Carol Burris writes in The Progressive about the alarming rate with which charters close. Parents should know this before enrolling their children and taking a chance.
She writes:
In May, a study by the National Center for Research on Education Access and Choice (REACH) at Tulane University found that charter schools close at much higher rates than public schools, even when controlling for factors such as enrollment and test scores. Each year, roughly 5 percent of charters close, compared with 1 percent of public schools.
But REACH’s data likely underestimates the problem. Because so many new charter schools open each year, the closure rate is offset by the overall growth of the industry. And a new charter opening in Columbus, Ohio, is of little help to a student whose charter just closed in Memphis, Tennessee.
To more accurately capture the big picture, we at the Network for Public Education published a report on the long-term viability of charter schools. We looked at seventeen cohorts, each composed of all U.S. charters that opened in a given year, beginning in 1998 and ending in 2014. Our goal was to track these schools over time and see how they fared when compared with one another. We found that, by year three, an average of 18 percent of charters had closed. By year ten, the proportion of failed charters topped 40 percent.
Enrollment data for the year before each school closed indicated that charter schools opening between 1999 and 2017 have collectively displaced upwards of one million students—often with almost no warning.
The alarming rate of charter school closures prompted the U.S. Department of Education to direct federal startup funding to schools more likely to succeed. But even modest proposals have met stiff resistance from the charter lobby. For them, the closures are seen positively: It is “the sector working as intended,” Chalkbeat reported, citing National Alliance for Public Charter Schools Chief Executive Officer Nina Rees.
And she’s right—charter churn, including abrupt closures, is baked into the marketplace model that believes only the most popular performers should survive. The three recent closings in North Carolina, however, were not based on popularity, or even low test scores—they were the result of greed and fraud.
To prevent this, government officials at all levels need to tighten regulations and hold charter school boards accountable. Until government officials get serious about charter school reform, each parent or guardian who enrolls their child in a charter school deserves a notice that says, “Caution: This school could close with little to no warning.”
Nina [Rhee-s] Rees says it is “the sector working as intended,” survival of the fittest. So, when your children’s school abruptly closes, causing you and your family hardship, just remember that’s what charters are for! And all the money extracted from your local community to pay the executives of the private charter company, why that’s just because there’s an opportunity gap — between you and the private charter company that stole your horses and left you by the side of the road. As. In. Tended.
It makes sense that publicly funded charter schools that have little or no oversight on spending often close. Once the founders get as much of that free public money as possible, they take off. The odds of being prosecuted for this questionable legal crime are probably rare once the grifters moves on.
In public schools, when someone is caught siphoning public money for their own gain, those frauds usually end up in prison. That’s because in the public schools, it’s illegal to do this, while in the charters, in most cases, there are no laws to stop them thanks to no transparency and not being required to follow the same laws that the public school must obey or else.
Clearly, Ms. Burris does not understand that at some point, an entrepreneur has milked a particular charter community of as much as he or she can, the law is closing in, and her or she needs to move on to a different grift.
Sorry, that would be contrepreneur
And sometimes you have to fold before the law arrives, as carnival burlesque show, medicine show, underground casino, cock fighting ring, charter operators, and others in the trade have long known.
Or as they say in the Trump RICO, nothing personal, it’s just business.
Parents who take their children out of the public schools should be required by districts to sign an agreement that says they won’t be able to put them back into the public schools until the following school year if the charter closes.
That might make them think twice about the charters.
Agree. A market economy has consequences for people who make poor consumer choices.
Public school advocates care about children which is why they strive for students to have less devastating disruption in their lives, for example, policies allowing students back in a real school immediately after the close of a grifter school.
The Noah Webster Educational Foundation, at its site, posted about Ohio. “Ohio’s public schools have been outperforming its charter schools. 40.1% percent of the state’s charter schools are failing compared to 1.5% of public schools.”
Bill Gates has no interest in evidence. The ideology of greed drives him.
In defense of Gates, he is not driven by greed. He has more than he could spend in many lifetimes. He is driven by misinformed arrogance. He has very bad advisors.
A man who announced plans to give away his fortune more than 20 years ago has remained atop the wealthiest men lists. Recently, he got PR for saying he’d be giving away more of his fortune. With skepticism, I speculate it is cover for his ego to accompany his fall from the richest lists because of his divorce settlement.
Have his farming solutions in poor countries been criticized relative to his investment portfolio in corporate agri-business products?