Rhode Island Officials—Governor Gina Raimondo and State Commissioner Angelica Infante-Green—are looking at the expansion of the no-excuses Achievement First Charter chain as part of the “solution” to the low-scoring Providence public school district.
Achievement First is a national charter chain known for high test scores, high suspension rates, and high teacher turnover. It was launched in Connecticut, funded in large part by Jonathan Sackler of Purdue Pharma, the opioid king, and significant contributions by hedge fund managers and philanthropists.
Let’s do the math.
Providence public schools enroll nearly 24,000 students. Two-thirds are Hispanic, 9% are white, 79% are low-income. Achievement First reports similar demographics in its two schools in Providence.
With now three schools in the state since opening in the 2013-2014 school year, Achievement First cites that the Rhode Island Department of Education in 2016 gave approval to Achievement First to grow to a high school — and add an additional K-8, giving Achievement First the ability to serve 3112 students — up from the current 1150 students in Providence and Cranston.
AF has 464 students in itselementary school, and 201 in its middle school in Providence. That was last year (2018-19), so the numbers might be higher this year.
So here is the question: If Achievement First expands by adding another elementary school and a high school, if its enrollment grows to serve a total of 3112 in two Rhode Island cities, how exactly does that uplift the Providence school district?
Suppose AF grows from its current enrollment of about 700 in Providence. Suppose it doubles its enrollment to 1,500 in Providence. That’s less that 10% of the students in the city.
What about the other 93% of the students?
What plans do the Governor and the State Commissioner have for them?
How does it transform Providence if a charter chain withdraws the students it wants and the funding for them from the struggling public schools?
To learn more about this charter chain, read this 2017 study from Yale. Thisstudy of Achievement First in Connecticut and New York says that its schools are highly segregated and get remarkably high test scores, but do so with a heavily white teaching staff strictly disciplining Black and Hispanic students, and with unusually high teacher turnover. The study is titled, “Achievement First, Children Second?” and suggests that AF’s strict discipline “may harm student development.”
AF likes to boast that if its schools can achieve great test scores, so can all schools. One way to test the proposition would be to turn an entire district over to AF. One candidate would be Central Falls, Rhode Island, the smallest urban district in Rhode Island, which registered the lowest test scores in the state. There are only 2,657 students in the whole district. Since the state is taking over Central Falls, why not invite Achievement First to demonstrate what it can do with an entire district, every single child…no exclusions, no cherry-picking. This would be a valuable lesson for all of us.

Schools Should Do Away With English-Only Policies and Racist Dress Codes
https://truthout.org/articles/schools-should-do-away-with-english-only-policies-and-racist-dress-codes/?eType=EmailBlastContent&eId=3dcdb664-639c-4899-9f18-42da82ab6ec1
LikeLiked by 1 person
Agreed. English only polices are racist and xenophobic at their core.
Six European countries, Austria, Denmark, France, Belgium, Latvia, and Bulgaria, have outlawed wearing of burqas in schools.
LikeLike
Thank you for posting the Truth Out op-ed. I have given it to my school admin to try to do away with our racist, sexist dress code. Wish us luck!
LikeLike
Yes. Charter chains are the worst, but all schools need to start being far more tolerant and inclusive, and far less punitive.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Achievement type districts never work because they are looking for easy “miracle” solutions to complex problems. They never bring in educators to guide change. They bring business types the are clueless about education. In ‘Forbes” Peter Greene explains why they never work. https://www.forbes.com/sites/petergreene/2019/05/28/five-reasons-school-takeovers-fail/#574240f11955
LikeLiked by 1 person
crucial line: THEY NEVER BRING IN EDUCATORS TO GUIDE CHANGE. Sadly this line is true in more and more districts across the nation.
LikeLike
My school in Los Angeles is currently having a dispute between students/parents and staff about the dress code. We’re assigning detention for wearing head scarves, for example. Racist. Curiously, the strict dress code camp is also the computerized, standardized test prep camp, and the clothing style as a civil rights issue camp is also the anti-test prep group. We will prevail soon enough. All these issues are interrelated, liberal versus conservative. Dress codes and English only policies benefit conservative ideologues, not students. And charter (contract) schools and testing are NOT liberal.
LikeLike
The “Colonial Model” is well and alive.
LikeLike
It’s up at Oped. https://www.opednews.com/Quicklink/Note-to-Rhode-Island-Offic-in-General_News-Charter-School-Failure_Education-For-All_Education-Funding_Educational-Crisis-190915-905.html
LikeLike
It astonishes me that the cherry picking by charters is ignored.
There is only one question to ask Governor Gina Raimondo and State Commissioner Angelica Infante-Green:
If you want to establish a new school that takes kids by lottery, demands that the students and their parents follow every rule set out for them, and kicks them out if they struggle, then why would they give that franchise to a private entity and not simply establish a public magnet school that does this so that the profits from teaching kids who are least expensive to teach stay in the public education system instead of going out to people you want to reward?
Gina Ramondo should have to go on record saying that she rejects the notion that any public school that cherry picks kids should exist and only private charter operators who she likes should be awarded that franchise to teach the most motivated kids because she wants them to get the profits.
It might make the most motivated parents who would use that charter school think about it. They should be organized and asked “do you want rich white folks coming in and telling you that your kid needs to obey your orders and you are never allowed to ask any questions or do you want a new PUBLIC magnet school for only the most motivated families where kids with any behavior or academic issues are not present? The magnet school respects your family and the charter school believes your only job is to do whatever they order you to do and be obligated to promote their brand and make them richer whenever they order you to do so. Which one do you want?
LikeLike