The Washington Post revealed the organization promoting the dilution of child labor laws. Iowa and Arkansas, both solid red states, were first to remove protections for children to meet the needs of employers.
To learn more about the gutting of child labor law in Iowa, watch this chilling video, thanks to reader Greg B.
Remember, the GOP is the party that loves the unborn but disdains the born. They value life in the womb but not actual children.
Investigative reporter Jacob Bogage of the Washington Post wrote:
When Iowa lawmakers voted last week to roll back certain child labor protections, they blended into a growing movement driven largely by a conservative advocacy group.
At 4:52 a.m., Tuesday, the state’s Senate approved a bill to allow children as young as 14 to work night shifts and 15 year-olds on assembly lines. The measure, which still must pass the Iowa House, is among several the Foundation for Government Accountability is maneuvering through state legislatures.
The Florida-based think tank and its lobbying arm, the Opportunity Solutions Project, have found remarkable success among Republicans to relax regulations that prevent children from working long hours in dangerous conditions. And they are gaining traction at a time the Biden administration is scrambling to enforce existing labor protections for children.
The FGA achieved its biggest victory in March, playing a central role in designing a new Arkansas law to eliminate work permits and age verification for workers younger than 16. Its sponsor, state Rep. Rebecca Burkes (R), said in a hearing that the legislation “came to me from the Foundation [for] Government Accountability.”
“As a practical matter, this is likely to make it even harder for the state to enforce our own child labor laws,” said Annie B. Smith, director of the University of Arkansas School of Law’s Human Trafficking Clinic. “Not knowing where young kids are working makes it harder for [state departments] to do proactive investigations and visit workplaces where they know that employment is happening to make sure that kids are safe.”
That law passed so swiftly and was met with such public outcry that Arkansas officials quickly approved a second measure increasing penalties on violators of the child labor codes the state had just weakened.
In Missouri, where another child labor bill has gained significant GOP support, the FGA helped a lawmaker draft and revise the legislation, according to emails obtained by The Washington Post.
The FGA for years has worked systematically to shape policy at the state level, fighting to advance conservative causes such as restricting access to anti-poverty programs and blocking Medicaid expansion.
But in February, the White House announced a crackdown on child labor violators in response to what activists have described as a surge in youths — many of them undocumented immigrants — working at meat packing plants, construction sites, auto factories and other dangerous job sites.
The administration’s top labor lawyer called the proposed state child labor laws “irresponsible,” and said it could make it easier for employers to hire children for dangerous work.
“Federal and state entities should be working together to increase accountability and ramp up enforcement — not make it easier to illegally hire children to do what are often dangerous jobs,” Labor Solicitor Seema Nanda said. “No child should be working in dangerous workplaces in this country, full stop.”
Congress in 1938 passed the Fair Labor Standards Act to stop companies from using cheap child labor to do dangerous work, a practice that exploded during the Great Depression….
On the surface, the FGA frames its child worker bills as part of a larger debate surrounding parental rights, including in education and child care. But the state-by-state campaigns, the group’s leader said, help the FGA create openings to deconstruct larger government regulations.
Since 2016, the FGA’s Opportunity Solutions Project has hired 115 lobbyists across the country with a presence in 22 states, according to the nonpartisan political watchdog group Open Secrets.
“The reason these rather unpopular policies succeed is because they come in under the radar screen,” said David Campbell, professor of American democracy at the University of Notre Dame. “Typically, these things get passed because they are often introduced in a very quiet way or by groups inching little by little through grass-roots efforts.”
Minnesota and Ohio have introduced proposals this year allowing teens to work more hours or in more dangerous occupations, such as construction. A bill in Georgia would prohibit the state government from requiring a minor to obtain a work permit.
The FGA-backed measures maintain existing child labor safety protections “while removing the permission slip that inserts government in between parents and their teenager’s desire to work,” Nick Stehle, the foundation’s vice president, said in a statement.
“Frankly, every state, including Missouri, should follow Arkansas’s lead to allow parents and their teenagers to have the conversation about work and make that decision themselves,” said Stehle, who is also a visiting fellow at the Opportunity Solutions Project.
The FGA declined to make Stehle and other representatives available for interviews.
It’s one of several conservative groups that have long taken aim at all manner of government regulations or social safety net programs. The FGA is funded by a broad swath of ultraconservative and Republican donors — such as the Ed Uihlein Family Foundation and 85 Fund, a nonprofit connected to political operative Leonard Leo — who have similarly supported other conservative policy groups.
The youth hiring or employment bills, as they are often titled, represent growing momentum among conservatives who contend that parents and not government policy should determine whether and where 14- and 15-year-olds should work.
“When you say that a bill will allow kids to work more or under dangerous conditions, it sounds wildly unpopular,” Campbell said. “You have to make the case that, no, this is really about parental rights, a very carefully chosen term that’s really hard to disagree with….”
Supporters of the child worker proposals say they reduce red tape around the hiring process for minors. A spokeswoman for Arkansas Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders, a rising Republican star, said her state’s law relieved parents of “obsolete” and “arbitrary burdens.”
“The main push for this reform didn’t come from big business,” Stehle, the FGA vice president, wrote in an essay for Fox. “It came from families like mine, who want more of the freedom that lets our children flourish…”
Tarren Bragdon, a former Maine state legislator, founded the FGA in 2011 with a focus on cutting social safety net and anti-poverty programs. It quickly tapped into conservative political fundraising networks and grew from $50,000 in seed funding to $4 million in revenue by its fourth year, according to tax filings and the group’s promotional materials.
In 2020, the most recent year for which the FGA and its funders’ full financial disclosures are available, more than 70 percent of its $10.6 million in revenue came from 14 conservative groups.
The FGA joined the State Policy Network, a confederation of conservative state-level think tanks that practice what leaders call the “Ikea model” of advocacy, its president said during the group’s 2013 conference. Affiliates such as the FGA display prefabricated policy projects for state officials, then provide the tools — including research and lobbying support — to push proposals through legislative and administrative processes.
In 2021, for example, Arkansas legislators passed 48 measures backed by the FGA, according to the foundation’s end-of-year report. It identified Arkansas, Missouri and Iowa among its five “super states” where it planned to increase its advocacy presence.
In 2022, the FGA claimed 144 “state policy reform wins,” including 45 related to unemployment and welfare, across a slew of states.
“Success in the states is critical for achieving national change, as it often opens the door to federal regulatory reform,” Bragdon wrote in the group’s 2021 report. “Once enough states successfully implement a reform, we can use the momentum and proven results to build pressure for regulatory change.”
Yet even legislators who support the FGA’s policies expanding child labor have found their limits.
Missouri’s bill was amended to require a parental permission form for children aged 14 to 16 who want to take a job. The original legislation, edited by the FGA, did not contain any such provision.
Slavery is the original form of capitalism and it always, everywhere reverts to type.
Not all parents know what is best for their children. Many children live in dysfunctional homes with dysfunctional parents. Some of these so-called parents would allow a fourteen year old to work so they don’t have to make much effort. We need guardrails to protect children from unscrupulous employers and those that may exploit them.
My father grew up poor. He described looking for shoes to wear in a barrel at The Salvation Army. He also delivered papers beginning at age 9, and he dropped out of school at age 13 to help support his four younger siblings. He started working in a textile factory, but he didn’t talk much about the experience. He also managed to get his GED, and he later went to school at night to get a degree in textiles. I worked with poor immigrants that found themselves in a similar situation. It is difficult to urge them to plan for a better future through education when their families are struggling to survive. Nevertheless, we have a responsibility to protect children and keep them safe.
You make such an important point. Your comment triggered memories of how important schools and libraries were for me and many of my classmates as refuges from various turmoils. Through ninth grade, I most attended schools with majorities or large numbers of military dependents. I can remember how, in the final years of the Vietnam War, stress was just something we lived with because many fathers were overseas or awaiting deployment. School was one of the few places to be a kid.
We spend so many years working and being an adult. We need to give young people a chance to grow and develop before they go out to work, and we need to shield them from dangerous jobs.
The next “big thing” for republicans may be CLT: critical labor theory. Textbooks will have to be rewritten to excise things like the Lowell factory system and anything related to Upton Sinclair, Samuel Gompers, and Ida Tarbell. Haymarket and Triangle Shirtwaist must be scrubbed from standards. Early grade books about the joys of working in factories and the prosperity that goes with it will be required ASAP. But certain parts of the Eugene Debs story stay in the frame.
In the 80’s, the college intro to business textbooks had a chapter on unions. By the late 90’s, the chapter was gone.
Besides controlling children and expanding a market for cheaper labor, anyone else think this is ploy to take jobs away from adults?
The federal government should step in to protect its youngest citizens from these terrible state laws:
“ Amendment XIV
Section 1.
All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.”
I’ve been reading about the MAGA RINO GOP’s autocratic loving, power addicted billionaires wanting to put children back to work, cheap labor and easy to control workers.
During the health care reform wars of the first Clinton administration, I attended a talk by Uwe Reinhardt, who was considered to be among the top healthcare economists in the nation. He explained how his son had joined the military around the time of the first Iraq war and advised him that, while he respected his son’s decision, he needed to be aware that if he were to have a severe, war-related disability, he was going to lead a second-class life dependent on policymakers, that his future opportunity, regardless of how many people “thanked him for his service,” would be severely limited to nonexistent.
Now imagine the long-term personal, familial, and societal cost — emotional and financial — just one catastrophic accident could do to a child, one who is incapable of making long-term life decisions. Just the economic costs alone, since decency, morality, and reality don’t matter to republicans, are staggering for individuals that society quickly forgets. As a Fox Dem commentator recently noted, they scream protecting the innocence of children and do stuff like this, as the legislator at the beginning of the video show, because it seems to be doable and somehow funny too.
They scream about protecting children then, vote for the GOP of no gun control. Guns are the leading cause of death in children.
Republican and hypocrite – synonyms.
I think Huckabee-Sanders and all of these right wing governors and legislators should lead by example and send their fourteen year olds to work in these meatpacking plants for six hours a day. I remember reading Upton Sinclair’s, “The Jungle”, while a sophomore in high school. It was universally seen as appalling that children or adults worked in such conditions. I guess that book is now on the banned list in red states.
Well, it was determined by the powers that be, through Common Core, that kids needed to be 3rd grade ready by the time they entered first grade. They moved 3rd grade level down to K-1 level.
Why shouldn’t the working age of 16 not be lowered to 14??? The kids have to be ready because CCSS dictates that they will be ready two years sooner than for us antiquarians who weren’t fortunate enough to have benefitted from CCSS. Why shouldn’t they work, especially in dangerous, tedious jobs?
“Parents Rights” is like shouting “2nd Amendment Rights” (or “Hunter’s laptop”). Put the word “rights” on it and dupe them all.
Missouri cited in article is another poster child for GOP insulting and using parents (and sadly too many don’t know or get it).
Parents Rights bills – to provide information to parents they already have, protect white kids from “collective guilt” for slavery, and “don’t say gay” protects them from child molesters.
Teachers Rights bills – to “protect” teachers from disruptive kids and unsupportive principals
Health and FAMILY rights bills – to require “health and family” course including “family structure” (aka, a mom and dad)
Gerrymandering districts, voter registration impediments… drag queen shows… all to protect rights. Ha! Whose rights?
And it works. Maybe achieving their goals by being last in teacher pay, keep kids OUT of school with labor laws and unregulated home schooling, legislating against science, underfunding urban schools, and #1 in guns isn’t a conspiracy theory.
FGA has 122 lobbyists in 22 states.
IMO, the goal is to make the US like Ireland during the great hunger.
The founder of FGA, Tarren Bragdon, moved to Ave Maria, Fla., to set up the organization. Bragdon and FGA’s Policy Director, both from Maine, were engaged in the politics of Republican Gov. Paul LePage, one of 18 children raised in a Catholic family.
At the Catholic Information Center site, readers can learn about the “selective ” process for Leonine Fellows. Leonine, which “offers Catholics new ways of engaging the world,” began in 2013. One of the 2022-23 Leonine Fellows is from FGA. To understand the broad scope and employers of the Fellows, readers should review the bio’s of Fellows at the CIC site. Leonine has 800 Fellows and locations in Chicago, LA., NYC and Wash. D.C. They, “integrate teachings of the Church within their professional and civic lives.”
The Church has been very successful in its attacks against women’s rights and have spent large sums against the LGBTQ community’s interests. The leading cause of death in children is guns. If the Church cared about the lives of children, one would assume they would have had a matching amount of political success with gun control.
Notre Dame’s professor should make it clear that he is speaking for himself not speaking for the university’s religious denomination. His view confirms for the public, their misperception that Notre Dame’s religiously-affiliated sect is liberal. The professor should include a quote about the ways in which the Koch’s State Policy Network achieves political success via voters persuaded by groups like Catholic Vote.