The New York Times reported that Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito assured Senator Ted Kennedy that he would not overturn Roe v. Wade. He said repeatedly that he respects precedent and considered Roe to be settled law. Seventeen years later, Justice Alito wrote the scathing opinion overturning Roe v. Wade and asserting that it was wrong from the start.
How should Americans react when they learn that at least three of the 6 justices who voted to overturn Roe are liars?
Senator Edward M. Kennedy looked skeptically at the federal judge. It was Nov. 15, 2005, and Samuel A. Alito Jr., who was seeking Senate confirmation for his nomination to the Supreme Court, had just assured Mr. Kennedy in a meeting in his Senate office that he respected the legal precedent of Roe v. Wade, the 1973 court decision that legalized abortion.
“I am a believer in precedents,” Judge Alito said, in a recollection the senator recorded and had transcribed in his diary. “People would find I adhere to that.”
In the same conversation, the judge edged further in his assurances on Roe than he did in public. “I recognize there is a right to privacy,” he said, referring to the constitutional foundation of the decision. “I think it’s settled.”
But Mr. Kennedy, a Massachusetts Democrat and longtime supporter of abortion rights, remained dubious that November day that he could trust the conservative judge not to overturn the ruling. He brought up a memo that Judge Alito had written as a lawyer in the Reagan administration Justice Department in 1985, which boasted of his opposition to Roe.
Judge Alito assured Mr. Kennedy that he should not put much stock in the memo. He had been seeking a promotion and wrote what he thought his bosses wanted to hear. “I was a younger person,” Judge Alito said. “I’ve matured a lot.”
The answer did not assuage Mr. Kennedy, who went on to vote against Judge Alito’s confirmation. If the judge could configure his beliefs to get that 1985 promotion, Mr. Kennedy asked in a notation in his diary, how might he dissemble to clinch a lifetime appointment to the nation’s highest court?
Justice Alito wrote the majority opinion this past June in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, the momentous Supreme Court decision that put aside 50 years of precedent and overturned Roe. Respect for longstanding precedent “does not compel unending adherence to Roe’s abuse of judicial authority,” he wrote. “Roe was egregiously wrong from the start.”

Two reactions –
Politicization of the Supreme Court. They are not held accountable for being any different than a “party first” politician.
They are like “sold-my-soul, hold-my-nose, can’t-look-my-granddaughter-in-the-eye, “I’m not voting for the person – I just want an empty for my ideology” voters. SCOTUS has evolved to puppets of the extreme majority who appoints them.
Like Alito, say whatever gets you the chair (and cross your fingers during the oath)
Like Thomas: “Justice Thomas temporarily blocks Lindsey Graham’s testimony”
Convenient Precedence
“Respect for longstanding precedent “does not compel unending adherence to Roe’s abuse of judicial authority,”
Can we substitute “literal interpretation of the 2nd amendment should not compel unending adherence to a well-regulated militia includes 18 year olds with AK-47s?” (which by the way even the official militia requires screenings and months of training)
LikeLike
You don’t get it. 18-year-old white boys with military-style weapons will be needed for the new Republican Brownshirt Citizens’ Militias (“They put the SA in USA”) that will be needed in order for them to consolidate power via state violence (suppressing dissent, curtailing voting) once they seize all branches of the federal government in 2024. So, perhaps this is just the Fascists looking ahead, and the goons who showed up at the Michigan state house and at the U.S. Capitol will be just a taste of what’s to come. The rapid rise of the extremist right in the US is extremely troubling.
LikeLike
The Extreme Court is no more nor less than an arm of the new, Fascist Republican Party. The Republicans should change their symbol from an elephant to a Phoenix rising from the ashes of democracy. Alito, Thomas, et al. are simply party apparatchiks and might as well give up any pretense of actually giving a hoot about justice and established law. Just Us, maybe, but definitely not Justice.
LikeLike
Lady G to Clarence T: I wish to evade the law.
Clarence T to Lady G: No problem, dear, at all.
LikeLike
That’s no Lady! Unless, of course, it’s of the political night.
LikeLike
Clarence T: That’s no Lady, that my wife!
LikeLike
got that right
LikeLike
Don’t worry, Ted. I was just lying about that. That’s what the country needs in a Just Us, right? A liar.
LikeLike
A Supreme Court Justice lying? Alito is not the only one. Clarence Thomas and most recently Brett Kavanaugh. Where is the FBI background investigation? Where are the impeachments in the House of Representatives?
LikeLike
Yup, all liars.
LikeLike
The irony is that they have made the Supreme Court into an institution that only a liar would want to be a member of.
LikeLike
How should Americans react …
If past practice is any indicator,
a symphony of dog whistles will
prevent them from hearing above
the din of concocted notoriety,
advising them as to which
electoral savior/master, will
set them free.
Even though the vote of
“we the people”
has never undermined the powerful
cabal of unelected club members
(officials), credentialed by
family histories, elite schools,
and unique career experiences,
seeking solace through electoral
fantasy continues.
“What better way to enslave a
man than to give him a vote
and tell him he is free.”
All governments rest on
SCHOOLING…
LikeLike
Surprised that the Supreme Court is a political body? Surprised that politics involves lies? Perhaps you have forgotten Jackson and Indian removal, Taney and Dred Scott. Back to the future.
LikeLike
Alito is the de facto Chief Justice and nothing about that will change until he dies. I am more concerned in a few weeks that we will have senators like Lee, Johnson, and Rubio reelected. Or that we could have Sen.-elects Laxalt, Masters, Oz, Walker, Balduc, Vance and/or Budd. Or that we could have Govs-elect Lake, Zeldin, Michels, or LePage? Or various qanon kooks as state Secs of State? Dems will have to run the table just to give democracy a chance to grasp at the life vest. And Alito will be there waiting with open arms.
LikeLike
Alito is the de fascisto Chief Justass
Fixed
LikeLike
Make that “de fascismo”
LikeLike
de fascismo
LikeLike
“I’ve matured a lot.” — Justass Alito
“I like beer” — Justass K.
Different words. Same intention: to dismiss the question.
And incidentally, Justass Roberts is also firmly on the list of goddamned Hellbound liars. Roberts also assured everyone in his confirmation hearings that he respected precedent. Of course, the precedent he really respected was Richard Nixon’s lying when he said “I’m not a crook”.
LikeLike
I’ve matured a lot
You’ve put me on the spot
But I’ve matured a lot
I used to be a liar
But now am just denier
I’ve learned to bob and weave
With aces up my sleeve
To make the folks believe
With purpose to deceive
LikeLike
I’m still learning to Bob.
–Bob
LikeLike
At least you’re not learning to rob
LikeLike
Every member of the Supreme Court majority is a liar for supporting Gorsuch’s written opinion in the “praying Coach ” case (in which , coincidentally, the coach’s name was also Kennedy).
The whole opinion was based on lies and the members of the majority all knew it.
https://www.vox.com/2022/6/27/23184848/supreme-court-kennedy-bremerton-school-football-coach-prayer-neil-gorsuch
LikeLike
Ted Kennedy obviously had a lot of flaws (Chappaquiddick being the main one) but he recognized bullshit and bullshit artists when he saw them.
He smelled a mountain of it when Dumbya and Dick were trying to convince everyone to attack Iraq.
LikeLike
Not incidentally, in response to the Praying Coach ruling, Harvard Law professor and Constitutional scholar Lawrence Tribe linked to the above Vox piece and said
“I’m old enough to remember when “alternative facts” weren’t a thing Supreme Court Justices would invent in order to drive a religious and political results-driven agenda they took with them to the Court. With religion, abortion, and guns this bunch has.”
Alternate facts”, lies, whatever one calls them, they are deceptions.
The Majority are a bunch of dishonest clowns.
LikeLike
They have made a mockery of one branch of our government.
LikeLike
Reblogged this on Filosofa's Word and commented:
It’s one thing to acknowledge that politicians will tell lies to get elected to office. We may not like it, and some tell small lies while others tell whoppers, but most people accept that there are some lies told by politicians. However, Supreme Court justices are NOT politicians, do not stand for election but rather are appointed for life, and thus we should be able to hold them to a higher standard. To say that today’s Court is a disappointment would be an understatement. Read what Diane Ravitch shows us about the lack of integrity of one Justice Samuel Alito.
LikeLike
Revolting. Precedent in Anglo-Saxon Law is a very strong tool of law. Others call it Jurisprudence… (‘prudence’ is part of Jusriprudence…)
Like I said: Revolting.
(Thanks for the post)
LikeLike