Parents in South Los Angeles are angry that their schools have been forced to share their space with a charter school. This practice, called co-location, creates tension and rivalry. Robin Urevich of Capital & Main tells the story:
In the Los Angeles Unified School District, some 50 public schools share their campuses with charter schools. It is often a contentious relationship. But now parents and teachers at Baldwin Hills and Trinity elementary schools in South Los Angeles, asserting that such arrangements jeopardize their children’s education, are demanding the Los Angeles Unified School District board end them for the 2022-23 school year. Baldwin Hills Elementary shares its campus with New Los Angeles Charter Elementary School, while Gabriella Charter School 2 is located at Trinity Elementary.
Students at Baldwin Hills take violin lessons on the playground during recess because there is no other space, said Jacquelyn Walker, Baldwin Hills’ community school coordinator. A program that offers fresh produce and clothing to kids and families who need them was forced to move to a nearby school for the same reason, Walker said. Private rooms are sometimes unavailable for counseling kids and families in crisis.
“We lost our computer lab,” said the Rev. AmberMarie Irving, DD, whose son is a second grader at the school. “If that happened at a majority Caucasian school, all hell would break loose,” Irving said.
“We’ve worked tirelessly to find a permanent home that is not on an LAUSD campus,” said Brooke Rios, executive director of New LA Charter School, which has about 198 students on Baldwin’s campus, according to Rios. “We’re aware of the tension,” she said.
Designated a 2020 California Distinguished School, Baldwin Hills is one of just three elementary schools in the district with a majority African American student body that includes a magnet school for gifted students. The school emphasizes science, technology, engineering, arts and mathematics. It boasts robotics, engineering, yoga and chess classes, and higher than average test scores. But teacher Marie Germaine said the district has undermined the school’s efforts with the space sharing arrangement. “They want us to accept our own suffering and our own demise. We refuse to accept it.”
Germaine, Walker and Irving were among parents and educators from Baldwin and Trinity who demanded the district get charter schools off their campuses when they addressed the school board on Nov. 1, the deadline for charter schools to request space on district campuses for the upcoming school year. Baldwin and Trinity are both among some 34 LAUSD community schools that are designed to be neighborhood hubs, offering services to children and families after traditional school hours. United Teachers Los Angeles treasurer Alex Orozco said that in 2019, the district agreed to avoid co-locating charter schools on such campuses, but hasn’t done so.
Trinity Elementary is at the other end of the achievement spectrum; it is struggling as one of 100 schools that LAUSD Superintendent Alberto Carvalho has targeted for improvement, said teacher Tanya Flores. However, Flores said it is hard to improve when kids do not have adequate space for learning. A fifth grade class meets in the auditorium and a section of the school library serves as a makeshift second grade classroom, she said.
Parent Yuvicela Ruiz said when her fifth grade son’s special education class was moved to another school because of lack of space at Trinity, “it hurt him academically and emotionally. It showed that my son’s education is not valued by the district,” she said.
* * *
Relationships between charters and the traditional schools with which they share space have long been fractious. Sharon Delugach, chief of staff to school board member Jackie Goldberg, said sharing campuses can be “like having a really horrible roommate.” Delugach said few co-locations are successful. “There are places where they’ve managed to have a civil relationship, but there’s rarely a positive one.”

Hey, honey, I’m going to move my mistress and her mom into the guest bedrooms. You don’t mind, do you?
LikeLike
So true. Thanks for the laugh. The only way parents can push against this incursion is to protest and vote for school board members that support well resourced public education. Parents must complain loudly and publicly via the media when possible.
LikeLike
PERFECT, Bob.
LikeLike
Thanks, Yvonne!
LikeLike
And they are poised to take over the master suite and front room.
LikeLike
yup, thanks to the Extreme Court
LikeLike
This will be the dominant theme of privatization in the coming years: Coexistence. They don’t threaten public education, they coexist and fill niches.
And for a great example of how to explain how this is another way of transferring wealth, start at 5:45-12:25 on this (the other parts are also really worth watching and sharing):
LikeLike
Privatizers exploit blurry lines between public and private as they transfer funds out of the public system to weaken it while they expand the private profit generating service. They are are working on privatizing Medicare through Medicare Advantage and starting in January ACO Reach where privatizers can ruin Medicare by extracting value for a new revenue stream for the already wealthy, another transfer of wealth. It is a gigantic scam.
LikeLike
YES, indeed. “It is a gigantic scam.”
LikeLike
Public Private Partnerships=Parasitic Privatization
LikeLike
!!!!!!!!!
LikeLike
Co-exist like a parasite.
LikeLike
In a parasitic relationship the host often withers and dies, and it is a feature of privatization. Right wing extremists are sucking the life out of public schools and communities to line the pockets of the politically well connected. The public pays while the wealthy destroy public schools and make even more money in the process. That is why they will never stop expanding and demanding more funding.
LikeLike
I was so tempted to post the Parasite video from Ozzy Osbourne. But I thought better of it.
LikeLike
LikeLike
We can’t ignore the following legal rationale for California charter schools:
“Provide vigorous competition within the public school system to stimulate continual improvements in all public schools.”
Public school communities have already been working overtime for years to create new programs and increase parental involvement as evidenced at Trinity and Baldwin Hills. However, the irony here is that the invasion of a charter co-location disrupts these programs by taking away the classrooms needed to administer them.
AND, what is not mentioned in the article is the fact that newly co-locating charters are gifted with new furniture and technology.
AND, there is no requirement for the charter to remain on a campus for more than one year. So, the district has to “reconfigure” a campus back to the original configuration if and when the charter vacates. All this costs money, which should instead be used to improve facilities for public schools.
AND, while charters pay a relatively low co-location pro rata facility fee to the district, they can and do apply for a yearly state grant that can pay up to 75% of this fee.
Given the above facts, it’s no wonder CCSA(California Charter School Association) fights tooth and nail to maintain this cash cow on behalf of charters to the detriment of public schools.
LikeLike
In New York, the charter lobby and Cuomo pushed through a law requiring the NYC public schools to give charters free public space and also to pay their rent if they didn’t like the public space they were offered. Very costly.
LikeLike
Look at the public school bullies, wow! What happened to “kids are kids. I know, build the Charter Schools their own facilities.
LikeLike
Please explain what you are trying to say. Gracias.
LikeLike
This has been going on for thirty years in Los Angeles, but when Charter Schools are asked to find new locations, theirs are the voices that LA media most emphasizes.
LikeLike
California really needs a ballot initiative to overturn Proposition 39. Charter enrollments threaten California’s ability to provide education to public school students. Proposition 39 should be considered a violation of the state constitution. We need to use ballot initiatives and lawsuits to overcome the attack on our state by billionaires like Reed Hastings who don’t believe in democracy.
LikeLike