Valerie Strauss writes here about an important new book about the Koch Empire and its desire to eliminate and privatize public schools. The book is “Kochland: The Secret History of Koch Industries and Corporate Power in America,” by Christopher Leonard.
Strauss writes:
The focus on K-12 education follows long involvement by the Koch brothers in higher education. As leaders of a conservative movement that believes U.S. higher education is controlled by liberals who indoctrinate young people, they spent as much as an estimated $100 million on programs at hundreds of colleges and universities that support their views…
In June, two Koch-related education initiatives were announced. One is a group called “Yes Every Kid,” which, its creators say, will bring together partisans in the education labor and funding debates to try to find solutions. The other is a project called 4.0 that commits the Charles Koch Foundation and the Walton Family Foundation to pledge $5 million each — along with $5 million from other donors — to support, according to a statement, “600 education entrepreneurs in incubating, testing and launching innovative approaches to education.” (The Walton foundation has long supported charter schools and other parts of the school choice movement.)
one thing is certain: the efforts of the Koch Foundation and the Walton Family Foundation are not doing it “for the kids.” By now, it a fact that kids in charters do not outperform their peers in public schools, and kidsin voucher schools get worse scores than their peers in public schools.
What do the billionaires want? Lower taxes. No unions. Powerless teachers. A free market where government has no role, and families compete for resources. The rich get richer, the poor get poorer, just like the economy. What we know about the market is that it produces a few winners and many losers. It does not produce equal educational opportunity.

. . . at its core, it’s also about the control of curriculum. . . . If you can get at kids’ thinking early-on, by either omission or commission, you can have massive control over the social and cultural order for generations. And that control includes eliminating or robotizing teachers by any means possible. CBK
LikeLiked by 1 person
scary to read this just after watching a PBS documentary on dictators — learning how Mussolini, Hitler and others rose up to take on such overwhelming power: controlling the school message is a crucial part of it
LikeLike
“The Koch network is the influential assemblage of groups funded by billionaire industrialist Charles Koch and more than 600 wealthy individuals who share his pro-business, anti-regulation view of economics and positions on social policy, such as climate change denial.”
The Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) is a charter member of the Koch Network.
Of course, MIT is also a charter member of the Jeffrey Epstein Network, an assemblage of groups funded by trafficker of young girls, Jeffrey Epstein.
One can only wonder what other “distinguished” networks MIT belongs to.
The El Chapo network?
LikeLike
“How MIT whitewashed the climate change denialism of a major donor, David Koch”
https://www.latimes.com/business/story/2019-08-26/how-mit-whitewashed-david-koch
With MIT, silence is not a bug. It’s feature.
This is supposed to be one of our nation’s premier scientific institutions?
What a joke.
LikeLike
Silence ain’t Science
MIT is silent
On this and that and other
Inaction that is violent
To sister and to brother
They’re silent on the Epsteins
And silent on the Kochs
The trafficking of preteens
And poisoning of folks
LikeLike
They’re silent on the princes
Dismembering Khashoggis
Officials sit on fences
And puff upon their stogies
LikeLike
There is a problem with private universities in this regard. They depend on funding, and the funds are coming from rich conservative people.
Are students silent there too?
LikeLike
Mate Funny you should mention it. . . . CBK
LikeLike
The students have no control over funding and there is actually no excuse for MIT taking money from Epstein, Koch brothers or the Crown Prince of Saudi Arabia who had the journalist murdered.
But if MIT wants to take money from such people, at the very least, they should be transparent about it
Actively hiding where the money is coming from is completely antithetical to science and makes people rightly question the published results of research funded by such individuals. Who in his or her right mind would believe results of research on climate change funded by the Koch’s?
The Epstein funding was just the tip of the slimeberg for MIT but nonetheless gave the public a window on what goes on there.
MIT officials obviously believe that if they remain silent long enough, the public will simply forget all about Epstein.
I think they may be in for a rude awakening.
LikeLike
I should have said hiding where funding cones from makes one question ALL results because one does not know whether it might have been funded by climate change denier a like Koch’s.
LikeLike
This is the primary damage: we start questioning university research in anything. Who can we trust then?
LikeLike
Secrecy iof all types (including funding) s inimical to all science.
Transparency is absolutely critical.
One would think a scientific “institute” would understand that.
But they don’t and the damage they have suffered to their reputation and credibility as a result is deserved, in my opinion.
There are lots of public research institutions that are just as good as MIT which don’t hide their funding sources.
And if MIT wants to continue to hide their private funding sources, fine. But in that case, we should yank all the hundreds of millions they get in Federal funding each year.
LikeLike
Some might say that “funding sources don’t matter in science”.
While in theory that is true, since science is about replication of results, in practice it does matter because in many cases, replicating research results requires millions of dollars and universities like MIT often get a pass on the normal replication process based on their reputation. Sometimes (as in the case of exaggerated or even fraudulent claims by the MIT Media Lab) giving them a pass is a big mistake.
https://www.the-scientist.com/news-opinion/new-woes-for-mit-media-lab-66485
LikeLike
What do the billionaires want?
“They want it all”
The wealthy want it all
A third or half won’t do
The wealthy want the Fall
And other seasons too
The wealthy want the land
And want the seven seas
They even do demand
The flowers, birds and bees
The wealthy will not rest
Until the earth is theirs
And manage to bequest
The planet to their heirs
(Whatever is left after their ravages)
LikeLike
The wealthy want the girls
And planes and islands too
The wealthy want the worlds
Where they are free to screw
LikeLike
If wealthy had a rocket
And means to conquer Mars
They’d put it in their pocket
And move to take the stars
LikeLike
If you haven’t already seen it, watch “Dark Money”: https://www.amazon.com/Dark-Money-John-S-Adams/dp/B07J2TV1DD/ref=sr_1_1?keywords=dark+money+movie&qid=1571364512&sr=8-1 (sorry for the amazon link – it’s free with Prime. I believe it’s also on Netflix, but that’s not any better.)
What infuriated me in that movie is how much time and effort and resources it took to go after one state legislator. Fortunately, they were ultimately successful even though they encountered every possible roadblock. But there are hundreds, if not thousands more legislators and judges/justices that are doing the same thing. We the people simply don’t have the resources to fight every one of them.
LikeLike
“We the people simply don’t have the resources to fight every one of them.”
I agree. Which is why it was so important to appoint Supreme Court Justices to repeal Citizens United. It would still be a huge fight even with the repeal of Citizens United, but at least we would be making it easier for the people in the trenches fighting this.
LikeLike
Please. Do you think Kagan would vote against Citizens? Would Merrick Garland, had he made it to the court? Pfft. Hillary’s nominee’s would have been just as neoliberal as those two.
LikeLike
“But there are hundreds, if not thousands more legislators and judges/justices that are doing the same thing. ”
But there are over 300 million of us. Times are changing and the US won’t go back to the times where 300 million serves a few thousand.
LikeLike
I just watched Dark Money. Wow. I hate horror films, and this one is worse than any other in the genre.
It’s “free” on Amazon Prime and it’s not on Netflix.
LikeLike
Reblogged this on Crazy Normal – the Classroom Exposé and commented:
Now that David Koch is dead, Charles Koch and his son continue the war to destroy the Constitutional Republic of the United States with a focus on OUR public schools.
LikeLike
Koch Goals
Planetary destruction
Nothing less will do
National disruption
Just a running through
LikeLike
Just another part of the XLV-GOP-Broad-Koch-Walton plan to Make America “Great” Again by Destroying Everything America Ever Stood For
LikeLike
Well said.
LikeLike
Make America Gated Again (like it was back in the Age of Robber Baron’s)
LikeLike
Make America Gated Again
Make America Gated
Like Gated Age of yore
Make the rich elated
That Gates is safe, for sure
LikeLike
The Gated Age
The Guilded Age
Was full of gates
But Gated Age
Is full of Gates’
LikeLike
“kids in voucher schools get worse scores than their peers in public schools.”
To the best of my ability, I don’t cite research that uses test scores to validate or condemn a public policy. But it’s pervasive in education research.
LikeLike
“U.S. higher education is controlled by liberals who indoctrinate young people”
Well, higher ed is expected to give direction for the future, and the future is in the oppsite direction from libertalianism.
LikeLike
Now THAT is a proposition worth debating. The libertarian approach was the fundamental philosophy of the USA until Woodrow Wilson and Roosevelt when progressivism took hold and took over. It could be argued that progressivism has become irrational, especially in its green fringe. There is a deep libertarian component in the psyches of Americans. Perhaps the future is less progressive than it has been, and desirably so. Probably why Trump won the 2016 election, and did so legitimately because progressivism’s candidate was Hillary’s flaccid, corrupt progressivism. And for 2020, the Democrats seem hardly able to offer anyone better. Koch and DeVos are just part of the libertarian backlash against socialism. Even China had to discard Mao to save itself. And I believe that Trump will have to crush the Democrats soundly to save America. Thanks for framing the question historically and philosophically rather than emotionally and politically.
LikeLike
FDR and his New Deal made America Great and created a great middle class.
LikeLike
Well, FDR’s history is complex and many aspects are highly problematic as detailed here. https://truthout.org/articles/disrupting-the-myth-of-franklin-d-roosevelt-in-the-age-of-trump-sanders-and-clinton/
LikeLike
Mao was simply a dictator. Neither liberal, nor progressive.
Progressive means progress with the times. Libertarians are not progressing with the times, they want to turn back to the times when a few chosen people ruled the brainwashed, submissive or frightened masses. Not going to happen again. The world way passed those times.
LikeLike
Ah, the rich irony of this running in the WaPo, owned by Bezos. Of course we all know the plan is for digital, surveillance education that will live on AWS. He has the last laugh on all of us. We need a structural analysis of the problem, which is that education is being remade to serve an economy that doesn’t really need that many people anymore. Carnegie remade it for the factory, and Carnegie is remaking it again for the factories to be run by the robots (and the globalized platform service work). The 4th Industrial Revolution overlords want cheap parts for re-skilling and the rest of society will be triaged early as raw material for social impact investments. To make it about Koch is very much missing the point.
LikeLike
No, it is not ironic that Valerie Strauss wrote about the Koch plan to eliminate public schools. She has been a champion for the Resistance to disruption, DeVos, the Koch’s, Arne Duncan etc for years. The irony is that the WaPo leaves her alone.
LikeLike
Right….
LikeLike
They will leave her alone until she criticizes Bezos’.
Then they will have her writing obituaries, including her own (metaphorically speaking, of course)
LikeLike
You can mess with Koch
But never mess with Jeff
And never mess with Pepsi
Cuz Pepsi is the best
LikeLike
“Carnegie is remaking it again”
Now that you say this, I realized that many universities are shooting for what they call “research status 1” or R1 status and this is tied to the Carnegie foundation. R1 institutions get much more public funding. In fact, how much research funding an institution gets from public funds is still the basis of this classification.
In other words, if you get enough public funds in the form of grants, you get classified as R1 and as a result you get even more funds but now automatically, not just from grants.
Prior to the 2000 edition, the Carnegie Foundation categorized doctorate-granting institutions according to the amount of federal funding they received. The 2005 edition categorizes doctoral-institutions according to their research support but uses a more complex formula than used in previous editions. Despite the fact that it is no longer used by the Carnegie Foundation, the descriptor Research I is still commonly used in reference to universities with the largest research budgets, often by the institutions themselves in their promotional materials.
It’s all about $. I see nowhere in the descriptions any mention of quality of education and research. One of the highly questionable ways the Carnegie foundation advises (and hence evaluates) research is
** 4. We cannot improve at scale what we cannot measure. **Scale-up of a practice in the research field means to implement it with fidelity in new settings, but improvement science focuses on the integration of what is learned from studying implementation within a setting.[7] Measurements are used to collect data prior to implementation to learn about the current system, about participants needs (both social and psychological), and establish baseline data to aid in measuring impact once improvement efforts begin. Then the organization needs a system in place to study processes and provide feedback in order to learn about and from improvement efforts, tailor them to participant needs, and test the practical theory of improvement.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carnegie_Foundation_for_the_Advancement_of_Teaching
On the wikipedia page for Carnegie classification, I even see
Information used in these classifications comes primarily from IPEDS and the College Board.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carnegie_Classification_of_Institutions_of_Higher_Education#General_description
LikeLike
ETS (Educational Testing Service, standardzed test giant, owner of TOEFL, GRE, among others) is also the Carnegie Foundation’s child.
LikeLike
This recent post regarding the makeover of higher ed for re-skilling and human capital impact investing may be of interest. https://wrenchinthegears.com/2019/10/09/has-the-chamber-of-commerce-hijacked-your-education-system-engineering-students-for-a-low-wage-gig-economy/
LikeLike
Grrr.
Testimony given by former Ohio Senator Ralph Regula on the High Skills Competitive Workforce Act of 1991, stated that “Business knows what sort of formal education is best and what would help their employees and their profit margins, and I think if this is to be successful, the business and industrial community needs to be very much a part of shaping a final package.”
LikeLike
Trump is what happens when business is all there is to it. CBK
LikeLike
This may be of interest re the shift in higher ed to re-skilling. I think the R1 are set up to train the overlords. https://wrenchinthegears.com/2019/10/09/has-the-chamber-of-commerce-hijacked-your-education-system-engineering-students-for-a-low-wage-gig-economy/
LikeLike
That’s my guess too.
LikeLike
We really need to make sure no one is really looking into SoftBank’s robot teachers. That might actually wake people up to the fact that this is about transnational global capital using the poor as data commodities for futures trading. Yet I understand why it is serves the purpose of certain interests to attempt to make this “reimagining” education a partisan enterprise. If people believe this is about the Koch brothers they are clearly missing the larger global picture.
LikeLike
The Slave Owning Society that once held its sway in the USA never dies, it but changes its dress, its disguises, and its PR slogans from time to time. Today it parades about under the flag of Libertarianism a la Koch & Walton. Anyone who dreams that has anything to with the Freedom of anyone but Koch & Walton &c. to do anything but die in the gutter is just the sort of blithering idiot who thinks Koch is the Real Thing.
LikeLike
Sometimes subjugation takes unexpected forms. Would be interested in your thoughts here. https://wrenchinthegears.com/2019/01/26/could-community-schools-be-todays-sugar-refineries/
LikeLike