A reader posted this article, which was published a year ago, and wondered whether Erik Prince and his right wing militia may have infiltrated peaceful demonstrations in order to create violence and discredit them. I have no idea. If the FBI had not been captured and controlled by Trump, it would have kept a close watch but its safe to assume it is not surveilling Betsy DeVos’ brother and his clandestine activities.
WASHINGTON — Erik Prince, the security contractor with close ties to the Trump administration, has in recent years helped recruit former American and British spies for secretive intelligence-gathering operations that included infiltrating Democratic congressional campaigns, labor organizations and other groups considered hostile to the Trump agenda, according to interviews and documents.
One of the former spies, an ex-MI6 officer named Richard Seddon, helped run a 2017 operation to copy files and record conversations in a Michigan office of the American Federation of Teachers, one of the largest teachers’ unions in the nation. Mr. Seddon directed an undercover operative to secretly tape the union’s local leaders and try to gather information that could be made public to damage the organization, documents show.
Using a different alias the next year, the same undercover operative infiltrated the congressional campaign of Abigail Spanberger, then a former C.I.A. officer who went on to win an important House seat in Virginia as a Democrat. The campaign discovered the operative and fired her.
Both operations were run by Project Veritas, a conservative group that has gained attention using hidden cameras and microphones for sting operations on news organizations, Democratic politicians and liberal advocacy groups. Mr. Seddon’s role in the teachers’ union operation — detailed in internal Project Veritas emails that have emerged from the discovery process of a court battle between the group and the union — has not previously been reported, nor has Mr. Prince’s role in recruiting Mr. Seddon for the group’s activities.
Both Project Veritas and Mr. Prince have ties to President Trump’s aides and family. Whether any Trump administration officials or advisers to the president were involved in the operations, even tacitly, is unclear. But the effort is a glimpse of a vigorous private campaign to try to undermine political groups or individuals perceived to be in opposition to Mr. Trump’s agenda.
Mr. Prince, the former head of Blackwater Worldwide and the brother of Education Secretary Betsy DeVos, has at times served as an informal adviser to Trump administration officials. He worked with the former national security adviser Michael T. Flynn during the presidential transition. In 2017, he met with White House and Pentagon officials to pitch a plan to privatize the Afghan war using contractors in lieu of American troops. Jim Mattis, then the defense secretary, rejected the idea.
Mr. Prince appears to have become interested in using former spies to train Project Veritas operatives in espionage tactics sometime during the 2016 presidential campaign. Reaching out to several intelligence veterans — and occasionally using Mr. Seddon to make the pitch — Mr. Prince said he wanted the Project Veritas employees to learn skills like how to recruit sources and how to conduct clandestine recordings, among other surveillance techniques.
James O’Keefe, the head of Project Veritas, declined to answer detailed questions about Mr. Prince, Mr. Seddon and other topics, but he called his group a “proud independent news organization” that is involved in dozens of investigations. He said that numerous sources were coming to the group “providing confidential documents, insights into internal processes and wearing hidden cameras to expose corruption and misconduct.”
“No one tells Project Veritas who or what to investigate,” he said.
A spokesman for Mr. Prince declined to comment. Emails sent to Mr. Seddon went unanswered.
Mr. Prince is under investigation by the Justice Department over whether he lied to a congressional committee examining Russian interference in the 2016 election, and for possible violations of American export laws. Last year, the House Intelligence Committee made a criminal referral to the Justice Department about Mr. Prince, saying he lied about the circumstances of his meeting with a Russian banker in the Seychelles in January 2017.
Once a small operation running on a shoestring budget, Project Veritas in recent years has had a surge in donations from both private donors and conservative foundations. According to its latest publicly available tax filing, Project Veritas received $8.6 million in contributions and grants in 2018. Mr. O’Keefe earned about $387,000.
Last year, the group received a $1 million contribution made through the law firm Alston & Bird, a financial document obtained by The New York Times showed. A spokesman for the firm said that Alston & Bird “has never contributed to Project Veritas on its own behalf, nor is it a client of ours.” The spokesman declined to say on whose behalf the contribution was made.
The financial document also listed the names of others who gave much smaller amounts to Project Veritas last year. Several of them confirmed their donations.
The group has also become intertwined with the political activities of Mr. Trump and his family. The Trump Foundation gave $20,000 to Project Veritas in 2015, the year that Mr. Trump began his bid for the presidency. The next year, during a presidential debate with Hillary Clinton, Mr. Trump claimed without substantiation that videos released by Mr. O’Keefe showed that Mrs. Clinton and President Barack Obama had paid people to incite violence at rallies for Mr. Trump.
In a book published in 2018, Mr. O’Keefe wrote that Mr. Trump years earlier had encouraged him to infiltrate Columbia University and obtain Mr. Obama’s records.
Last month, Project Veritas made public secretly recorded video of a longtime ABC News correspondent who was critical of the network’s political coverage and its emphasis on business considerations over journalism. Many conservatives have gleefully pounced on Project Veritas’s disclosures, including one particularly influential voice: Donald Trump Jr., the president’s eldest son.
The website for Mr. O’Keefe’s coming wedding listed Donald Trump Jr. as an invited guest.
Mr. Prince invited Project Veritas operatives — including Mr. O’Keefe — to his family’s Wyoming ranch for training in 2017, The Intercept reported last year. Mr. O’Keefe and others shared social media photos of taking target practice with guns at the ranch, including one post from Mr. O’Keefe saying that with the training, Project Veritas will be “the next great intelligence agency.” Mr. Prince had hired a former MI6 officer to help train the Project Veritas operatives, The Intercept wrote, but it did not identify the officer.
Mr. Seddon regularly updated Mr. O’Keefe about the operation against the Michigan teachers’ union, according to internal Project Veritas emails, where the language of the group’s leaders is marbled with spy jargon.
They used a code name — LibertyU — for their operative inside the organization, Marisa Jorge, who graduated from Liberty University in Virginia, one of the nation’s largest Christian colleges. Mr. Seddon wrote that Ms. Jorge “copied a great many documents from the file room,” and Mr. O’Keefe bragged that the group would be able to get “a ton more access agents inside the educational establishment.”
The emails refer to other operations, including weekly case updates, along with training activities that involved “operational targeting.” Project Veritas redacted specifics about those operations from the messages.
In August 2017, Ms. Jorge wrote to Mr. Seddon that she had managed to record a local union leader talking about Ms. DeVos and other topics.
“Good stuff,” Mr. Seddon wrote back. “Did you receive the spare camera yet?”
As education secretary, Ms. DeVos has been a vocal critic of teachers’ unions, saying in 2018 that they have a “stranglehold” over politicians at the federal and state levels. She and Mr. Prince grew up in Michigan, where their father made a fortune in the auto parts business.
AFT Michigan sued Project Veritas in federal court, alleging trespassing, eavesdropping and other offenses. The teachers’ union is asking for more than $3 million in damages, accusing the group of being a “vigilante organization which claims to be dedicated to exposing corruption. It is, instead, an entity dedicated to a specific political agenda.”
Project Veritas has said its activities are legal and protected by the First Amendment, and the case is scheduled to go to trial in the fall.
Other Project Veritas employees on the emails include Joe Halderman, an award-winning former television producer who in 2010 pleaded guilty to trying to extort $2 million from the comedian David Letterman. Mr. Halderman was copied on several messages providing updates about the Michigan operation, and in one message, he gave instructions to Ms. Jorge. Project Veritas tax filings list Mr. Halderman as a “project manager.”
Two other employees, Gaz Thomas and Samuel Chamberlain, were also identified in emails and appeared to play important roles in the Michigan operation. Efforts to locate Mr. Thomas were unsuccessful. A man named Samuel Chamberlain who matched the description of the one employed by Mr. O’Keefe denied he worked for Project Veritas. He did not respond to follow-up phone messages or an email.
Last year, Project Veritas submitted a proposed list of witnesses for the trial over the lawsuit. Mr. Chamberlain and Mr. Thomas were on the list. Mr. Seddon was not.
Ms. Jorge, 25, did not respond to email addresses associated with her Liberty University account. In an archived version of her LinkedIn page, Ms. Jorge wrote she had a deep interest in the conservative movement and hoped one day to serve on the Supreme Court after attending law school.
In a YouTube video, Mr. O’Keefe described the lawsuit as “frivolous” and pointed to a portion of the deposition in which David Hecker, the president of AFT Michigan, said that one of the goals of the lawsuit was to “stop Project Veritas from doing the kind of work that it does.”
Randi Weingarten, the president of the American Federation of Teachers, said in a statement: “Let’s be clear who the wrongdoer is here: Project Veritas used a fake intern to lie her way into our Michigan office, to steal documents and to spy — and they got caught. We’re just trying to hold them accountable for this industrial espionage.”
In 2018, Ms. Jorge infiltrated the congressional campaign of Ms. Spanberger, posing as a campaign volunteer. At the time, Ms. Spanberger was running to unseat a sitting Republican congressman in a race both parties considered important for control of the House. Ms. Jorge was eventually exposed and kicked out of the campaign office.
It was unclear whether Mr. Seddon was involved in planning that operation.
Mr. Seddon was a longtime British intelligence officer who served around the world, including in Washington in the years after the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001. He is married to an American diplomat, Alice Seddon, who is serving in the American consulate in Lagos, Nigeria.
Mr. O’Keefe and his group have taken aim at targets over the years including Planned Parenthood, The New York Times, The Washington Post and Democracy Partners, a group that consults with liberal and progressive electoral causes. In 2016, a Project Veritas operative infiltrated Democracy Partners using a fake name and fabricated résumé and made secret recordings of the staff. The year after the sting, Democracy Partners sued Project Veritas, and its lawyers have since deposed Mr. O’Keefe.
In that deposition, Mr. O’Keefe defended the group’s undercover tactics, saying they were part of a long tradition of investigative journalism going back to muckraking reporters like Upton Sinclair. “I’m not ashamed of the methods that we use or the recordings that we use,” he said.
He was asked whether he had provided any of the group’s secret recordings of Democracy Partners to the Republican National Committee or any member of the Trump family. He said that he did not think so.
In 2010, Mr. O’ Keefe and three others pleaded guilty to a federal misdemeanor after admitting they entered a government building in New Orleans under false pretenses as part of a sting.
Kitty Bennett contributed research.
wow if even partially true
On Mon, Jun 8, 2020 at 9:03 AM Diane Ravitch’s blog wrote:
> dianeravitch posted: “A reader posted this article, which was published a > year ago, and wondered whether Erik Prince and his right wing militia may > have infiltrated peaceful demonstrations in order to create violence and > discredit them. I have no idea. If the FBI had not been ” >
“In 2017, he [Erik Prince] met with White House and Pentagon officials to pitch a plan to privatize the Afghan war using contractors in lieu of American troops. Jim Mattis, then the defense secretary, rejected the idea.”
Will defunding and dismantling policing as a public good lead to using private contractors in lieu of citizens committed to upholding peace and justice so as to advance democratic ideals to become ever more practicable?
Do protesters’ growing demands to defund and dismantle police departments amount to quick-fix, reactionary solutions to police brutality, so go too far?
The protesters are not stupid and they’re not demanding any kind of “quick fixes”. They’re not demanding the end of policing “as a public good”. They are demanding the end of policing PERIOD.
The goal of the police/prison abolition movement is to re-imagine world that is not simply about power and control. Where there is not simply a punishment (or series of punishments) for “bad” behavior or behavior we don’t like. What might we do differently if we couldn’t simply lock people up? How would we handle conflict? What would we do proactively to prevent conflict?
That sort of vision requires us to imagine a world in which everyone’s needs are met and everyone feels safe, respected, heard and part of the community. After generations of discord, inequity and injustice, it is no mean feat to achieve such a world and there is no “quick fix”.
It’s a process and no one is saying to dismantle all law and order and let chaos reign. But there are steps to get there, such as funding community groups rather than more police officers to work with conflict within black and brown communities.
Policing, at least as it is currently structured, is inherently racist and classist (the two being inextricably linked). It is set up to protect the property and lives of those in the power structure against those who would upset that structure. Defunding the police is about restructuring that power so that it is shared more equally, so that everyone has a stake in the social contract.
I am quite confident that the protesters will not be fooled by some privatization scheme of faux “reform”. We’ve been down that path far too long now. I’m quite confident that no protester would ever agree to defund the police in exchange for funding something like Blackwater.
In other words, have police act toward non-white people exactly as they treat white people in affluent white communities.
Isn’t that the bottom line? It police treated every single person if they were a white man who was best friends with their white police chief and treat every teenager as if he was a white teenager whose father was best friend with the white police chief? Where the police can’t rough him up and say ‘he deserved it” and have it accepted at face value.
It isn’t brain surgery. It’s simply the way that policing is generally done in middle class white people in suburban mostly white communities. It’s the way police act toward white men marching around with assault weapons! They don’t say, there was a crime on the next block where someone broke a window, so we will be shooting rubber bullets and tear gassing every white marcher in the group over here.
Suburban white professionals commit crimes, too. Police are called out. But they do not use a description of “white man” and aggressively toss down and cuff the nearest white man because he “fits the description”.
It would never occur to me that if a policeman stopped my car for speeding and asked me to show him my license, that I should not reach for my wallet to get it. I would assume I was following his orders. I would not expect to be shot dead for it. And if an affluent white professional was shot dead for responding to a policeman asking him to show him an ID by reaching for his wallet, I am positive that their family would not say “well, it’s his fault for not understanding that means he should NOT reach for the wallet!”
There should be community services in poor areas. But what is incomprehensible is why anyone believes that poor people need to be policed differently than affluent white ones.
It is “no excuses” all over again. The mantra that “those” people are different and need a special kind of policing that white people in suburbs don’t need, just like white students in suburbs don’t need “no excuses”.
Another take on defunding the police: https://jacobinmag.com/2020/06/defund-police-protests-minneapolis-city-council
More: https://jacobinmag.com/2020/06/alex-vitale-police-reform-defund-protests
Maybe it’s just me, but I don’t get the idea of abolishing police departments.
Crime is real, not fictional.
Innocent people get brutalized.
Yes, there must be reform of what police May and May not do.
But if someone breaks into my house with the intent of robbing or harming me, who should I call?
John Oliver explains what it means to defund the police. It does not mean to abolish our police.
These are the same tactics that were employed by the Stasi and other state secret police forces behind the Iron Curtain. Makes the movie The Lives of Others seem Disney-esque in comparison.
If Betsy the Brutal’s brother the Prince was spying on people to benefit Trump, you can take it to the bank that Trump knew and approved. Trump has a long history as a micromanager and that hasn’t changed. But when things Trump approved go wrong, he never knows anything about it. Trump, like all crime lords, learned to keep a buffer between him and the people that do illegal and sneaky things for him.
With Trump, the buck stops anywhere but here.
Over there. Blame him. Blame them.
Blame anyone else for his errors.
In the last few days, I’ve seen lots of photographs of armed riot-control forces, in full military-like gear, in cities around the United States but with neither name tags nor identification. The other odd thing about these is that the men tend to be middle-aged and overweight. Who are these people? Our press needs to answer this question.
“The other odd thing about these is that the men tend to be middle-aged and overweight. Who are these people?”
ANSWER: Trump Clones
“overweight”: This is my biggest pet peeve about American law enforcement. In my small community, virtually all the police–who seem to spend an inordinate amount of time pulling people over for driving while black–are fat and out of shape. As are many of the police around the nation. They drive around all day sitting in their suvs, trolling around to figure out where they’re going to get their free lunches and dinners.
When I worked in Europe driving around in places I had never been, I often stopped at police stations or waved at police to ask for directions when I got lost–something I would never do here. Over there, they are professional, in shape, the very definition of public servants. My favorites were in Spain. Once I got lost and kept driving around in circles and couldn’t find my hotel. I pulled into a police station, where no one spoke English, showed them the address and one of the policeman motioned me to follow him to the hotel. Same thing happened in another city. After coming to the same light for the third time, I saw a police car at the light in front of me. I jumped out of my car, ran up and knocked on his window before the light changed, showed him the address (both of these example were before GPS), and he laughed and motioned me to follow him. All professionals.
I did not mean to slight people who struggle with weight issues. My point was that these people clearly aren’t regular soldiers. They don’t meet the physical requirements of regular service personnel. Did the DOJ hire paramilitary outfits made up of ex-soldiers to show up, without identification, at the protests? Was this part of the big plan for a “law and order” crack down that Trump was signalling during his goose step to a church he didn’t belong to, where he held up a book he’s never read in order to cloak his fascism in the mantle of Christianity? My suspicion is that the fascists around Trump had plans to seize this as their moment and quickly, very quickly, learned what a mistake that was from the appalled reaction nationwide.
When Trump gave his “law and order” speech, I expected that he and his band of fascist thugs were plotting something big and worried that they might stage truly egregious false flag operations around the country–ones calculated to create a public demand for a major crackdown, using agents provocateurs. These people are capable of anything. They are completely amoral.
Never thought of policing as a huge boondoggle; but maybe it is welfare for white dudes.
https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2020/06/05/protests-washington-dc-federal-agents-law-enforcement-302551
That article, jcgrim, is astonishing. So, there has been the same proliferation of police forces as there has been of intelligence agencies.
After reading that Political piece, it is apparent that Trump and his ass-kissing, totally corrupt, and fascist administration (he had to fire a lot of people to get there) think of these many different federal police agencies as their heavily armed, undertrained, undereducated private army.
I expect Trump to use them when he makes his move to take over the government, and then it will be the DOD (Army, Navy, Airforce, Marines, and Coast Guard) vs Trump’s MAGA Army. Will these troops wear a flag patch with Trump’s name emblazoned name spread across the stars and stripes?
Imagine Trump’s MAGA Army battling the Marine Corp led by General Mattis. Who do you think will win that one while Trump cowers in a bunker somewhere, another cowardly bully like Saddam Hussein hiding in a hole?
It turns out that these are largely riot police from the Bureau of Prisons and Border Police, but there are hundreds of obscure federal police units that they can be drawn from, such as the National Gallery of Art police (lol).