To no one’s surprise, the ultra-conservative Supreme Court ruled in favor of funding religious schools in states that fund other private schools. Whereas the Supreme Court has long issued rulings forbidding any state support for religious schools, the current Supreme Court has signaled its willingness to rule in favor of equal treatment of religious schools. Brick by brick, this Supreme Court is dismantling the “wall of separation” (Thomas Jefferson’s phrase) between church and state.
David Savage of the Los Angeles Times reports:
WASHINGTON —
The Supreme Court on Tuesday extended its support for religious schools, ruling that parents who send their children to such institutions have a right to tuition aid if the state provides it to other similar private schools.
The 6-3 decision in the Carson vs. Makin case from Maine could open the door to including religious schools among the charter schools that are privately run but publicly financed.
In the past, the high court had said that giving public funds to church schools violated the 1st Amendment’s ban on an “establishment of religion.”
But in the past five years, the court’s conservative majority has flipped the equation and ruled it is unconstitutional discrimination to deny public funds to church schools simply because they are religious.
Maine has an unusual subsidy program because many of its small towns do not have a high school. In such cases, students may enroll in a private school or in another public high school, and the state pays their tuition.
Since 1980, however, the state has not extended these subsidies to students in church schools, apparently fearing it would be unconstitutional to do so.
The court majority said that was a mistake.
Among the six conservative justices in the majority, all of them attended Catholic schools except for Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr., who went to public elementary and secondary schools in New Jersey.
The conservative justices in recent years have cast aside the principle of church-state separation and argued it grew from an anti-Catholic bias in the late 19th and early 20th centuries.
“It was an open secret that ‘sectarian’ was code for ‘Catholic,’” Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. wrote in 2020, describing the common state laws that prohibit sending tax money to schools affiliated with a church. These restrictions were “born of bigotry” and “arose at a time of pervasive hostility to the Catholic Church and to Catholics in general,” he said in Espinoza vs. Montana.
The 1st Amendment forbids laws “respecting an establishment of religion,” which had been seen as barring the government from subsidizing religion. But Justices Clarence Thomas and Neil M. Gorsuch have disagreed.
“The modern view which presumes that states must remain … virtually silent on matters of religion is fundamentally incorrect,” Thomas wrote in an earlier school case. “Properly understood, the Establishment Clause does not prohibit states from favoring religion.”
Notre Dame law professor Nicole Garnett, a former Thomas clerk, predicted last year there will be a move “in the near future to permit religious charter schools,” either through the courts or the states.
If these “charter school programs are properly considered programs of private school choice,” they can take advantage of the court’s ruling forbidding the exclusion of religious schools, she said.
My comment as an historian who has studied church-state issues:
The Court is right that there was a strong anti-Catholic bias in American society throughout the nineteenth century. The so-called Blaine amendments found in many state constitutions were animated in large part by a desire to block public funding of Catholic schools. As I showed in my book “The Great School Wars,” a history of the New York City schools, the Catholic Church eagerly sought public funding in the 1840s.
But the ban on funding religious schools that has been in place nationally for more than a century applied to all religious schools, not just to Catholic schools. Schools run by Protestants, Catholics, Jews, Muslims, and other religious faiths were ineligible for public funding. This view was reinforced repeatedly by the Supreme Court in numerous rulings. The common understanding, upheld by the Court, was that public funds should not be used to indoctrinate public funds into the belief system of any religious faith.
Public schools exist to promote public purposes: literacy and judgment needed to vote, to serve on juries, to participate in civic life, to sustain a democratic polity. Religious schools exist to teach and perpetuate–and yes, to indoctrinate–the faith of adherents. Religious believers do not want to support the schools of other faiths. But under this ruling, all religious faiths will be entitled to public funding in any state that funds any private schools.
Maine should end its policy of “tuitioning” and limit public funds to public schools. Other states that subsidize any private schools should stop doing so. The path on which SCOTUS has embarked will end in publicly funding schools for every religion, of which there are scores. It threatens the principle of the common school, supported by the public and open to all children.
The next step, as the article suggests, will be religious charter schools, scooping up public funds with no accountability, no oversight, and no adherence to anti-discrimination laws. Is it not unjust to expect the public to pay for schools where their own children are ineligible to attend because of their own religion?
Betsy DeVos and Charles Koch must be celebrating right now.
The decisions of the current Supreme Court will be the downfall of this country.
Literally. Taken together, they will amount to our version of the German Enabling Act of 1933. The leaked abortion decision is the template for that.
Christian sharia law coming our way soon.
Already here in a number of U.S. states
This is a slippery downhill slope that may very well lead to universal vouchers. If religious schools receive public funds, why shouldn’t the parents of the super wealthy that send their children to Phillips Academy and Sidwell Friends seek to get a voucher to defray the cost of their tony private school tuition. This ruling takes a wrecking ball to the concept of separation of church and state.
Can I be both shocked and not surprised at the same time?
YES!
same, Elle
We shouldn’t sugar coat what is taught in the religious schools. (1) Girls have so little value that they should sacrifice their lives for fetuses. (2) Christ rejected women for leadership roles in the sects’ churches – the churches where women are half of the members and the churches where the women take their children to be indoctrinated.
(3) Gay people should not have the same rights as straight people. (4) Voices from the ether world tell an arbitrary person in the sect what members of the sect must do.
(5) Human rights and democracy are trumped by religious law.
pretty much
The Catholic Court is mad because Catholic schools wanted public funding in the 1840s. Where did Black people go to school in the 1840s?
Brown v Board is overturned today. Segregation is here to stay. States will be required to fund separate but equal schools that appeal to families based on the religious traditions of their nations of heritage. Integration is dead.
I cannot understand how it can be considered acceptable for public funds to be used in any schools that discriminate against students based on color, religion, sex or immigration status. These were the protected classes in the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
Nearly as egregious is the fact that if a private school cannot provide an accommodation for a particular student, the public schools must do it for them, i.e. if a student in the private school needs physical therapy and they don’t provide it, a public school therapist will provide the service, at the expense of public schools.
LCT-
Excellent points.
Well said, LCT, RT, & Marc!
Interesting question that I don’t know the answer to. Where did black students attend school in America in the 1840s?
They didn’t. They were enslaved.
Not all of them.
In the north, there were some Quaker schools for blacks, and literacy among blacks in some northern cities was fairly high. However, overall literacy rates for blacks in both the North and South were very low. In general, black people had to work from very young ages in order to survive. No leisure for schooling. Some few in the North were fortunate to have “masters” or employers who provided some tutoring to them, but this was fairly rare. And, of course, in many places in the South it was actually illegal to teach a black person to read. It wasn’t until after the Civil War that Northern philanthropists pitched in in a big way to create black schools.
Ugh.
And the schools where Black children could get an education in the North were generally segregated.
“Mr. Jefferson, tear down that wall!”
Alas, this is what the current fundie court is saying.
LOL!
So the obvious solution is no government funding of private schools at all.
Yes. I bet my legislators will go that way. (Sarcasm alert)
Does this mean that Catholic Schools that get public funds will have to open themselves up to regular pedophile inspections?
It take a leap to suggest that the first amendment was anti-Catholic. Consider:
The first amendment predates the Blaine Amendments by a century.
Recall that there were established churches at the time of the first amendment. They were established by state authority, and not by national authority. Not until the 14th amendment was the anti-establishment clause applied to states.
Also recall that the folks arguing for vouchers for their segregation academies in the 1960s were largely Protestant.
Time to stop state funding of all private schools.
Exactly right! No more public funding for private schools!
Very good!
What about school districts that do purchase of service with schools for serious disabilities?
I agree! We have created a huge mess opening the public funding doors to private and/or religious groups.
It would be amazing if far right legislators like the ones in my state took that approach. I predict, rather, a consistent march toward talibanism until the Taliban literally starts a school. Then you will see discrimination based on creed, throwing out that part of the constitution.
That would indeed be a good outcome, but alas , cutting all state funding to private schools will not happen because there is already a powerful lobby for charters and vouchers and now the religious schools will just team up with the latter to ensure that they all get a piece of the public pie.
And the Supremes certainly understand all of this.
So the claim that religious schools can be refused state funding if private schools are also refused rings hollow.
And the Supremes certainly understand all of this
You can bet your rosary on that one!
This is apparently Karma thanks to our Founding Fathers allowing losers to win elections. The US is the only republic/democracy in the world that elects it’s leaders through an easily manipulated Electoral College system instead of the popular vote.
If it wasn’t for the Electoral College, George W. Bush and Traitor Trump, who loves and lives and thrives to get revenge on anyone and anything that doesn’t do what he wants, would have never been elected president.
I’ve been meaning to get my madrassa started up.
Yup. Here they come.
And I’ve been wanting to get a Pastafarian school going ever since the FSM came into being. Our first road trip will be to his home in Russell’s Teapot!
Muslim schools? Buddhist? Hindu? Religious cults?
I would assume that states will still have the ability to define the academic standards for what kind of “school” is eligible for funding. But a Muslim school that meets whatever academic standards are in place? Seems like a state could not withhold funding from a general program through which it is funding other private schools.
FLERP, in theory you are right. States set academic standards. But there is little oversight, sometimes none at all. New York Regents can’t bring themselves to enforce state standards for Yeshivas, such as teaching basic subjects in English, not Yiddish.
And, how are those ‘standards’ measured?
This is much broader than “standards.” State departments of education also decide what courses will be officially recognized by the state, provide names and content descriptions for those courses, set minimum requirements for graduation that include test scores and coursework completed, set attendance requirements, set mandatory requirements for teacher certification and recertification, and much, much more. Some states even provide day-by-day course outlines!!!! Private schools are exempt from almost all of these requirements.
Fenton, how would you define Gulen charter schools?
Gulen charter schools are part of a national chain organized by the Imam Fethullah Gulen, who lives in exile in Pennsylvania. You can recognize a Gulen School by the large number of Turkish people who are on the board and staff. They pretend not to be Gulen. Google them. Or watch Ed Hall’s documentary KILLING ED.
My question to Fenton is,do you define Gulen charter schools as Muslim schools?
At the Amish America site, readers can learn the 15 ways Amish schools differ from public schools.
Most states leave the Amish alone for their differences because nothing they do requires the use of the “common good.” They pay income tax, property tax and state sales tax, but in connection with an agreement they made with the federal government in the 1960s, they are not required to participate in Medicare and Social Security.
Shout out to Bill and Melinda Gates, John Podesta and Tom Daschle.
and, to the Edelman family.
I demand equal shout out time (we know that money is speech, so I want the $$$) for the highest holyest true god there is. . . The FSM! All praise his noodly appendages. . . ramen!
Ramen!
HAAAAAAA!!!! OMG!!! That’s beautiful.
In his 2020 State of the Disunion Address, Don the Con gave Ditzy DeVoid, his Secretary of the Department for the Privatization of U.S. Education, everything her little walnut-hard heart could have wished for. He called on requiring states to use taxpayer dollars, in the form of school vouchers (misnamed “scholarships”) to fund private religious schools. And in two decisions, Espinoza v. Montana and Carsen v. Maken, a Republican supermajority on a now Extreme Court, with its three Trump appointees, has delivered upon Trump’s promise.
As you know, for years now, throughout the country, extreme right-wing Republicans have been introducing school voucher legislation, usually based on a boilerplate created by the ultra-right-wing American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC). And they’ve secured a great blow against the separation of church and state and a great victory for vouchers and fundamentalist indoctrination at taxpayer expense.
So, why is this happening?
The smarter Republicans, as in the U.S. oligarchs and their lawyers, know that the writing is on the wall. They know that on issue after issue after issue–climate change, Medicare for all, guns, LGBTQX rights, voting rights, women’s rights, and so on–young people oppose them, often by overwhelming numbers. And the changing demographics of the country are also against them. So, in a generation, the Repugnicans are facing extinction. What’s a rich, rapacious, racist, sexist, worker exploiting, political bobblehead-purchasing, Ayn Randian, war-and-surveillance-profiteering oligarch to do?
Well, since Reagan, the Repugnicans have been able to count on using issues like abortion and LGBTQX rights to stir up the Christian fundamentalist rubes and get them to the polls. And what better way to ensure the creation of a whole new generation of Christian fundamentalist rubes whom they can continue to lead, Pied Piper-like, off the cliff of their own economic powerlessness than to use taxpayer money to fund fundamentalist Christian madrasas throughout the country and to effect the transfer of millions of students (and billions in funding) out of public schools and into those?
This is the method in the madness.
cx: Carson v. Makin
Thanks, all, for tuning in to this episode of Democracy under Siege: How 77 Years after Defeating the Nazis, the United States became a Fascist Power
cx: Became
James Madison:
“The purpose of separation of church and state is to keep forever from these shores the ceaseless strife that has soaked the soil of Europe with blood for centuries.”
“And I have no doubt that every new example will succeed, as every past one has done, in showing that religion and Government will both exist in greater purity, the less they are mixed together. ”
It’s very obvious the six religious fanatics on the Supreme Court didn’t get THAT memo.
Thank you for this. Yes, yes, yes!!!!
They did, however, get the message- in all ages, in all countries, the priest aligns with the despot- Jefferson’s warning.
I thought the priest aligned with the pedophile.
But maybe that was someone else’s warning.
Our Supreme Court is sick, sick, sick. They are destroying our Constitution when they were installed to protect it from politicians. There’s nothing ‘conservative’ about them.
“Alito wrote that agency-shop agreements violate “the free speech rights of nonmembers by compelling them to subsidize private speech on matters of substantial public concern.”[15] Alito recognized that losing these fees would put a financial burden on the public sector unions, who would continue to have to represent nonmembers even without their agency fees, but stated that “we must weigh these disadvantages against the considerable windfall that unions have received.”[15] In the decision, the Court held that the conclusion reached by Abood was inconsistent with the First Amendment and thus overruled that decision.”
Hard not to see that diverting my tax dollars to a Christian or Jewish …. Taliban school is not a violation of my First amendment rights as was the logic with agency fees in Janus.Forcing me to support speech and concepts I disagree with.
Unlike the Union that is forced to represent free loaders I am receiving no benefit .
So therefore I should sue to avoid all State taxes that could be used to fund the Madrassas . Of course the flip side is de funding Public Education is their goal.
To say the least the hypocrisy of these …… ……. ….would be on full display.
“de funding Public Education is their goal”
Exactly.
If only they were at least honest.
Instead, they hide behind bogus legal and Constitutional arguments.
Honesty: “I like beer.” — Bretty K
Sonia Sotomayor’s dissent gets tot he point, how this ruling truly perverts the Constitution. Now, not only what we see with our eyes is debatable, but so are words that once had clear meanings, as Thomas’s farcical conclusion that the establishment clause doesn’t deny states to favor (certain) religion(s).
“Today, the court leads us to a place where separation of church and state becomes a constitutional violation. If a state cannot offer subsidies to its citizens without being required to fund religious exercise, any state that values its historic antiestablishment interests more than this court does will have to curtail the support it offers to its citizens.”
Religion is extremely useful to fascists. And, of course, that’s LOOOOOONG been the case. It was no accident that the first cities–the city states–were organized around a manmade central oracular mountain that dominated the landscape and housed the wealth of the city, its absolute god/king ruler, priests and an army whose job it was to enforce the ruler’s well. The message to everyone else: bring us the grain you produce. We will store it here. Then, we will give it back out to you as we see fit, and this is not just the will of a powerful human, it is the will of The God.
Now, here we are, in the 21st century, FIVE THOUSAND YEARS AFTER URUK, and 6 “justices” of the Supreme Court of the most powerful country on earth are besotten with ancient religious superstition.
God (take your pick of the thousands of these, lol) help us.
cxL the ruler’s will
Don’t ever, every ask me to show “respect” for anyone’s religious superstitions ever again, please.
cx: ever
So mad I can barely type, lol
Yes, I’ve been at that point for quite a while. Why should I show respect for inane, absurd and insane ideas that are especially the Abrahamic three religions faith belief nonsense?
Fascism will come to America carrying a cross.
It’s already been here for decades.
yes
Akashic Kakistonics, or Opening Heaven’s Gate to Every Child
Enlightened Master Bob says, “Thanks, Supremes!”
Tired of those failing public schools? Want to send your child a true Akashic Academy where he/she/they can receive nourishment for the mind AND the soul?
Then enroll him/her/them in Enlightened Master Bob’s AYAHUASCA SCHOOL FOR LITTLE COSMIC VOYAGERS.
Here at Enlightened Master Bob’s, your child will learn how he or she can skip breakfast, lunch, and dinner and draw nourishment directly from Father Sun in our Solar Temple.
We offer complete holistic health training, using our proprietary textbooks on the Ethereal Body, including uncapping and aligning children’s Chakras so they can download DIRECTLY from the Mother Ship the Cosmic Light necessary for the coming Transformation from Earth-bound Homo sapiens to Interdimensional Beings.
In our history classes, students will learn all about Atlantis, Lemuria, Camelot and Glastonbury, the Black Rock Desert, and other Places of Power throughout the Ages.
Students will also learn how to protect themselves against the forces of the Evil Galactic Emperor Xenu and his band of sometimes invisible, shape-shifting reptilian aliens from Alpha Draconis.
But don’t delay! Soon, as our galaxy moves into proximity to the Pleiades, the vibrational tone of the entire planet will rise to such a pitch that the Blue Crystals of Destiny will be exposed, enabling the Alpha Draconians to assemble their Karmic Path Determinator and enslave the entire planet UNLESS undergo Ascension before then!!!! So, EVERYTHING depends on how many young Lightworkers we can bring into Alignment and Cosmic Consciousness before then!
Of course, all this is absolutely FREE because you can use your State Scholarship, or Voucher, to pay for it. Thanks, again, Supremes!!! Where would we be without you!?!?!?
Enlightened Master Bob’s AYAHUASCA SCHOOL FOR LITTLE COSMIC VOYAGERS, where all classes are taught by the Spiritual Wives of Enlightened Master Bob himself!!!!
NB: While thanks to the Supremes, your school voucher will defray some of the costs of the Enlightenment Path, achieving higher levels does require that you sign over your earthly possessions so that these will not weigh you down and prevent your ascension!
Drop the weight!
Don’t hesitate!
That’s how you’ll come
to Heaven’s Gate!
It would be religious discrimination, of course, to provide state funding to Catholic schools and Baptist schools and Unitarian schools and not to EnBobist schools. Bob be with you, children of light!
Blasphemy! We all know that the only true religion is Pastafarianism. All Praise HIS/HER/ITS/whatever noodly appendages. May you be slapped up side the head with one of his noodly appendages.
Hijo de putanesca! Overcooked Pastabrain! Take heed! Risk not a Holy War you cannot win, purveyor of carb-heavy spiritual gunk food!
The impudence. The audacity. The unmitigated God.
My thoughts may be unpopular, especially on a blog such as this, but this is now part of the supreme law of the land, and we can’t waste time complaining. The majority decision made clear that states need not fund private schools (although as Breyer argued in the dissent, “may” could easily turn into “must” in a state of a given legislative persuasion). But if they decide to do so, HANDS OFF any laws that are based on religion.
I don’t think that’s a completely bad thing and I, now more than ever, want to campaign for laws, maybe national laws, that prohibit public funding of private organizations, even if they’re schools, except in cases of equality of access or opportunity. Such laws would not run afoul of this case, but it’s reasonable to think (and pretty much expected of a 3 strong + 3 weak conservative + 3 liberal Supreme Court) that excluding schools on the basis of religion does run afoul of the Establishment Clause.
Fight for something you can win: just don’t publicly fund schools that don’t have to play by the same rules regarding equality of opportunity. Then, seek laws that tax religious institutions, since excluding them from paying taxes on the basis of religion, even though many engage in activities that would be considered “political,” reasonably could be considered to run just as hard against the Establishment Clause as the Maine case argued here. That’s where I’d focus if I had more resources.
I think you will actually find a lot of agreement here with the idea that private entities should not get public funding.
But from a practical standpoint, even if they wanted to, states like Maine where the challenge originated couldn’t yank all public funding to the private schools unless they built a lot more public schools, which would cost more money than the current setup.
Unfortunately, this Supreme Court ruling is just one example of a Court that has become far too powerful — far more powerful than envisioned by the Framers of the Constitution.
I’m not sure how it will happen with a currently dysfunctional Senate, but the Supreme Court needs to be reigned in by Congress.
you are being MUCH too logical in your understanding of this mess 🙂
Paul, I agree here, in large part.
Maine and other states should not fund private schools, whether religious or not.
America has become a juristocracy where the laws and rules are effectively set by a bunch of unelected judges who get their jollies from forcing women and everyone else to do their will.
The Supreme Court majority are simultaneously our King and Court Jester.
It is not supposed to be this way. Ironically, the Supreme Court is behaving in a decidedly unconstitutional manner.
https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2022/06/supreme-court-power-overrule-congress/661212/
How common is the practice of the Catholic school having a RV type vehicle parked on the street that has learning disability tutoring? I was a sub at a Catholic school where a government funded RV parked off of school grounds provided the LD services during school hours.
In recent times, the conflict between the two major U.S. religions was the check and balance that prohibited an American theocracy. The 70’s ushered in what was erroneously (in hindsight) viewed as an advance i.e., the Catholic Church’s acceptance of pluralism. The pluralism enabled the alliance of evangelicals and conservative Catholics. At Pat Buchanan’s site, an interview by Ryan Girdusky (founded the 1776 PAC to fund school board members opposed to CRT), describes the formation of that alliance and their success in Scalia’s appointment.
John Paul II told Catholics to become political and unlike the liberal bent of Pope Francis, the political outcome was wins for the GOP’s extremism, racism, sexism and anti-gay actions.
The Manhattan Declaration (Wikipedia) written by Robert P George
was signed by the Catholic bishops of 15 major cities.
This ruling is completely illogical.
How does a particular state’s barring state funding of religious schools violate the First Amendment?
“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof”
The Maine ban on funding of religious schools does not “respect an establishment of religion” (in fact, it is meant to specifically avoid such an establishment!) nor does it prevent the free exercise thereof — unless, of course, one interprets “free” as “zero cost in $$’s”. Even if one subscribes to “original intent”, there is no evidence that the Framers were referring to “zero $$’s” with the term “free”.
This is very reminiscent of the Supreme Court ruling that said a religious school should have been eligible for state funds for playground equipment.
You know, because the First amendment guarantees “free exercise” to all religions.
The article, “John Roberts Plays the Long Game…,” at CNN, 6-22-2022, provides a good analysis of the loss of taxpayers.’ rights. The SCOTUS case forces taxpayers to fund religion.
Roberts is obviously on a personal crusade to counter what he perceives as anti-Catholic motivations behind every ban of public funding to religious institutions.
He seems to have completely lost touch with reality.
From a sense of superiority and entitlement, he’s steered by false grievance – like most Republicans.
Relative to your final sentence, he’s in the company of Clarence and Ginni Thomas.
Religion is losing ground. A recent study showed that church membership in the US has dropped from 70 percent of adults in 1999 to 47 percent today. In the Middle Ages, when almost everyone was uneducated, it was easy enough to convince people to believe in the devil, in demons, in Hell, in virgin births and Original Sin and magic water and so on. As people have become more educated, belief in these superstitions from the infancy of our culture has fallen off to such a point that most Americans practice today what I have taken to calling the Religion of Vaguism. Oh, I think that there is “an energy.” “I’m spiritual but not religious.” The Pew religion studies have shown that Americans are as likely or more likely to believe in reincarnation (not a Christian notion) or astrology as they are in hell or Satan. LOL.
All this is, I think, quite positive. It’s important, essential, I would argue, for people to have vague notions about matters that are, in fact, vague. There is MUCH that we don’t know about ourselves and about nature generally, and having vague notions is appropriate IF one is honest about the fact that one doesn’t know and has these vague inklings that this or that MIGHT be the case. That’s very different from the traditional absolutism of religions and religious persons. Very, very different.
It’s not surprising, ofc, that at this time of dramatic cultural change, when religion is losing a LOT of ground, that superstitious troglodytes on the Extreme Court should try to give it a shot in the arm. It’s not surprising, but it IS disturbing because religion is the handmaiden of despotism, typically. Putin and the Russian Orthodox Church. Don the Con and the Evangelicals.
Religion is a powerful means for centralized, authoritarian command and control over masses of people. The right in America understands this. Even someone as stupid and ignorant as is Donald Trump understands this.
Want an image to clarify the social and political role of religion? The ziggurat. The manmade but supposedly divine oracular center of power, command, coercion, and control.
Real wonders, real mysteries, are all about us. They never cease. We should be reeling from the real, constantly, from the sheer bizarreness and beauty of it all. But we are dead to it. We aren’t paying attention. We’re on our way to the movie about the aliens: you know, the really imaginative, surprising movie in which the aliens appear, like, out of nowhere, see, and they hover over cities, see, in these big flying saucers and then–OMFG!!!–start blowing everything up. Can you believe that!!!????
Cheap thrills, and not all that thrilling. We squat like Calibans in a pâtisserie, the shelves filled with fresh baklava and brioche and éclairs, eating the three-day-old hotdog buns we stole from a 7-Eleven. The reel of the world—the dream of the One—is real magic, and every day is strewn with diamonds and philosopher’s stones.
Greg: Great song. Great vid. Yeah, it’s hard. Change usually is.
Reply to all;
Sorry for early post of tomorrow 9 am piece. Whet your appetite, I hope!
Fascism will come to America carrying a cross and a credit card
Fascism has come to America carrying a cross and a credit card in a very small hand.
Ha ha ha
A every small hand making a zero.
https://i.insider.com/561550a8bd86ef1b008bffe2?width=400&format=jpeg&auto=webp
Do you suppose he was trying to tell us something?
That signal is a rightwing message
If these rural religious schools are able to accept the public money, they should also be required to not discriminate on the basis of gender, race, religious belief, etc.
SCOTUS in 2020 exempted religious schools form civil rights employment law- a short step to other exemptions. Catholic adoption agencies can discriminate against gay people in placements. Catholic organizations are the nation’s 3rd largest employer. The ship for protecting civil rights has sailed.
I presume that Catholic schools, at the taxpayers expense, can continue to demand students recite an altered U.S. pledge of allegiance that incorporates church doctrine
Do you mean the “under God” bit? That was added by Eisenhower.
God’s on Top
God’s on top
With us down under
God’s the cop
And we’re the mugger
Supreme Pledge of Allegiance
I pledge allegiance to The God
Of the United States of America
And to the Republicans for which He stands
One Nation, One God (invisible) with Libertarians and Just us for all.
I mean the part about abortion- not all Catholic schools but, some e.g. Covington Catholic in Kentucky.
This is what happens when you let MAGA take over!