Forest Wilder writes in the Texas Monthly about a scheme hatched by charter operators and voucher zealots to launch private school vouchers, which have been stalled in the legislature for years. Vouchers were originally intended to allow white students to escape racially integrated school. Now they are falsely sold as a means of helping poor kids “escape failing schools,” but in fact they are almost always used to subsidize the private school tuition of affluent families.
The article shows how a charter chain—ResponsiveEd—is trying to sneak vouchers into the state. Responsive Ed was called out in Slate in 2014 for teaching creationism. Slate wrote: “Responsive Ed has a secular veneer and is funded by public money, but it has been connected from its inception to the creationist movement and to far-right fundamentalists who seek to undermine the separation of church and state.”
Today, ResponsiveEd has two charters in Texas which operate 91 different charter schools, including an online school. When Betsy DeVos was Secretary of Education, she gave ResponsiveEd a five-year grant for $40.8 million to expand. The CEO of ResponsiveEd is Board Chair of the Texas Charter School Association. State Commissioner Mike Morath approved 13 new campuses for the chain in 2022.
Wilder writes:
The proposal landed on Greg Bonewald’s desk like a pipe bomb. Bonewald, a soft-spoken career educator, had served as a teacher, coach, and principal in the fast-growing Hill Country town of Wimberley for fifteen years. In 2014, he took a bigger job as an assistant superintendent in Victoria, about two hours to the southeast. But he maintained an affection for Wimberley, and when its school board sought to bring him back as superintendent this year, he was thrilled. His honeymoon would be short.
In a document obtained by Texas Monthly, stamped “Confidential” and dated May 3—the day after Bonewald was named the sole finalist for the job—a Republican political operative and a politically connected charter-school executive laid out an explosive proposal for “Wimberly [sic] ISD.” (Out-of-towners frequently misspell “Wimberley,” much to the annoyance of locals.) Apparently, the plan had been in the works for months and had been vetted by the outgoing superintendent. But Bonewald said no one had bothered to mention it to him.
One of the authors of the plan was Aaron Harris, a Fort Worth–based GOP consultant who has made a name for himself by stoking—with scant evidence—fears of widespread voter fraud. In June, he cofounded a nonprofit called Texans for Education Rights Institute, along with Monty Bennett, a wealthy Dallas hotelier who dabbles in what he regards as education reform. The other author was Kalese Whitehurst, an executive with the charter school chain Responsive Education Solutions, based in Lewisville, a half hour north of Dallas.
Their confidential proposal went like this: Wimberley would partner with Harris and Bennett’s Texans for Education Rights Institute to create a charter school tentatively dubbed the Texas Achievement Campus. But “campus” was a misnomer, because there would be none. The school would exist only on paper. Texans for Education Rights would then work with ResponsiveEd, Whitehurst’s group, to place K–12 students from around the state into private schools of their choice at “no cost to their families.”
The scheme was complex but it pursued a simple goal: turning taxpayer dollars intended for public education into funds for private schools. The kids would be counted as Wimberley ISD students enrolled at the Achievement Campus, thus drawing significant money to the district. (In Texas, public schools receive funding based in large part on how many students attend school each day.) But the tax dollars their “attendance” brought to the district would be redirected to private institutions across the state.
The plan was backed not only by an out-of-town Republican operative and a charter-school chain with links to Governor Greg Abbott, but by a Wimberley-based right-wing provocateur who bills himself as a “systemic disruption consultant.” Texas education commissioner Mike Morath—an Abbott appointee—also seemed to support the deal.
Its proponents have called the scheme pioneering and innovative. Though the effort ultimately failed in Wimberley, one of its backers says he is shopping the plan around to other districts. Critics have raised all manner of alarms.
“I’m not accusing anyone of laundering money, by the legal definition, but there sure are a lot of hands touching a lot of money in this,” said H.D. Chambers, the superintendent of Alief ISD, a district in the Houston area that serves 47,000 students. He also pointed to another, more sweeping, concern: “It’s a Trojan horse for vouchers.”
Please open the link and read the rest of the story.

Profiteering Off Our Public Ed Dollars (POOPED)
LikeLike
All privatization schemes have lots of people wanting to get their hands on public money. We have reached a point in which facts and evidence no longer matter. Texas voters repeatedly rejected vouchers when they were put on the ballot. Research on vouchers shows they get dismal results for poor students, and the wealthy use them to subsidize tuition at private schools. The radical right does not care what voters want. Those with money want stealth, top down privatization of public schools whether voters want them or not. If vouchers are adopted, it would be a loss for the poor and working class and a gain for affluent families. Vouchers would also further drain the finances of underfunded public schools.
LikeLike
Everything the privatizers advocate has failed. Yet they keep funding more failures.
LikeLike
“They are failing all the way to the bank.”
LikeLike
Albert Einstein once said that “falling” was the happiest thought of his life (because it made him realize that gravity is equivalent to acceleration).
With the school privatizers, it’s “failing” that is the happie$t thought (because it makes them realize that school is equivalent to profit$)
LikeLike
This privateering push can only happen because the politicians pushing it are paid a percentage by their pimps in private interest groups to divert public funds their way.
LikeLike
A similar policy was tried in Douglas County, Colorado. The state supreme court found it to be unconstitutional. See https://www.courts.state.co.us/userfiles/file/Court_Probation/Supreme_Court/Opinions/2013/13SC233.pdf
However, the U.S. Supreme Court then ordered that the Colorado Supreme Court reconsider its decision in light of the 2016 Trinity Lutheran decision. Long story short, the DougCo school board flipped and no longer supported the charter-voucher policy, so they dropped the appeal — and the policy hasn’t been revived in Colorado. See https://co.chalkbeat.org/2017/12/4/21107310/douglas-county-school-board-ends-controversial-voucher-program
LikeLike
I think it is critical to understand what we are dealing with. There is no use talking about the “failures” of the privatization movement since it is actually succeeding wildly at its aims. Wringing hands over its supposed “failures” does nothing but assume good faith on its part and play into the main misdirection of the con game.
LikeLike