Jan Resseger analyzes a new study by Sean Reardon of Stanford University that demonstrates what has been widely known for decades: Schools alone don’t cure poverty.
Those who insist that they do are either uninformed, selling something (TFA founder Wendy Kopp has claimed that inexperienced teachers can overcome poverty and close achievement gaps caused by poverty), or just don’t want to pay taxes to provide the resources schools need (think the Koch brothers, the Waltons, the DeVos Family, or other billionaires).
She begins:
Here is the succinct conclusion of a complex, technical, and nuanced report released on Monday by Stanford University’s Sean Reardon and a team of researchers, Is Separate Still Unequal? New Evidence on School Segregation and Racial Academic Achievement Gaps: “We use 8 years of data from all public school districts in the U.S. We find that racial school segregation is strongly associated with the magnitude of achievement gaps in 3rd grade, and with the rate at which gaps grow from third to eighth grade. The association of racial segregation with achievement gaps is completely accounted for by racial differences in school poverty: racial segregation appears to be harmful because it concentrates minority students in high-poverty schools, which are, on average, less effective than lower poverty schools… We find that the effects of school poverty do not appear to be explained by differences in the set of measurable teacher or school characteristics available to us.”
In the report, Reardon defines academic test score gaps: “We examine racial test score gaps because they reflect racial differences in access to educational opportunities. By ‘educational opportunities,’ we mean all experiences in a child’s life, from birth onward, that provide opportunities for her to learn, including experiences in children’s homes, child care settings, neighborhoods, peer groups, and their schools. This implies that test score gaps may result from unequal opportunities either in or out of school; they are not necessarily the result of differences in school quality, resources, or experience. Moreover, in saying that test score gaps reflect differences in opportunities, we also mean that they are not the result of innate group differences in cognitive skills or other genetic endowments… (D)ifferences in average scores should be understood as reflecting opportunity gaps….”
“In sum, our analyses provide evidence that racial school segregation is closely linked to racial inequality in academic performance. This implies that segregation creates unequal educational opportunities. Although our analyses do not identify the specific mechanisms through which segregation leads to inequality, they make it clear that the mechanism is linked to differences in schools’ poverty rates, not differences in schools’ racial composition.”
In their review of the academic literature, Reardon and his colleagues emphasize the importance of studies which have demonstrated the importance of public policy that would invest more in schools serving poor children and in making state funding formulas more equitable. But they conclude finally: “(W)e have no example of a school district where minority students disproportionately attend high poverty schools that does not have a large racial achievement gap. If it were possible to create equal educational opportunity under conditions of segregation and economic inequality, some community—among the thousands of districts in the country—would have done so… If we are serious about reducing racial inequality in educational opportunity, then, we must address racial segregation among schools.”
I am pleased to see Reardon so clearly describe the realities his research exposes, but I am frankly concerned that—in a society his own 2011 research demonstrates is rapidly resegregating economically as families with means move farther and farther into the exurbs—it will be politically difficult to address the concerns his research uncovers.
What is certain is that this new research confirms what many have believed is a catastrophic mistake in two-decades of “accountability-based school reform.” This is the test-and-punish regime imposed at the federal level by the 2002 No Child Left Behind Act, followed by programs like Race to the Top and policies adopted across the states to punish teachers who were supposed to work harder and smarter to close achievement gaps or their schools would be punished.

So they can’t identify what specific mechanisms are driving “achievement gaps” (what they call “racial inequality in academic performance”). But they can say that whatever those mechanisms are, they correlate to poverty, not the “racial composition” of schools. So the solution is . . . to the racial composition of schools? Not following that logic. Seems like given these predicates, the solution should be to fix poverty.
LikeLike
to “change” the racial composition of schools, meant to type.
LikeLike
Bear in mind that I only read Diane’s post, not Resseger’s summary, and most certainly not Reardon et al.’s study.
LikeLike
“Schools alone don’t cure poverty.” KEY WORD: **Alone Families and schools are basic institutions in a civilized culture. We can only wonder what it would be like if we all weren’t already basking in the benefits that flow from what schools do to diminish the negative effects of poverty that accompany each child that comes into the classroom or, for that matter, to enhance the positive.
Also, what often gets lost in this kind of discussion is the importance of parents’ education–and by inference, the much-overlooked adult education system in the U.S. and other countries. If anything can help to make MORE of a difference in the child’s life (and in what they bring to the classroom), it’s the support of that AE system, as well as the support of school-to-family communications. CBK
The other suspect word in the report is measurable. CBK
LikeLiked by 1 person
I found Resseger’s summary confusing, but I found a research summary on-line that made more sense for me considering my own experiences working with poor minority ELLs in an integrated setting. Poor students derive tremendous benefit from attending a well resourced, supportive school. This is not a surprise to me since I saw many poor ELLs go to college and get middle class jobs after attending integrated schools. This report confirms that separate is never equal, and our funding system ensures that mostly poor minority majority schools have lower budgets, larger classes and fewer resources. Integrated schools provide greater opportunities for minority students, and this is no surprise to me. The difference now is that Stanford had created an “opportunity index” based on student learning rates in many districts.https://ed.stanford.edu/news/new-evidence-shows-school-segregation-leads-racial-achievement-gap-it-school-poverty-not-racial
LikeLike
BTW, some of the funding for this study came from the Gates Foundation.
LikeLike
Thanks for that link, retired teacher. It was a little clearer. And yet, this—“The data have also shown that students’ early test scores do not predict academic growth over time, indicating that poverty does not determine the effectiveness of a school”—sounded contrary to other statements. “Do not predict academic growth” was linked to a summary of a sub-analysis, which was helpful. Still I don’t really get it. I think what they’re saying is there are a few districts where growth rate is way above average despite similar concentration of poor minority children, so there’s something to be learned from them. But then, doesn’t that mean that it is the schools, not the segregation? Count me confused.
LikeLike
Poor ELLs are not subjected to the debilitating effects of generational poverty and dependence. Poor ELLs also tend to have intact family units. When poverty is a way of life, and family dysfunction is the norm, expectations are diminished, the incentive to use education as a way out is squashed, and the most debilitating human emotion takes over: hopelessness.
LikeLike
I agree that poor ELLs look at what we have and see lots of opportunity compared to what they left. As far as the intact families go, it is a mix of nuclear families and single moms. Many of the single parents often have a grandmother in the home. I’ve had a few students wind up in jail as well, but over all immigrants tend to be aspirational.
LikeLike
The mere fact that we have segregated schools says we treat certain populations differently. Otherwise, why have segregated schools? Eliminating segregated schools is an attempt to address the wider societal prejudice. It is much harder to look down on a neighbor with whom you live and work on an equitable basis.
Humans do seem to need some sort of pecking order since we seem to create them in almost all aspects of our lives. In a sense, we are rolling that fickle boulder up the hill only to have it tumble down again. Most older people would say we have made progress. Younger people now have a different baseline. I hope they can continue to push that boulder; each succeeding generation has its own mountains to tackle.
LikeLike
The practice of redlining in the real estate industry, which subtly continues despite it being illegal, is part of the problem. Market forces play a part too as people tend to live where they can afford. These forces often contribute to pockets of one type of people living in certain neighborhoods versus others.
LikeLike
Redlining, blockbusting must be dealt with, although it is hard to find legal ways to deal with blockbusting on the one hand and gentrification on another hand. A lot still depends on people’s perception of the “others”, not just on unscrupulous banks and real-estate agents. But busing is not an option, I always have thought and still think it is a bad idea, which directly clashes with the concept of local school, catchment area and stuff like that.
LikeLike
As Michael Moore has points out in one of his documentaries, in Finland, it is illegal to establish a private school that gets funding from the nonpublic sector and that charges tuition, and so, in general, wealthy people must send their kids to the same schools that less wealthy kids attend, and so they must care about the quality of those schools.
LikeLike
Our country is on such a wrong track. Privatization promotes separate experiences for different types of students, often along racial and socioeconomic lines. We also should stop believing that standardized testing produces anything worthwhile. Integration is far more helpful to poor students. High stakes testing just beats these students down more. Many people can lead productive lives and have decent careers without the SAT or the CCSS tests.
LikeLiked by 1 person
We need schools of equal quality for all students, and we need wraparound services for poor kids sufficient to compensate for their high-poverty environments and the attendant ills of those. And this has nothing to do with race. One finds the same issues in poor inner-city neighborhoods and in poor rural communities, among blacks and whites.
These people who thought that they could “fix the education problem” with tests are simply idiots. Imagine. A kid is hungry. His single Mom is addicted to opioids. His Mom’s boyfriend is deals meth for a motorcycle gang. No one at home ever knows whether the rent or the electric bill will be paid this month. The adults around the kid solve issues with violence. He’s grown up being hit and yelled at a lot. And you are going to change this kid’s future by testing him more? Anyone who thinks such a thing is clueless. Utterly clueless.
LikeLike
So true! Instead of trying to rate and rank, we need to offer appropriate supports and well resourced schools that will provide equity, not judgment. Scores are more about having a vehicle to justify privatizing than helping students. Our policies are a disgrace.
LikeLike
“Imagine. A kid is hungry. His single Mom is addicted to opioids. His Mom’s boyfriend is deals meth for a motorcycle gang.” — Or: “Imagine. A kid is hungry, because his family just came from a poor South-Asian country. His mom works two shifts, his dad works three shifts, they get help from the community, they manage to find an apartment close to a learning center, they buy one chicken and prepare it for the whole week and eat all the parts, they feed the kid, they sign him into a prep pre-K center, he gets into a gifted program, dad learns English and gets a better job… and this is how the kid finally gets into Stuy.”
LikeLike
Do you have a point?
LikeLike
The child does not choose to be born into generational poverty, among people with no hope. But we choose whether to provide equitable opportunity and environments for every child OR tax breaks for C-level managers of healthcare RICOs so they can repave the tarmac on the heliport for their hunting lodges in Montana.
LikeLike
You can infer a whole bunch of points from my diatribe. Like, narcs should not be allowed to procreate. Or, social services should do their job better, pulling children out of the hands of their abject parents and putting them into boarding houses having, among all, decent school. It is not the task of a regular local school to deal with all these issues. Instead, these issues must be caught earlier and handled by respective services, which are supposed to exist and work in a functioning society. One cannot require from regular local public schools to handle poverty, drugs, violence, inability to speak English, etc. There are other services that should deal with this. A regular school is meant to teach regular children with two arms, two legs, decent-working brain and well-fed. In a normal society most kids should be like this. The sheer breadth of problems that schools are dealing with means that our society is not normal, but then again, schools are only providing education, they do not provide bed, breakfast and therapy. Wealthy parents are fleeing public schools because instead of doing their primary job – teaching their children using decent curricula and having knowledgeable teachers – they are burdened with social tasks, leaving education on the sidelines.
LikeLike
Just curious. Does BA stand for what it did in the A Team?
LikeLike
Ed Deformers sold Americans a lie: problems like “the achievement gap” and low rankings of American students on international tests were due to “the tyranny of low expectations.” Create higher expectations, in the form of national “standards” and standardized testing and school grading and VAM, and achievement gaps would disappear, and America’s standing on international tests would soar.
Well, here we are, an entire generation into the NCLB era, and NONE OF THIS HAS HAPPENED. By its own measures, test scores, Ed Deform has UTTERLY FAILED.
It’s time to tell our politicians and education decision makers as clearly as possible that IT’S THE POVERTY, STUPID. So, reports like this one are extremely important.
LikeLiked by 1 person
somehow we still cannot for the life of us find politicians running on this exact criteria: NCLB et al have utterly — and devastatingly — failed
LikeLike
This will happen if or when the large teacher’s unions start making opposition to the standardized testing a major thrust of their operations. It’s long past time that that happened.
LikeLike
It was obvious from the beginning, that 100% proficiency by 2014 (or by 2124, does not matter) had no touch with reality. It was pure PR for dummies.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes. It was absurd, wasn’t it? Where were the schools going to come from to replace those that were not achieving AYP toward that ridiculous goal? Well, former Secretary of Education, gambler, and expert on morals Bill Bennett had an online alternative for those kids–his company K12. So sick and crooked.
LikeLike
Lack of evidence does not stop the wealthy “forced march” over our public schools. They just continue to buy the people at the top in order to impose privatization on those at the bottom.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Quelle etonnant! Hopefully, others besides the choir will read this report.
Thank you Sean, Jan & Diane.
LikeLike
Here is another study titled Miseducation, a title that is troublesome because it seems to be blaming educators for much beyond their ability to control. The Miseducation study, by some of the same authors, uses many of the same data bases.
It is of course regretable that test scores in grades 3-8 and only in ELA and math dominate so much educational research, including the study that Jan Resseger discusses.
For the related study “Miseducation” with Sean Reardon one of the key authors, see https://projects.propublica.org/miseducation/
The bottom line seems to be this: Money matters and in a thousand ways that perpetuate poverty in tandem with intentional racial segregation including redlining of real estate. A current version of redlining is enabled by billionaire supporters of GreatSchools.org, a website designed to market schools based on a convoluted system of ratings and data-gathering, including race/thnicity of students and recently, measures of “school climate.” All of the data at the website is available for lease, for a fee. Zillow is a major buyer of the data.
LikeLike
There are many pieces to the puzzle when it comes to fixing poverty. What is significant is that it is a long term project. The real question is what do we do today to adapt the system of education to meet the needs of all students.
The problem is systemic and the solution is to change the system design to assure all students are well served.
To accomplish this we must accept the reality that poverty is under a large umbrella. When poverty leads to childhood stress, the process of learning becomes difficult. However, when a child in poverty is protected from those roadblocks, the learning process is not affected.
When the student enters the classroom, the teacher has no idea whether or not the child is affected. Nor can they wait for months for a big test. They need immediate information to sufficiently pdevelop a proper plan for the student. The big test is useless. However, a small pre test would give the teacher a head start to properly service the student
With this information, teachers will realize all children are different and have different needs. And plan accordingly.
This takes systemic change. Public Schools: Change or Perish!
LikeLike
Ending poverty. How? It’s not obvious to me.
LikeLike
Obvious? The only thing that is obvious is that the richest country in the world ought to be able to do a better job. There are people who have spent their lives working on various issues associated with poverty who probably have some good ideas of steps we could take. I’m guessing that the real sticking point would be funding and how it would be distributed.
LikeLike
Reblogged this on David R. Taylor-Thoughts on Education.
LikeLike