Historian Heather Cox Richardson describes the sharp contrast between the two parties: the Democrats are looking to the future, building platforms for innovation, new industries, and economic growth, while the Republicans are mired in stale culture war issues—campaigning for more restrictions on abortion, despite public opinion, and relitigating the 2020 election.
She writes:
At Georgetown University’s School of Foreign Service today, Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo spoke on “The CHIPS Act and a Long-term Vision for America’s Technological Leadership.” She outlined what she sees as a historic opportunity to solidify the nation’s global leadership in technology and innovation and at the same time rebuild the country’s manufacturing sector and protect national security.
Congress passed the CHIPS and Science Act in August 2022 by a bipartisan vote, directing more than $52 billion into research and manufacturing of semiconductor chips as well as additional scientific research. Scientists in the U.S. developed chips, and they are now in cars, appliances, and so on. But they are now manufactured primarily in East Asia. The U.S. produces only about 10% of the world’s supply and makes none of the most advanced chips.
That dependence on overseas production hit supply chains hard during the pandemic while also weakening our national security. The hope behind the CHIPS and Science Act was that a significant government investment in the industry would jump-start private investment in bringing chip manufacturing back to the U.S., enabling the U.S. to compete more effectively with China. In the short term, at least, the plan has worked: by the end of 2022, private investors had pledged at least $200 billion to build U.S. chip manufacturing facilities.
Today, Raimondo framed the CHIPS and Science Act as an “incredible opportunity” to enable the U.S. to lead the world in technology, “securing our economic and national security future for the coming decades.” In the modern technological world, “it’s the countries who invest in research, innovation, and their workforces that will lead in the 21st century,” she said.
Raimondo described the major investment in semiconductor technology and its manufacture as a public investment in the economy that rivals some of the great investments in our history. She talked of Abraham Lincoln’s investment in agriculture in the 1860s to cement the position of the U.S. as a leader in world grain production, Franklin Delano Roosevelt and Harry S. Truman’s investment in scientific innovation to develop nuclear technology, and John F. Kennedy’s investment in putting a man on the moon.
Each of those massive investments sparked scientific innovation and economic growth. Raimondo suggested that “the CHIPS and Science Act presents us with an opportunity to make investments that are similarly consequential for our nation’s future.”
The vision Raimondo advanced was not one of top-down creativity. Instead, she described the extraordinary innovation of the silicon industry in the 1960s as a product of collaboration between university scientists, government purchasing power, and manufacturing. Rather than dismissing manufacturing as a repetitive mechanical task, she put it at the heart of innovation as the rapid production of millions and millions of chips prompted engineers to tweak manufacturing processes a little at a time, constantly making improvements.
“This relentless pace of lab-to-fab[rication] and fab-to-lab innovation became synonymous with America’s tech leadership,” she said, “doubling our computing capacity every two years.” As the U.S. shipped manufacturing jobs overseas, it lost this creative system. At the same time, inability to get chips during the pandemic hamstrung the U.S. economy and left our national security dependent for chips on other countries, especially China.
Reestablishing manufacturing in the U.S. will spark innovation and protect national security. It will also create new well-paying jobs for people without a college degree both in construction and in the operations of the new factories. With labor scarce, Raimondo called for hiring and training a million women in construction over the next decade, as well as bringing people from underserved communities into the skilled workforce to create “the most diverse, productive, and talented workers in the world.”
Raimondo warned that the vision she laid out would be hard to accomplish, but “if we—as a nation—unite behind a shared objective…and think boldly,” we can create a new generation of innovators and engineers, develop the manufacturing sector and the jobs that go with it, rebuild our economy, and protect our national security.
Just “think about what’s possible 10 years from now if we are bold,” she said.
Later, Raimondo told David Ignatius of the Washington Post: “This is more than just an investment to subsidize a few new chip factories…. We need to unite America around a common goal of enhancing America’s global competitiveness and leading in this incredibly crucial technology.… Money isn’t enough. We all need to get in the same boat as a nation.”
Part of the impetus for the bipartisan drive to jump-start the semiconductor industry is lawmakers’ determination to counter the rise of China, which has invested heavily in its own economy. As the U.S. seeks to swing the Indo-Pacific away from its orientation toward China, Raimondo will travel to India next month to talk about closer economic ties between the U.S. and India, including collaboration in chip manufacturing as India, Japan, and Australia are launching their own joint semiconductor initiative.
For the Biden administration, the investment in chips and all the growth and innovation it promises to spark, especially among those without college degrees, is also an attempt to unite the nation to move forward. Theirs is a heady vision of a nation that works together in a shared task, as Lincoln’s United States did, or FDR’s, or JFK’s.
Their orientation toward the future, growth, and prosperity is a striking contrast to the vision of today’s Republicans, who look backward resolutely and angrily to an imagined past. In the short term, many of them continue to relitigate the 2020 presidential election, long after the Big Lie that Trump won has been debunked and the rest of the country has moved on.
In the New York Times yesterday, Luke Broadwater and Jonathan Swan reported that one of the reasons House speaker Kevin McCarthy handed access to more than 40,000 hours of video from the U.S. Capitol from January 6, 2021, to Fox News Channel personality Tucker Carlson was that McCarthy had promised the far right that he would revisit that event but did not want to have the Republican Congress tied to the effort. His political advisors say swing voters want to move forward.
In the longer term, today’s Republicans are out of step with the majority of Americans on issues like LGBTQ rights, climate change, gun safety, and abortion. Although Republicans are pushing draconian laws to end all abortion access, today Public Religion Research Institute (PPRI), a nonprofit, nonpartisan organization, released a report showing that 64% of Americans say that abortion should be legal in most or all cases, while only 25% say it should be illegal in most cases and only 9% say it should be illegal in all cases. Less than half the residents in every state and in Washington, D.C., supported overturning the 1973 Roe v. Wade decision legalizing abortion, as the Supreme Court did with the Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health decision of last June.
In a speech in Des Moines, Iowa, yesterday, Senator Tim Scott (R-SC) echoed Trump’s “American Carnage” inaugural address with his description of today’s America as one full of misery and hopelessness. Florida governor Ron DeSantis traveled this week to New York City, Philadelphia, and Chicago to insist those Democratic-led cities were crime-ridden, although as human rights lawyer Qasim Rashid pointed out, Florida has a 19% higher rape rate, 66% higher murder rate, and 280% higher burglary rate than New York.
Another study released yesterday by the Anti-Defamation League, which specializes in civil rights law, noted that domestic extremist mass killings have increased “greatly” in the past 12 years. But while murders by Islamic extremists, for example, have been falling, all the extremist killings in 2022 were committed by right-wing adherents, with 21 of 25 murders linked to white supremacists.
President Biden’s poll numbers are up to 46% in general and 49% with registered voters. Perhaps more to the point is that in Tuesday’s four special elections, Democrats outperformed expectations by significant margins.
There are many reasons for these Democratic gains—abortion rights key among them—but it is possible that voters like the Democrats’ vision of a hopeful future and a realistic means to get there rather than Republicans’ condemnation of the present and vow to claw back a mythological past.
To read her footnotes, open the link.
While Richardson makes many good points, I believe her diagnosis and conclusion are dead wrong. And it’s part of the reason why Democrats will never get serious. There are two more significant issues she does not see, or at least she does not in this essay. The first is that the “forward looking-backward looking” is technically and historically correct, but it is politically distracting. People primarily act out of their self-interest and an aspiration to do good for their families, communities, and other things with which they identify. Liberals understand that self-interest combined with aspirational ideas about how society can serve it. Conservatives have morphed from linking self-interest to individual opportunity and prosperity to connecting it instead to identity. So rather than focus generally on “tax and spend” agendas, they use the rhetoric of it to obscure the fact that the are actually linking self-interest to specific expectations open in varying ways or not at all to certain “other” identities.
The second is that liberals have to come to terms with and find a constitutional solution to stop the attack on democracy–the many forces working on different tracks to fundamentally kill it–while keeping the appearance of normal, constitutional transition and order. That may not be possible, putting liberals in a serious quandary if their goal to save democratic-republican governing. So-called conservatives thought leaders like Bannon and his disciples understand and have bet on this. Corrupting the judiciary, making legislative functions impotent and turning them in weapons to have constitutionally-sanctioned death by suicide, rampant gerrymandering, and relentless attacking the executive branch when out of power and focusing on politics only instead of governing when in power are all much more malignant to our society. More so than any “forward/backward-looking” conclusions that might actually find their way into political strategies.
And knowing what I know of Raimondo and education policy, her argument about more jobs don’t convince.
Yeah it’s hard reading Raimondos name here even. 🤬
If Democrats really give a rat’s rear for the future, they will do whatever it takes to prevent nuclear war, which pretty much eliminates all future, at least for human- and most plant- and animalkind. Escalating tensions with Russia over who controls Crimea – which most Americans can’t even find on a map and only care about (if they do at all) because the media tell them to – is not the way to do that.
And, since this apparently needs to be said every single time, no, I’m not saying Republicans are any better or any more likely to prevent nuclear war. As you all are fond of saying when it suits you, two things can be bad at the same time.
Crimea? Russia has controlled Crimea since 2014 and the US did exactly what you wanted and let him. Are you now admitting that the only way to stop nuclear war would have been to stop Putin back in 2014? Your logic is very strange.
If you gave a rat’s ass about preventing nuclear war, you’d be consistent in your desire to have all people in the world subjugate themselves to anti-trans Putin. Why don’t we all give up to Putin now and “prevent nuclear war” like you want?
“Right Now China leads the world in 37 Out Of 44 Critical Technologies.
Tech superpower dominance in defense, space, robotics, energy, environment, biotechnology, artificial intelligence (AI), advanced materials & key quantum technology.
Currently dominating drones, machine learning, electric batteries, nuclear energy, photovoltaics, quantum sensors and critical minerals extraction.
Australia Report: https://www.aspi.org.au/report/critical-technology-tracker
Public School Opportunities For All!
https://www.aljazeera.com/economy/2023/3/3/china-beating-west-in-race-for-critical-technologies-report-says
Diane and Greg Greg mentions: “Death by suicide.” Funny you should mention it, Greg . . . I was thinking as I read the article . . . about the “red flag” references to tech-work and good jobs for those without a college education.
That’s just what we need to enhance the long-term movement of “death by suicide” . . . of democracy. It’s not what the writer is talking about, but what is missing from that talking (at least, as you say, it doesn’t show up in the article).
What we need (then) is more techno-fascists and non-college educated workers who have little or no understanding of history (for one), political and otherwise and who “don’t have time” to keep up with what’s going on in the world.
I have thought for a long time that a four-day work week is a good idea, but also that a systematic government-business development of serious and qualified continuing education for those in both kinds of fields would keep us from drowning in our own bathwater.
The idea that “getting an education” is ONLY about “getting a job” and making money, and the tacit absence of understanding what a GOOD education really is and is for, is on its last breath, in unison with what’s left of democracy. Basically, it’s minds are dying, but they have guns. (They don’t even know the difference between AI and a human mind . . .)
Did we really think scientific and economic positivism was going to get us, and the also-dying idea of reasonable discourse, anywhere but where we are today?
And while I am at it, I am a capitalist; but Trump, Musk, Murdoch, Koch, big businesses like Koch Industries, big oil and pharma, etc., and those unelected few who are involved in predatory and anti-democratic “PACS,” are nothing but poster boys for capitalism’s failure: Greed.
How much that has to do with similar tracks and absences in their education is an open question. However, even Plato and Aristotle knew that, and they knew very little about what WE commonly mean by science. CBK
The rhetoric about “kids who don’t go to college” (or do and don’t finish) is interesting. We all agree theoretically that this is vitally important. We need a public-private partnerships supporting vocational training as a goal to make a good, honest living with expectations about the future. We need to invest in higher AND vocational education. The “job trainer” mentality in education the republicans want to push comes at the expense of higher education support.
GregB Never in our history have we, nor democratic institutions across the world, needed “higher” education more, regardless of the problems going on in academia today. Colleges and universities are still the seed-beds for our intelligent excursions where people can actually do the “job” of thinking.
THE BIG IF: If business and government work together from the same democratic page (small d), education can actually continue to serve the understanding and the needs of those who will benefit from democracy long into the future.
The dichotomy you speak of, however, (between higher and vocational education) is only a zero-sum divisiveness (generated in the 60’s?) in the minds of those who don’t understand or don’t care about exactly what is missing in the mentality that thinks education equates ONLY to (the questionable qualifiers) of a better job and a higher income. Remember that it was in higher education that young adults “got it” about the bedtime relationship between the war in Vietnam and big-business interests. We cannot have THAT now can we (or even remember it as a part of our history.)
Neither Koch et al nor Desantis wants to control the university curricula, or get rid of it altogether, out of the goodness of their hearts. CBK
Koch wants to sell young people on the courtiers of the free market.
DeSantis wants to indoctrinate students to believe what he believes and never to think critically.
The new nickname given to DeSantis is DeKaren.
Linda, why DeKaren. The white boots?
We need to give our kids the basic tools to pursue what ever career they want. Since when was it the States responsibility to provide training that is fairly employer or industry specific. Many Unionized industries provide training today, Construction and Machinists come quickly to mind but there are others.
Since the Mid 90s the number of employers who report to the D.O.L. that they provide any training has dramatically declined . While they expect the ‘State’ that they pay as little taxes to as possible and would like to shrink to a pin head , to provide that training.
As they cry that their employees lack skills.
NASA is another example.
Click to access Benefits-Stemming-from-Space-Exploration-2013-TAGGED.pdf