This is one of the most heartening statements I have seen in a long time.
Statement of Support for Art Professor Fired from Hamline University
January 9, 2023MPAC
It is with great concern that the Muslim Public Affairs Council (MPAC) views the firing of an art professor, Erika López Prater, from Hamline University on the grounds of showing a fourteenth-century painting depicting the Prophet Muḥammad. We issue this statement of support for the professor and urge the university to reverse its decision and to take compensatory action to ameliorate the situation.
News sources report that the matter reached the university administration after a Muslim student complained to them about the professor showing the image in class. Subsequently, undergraduate students at the university received an email from the administration declaring the incident to be “undeniably inconsiderate, disrespectful and Islamophobic.” Because the professor was hired as an adjunct, her contract was not renewed and she was effectively fired.
As a Muslim organization, we recognize the validity and ubiquity of an Islamic viewpoint that discourages or forbids any depictions of the Prophet, especially if done in a distasteful or disrespectful manner. However, we also recognize the historical reality that other viewpoints have existed and that there have been some Muslims, including and especially Shīʿī Muslims, who have felt no qualms in pictorially representing the Prophet (although often veiling his face out of respect). All this is a testament to the great internal diversity within the Islamic tradition, which should be celebrated.
This, it seems, was the exact point that Dr. Prater was trying to convey to her students. She empathetically prepared them in advance for the image, which was part of an optional exercise and prefaced with a content warning. “I am showing you this image for a reason,” stressed the professor:
There is this common thinking that Islam completely forbids, outright, any figurative depictions or any depictions of holy personages. While many Islamic cultures do strongly frown on this practice, I would like to remind you there is no one, monothetic Islamic culture.
The painting was not Islamophobic. In fact, it was commissioned by a fourteenth-century Muslim king in order to honor the Prophet, depicting the first Quranic revelation from the angel Gabriel.
Even if it is the case that many Muslims feel uncomfortable with such depictions, Dr. Prater was trying to emphasize a key principle of religious literacy: religions are not monolithic in nature, but rather, internally diverse. This principle should be appreciated in order to combat Islamophobia, which is often premised on flattening out Islam and viewing the Islamic tradition in an essentialist and reductionist manner. The professor should be thanked for her role in educating students, Muslim and non-Muslim alike, and for doing so in a critically empathetic manner.
In a time of rampant Islamophobia, highly offensive and racialized images of the Prophet Muḥammad abound on the internet and on social media. We consider these images to be inappropriate and not dissimilar to “black face” or Anti-Semitic cartoons; even if such images and their makers are protected by law, social opprobrium is due to them by all those who are reasonable and decent. As Muslims, of course, we must respond in a calm and graceful manner as befits our religion:
The servants of the Compassionate are those who walk humbly upon the earth, and when the ignorant address them [with insulting words], they respond, ‘peace.’ (Q 25:63)
Given the ubiquity of Islamophobic depictions of the Prophet Muḥammad, it hardly makes sense to target an art professor trying to combat narrow understandings of Islam. There is an unmistakable irony in the situation, which should be appreciated. Additionally, misusing the label “Islamophobia” has the negative effect of watering down the term and rendering it less effective in calling out actual acts of bigotry.
Finally, we stress the importance of education in the Islamic tradition. On the basis of our shared Islamic and universal values, we affirm the need to instill a spirit of free inquiry, critical thinking, and viewpoint diversity in the university setting.
Muslim Public Affairs Council
Excellent post, Diane. 👍
Thank you.
“who have felt no qualms in pictorially representing the Prophet (although often veiling his face out of respect).”
Ha ha ha ha, out of respect. Gimme a break, respect for fantastical nonsense? Sorry, not from this corner. More religious faith belief horse manure.
As a graduate of Hamline, I’m outraged and deeply disappointed at its actions and inability to correct its mistake. Instead, administration has tried to sanitize and minimize by deleting critical online comments, posts. This professor should be reinstated and financially compensated for damage done to her reputation and career. Administrators should be fired immediately.
Not related to this story, but here is what has been happening in Montana politically. It’s a very thorough picture, in the New York Times today: https://www.nytimes.com/2023/01/11/magazine/montana-republicans-christian-nationalism.html
Wow! That’s a powerful article. Sounds like the GOP in Montana doesn’t welcome non-Christians.
A lot of right wing Christians and libertarians have moved to Montana, Oregon and Idaho. It’s a breeding ground for right wing extremism. The rural setting and lack of regulations appeal to them.
New Hampshire has a significant minority of libertarians, who seek no government at all. Some of them are in the legislature. They are called “Free Staters.” I remember reading an article in the New Republic about them. The article referred to a clash between people who still wanted municipal garbage collection. When it was canceled, bears were rummaging through garbage cans.
“Live free and die”… from a bear attack
Not related to this story”
At its core, it is.
Both cases involve members of one religion trying to dictate what non-members (and even possibly members with different beliefs) can do or even view.
It is a fundamentally INtolerant stance to take in a pluralistic society.
It’s an interesting letter. And, it’s well written. “Heartening” is a good word, too.
For those of us who believe that there should be no graven images of Bigfoot, life is hard. More and more we are subjected to his depiction, even in steel sculpture on agricultural fences. How these farmers can trivialize my belief in The Big guy disappoints and angers me.
As it should! I feel the same way about The Big Lebowski.
His Dudeness.
The still images are bad enough, but the fake videos of
guys in gorilla suits are beastfamous.
Lored Bigfoot should not be beastfamed in that manner.
..lest he live forever in beastfamy.
Bigfoot Beastfamy
Plaster casts of Bigfoot tracks
Videos of monkey backs
All these things are beastfamous
Cheapen all Lored Bigfoot does
It is pronounced beast-fah-mous, of course
Some folks have misinterpreted “Blessed are the beastmakers, for they shall inherit the Earth” to mean they are not only free but welcome to beastfame the Lored.
Very heartening.
I’ve only seen one comment on this blog that defended the university’s firing of this teacher: https://dianeravitch.net/2023/01/08/heather-cox-richardson-on-the-republican-debacle/comment-page-1/#comment-3444921
What a wonderful statement and so true. This professor tried to do everything imaginable short of censoring those works completely, which cheapens the education for all students, and yet she was still fired
What are we as teachers supposed to do? We can’t teach anything that will broaden students’ horizons without getting in trouble, and yet we get in trouble if we DON’T broaden students’ horizons.
We absolutely SHOULD broaden students’ perspectives on the world, but we can’t.
Mehdi Hasan on the topic:
Thanks Christine!
😉
I confess. The dots I’ve been using for years on this blog, at the ends of my sentences, are actually depiction of the Prophet Duane.
depictions
Various depictions. The Prophet Duane Swacker, marinara’d be his name, sacrificing a meatball. The Profit Duane, selling highly marked-up pastas to devotees of S/He of the Noodly Appendages. And most controversial of all, the Prophet Duane preparing Putanesca with a harem of this sauce’s namesakes.
Deep…
So deep, Bob.
Inspired me to buy some sausage links.
Hail, Swacker!
I know that some might consider this blasphemous, but I think I should be commended for my mastery of the miniature!
Seems to me that it is time to head to the river!
I would enjoy that. You might drown me halfway, though, if we got off on a conversation about W.
Hope all is well with you, amigo.
Good enough to be alive, eh! Thanks!
You guys are getting way too serious
Lighten up a bit
Talking Heads-official FSM group.
Oh, and those dots???
I thought the devil got your tongue.
Some of those, Duane, are microdots.
All the better!
Hello everyone,
Actually the idea behind not wanting to show the image of a deity is all about idolatry. If you have an image of divinity, people tend to take that image as the deity itself rather than to the Mystery to which the image points metaphorically. That is idolatry. So if you can have an image but remember that it’s not the divinity itself, you’re good. It’s when you fix the image and say, “That is God,” then you have a problem. So in some religions we have the EXPERIENCE of divinity through an image and some religions that believe that an image will only hinder experience of divinity and the idea that we cannot fix divinity in an image. Of course, both ideas can live together if we are open to paradox.
Well said, Mamie.
“Believing” can block the experience of what’s being believed. The mind, with all its definitions and categorizations, gets in the way of the immediate reality. Worshiping an image can be a prime example of that point.
But if seeing the image transports you beyond and into the moment; you’re golden.
“The mind, with all its definitions and categorizations, gets in the way of the immediate reality.”
All reality is immediate reality, whether past, present or future. Or is that statement a glaring example of your statement?
“All reality is immediate reality, whether past, present or future. Or is that statement a glaring example of your statement?”
Well said. The reality exists whether we’re “experiencing” it or not.
I’m speaking of our ability to experience ourselves as a part of the whole. Not separate. In the moment. Discussing, explaining, and saying I believe in it (like what I’m doing right now) creates that separation. Keeps me from experiencing it.
And I’m saying that no, it doesn’t prevent me from experiencing it. It’s just a different kind of experience.
“It’s when you fix the image and say, “That is God,” then you have a problem.”
How can’t it not be god (which one is another story) since that god is supposedly (THEFSM knows better) omnipresent and omniscient. We’re all gods, except THEFSM who doesn’t really like to associate with Homo Supposedly Sapiens.
You are not a drop in the ocean. You are the entire ocean in a drop. 🙂
-Rumi
That’s what a hologram is.
If you cut up a hologram,every little piece still contains the information needed to recreate the image. All you need to do is shine the laser beam used to create the image on the hologram.
It’s like blocking a window with a screen that has a tiny hole in one part. You can still see the whole view outside by looking through the pinhole.
You lose some definition and brightness, but the whole view is still there.
I spent several hours a day in a dark room making holograms one semester in college.
They are the coolest things.
And of course, the coolest thing about holograms is they recreate a 3-d image, just like if you were actually looking at the object.
When you change your viewing perspective, you see a different view of the object.
It’s my theory that “George Santos” is actually a hologram.
Err, hollowgram.
Good one Christine!
George Santos is an anagram for
O, eso gangster
Santos—or Anthony Devolder, as he used to be named—is a symbol of KevinnMcCarthy’s depravity. He would rather keep that fraud in Congress than lose one vote.
Meanwhile the republicans in Nassau County, part of which he represents, have called for him to resign. Not Kevin.
I think a laugh, or at least a chuckle is in order. Diane, you’re a New Yorker – have you had the pleasure of dining at Il Bacco in Queens?
https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2023/01/george-santos-il-bacco-campaign-spending-new-york.html
Christine,
I have not had the pleasure of dining at Il Bacco. My NYC dining spots are usually Brooklyn, sometimes Manhattan.
So many great restaurants in Brooklyn. La Vara and Saint Julivert come to mind. I think Santos owns and is head chef in both.
One of my favorites is Frankie 457 on Court Street.
Table 87 on Atlantic has great pizza.
A personal favorite is Dellarocca on Hicks near Montague.
All excellent.
I love Frankie’s, too. Cavatelli w sausage is my fave. Love their Old Fashions. My wife was involved with setting up the backyard area. She’s a gardener/designer. Plants, trees, etc.
Ditto for Frankies, except I love their meatballs…
gitapik, the backyard garden dining area is lovely, so thank you to your wife.
She says, “thank you”. The full design was drawn up by a small company named, “Sassafras”. Frankie’s was one of her first jobs when she signed on with them. Got her own business, now.
The meatballs are delish, as are all the dishes. We’ve got their cookbook.
Excellent. Thanks for posting this, Diane.
The bigger story is that the professor is an adjunct so can be fired at will. The percentage of adjuncts is huge – people who do not have job security, decent pay and benefits in most cases.
So true, Sara. My daughter chose to teach K-12 over college specifically for that reason and no other. She’s brilliant and an excellent teacher. Happy with her job but would prefer college and grad.
“The bigger story” in so many ways.
I’m a strange mix of atheism and religion. I must say that as such, I cringe when fellow religious believers are intolerant of each other. Atheists are also believers in something, and it makes me cringe to see fellow atheists intolerant of others. Laudable are people like the members of MPAC who appreciate diversity of beliefs. Much love to all my friends who regularly comment here, but also a little, light slap on the wrist. Let’s try to be less extremist with our religious views, shall we.
Atheists shouldn’t proselytize.
Atheists, like many religious people, are guilty of certainty where they cannot actually be certain. And yes, when people are on such shaky epistemological ground, they shouldn’t proselytize, but those are the very people who typically DO proselytize, who see it as their duty to do so.
I have grown tired of the “you must respect people’s religion” stuff. No, I do not respect grown people believing in ridiculous superstitions from the infancy of our species, especially when just those superstitions are being used to justify control over women’s bodies and over peoples’ right to love whom they want to love and dress as they wish to dress. I don’t respect this JUST AS I wouldn’t respect their believing that the Earth is flat or that the pyramids and Stonehenge were built by extraterrestrials. It’s simply dumb (or afraid) to believe this ancient religious nonsense, and it is shocking to me that people are so weak that they persist in doing so. And it makes me sad. It makes me wonder when our species is going to grow up or if it ever will. If, instead, our institutions will continue to be run by people with the cognitive capacity of Sarah Huckster-bee Sanders or Paul Gosar or Matt Gaetz or Marjorie Taylor Greene.
Well-said, as usual. It’s hard to understand why adults believe in fairy tales.
You don’t have to respect anyone.
When I first moved from teaching 5th grade in National City, a community of relatively wealthy immigrants near the border in San Diego county to teaching 8th grade in the community of Watts in Los Angeles, I was in for a shock. My first day, my second class, I said, “I’m Mr. B****… Open your books to page so and so.” A young man, a student, a 3rd- or 4th-generation legacy member of East Side Watts Baby Loc Crips, immediately replied, “You (are) racist!” (I was telling Black people what to do.) I made the mistake of disagreeing aloud. Long story short, my point was that regardless of my skin color, I was a teacher, and students must respect their teachers. He said something — to the cheers of the rest of the class, including the Grape Street Bloods — that it turns out is an old adage in South L.A.: “You gots (sic) to give respect to get respect.”
Religions have disrespected and oppressed you, dear reader, and your friends and loved ones over the course of centuries and millennia with “superstitions… used to justify control over women’s bodies and over people’s right to love whom they want to love and dress as they wish to dress.” Etcetera! I hear you. Your distaste for religion is understandable. Religious believers want you to respect their views, but they have to give respect to get respect, and many don’t. And their usurpation of control over others is based on beliefs that often make about as much sense as a Flying Spaghetti Monster creating all the matter and energy in the universe — beliefs that make about as much sense as hiring someone from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation to work in the Department of Education! That has to sting, no doubt about it.
Religions stereotype others. If you’re not a “Jew”, you’re a “goy”. If you’re not a “Christian”, you’re a “heretic”. Atheists stereotype others too. If I’m a “believer”, I am lumped in with fundamentalists who interpret the Bible literally, with people who want control over your bedroom, with murderous people who self-anoint as God’s chosen rulers of the world. Many people assume when they find out I’m religiously Jewish that I support bulldozing the homes of Palestinians in the West Bank. Nothing could be farther from the truth.
Let me tell you about my religion. I believe in being thankful for my ancestors and what I inherit from them. I do not descend from fools, superstitious though they may have been. At least once a week, on the Sabbath, I say “prayers” of thanks three times. I say thanks for having a day off from work, the Sabbath. I am as thankful to my religious heritage for one day off a week as I am to labor unions for a second day a week of weekend. The Sabbath was a great idea, very progressive and ahead of its time. I also say thanks for fruits, vegetables, grains, and the farming that allows me to eat without hunting and gathering, for the fruit of the vine and the bread of the earth. Brilliant ancient invention, irrigation! I say thanks for the soft, quiet candlelight by which sometimes I read my books. Thank YOU if you’re still reading! Almost there.
That’s it! That’s my religion. No superstitions, no hatred of others, no eyes for eyes or teeth for teeth, just relating to and being thankful for the past that brought me to this present: for my parents, for my grandparents, for my grandparents’ grandparents’ grandparents, for the invention of the wheel, for light…
Which brings me back to Watts and that young man from Baby Locs. I am thankful for him. He taught me an important lesson. If I want to be a good teacher, I must lower my head. I must let my students be my equals to a certain extent. If I want my literary curriculum to join the narratives elders and peers of my students have already long ago established, I have to work within the narratives. I have to start with listening to the students instead of with reading the books. Once I prove to them that I respect them, then I can argue that Robert Frost’s poetry is alive. If I want to be a good defender of public education and warrior for social justice, I must lower my head. I have to start with listening to the narratives, religious and otherwise, believed in by large numbers of visitors to this blog rather than with my beliefs about the Sabbath and the Flying Spaghetti Monster. Once I prove I respect others, then I can argue that public education is “God’s work”. I worry that we put too many people off with our stereotypes: flat Earth, extraterrestrials, Flori-DUH. We are here to save public schools, and we need allies of Catholics who do NOT want to take vouchers, of Pastors for Texas Children, of religious believers of all stripes. They are not fools, and they do not descend from fools. We must be kind to people about their cultures so that we can be relatable about social and economic, especially education, politics. This has been a longstanding concern of mine. We must give respect to get respect.
You do not have to respect anyone, dear reader. But you should so that you can respectfully disagree when the blessed moment presents itself.