced journalism professor currently working at the University of Texas at Austin who previously worked as an editor at The New York Times, turned down an offer to reboot A&M’s journalism program after a fraught negotiation process first reported by The Texas Tribune. What originally was a tenure-track offer was reduced to a five-year position, then to a one-year position from which she could be fired at any time.
“This offer letter … really makes it clear that they don’t want me there,” McElroy said last week about the one-year contract. “But in no shape, form or fashion would I give up a tenured position at UT for a one-year contract that emphasizes that you can be let go at any point.”
Initially, Texas A&M celebrated hiring McElroy with a public signing ceremony to announce her hiring. But in the weeks following, vocal groups from outside the university system expressed issues with her previous employment at The New York Times and her support for diversity in newsrooms. McElroy has said she was told that not everyone was pleased by her joining the faculty. Critics of her hiring focused on her prior work on diversity and inclusion.
McElroy said she was further told by José Luis Bermúdez, then interim dean of Texas A&M’s College of Arts and Sciences, that there was “noise in the [university] system” about her, though he did not give specifics. When she pressed him, she said he told her, “you’re a Black woman who worked at The New York Times.” He told her that in some conservative circles, The New York Times is akin to Pravda, the newspaper of the Communist Party in Russia that began in the early 1900s.
McElroy said that Bermúdez ultimately told her he could not protect her from university leaders facing pressure to fire her over “DEI hysteria” surrounding her appointment and advised McElroy to stay in her tenured role at UT-Austin.
Earlier this week, Bermúdez announced he would step down from his role as interim dean at the end of the month.

Some rich White guys hid their prejudice by getting the university president who was a woman and an interim dean who was Hispanic to make a Black woman’s career position intolerable. Two people lost their jobs and the White guys continue like nothing happened. Paint me surprised.
Off topic, women who vote Republican after reading right wing quotes from people like Charlie Kirk about the wokeness in the Barbie movie, are proud to be stupid.
LikeLike
Can’t really understand why some people are afraid of diversity. This is a terrible story.
Sent from Elaine Barnett’s iPhone
>
LikeLike
yup
LikeLike
A interesting bit of inconsequential trivia: Banks was born in Whitesburg, Kentucky.
LikeLike
Not inconsequential, Banks’ PhD is from a legacy admission school- Duke. Jose Luis Bermudez attended the elite St. Paul’s School, London and King’s College, Cambridge.
While both McElroy and Banks have degrees from public and private schools, public universities should give preference to public university grads for leadership positions. McElroy’s doctorate is from a public university.
LikeLike
Private college and university grads should not even be considered for president and other high level administrative positions at public institutions because they simply lack the background and experiences to really understand the purpose of such institutions.
LikeLike
No private school grad should be included on the board of trustees of a public institution, either
LikeLike
You are 100% correct, Poet
LikeLike
I think Santa Ono is well qualified to lead the University of Michigan despite being educated at private universities. I also think our host would be well qualified to serve on a board of trustees at a public university.
LikeLike
The problem is actually not the exceptions.
But if you eliminate the privately educated people you effectively reduce the likelihood of the problem (people trying to impose what might be called “private or elitist ideas” on public institutions) with no real loss because there are plenty of publicly educated people who are eminently qualified.
LikeLike
And I would say that the younger version of Diane Ravitch is probably a much better example of the average person coming out of a private school background. There are exceedingly few who have the dramatic shift in philosophy that Diane has shown.
LikeLike
And there is no reason that we the taxpayers should entrust the direction of our public institutions to folks who were educated in an elitist bubble.
LikeLike
And no, I don’t believe that those educated in private institutions are necessarily more qualified (in any regard) than those educated in public institutions.
Many (if not most) of the former believe they are, but that does not make it so.
LikeLike
And not incidentally, the latter problem (that so many of these folks unjustifiably believe that they are smarter and more knowledgeable — and hence, believe their solutions to problems are superior to those of the inferior classes) is a problem that has had critical ramifications for our society at large.
Many of the FUBAR policies of the US (Vietnam and Iraq wars to name just two) were a direct result of the latter.
LikeLike
Poet, You make excellent arguments. The Hill posted research from Opportunity Insights that shows that those in the richest 0.1.% were 50% more likely to be admitted to elite schools (even when having the same ACT and SAT scores). At public flagship universities, the researchers found the same advantages weren’t found.
We should note that Opportunity Insights is funded by Bill Gates (irony) and OI’s “leadership”, a team of 4, includes John Friedman of Brown (the ed reformy camp?) and Raj Chetty.
Teaching economist seems to excel at flawed arguments.
LikeLike
Poet- My reply is in moderation, please check back.
The Hill has a report about the magnitude of advantage that the richest 0.1% have in getting into the elite private colleges.
LikeLike
Linda,
I am glad that you think Raj Shetty’s research methods are valid.
LikeLike
Raj Chetty of Harvard University discovered that rich kids—whose parents can pay full tuition—are far more likely to win admission to elite universities than kids from families that can’t pay their own way.
Will he next discover that the earth is round? Or that the people with the largest incomes live in bigger houses?
LikeLike
SDP,
We are in agreement that people educate at private universities are not necessarily more qualified than people that are educated at public universities.
I just think that public colleges and universities might benefit by being lead by folks with degrees from places like Howard, Bethune-Cookman, Clark Atlanta, Dillard, Fisk, Hampton, Johnson C Smith, Lane, Morehouse, Shaw, Spelman, Tuskegee, Wilberforce, and the many other private HBCU’s in the county.
Do you disagree?
LikeLike
I made my position crystal clear to anyone who can read and understand plain English (which obviously does not include Teachingeconomist, since he nonetheless needs to ask if I disagree that private college grads should be considered for the very thing I said they should not be)
“Private college and university grads should not even be considered for president and other high level administrative positions at public institutions because they simply lack the background and experiences to really understand the purpose “
“No private school grad should be included on the board of trustees of a public institution, either“
LikeLike
Serving as president or on the board of trustees of a public university is a privilege, NOT a right.
If people want to be considered for such positions, they are perfectly welcome to get their undergraduate or advanced degrees from public institutions.
LikeLike
If they are not willing to make that basic investment, they are simply not worthy of consideration.
But no need to worry, there are lots of opportunities available to grads of elite private schools for which public school grads are less likely to be considered.
LikeLike
Of course, many members of the Private Club (TM) take no issue with effectively excluding the public from leadership positions within their own organizations but at the same time balk at the suggestion that they not be allowed to decide how public institutions operate.
These people are just pathetic,
LikeLike
But this whole discussion is a waste of time because we all know what I am suggesting would never happen in a million years.
So, the private school grads have absolutely no need to worry about a watering down of their degree – that it will no longer be a universal key that unlocks every door to every boardroom on the planet.
LikeLike
But I am glad to hear that VAManujan (aka Raj Chettypicker) is still studying the vacuum between his ears.
LikeLike
What ever happened to that (fake) Nobel Prize in economics* that VAManujan (akaRaj Chettypicker ) was so certain he would get for his VAM based teacher impact study?
Was he awarded the prize in secret because the Swedish bank that gives it out has been embarrassed on several previous occasions for awarding a prize for rubbish?
*it’s not a real Nobel Prize and is typically awarded for right wing libertarian BS
LikeLike
The percentage of Black students who choose HBCU’s is 9-10%. Within the schools themselves, Black students are about 75%. HCBU’s are about 3% of the country’s colleges and universities.
Policies are written for the whole not for the exceptions.
LikeLike
While HBCU’s are 3% of colleges and universities, the student count is 1.4%. Based on the numbers, the grads are unlikely to get leadership positions. Top spots in government, business, NGO’s, etc. are a contact sport. The deal that would enable their brethren in public colleges to get a chance by beating out legacy admission grads, may be one they would willingly make.
LikeLike
Poet,
Don’t lose heart (your 10:38 comment). If I recall correctly, the board of Texas A & M is made up of A&M grads (and, a current student)
LikeLike
One clarification.
I think a person who got an undergrad degree from a private school but a grad degree from a public university should still be considered for a position as president or on the board of a public institution.
But I don’t believe the reverse should be the case (a person who got an undergrad at a public school but grad degree at a private school)
So where the graduate degree was obtained should really be the decider (unless of course all they have is an undergrad degree, which won’t be the case for most presidents of universities, in any case)
LikeLike
Important clarification. I’m forwarding this comment to the people who make all these hiring decisions. The new policy should be implemented soon.
LikeLike
It would have been a pity is Michael Crow, president of Arizona State University, would have been denied eligibility because his PhD is from Syracuse
LikeLike
Your Aggie Jokes Here …
LikeLike
This post shows how deeply damaging all this anti-CRT propaganda can be. The right is so deeply entrenched in its bias that it will reject an outstanding candidate because of latent racism, but maybe that is part of their devious agenda, to deny opportunities to qualified Black scholars. Texas is often the object of deserved scorn from the left, but its public university system is outstanding, and Texas A&M has missed an opportunity to show that it can rise above racism.
LikeLike
Like Florida, Texas is self destructing.
Even its higher ed system will eventually become a thing of the past as more professors leave and no one with any self respect wants to go there to replace them.
The almost total ban on abortion has undoubtedly already had a negative impact on the ability of Texas Universities to hire good people.
Stick a fork in Texas: it’s done.
LikeLike
Texas Governor Abbott gloated barrels wrapped in razor wire in the Rip Grande to
blockkill fathers, mothers and children trying to cross into the US from Mexico.And the Texans who vote for that inhuman monster are as bad as he is.
LikeLike
It’s not going to get any better if these states keep putting regressive good ‘ole boys in office.
LikeLike
A majority of Texas voters support the good old boys, so the problem is actually a very big one.
LikeLike
DeSantis’ racist policies are starting to take a toll on the economy. The hospitality sector cannot fill vacancies, and builders that are generally big GOP donors are angry over the labor shortage.
LikeLike
No immigrants in Florida means no workers for tourism, hospitality, agriculture.
LikeLike
Republicans in Florida only object to DeSantis’ policies when they hurt them economically.
LikeLike
WOW racism is alive and well at Texas A&M. Sounds like reconstruction all over again. This is really a sad moment and for our country and A &M in particular. I would not want to be a minority student there. The message is that your existence in the student body is not wanted or appreciated.
LikeLike
yes
LikeLike
Subsequent to the above post by McGee, she wrote another article about Hart Blanton who said his signature was used in revised versions of the job offer without his permission.
LikeLike
Indeed, the negative press is
a distraction from the ongoing
racism and lack of diversity
and inclusion,
virtually unchanged
by articles, essays, books,
proclamations, yadda-yadda.
So when it comes to doing
the same thing over and
over again, one should ask:
Who benefits?
What changes?
Who am I working for?
Who am I kidding?
LikeLike
Very interesting story. A&M has one of the closest communities of any university in Texas. Older “Aggies” mentor younger ones and provide them a network of support for life. I recently heard a story from a friend of mine of a younger “Aggie” having arguments with his older relatives (All Aggies) about his support for the LGTBQ+ community. I had no idea there was a battle over “Draggieland” at A&M. I did a Google search and found a change.org petition to stop “Draggieland”. The most interesting part of the petition are the reasons why people signed the petition. Here’s one example: “For A&M to have the title of “the heart of college conservatism in the USA,” it must take a stand against degeneracy like draggieland.” I’m think it’s hopeful that there is a younger generation of Aggies who wish to more inclusive than previous generations.
LikeLike
Texas A&M Board of Regents- 9 men. The only female on the board is a student representative who is White.
Based on the photos provided, it appears only one of the 10 Board members is Black.
LikeLike
“only one of the 10 Board members is Black.”
That’s pretty close to the percentage of Texans who are black.
LikeLike
Whites are now a minority in Texas. Not 90%.
LikeLike
I’d prefer to see a legislature in Texas that was not gerrymandered and not dominated by white men. Blacks and Hispanics are woefully underrepresented.
LikeLike
Outrageous—five white board members should be immediately fired and replaced with Hispanic board members.
LikeLike
Looks like only Hispanics are grossly underrepresented relative to their share of the population. And arguably Asians. The percentage of Black Texans in the state legislature is pretty close to their share of the state population.
LikeLike
Flerp-
Rhetorically, in what year in the future do you think we’ll experience the outrage at full representation by women, Brown and Black people in positions of power?
It seems like there’s a lot of outrage now, at just the prospect that the demographic groups might advance.
LikeLike
47% of the Texas A & M student body are women.
LikeLike
I have no idea, I’m not a Texan and I’m not that familiar with its politics. I do know that you can’t gerrymander the percentage of women voters in a district much lower than 50%, and women are free to run for office and vote. Whether they choose to run and who they choose to vote for is up to them.
LikeLike
Why does Texas have a relatively small population of Black people?
There might be a suspicion that the state had a history of antagonism to Black people. The state is bordered by Oklahoma which had the Tulsa race massacre and Arkansas where the Elaine massacre is described as the bloodiest.
How many sundown towns were there in Texas (they are identified at the History and Social Justice site).
How about the bans on immigration by Black people, from state to state and from abroad. The info is available at African-American Heritage, “the great migration 1910-1970.”
Truthful science and history have their opponents.
LikeLike
Texas A & M regents are appointed by the Governor.
LikeLike
Greg Abbot can be counted on to appoint people like himself: mean, cruel, and bigoted.
LikeLike
Flip the framing: Why does Mississippi have a relatively large black population? It’s certainly can’t be because the state has no history of hostility to blacks?
LikeLike
“The bureau said that in 2022, Hispanic people made up 40.2% of the population, surpassing white people who make up 39.8%. Additionally, 13.4% of Texans are Black and 5.7% are Asian, according to the data.Jun 22, 2023.”
Whites are a minority in Texas. Hispanics are the largest ethnic group. Whites control the government.
LikeLike
Is your point that there were no significant historical differences in the economic base of say South Carolina and Texas?
In terms of quality, the class you conduct in avatar mediation, likely rivals your class in economic history of the states.
LikeLike
My only point in posting the demographic data about the legislature was to note that it is not correct that that “blacks and hispanics are woefully underrepresented” in the Texas legislature. Hispanics are. But blacks are pretty much at a representative level. Whites are overrepresented.
We could perhaps solve this problem with a law that no person may be permitted to run for public office if they belong to a racial or ethnic group that is “overrepresented” by a certain number of percentage points. Surely no reasonable and fair-minded person would object to that.
LikeLike
How about ending gerrymandering so that people who are not white have a chance of representation?
LikeLike
Linda, I’m not an expert in the history of either state, so I’ll defer to you. But maybe you’re right, perhaps the different economic histories may explain the different demographics.
LikeLike
“But in the weeks following, vocal groups from outside the university system expressed issues with her previous employment at The New York Times and her support for diversity in newsrooms.”
“Vocal groups” as in fascist loving anti-WOKE cancel culture anchored firmly in the extremely right political spectrum.
LikeLike
I’m still figuring out the whole story that led to this mess. I know there’s an apparent pressure from conservative camps of faculty and the board, as well as outside pressure over ‘DEI’ hysteria. At the same time, however, I also find the dean responsible for her role in hiring practice. The department head of Communication and Journalism apparently had an issue with her handling of the academic affairs that go beyond the scope of this scandal.
https://www.texastribune.org/2023/07/21/banks-tamu-journalism-hire/
LikeLike