Scores of education deans signed a letter to Rep. Bobby Scott (D-VA), chair of the House Education Committee, in opposition to the recent announcement by the Biden administration that it would not grant waivers to states from the annual testing mandate in the Every Student Succeeds Act, which originated as part of the No Child Left Behind Act of 2002. The letter was written before the confirmation of Secretary of Education Miguel Cardona. The signatures were gathered by Kevin Kumashiro as spokesman for the group.
Dear Chairman Scott,
I am writing as a leader of Education Deans for Justice and Equity (https://educationdeans.org), an alliance of hundreds of education deans across the country with expertise in educational equity and civil rights.
We, in EDJE, are deeply concerned by the recent announcement by the U.S. Department of Education that it will not grant state waivers of ESSA mandates for 2021 student testing, as it did in 2020. Two weeks ago, we sent the attached letter to Secretary-Designate Miguel Cardona, signed by over 200 deans and other leaders, that outlines what we believe the research makes clear, namely, that there are fundamental problems with these tests, that the administration and use of these tests widen (not remediate) inequities, and that these problems are exacerbated in the midst of the pandemic.
We agree that we need data to make informed decisions and to address long-standing and emergent challenges, but to do so, we describe the different types of data that are needed and the assessments–other than state testing–that are more appropriate for such purposes. We urge you and Congress to act quickly and forcefully to insist that the Department waive mandates for 2021 student testing, and we are available to work and meet with you in support of this change.
The letter, included in the link below, begins:
As the nation struggles to address the impact of the pandemic on public schools, we urge the U.S. Department of Education to waive federal ESSA student-testing requirements for all states for 2020-2021 (as was done for 2019-2020).
We, Education Deans for Justice and Equity (EDJE), are an alliance of hundreds of deans of schools and colleges of education across the country who draw on our expertise as researchers and leaders to highlight three research findings to support our request.
First, problems abound with high-stakes standardized testing of students, particularly regarding validity, reliability, fairness, bias, and cost. National research centers and organizations have synthesized these findings about standardized testing, including the National Educational Policy Center and FairTest. For example, some of the harmful impacts of high-stakes testing include: distorted and less rigorous curriculum; the misuse of test scores, including grade retention, tracking, and teacher evaluation; deficit framing (blaming) of students and their families and ineffective remedial interventions, particularly for communities of color and communities in poverty; and heightened anxiety and shame for teachers and students. Researchers have also spoken specifically about annual state testing, like in California and Texas, arguing that such assessments should not be administered, much less be the basis for high-stakes decision making.
Second, these problems are amplified during the pandemic. The research brief, The Shift to Online Education During and Beyond the Pandemic, describes the “law of amplification” and ways that the shift to online education widens long-standing inequities and injustices in education, particularly for groups already disadvantaged in schools. These challenges with technology, logistics, and safety would unquestionably apply to testing, whether in-person or online. For example, districts that administer computer-based tests in-person are now trying to determine how to recall computers that were loaned to students in order to have enough computers in school, which in effect, means that those students will not have computers for remote learning for weeks. In fact, with the vast changes and differences in curriculum and instruction that resulted from the shift to online education over the past year—that is, the reduction in opportunities to learn, particularly in schools that were already under-resourced—the content validity of the tests is almost certainly compromised, as described by the National Education Policy Center. Furthermore, with so much trauma in the lives of students and families, schools need to invest all they can into quality time with students, supplemental tutoring, and enrichment and wellness programs, not stress-inducing, time-consuming tests that provide narrow data of limited use.

Looks like Donald and Ahhhnold havd competition from Little Andrew for the Gropinator title.
LikeLike
I don’t object to the tests as much as many here do, maybe I’ve been brainwashed by 20 solid years of promotion and marketing, I don’t know, BUT I do think it is VERY telling that the single “contribution” to public school students in the pandemic by ed reformers was to lobby for a testing mandate.
They don’t have anything else to offer public school students and families OTHER than test and punish. Just the absolute disdain for our students, that no one in ed reform even bothers to come up with something approaching a positive policy idea or platform for them. It’s all grim, it’s all bad news, they’re all failing, repeated over and over and over.
Why in God’s name would anyone who uses or supports a public school hire these folks? They offer NOTHING that is positive to public school students. None of them even seem to contemplate that they might WANT to offer something positive.
The ed reform response to the pandemic was to lobby for a testing mandate and promote charters and vouchers.
So exactly the same as what they lobby for every year. Public school students, once again, get nothing. Can they really call themselves “public education advocates” if they do no positive or productive work at all for the schools 90% of students attend?
LikeLike
I do not object to tests either, just the ones which do not serve the students. Some tests allow the student to see his or her learning in a focus relative to the subject matter encountered. Whatever you think about a particular test, if it does not do this, then it is hostile to student learning. Since high stakes tests have the expressed purpose of sorting students rather than teaching them, they do not fit the criteria for acceptable practice. They are, in the words of Senor Swacker, malpractice.
LikeLike
In Utah, teachers have never even been able to see a single question from any of the tests ever. Completely useless.
LikeLike
I took Iowa tests back in the day and I can only recall taking them 2-3 times in my whole public school experience. They were very basic in nature and didn’t take up much classroom time (maybe two 1/2 days of testing?), there was no test prep, there was no stress placed upon us to perform like circus animals. It was no big deal for students, teachers or parents. I always scored great on the reading but average on the math and no one made a big deal out of it. I guess they were providing useful feedback? I wouldn’t have minded Iowa tests for my children.
The testing now…OMG!!….in my public district they take MAP testing 3-4 times per year (with a few days of test prep before each test) and they take PARCC (with weeks/months of pre tests to see if the kids are aligned to the test). Then all along they are test prepping as curriculum(with computer tests) . Once they get to HS, the AP classes are test prep from September to test time. This all needs to end. There is barely any learning going on.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I also took Iowa tests and I agree they were no big deal. It isn’t the idea of an occasional standardized test that has so seriously harmed education, it is the misuse, and the greatly expanded emphasis on testing that has been so awful.
I do disagree with you on one comment which kind of proves my point: Not all AP classes are “test prep from September to test time”. My experience as a parent could not be more different — those classes have been engaging, interesting and well-taught and far better than the non-AP classes and 100x better than any “Honors Social Studies” class I took many decades ago in a public high school where I had no idea that AP exams or AP classes even existed. I have no doubt that some AP classes are taught that way, but that is not because of the exam but because of the misuse of the exam.
LikeLike
Yes: so many people somehow forget that there were tests before NCLB
LikeLike
Yes, there were tests before NCLB, but they were not mandated by the federal government; they were not used to reward or punish teachers or to close schools.
LikeLike
I took Iowa Tests as well. I remember the feedback–you would receive grade level scores for each subject–because the teachers would hand them out for students to take home, we could actually read them! My parents (o.b.m.) & I always went over them together, discussing what I excelled in & what I needed work on–&, of course, the teachers knew that too: that was when testing actually informed educators as to students’ strengths & weaknesses so as to better teach. Since the Iowas weren’t nerve wracking (there was no prior test “prep” for weeks on end & pressure & testing “pep” rallies) & the questions made sense (unlike the “Pineapple ?”) & there was clearly one right answer (again, unlike the current test–no accountability, no quality control), it was fine.
We should go back in time–at least w/regard to testing.
LikeLike
“I don’t object to the tests as much as many here do, maybe I’ve been brainwashed by 20 solid years of promotion and marketing, I don’t know,”
Yes, you’re brainwashed! No doubt.
LikeLike
This is a very comprehensive letter that describes the negative consequences of standardized testing, particularly after a devastating pandemic.
LikeLike
It is astounding that there has to be a concerted effort to move the country toward a goal that is so obviously the right direction. Am I so solidly set away from reality that the things of my chosen profession are quite hidden from me? Am I deluded when I see that the testing that has so dominated my chosen life’s work has gone a long way toward ruining that work?
LikeLike
My sister taught for over 30 yrs. She couldn’t wait to retire toward the end because of the testing. She doesn’t miss it at all. Her early plan was to retire and then substitute part time for extra income, but once the testing/test prep craze took hold, she dumped that plan. She swears she will never set foot in a public school again.
LikeLike
No and no!
LikeLike
It should be amazing that there are so many cases for which pressure has to be exerted on our politicians to do the right and moral thing.
But it’s not really amazing at all for the average politician in the US.
LikeLike
Ed reform is so much an echo chamber I don’t think they realize how consistently and reliably NEGATIVE it is as far as public school students.
Here’s testimony from one of the ed reform lobbying groups before the state legislature:
https://fordhaminstitute.org/ohio/commentary/testimony-given-house-finance-committee-hb-110
Look for something positive for public school students. There is nothing. There’s lots of positives for charter schools and private school vouchers! But public schools? They get testing and reporting mandates.
I don’t know why anyone who has a kid in a public school or supports public education would hire these people. They offer absolutely nothing to students who attend public schools. AT BEST they won’t actually harm your kid’s school, but that’s all they’re offering.
In 20 years they’ve gone from “we will improve public schools” to “we promise not to deliberately harm students who attend public schools”. Why is this acceptable? They’ve set the bar so incredibly low – it’s now ” pay us and we won’t ruin your schools”.
LikeLike
Be it education, health, or a car problem, why test for something, find out it’s broke, not find the money to fix it, then use more money to test?
Low SES students need more funding. What’s the big mystery?
LikeLike
Because it’s not about doing what’s right for children or teachers or schools. Education spending is 6-7 Billion in tax dollars (probably more!) . The deformers (private businesses and stink tanks) find ways to get their hands on those sweet tax dollars (testing, charter schools, on line schools, schemes). Testing is a billion dollar industry and if the kids are “failing”, then there is always “curriculum in a can” that can be purchased to try and up the scores.
LikeLike
“Be it education, health, or a car problem, why test for something, find out it’s broke, not find the money to fix it, then use more money to test?”
No no no no no no ad infinitum! Education is not like health or a car problem. What you suggest is a false and harmful paradigm, that of the attempted medicalization of the teaching and learning process. There are no academic standardized tests that can logically, ethically and justly perform that diagnostic function. And we don’t need that “find a problem and fix it” attitude. It’s completely wrong!
The teaching and learning process should focus on enabling the student to live and grow into their own being, not to being forced into a specious process that dictates just how “diseased” they are. Since the primary purpose of public education as found in the various state constitutional wording of authorization is “to promote the welfare of the individual so that each person may savor the right to life, liberty, the pursuit of happiness, and the fruits of their own industry” our paradigm for the teaching and learning process should be working with each student to help them fulfill their own goals.
Until we back away from and quit focusing on “deficits in learning” or “diseased learning” we will continue to bastardize the teaching and learning process in wrongly attempting to be the money making profession that medicine has become.
LikeLike
Ohio doesn’t even bother to complete a public school funding formula anymore.
It’s been years. No one bothered to do one. We have ELABORATE schemes for funding charters and private school vouchers (and we increase the funding every year) but no one managed to get even basic state governance completed for the 90% of students in the state who attend public schools.
Public school students- the dead last priority. If there’s time left after the latest round of voucher expansion and charter promotion and marketing lawmakers reluctantly turn to the public schools that serve 90% of students, but they never actually get anything done.
The last thing they accomplished “for” public schools was a mandate to hang placards in public school classrooms recognizing God to kowtow to the GOP political base. That’s the level of effort and quality we get. Politically motivated junk that is forced on our schools.
LikeLike
I suppose we should count our blessings. Reportedly the Obama ed reformers pushed for a RttT II in the stimulus bill so we COULD have blown another billion dollars on teacher ranking and sorting schemes and charter school promotion and marketing.
Somehow Biden avoided THAT, so be grateful.
LikeLike
No funding or resources will be given to anyone because of the scores. Standardized tests are biased. They are used to promote segregation and deny people access to a fully funded, local neighborhood, public school with experienced teachers. High stakes tests are neo-Jim Crow. They are like the tests freedmen used to have to pass to vote. They are used to deny rights.
LikeLike
Time and money are always precious in schools, but never more precious than this year. And while we have been in full time school 4 days a week, we have still lost 20% of our instructional time and now will have to spend the better part of a quarter giving useless tests. My school is “failing,” bit has never gotten a dime of extra support or paraprofessionals. In fact our physical facility is falling apart and our classes are overcrowded with no ventilation and a constant battle to get the kids to wear masks. Kids have gone in and out of the inferior online school all year and come back with all kinds of deficits. And we could be closed, the whole staff fired, of converted to a charter if we don’t “pass, this year.
LikeLike