Trump has repeatedly defended the Confederate flag as a representation of Southern heritage, and he has defended Confederate monuments as part of “our history.” The military doesn’t want Confederate symbols and doesn’t want the names of Confederate leaders on its bases, which is deeply offensive to those who understand that the men so honored were traitors, not heroes.
Since there has been so much agitation about the Confederate flag and what it represents, it seems worthwhile to hear directly from the Vice-President of the Confederate States of America, Alexander H. Stephens, who gave a famous speech called “the Cornerstone Speech,” in 1861.
It is too long and tedious to print in full, but you can open the link and read it.
Here is the key section that explains the Cornerstone of the Confederacy.
The new constitution has put at rest, forever, all the agitating questions relating to our peculiar institution African slavery as it exists amongst us the proper status of the negro in our form of civilization. This was the immediate cause of the late rupture and present revolution. Jefferson in his forecast, had anticipated this, as the “rock upon which the old Union would split.” He was right. What was conjecture with him, is now a realized fact. But whether he fully comprehended the great truth upon which that rock stood and stands, may be doubted. The prevailing ideas entertained by him and most of the leading statesmen at the time of the formation of the old constitution, were that the enslavement of the African was in violation of the laws of nature; that it was wrong in principle, socially, morally, and politically. It was an evil they knew not well how to deal with, but the general opinion of the men of that day was that, somehow or other in the order of Providence, the institution would be evanescent and pass away. This idea, though not incorporated in the constitution, was the prevailing idea at that time. The constitution, it is true, secured every essential guarantee to the institution while it should last, and hence no argument can be justly urged against the constitutional guarantees thus secured, because of the common sentiment of the day. Those ideas, however, were fundamentally wrong. They rested upon the assumption of the equality of races. This was an error. It was a sandy foundation, and the government built upon it fell when the “storm came and the wind blew.”
Our new government is founded upon exactly the opposite idea; its foundations are laid, its corner-stone rests, upon the great truth that the negro is not equal to the white man; that slavery subordination to the superior race is his natural and normal condition. This, our new government, is the first, in the history of the world, based upon this great physical, philosophical, and moral truth. This truth has been slow in the process of its development, like all other truths in the various departments of science. It has been so even amongst us. Many who hear me, perhaps, can recollect well, that this truth was not generally admitted, even within their day. The errors of the past generation still clung to many as late as twenty years ago. Those at the North, who still cling to these errors, with a zeal above knowledge, we justly denominate fanatics. All fanaticism springs from an aberration of the mind from a defect in reasoning. It is a species of insanity. One of the most striking characteristics of insanity, in many instances, is forming correct conclusions from fancied or erroneous premises; so with the anti-slavery fanatics. Their conclusions are right if their premises were. They assume that the negro is equal, and hence conclude that he is entitled to equal privileges and rights with the white man. If their premises were correct, their conclusions would be logical and just but their premise being wrong, their whole argument fails. I recollect once of having heard a gentleman from one of the northern States, of great power and ability, announce in the House of Representatives, with imposing effect, that we of the South would be compelled, ultimately, to yield upon this subject of slavery, that it was as impossible to war successfully against a principle in politics, as it was in physics or mechanics. That the principle would ultimately prevail. That we, in maintaining slavery as it exists with us, were warring against a principle, a principle founded in nature, the principle of the equality of men. The reply I made to him was, that upon his own grounds, we should, ultimately, succeed, and that he and his associates, in this crusade against our institutions, would ultimately fail. The truth announced, that it was as impossible to war successfully against a principle in politics as it was in physics and mechanics, I admitted; but told him that it was he, and those acting with him, who were warring against a principle. They were attempting to make things equal which the Creator had made unequal.
In the conflict thus far, success has been on our side, complete throughout the length and breadth of the Confederate States. It is upon this, as I have stated, our social fabric is firmly planted; and I cannot permit myself to doubt the ultimate success of a full recognition of this principle throughout the civilized and enlightened world.
As I have stated, the truth of this principle may be slow in development, as all truths are and ever have been, in the various branches of science. It was so with the principles announced by Galileo it was so with Adam Smith and his principles of political economy. It was so with Harvey, and his theory of the circulation of the blood. It is stated that not a single one of the medical profession, living at the time of the announcement of the truths made by him, admitted them. Now, they are universally acknowledged. May we not, therefore, look with confidence to the ultimate universal acknowledgment of the truths upon which our system rests? It is the first government ever instituted upon the principles in strict conformity to nature, and the ordination of Providence, in furnishing the materials of human society. Many governments have been founded upon the principle of the subordination and serfdom of certain classes of the same race; such were and are in violation of the laws of nature. Our system commits no such violation of nature’s laws. With us, all of the white race, however high or low, rich or poor, are equal in the eye of the law. Not so with the negro. Subordination is his place. He, by nature, or by the curse against Canaan, is fitted for that condition which he occupies in our system. The architect, in the construction of buildings, lays the foundation with the proper material-the granite; then comes the brick or the marble. The substratum of our society is made of the material fitted by nature for it, and by experience we know that it is best, not only for the superior, but for the inferior race, that it should be so. It is, indeed, in conformity with the ordinance of the Creator. It is not for us to inquire into the wisdom of His ordinances, or to question them. For His own purposes, He has made one race to differ from another, as He has made “one star to differ from another star in glory.” The great objects of humanity are best attained when there is conformity to His laws and decrees, in the formation of governments as well as in all things else. Our confederacy is founded upon principles in strict conformity with these laws. This stone which was rejected by the first builders “is become the chief of the corner” the real “corner-stone” in our new edifice. I have been asked, what of the future? It has been apprehended by some that we would have arrayed against us the civilized world. I care not who or how many they may be against us, when we stand upon the eternal principles of truth, if we are true to ourselves and the principles for which we contend, we are obliged to, and must triumph.
Thousands of people who begin to understand these truths are not yet completely out of the shell; they do not see them in their length and breadth. We hear much of the civilization and Christianization of the barbarous tribes of Africa. In my judgment, those ends will never be attained, but by first teaching them the lesson taught to Adam, that “in the sweat of his brow he should eat his bread,” and teaching them to work, and feed, and clothe themselves.
To understand what the Confederate flag represents, ponder the words of one of its leaders. It is a symbol of white supremacy and black subordination. It has no place in our country today other than as a relic of a terrible war that was fortunately lost by the racist Confederate States of America.
One need only read the Declarations of Secession of the various Confederate states, as well as their constitution to understand why the slaveholding states wanted to leave the union. Those who claim it was “states rights” ignore that the “right” the southern states wanted was to hold 4 million slaves in bondage.
https://avalon.law.yale.edu/subject_menus/csapage.asp
Exactly. See, for example, the declaration made by the first state to call a convention to secede from the Union, South Carolina:
Thus were established the two great principles asserted by the Colonies, namely: the right of a State to govern itself; and the right of a people to abolish a Government when it becomes destructive of the ends for which it was instituted. And concurrent with the establishment of these principles, was the fact, that each Colony became and was recognized by the mother Country a FREE, SOVEREIGN AND INDEPENDENT STATE. . . . Thus was established, by compact between the States, a Government with definite objects and powers, limited to the express words of the grant. This limitation left the whole remaining mass of power subject to the clause reserving it to the States or to the people, and rendered unnecessary any specification of reserved rights. . . .
The Constitution of the United States, in its fourth Article, provides as follows: “No person held to service or labor in one State, under the laws thereof, escaping into another, shall, in consequence of any law or regulation therein, be discharged from such service or labor, but shall be delivered up, on claim of the party to whom such service or labor may be due.”
This stipulation was so material to the compact, that without it that compact would not have been made. The greater number of the contracting parties held slaves, and they had previously evinced their estimate of the value of such a stipulation by making it a condition in the Ordinance for the government of the territory ceded by Virginia, which now composes the States north of the Ohio River.
The same article of the Constitution stipulates also for rendition by the several States of fugitives from justice from the other States.
The General Government, as the common agent, passed laws to carry into effect these stipulations of the States. For many years these laws were executed. But an increasing hostility on the part of the non-slaveholding States to the institution of slavery, has led to a disregard of their obligations, and the laws of the General Government have ceased to effect the objects of the Constitution. The States of Maine, New Hampshire, Vermont, Massachusetts, Connecticut, Rhode Island, New York, Pennsylvania, Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Wisconsin and Iowa, have enacted laws which either nullify the Acts of Congress or render useless any attempt to execute them. In many of these States the fugitive is discharged from service or labor claimed, and in none of them has the State Government complied with the stipulation made in the Constitution. The State of New Jersey, at an early day, passed a law in conformity with her constitutional obligation; but the current of anti-slavery feeling has led her more recently to enact laws which render inoperative the remedies provided by her own law and by the laws of Congress. In the State of New York even the right of transit for a slave has been denied by her tribunals; and the States of Ohio and Iowa have refused to surrender to justice fugitives charged with murder, and with inciting servile insurrection in the State of Virginia. Thus the constituted compact has been deliberately broken and disregarded by the non-slaveholding States, and the consequence follows that South Carolina is released from her obligation.
In other words, the justification for secession was CLEARLY that the Union had violated South Carolinians’ perceived “right” to own other people.
AMEN: “Our new government is founded upon exactly the opposite idea; its foundations are laid, its corner-stone rests, upon the great truth that the negro is not equal to the white man; that slavery subordination to the superior race is his natural and normal condition. This, our new government, is the first, in the history of the world, based upon this great physical, philosophical, and moral truth.”
So many African American women who have contributed to STEM have never been written about until most recent days.
Changing the Equation: 50+ US Black Women in STEM by Tonya Bolden …
https://abramsbooks.com/product/changing-the-equation_9781419707346/
Share the above with others. They may learn something.
AWESOME, Yvonne!!! Thanks for the link!!!
“With us, all of the white race, however high or low, rich or poor, are equal in the eye of the law. Not so with the negro. Subordination is his place.”
Well, I am no Obama fanatic, but Obama has clearly demonstrated his superiority over Trump in cognitive, social and emotional intelligences, and probably physically as well.
Is this the true origin of eugenics? Many do not consider Jews to be white, though I would be hard pressed to understand how, since Jesus was Jewish and is typically depicted as a white man. But no wonder Hitler loved this philosophy. Contrary to these claims, it IS just philosophy, NOT science.
And Adam Smith was wrong, too! We cannot depend on prosperity for the masses by way of “the invisible hand” or “free markets”, when it has been repeatedly demonstrated that without regulated markets, self-interest leads to snake-oil salesmen, like Trump and his phony University (& Foundation, etc.), as well as to the inequitable distribution of wealth and capitalism gone wild.
right on both counts. A market that most people can never dream of participating in can only be called “free” with utter disingenuousness–with a wink, wink and a hearty laugh with the other fat cats. People have swallowed this claptrap about our free markets for far, far too long.
Make the rich return an enormous share of the value of others’ labor appropriated by them.
There you have it. From the horse’s mouth (or whatever other part of the anatomy you care to insert into that metaphor).
Of course, Trump doesn’t know any of this history. This is the guy who had to ask an aide what was commemorated by Pearl Harbor Remembrance Day; the one who thought that back during the Revolutionary War, the Continental Army captured the airports; who said that Frederick Douglass is doing some really great work these days. LOL.
However, Trump’s White Supremacist Propaganda Minister, Stephen “Goebbels” Miller, knows this history, and he gets Trump to dog whistle it all the time.
Next up from the Trump Clown Car Posse: their “merit-based” (i.e., wealth-based”) eugenics for the contemporary era immigration package–one that, btw, would have excluded Miller’s own grandparents.
Might have excluded Trumps parents too. According to Mary Trump, Donald’s mother was a cleaning lady. No degrees.
Would have excluded my mother and her family, who knew no English, had no degrees. No skills either.
Trump hasn’t a clue what this country is about. It’s a nation of immigrants who fled poverty and violence and repression–you know, like those whom he has been locking up at our Southern border. There’s a great interview by Studs Terkel with a longshoreman, in which this dock worker proudly nails it: “Longshoremen,” the guy says, “are the scum of the Earth. America was built by the scum of the Earth.” And what he meant, of course, is that it was built by poor immigrants with little education and no prospects in the Old World who came here to work their tails off make better lives for their sons and daughters. Jefferson was committed to the idea of a “natural aristocracy of talent,” one that eschewed the automatic advancement of people born into privilege, one in which the son of a blacksmith could become president.
It has always been the promise of America that people can come here with nothing and make their way in the world. That is why this country is known as the “land of opportunity.” Sadly, the new money billionaires try to pull up the ladder they climbed behind them rather than share the benefits with those that actually do the work for them. It is also sad we have devolved into a restrictive oligarchy.
“With wisdom, prudence, and statesmanship on the part of our public men, and intelligence, virtue and patriotism on the part of the people, success, to the full measures of our most sanguine hopes, may be looked for.”
So many elected representatives have demonstrated they have neither intelligence, virtue nor patriotism. Perhaps this is one reason why so many women including women of color are going into politics and winning. People are tired of the status quo.
amen
The interesting thing about the symbolic representation of the south is that the purveyors of white supremacy in the Jim Crow period went for the Virginia battle flag. The actual flag of the confederacy was sort of like Texas.
Like so many of the ideas that tried to justify slavery and its child, Jim Crow, the leaders who voiced these ideas looked for symbols that would appeal to the generation in a way that would soften the edge of their harsh reality. In short, they wanted to sell this with good PR. The St. Andrews Cross was an old Scottish symbol that had been appropriated for the Virginia battle flag, and it became the symbol for the “lost cause” of the confederacy.
Symbols are important. Recently someone suggested renaming the Edmund Pettus Bridge for John Lewis. In one way, that is very appealing. Still, the process that has led a couple of generations to see the affair of Bloody Sunday at the bridge as the triumph of the Civil Rights movement has transformed the name of a white supremacist, Pettus, into a symbol for freedom’s encroachment on tyranny. That has an appeal in and of itself. If the St. Andrews Cross can be appropriated as a symbol of white supremacy, is it not a great thing to turn the tables. It seems good either way.
“If the St. Andrews Cross can be appropriated as a symbol of white supremacy, is it not a great thing to turn the tables.”
If the essence of the Civil Rights Movement was/is to reverse matters so as to win the upper hand, then sure. But if the whole point was/is to contribute to advancing the human condition for ALL humans, then, no, it is not a great thing to turn the tables.
Failure to understand so-called white supremacy and such as a system, and the fact that a system, when pushed, will push back, should be a grave concern. Consequences to expect are not fundamentally different from consequences from failure to understand slavery as a system that pushed back and showed up as the Civil War, the Civil Rights Movement, and in other ways.
“If the relation of slavery, as it now exists in the Southern States, is susceptible of defence by the word of God, the relation must be a moral relation. If it is not, it ought to be abandoned. It is to the law and to the testimony we must appeal for the defence and government of every relation in life. If we do not speak and act agreeably thereto, it is because there is no truth in us.
“I will, with all due diligence, and with humble dependence on Divine aid, search the Scriptures with a view to learn what they say and teach, as to this much-litigated question.
[…]
“I have searched the holy Scriptures diligently, in view of this question, and particularly with a view to discover what the truth is with regard to this much-litigated question. I freely admit that I have satisfactorily convinced myself, as to the fact that slavery is, in deed and in truth, a moral relation, and humbly confess that I did not always think to; but searching the Scriptures brought me to a very different conclusion. Any honest man who will prayerfully read the quotations which I have carefully collated and placed on the forgoing pages, will, and must come the same conclusion that I have—that African slavery is a Divine institution.”
From “A Scriptural View of the Moral Relations of African Slavery,” by David Ewart of Columbia, S.C., 1849; Revised and Amended in 1859 (Charleston, S.C.: Walker, Evans & Co., Steam Printers, No. 3 Broad Street. 1859.)
This is a fabulous picture book and so needed during this time of the “dumpster.”
For Beautiful Black Boys Who Believe
in a Better World
With a guide by the Muhammad Ali Center
Written by Michael W. Waters
Illustrated by Keisha Morris
For Beautiful Black Boys Who Believe in a Better World
AVAILABLE SEPTEMBER 2020
Written by Michael W. Waters
Illustrated by Keisha Morris
Available September 2020, For Beautiful Black Boys Who Believe in a Better World tells the story of a boy named Jeremiah and his family who discover hopeful forms of activism and advocacy in response to racism and gun violence in their community.
Click below to access an extended version of the discussion and activity guide that is provided in the book. Written by the Muhammad Ali Center in Louisville, Ky.—a multicultural center and museum committed to promoting respect, hope, and understanding—the guide offers parents and teachers suggestions on how they can talk with children about racism, gun violence, and positive social change.
You can also download a free coloring page featuring artwork from the book. Click the image below to access a printable coloring sheet featuring Jeremiah and his friends.
Click to access 626aae_215ae378861444f692133bc478fefa33.pdf
https://www.flyawaybooks.com/for-beautiful-black-boys
“Dad, what happened?”
“Why are they shooting?”
“What is this vigil for?”
The shootings keep coming, and so do Jeremiah’s questions. Dad doesn’t have easy answers, but that doesn’t mean he won’t talk about it—or that he won’t act. But what if Jeremiah doesn’t want to talk anymore? None of it makes sense, and he’s just a kid. Even if he wants to believe in a better world, is there anything he can do about it?
Inspired by real-life events, this honest, intimate look at one family’s response to racism and gun violence includes a discussion guide created by the Muhammad Ali Center in Louisville, Kentucky, a multicultural center and museum committed to promoting respect, hope, and understanding.
An extended version of the guide and a printable coloring sheet featuring Jeremiah and his friends are available for download at
http://www.flyawaybooks.com/resources.
Reviews
“One of the most important and timely children’s books of the year. . . . Waters’ powerful words and Keisha Morris’ beautiful illustrations give families struggling to come to terms with the systemic racism of American society a way to talk about these extraordinarily challenging issues.”
Thanks for the information, Yvonne. I didn’t know about the Muhammad Ali Center.
Parts of the Cornerstone Speech remind me of Ted Yoho’s comments about AOC: “I cannot apologize for my passion or for loving my God, my family and my country.” Stephens argued that abolitionists were crazy, that containing slavery was “insanity”. He said abolitionists were the ones who should apologize for challenging slaveholders’ rightfully exclusive relationship with God, who created them as a naturally superior race. He said upholding and expanding slavery was patriotic. Only missing were the open misogyny and foul language.
By the way, we have here in Georgia the A. H. Stephens State Park…
https://gastateparks.org/AHStephens/
BYOBC+H? (Bring Your Own Burning Crosses and Hoods)?
Abraham Lincoln only referred to this entity as the “so-called confederacy,” lower case. We should always honor that by using the same term when we have to reference it. Along the same lines that there were no heroes, only traitors, murderous ones at that.
They were the rebs.
First rule of opposition research: never let the opposition choose their own titles and names. Kinda like fight club.
Before there was a confederacy there was the slave trade.
I highly recommend the C-Span lecture of Marcus Rediker Distinguished Professor of History at the University of Pittsburgh. Rediker leads mostly white students in his class to confront the horrible details of being on a slave trip. He enlists their imagination. In a related lecture he speaks of the slave trade as a matter of black, white, and green, with green for the money that slave owners and slave traders made. There is a text version of the lecture but the video version has compelling illustrations of the warehousing of slaves and devices used to intimidate them. https://www.c-span.org/video/?296230-1/slave-trade
And then, of course, yesterday, Arkansas Senator Tom Cotton (who people keep saying will run for president in 2024–ugh!) said that slavery was “a necessary evil.” Charming (that was sarcasm).
https://www.cnn.com/2020/07/27/politics/tom-cotton-slavery-necessary-evil-1619-project/index.html
Senator Cotton also introduced legislation to bar schools from using the 1619 Project about black history. What a fool
His position agrees with Trump who insists that Columbus discovered America and that anyone who thinks otherwise is wrong.
That is so disgusting, it truly gags me in the throat and nauseates my stomach…
Having to fight fascists is a necessary evil and having to wear a face mask in a pandemic is a necessary evil .
I see money as a necessary evil and, according to Thomas Paine, government is a necessary evil.
Slavery is the miserly, lazy man’s excuse for getting someone else to do his work for him without proper remuneration.
Disrespecting people, denying them their rights, exploiting them and treating them like chattel are all pure evils and there’s absolutely nothing necessary about any of that.
Senator Tom Cotton is evil but not necessary. He wants kids to grow up with a false history, like Trump, whose knowledge is limited to Columbus sailed the ocean blue in 1492.
Senator Cotton needs to be…picked–er.,kicked– out of office.
Up to Bob’s 12:29 PM comments above: speaking of Stephen Miller, his grandmother just died of covid-19 related complications. His uncle had reported this to the press.
This part of the Miller family does not support Miller’s views or positions: quite the opposite. (His wife also had covid-19. I am doubting whether she infected his grandmother as I don’t think the Millers were close.) In my readings, Miller has not made a statement regarding his grandmother’s death.
Miller is another heartless, soulless monster..
Learning something new every day. I hope in this enlightened era the “Cornerstone Speech” is required reading in hisch American History.
Likening the “discovery” of the inferiority of blacks to those of Galileo or William Harvey… 😀 😀 !! “V.P.” Stephens would have been seriously chafed to learn we are only 1% genetically differentiated from chimpanzees. (Let alone only 0.1% differentiation among us by environment and external factors, & 0% in core biology/ intelligence.)
Here is a follow up to the original posting , by Howell Cobb, January 1865 https://www.encyclopediavirginia.org/Letter_from_Howell_Cobb_to_James_A_Seddon_January_8_1865
I think that the proposition to make soldiers of our slaves is the most pernicious idea that has been suggested since the war began. It is to me a source of deep mortification and regret to see the name of that good and great man and soldier, General R. E. Lee, given as authority for such a policy…….The day you make soldiers of them is the beginning of the end of the revolution. If slaves will make good soldiers our whole theory of slavery is wrong …..