Cynthia Liu, a journalist in California, writes:
Cynthia Liu, a journalist in California, writes:
Nebraska loves its public schools!
It remains one of the few states to reject vouchers, charters, and the Common Core.
Nebraska’s Legislature said NO again to vouchers!
|
I will be in Columbus, Ohio, tomorrow, for a public discussion with Bill Phillis sponsored by Public Education Partners at the Sheraton Hotel in Columbus, Capitol Square, 6 pm.
https://www.eventbrite.com/e/moving-public-education-forward-tickets-59663258412
Bill Phillis reports:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The New York Legislature is considering legislation to affirm that parents have a right to opt out of state testing, and that school officials have an affirmative duty to inform them of their rights. The current testing regime is invalid and unreliable. It does not inform instruction. It has no purpose other than to demoralize students and teachers. Please add your name in support of this legislation.
The New York State Allies for Public Education urges you to:
TAKE ACTION NOW by supporting Senator Jackson and Assemblyman Epstein by getting your own NYS Senator and Assembly Member to show their support by signing onto the proposed legislation as a co-sponsor. This is the opportunity we’ve been waiting for years and there is no time to lose. Senate bill S5394 and Assembly bill is forthcoming.
Families HAVE THE RIGHT TO REFUSE the New York State grades 3-8 ELA and math assessments. Nevertheless, and as we have seen over the past several years and throughout the state, too many schools disregard that right, fail to communicate it clearly, or worse, take punitive measures against children when their parents exercise their rights.
Simply enter your name & address, and the form will automatically generate emails addressed to your specific elected officials. PLEASE SEND your letters TODAY and share with anyone else who wants to see our rights and our children’s rights respected!
Thank you for all of your continued advocacy to protect children and bring whole child policies to your schools!
Gary Rubinstein has the answer here.
Which state pays $20,000 for each recruit TFA sends to work in its schools after a five-week training course?
Can you guess?
How much does your state pay TFA to send young teachers who agree to stay for two years?
Jeff Bryant explains why many Democrats and progressives are backing away from the charter school idea. It is not just because Trump and DeVos are pushing charters, though surely that is one reason.
Arne Duncanpromoted charters as enthusiastically as DeVos. But something has changed.
Bryant writes:
The politics of charter schools have changed, and bipartisan support for these publicly funded, privately controlled schools has reached a turning point. A sure sign of the change came from Democrats in the House Appropriations Committee who have proposed a deep cut in federal charter school grants that would lower funding to $400 million, $40 million below current levels and $100 million less than what the Trump administration has proposed. Democrats are also calling for better oversight of charter schools that got federal funding and then closed.
This is a startling turn of events, as for years, Democrats have enthusiastically joined Republicans in providing federal grants to create new charter schools and expand existing ones.
In explaining this change in the politics of charter schools, pundits and reporters will likely point to two factors: the unpopularity of Secretary of Education Betsy DeVos, an ardent charter school proponent, and teachers’ unions that can exert influence in the Democratic Party. But if the tide is truly turning on bipartisan support for charter schools, it is the charter industry itself that is most to blame.
Read on.
At the annual conference of the NewSchools Venture Fund, which raises millions to launch charter schools, there was a sour and tremulous mood, according to Matt Barnum in Chalkbeat.
A group from the Oakland Education Association picketed outside the meeting, and the conveyors focused in on “the unions” as their big problem. It was especially galling to them that some of their own charters had been the target of strikes. The report did not indicate that anyone thought seriously about the teacher turnover for which charters have become noted. Nor about the gap between the sky-high salaries for charter administrators and lowly teachers.
Nor did there seem to be any self-awareness about the near-daily scandals in the charter industry. Did they discuss the public revulsion to for-profit charters or for-profit EMOs and CMOs? Apparently not.
They were aware that the teachers’ strikes during the past year specifically targeted charter schools, but they didn’t know why. Must be those damn unions. They really didn’t get that they were not only left out of Red4Ed, but seen as the enemy of teachers in states that had weak unions.
The level of self-scrutiny, as reported here, seemed defensive and shallow.
The event offered a look at how charter leaders from across the country are coming to grips with new limits on their growth and political clout. And there are signs that their anxiety is warranted, with charters losing support particularly in blue states and cities and among Democrats.
NewSchools attendees were reminded of the opposition when dozens of protestors, organized by the Oakland Education Association, gathered outside the conference hotel downtown. One of their chants: “Hey, hey, ho, ho, charter schools have got to go.”
“They are a leech onto the public system,” said Harley Litzelman, an Oakland teacher who protested at the event.
But charter backers also used the event to explain how they’re planning to confront what they see as the danger posed by teachers unions, internal and external.
The charter industry will never understand what went wrong until they stop looking for enemies and examine their own ranks and their own behavior.
Several years ago, I was invited to speak at Rice University in Houston by KIPP and TFA. At that time, I warned them that if the charter industry did not clean out its Augean stables and get rid of the grifters, entrepreneurs, dilettantes, and crooks, they would all be tarnished. They didn’t listen. They still lack the capacity to look inside to learn why things are going so badly.
In her book, After the Education Wars: How Smart Schools Upend the Business of Reform, Andrea Gabor identified school districts and educators who exemplified a truly forward-thinking, innovative path out of our current political stalemate. One of those districts was Leander, Texas, which was applying the principles of management guru W. Edwards Deming, thanks to a waiver from repressive state mandates.
Now Leander is looking for a new superintendent, and Gabor describes the innovative ideas that made the district remarkable.
Deming, a statistician who died in 1993, based his quality management philosophy on two seemingly disparate ideas: The use of statistical tools to measure and improve systems and the conviction that those closest to any given process are best equipped to identify problems and opportunities for improvement. What made Deming’s ideas controversial was his insistence that meaningful employee input only works if it is based on trust. Deming opposed punitive employee evaluations and individual bonus systems on the grounds that they foster fear and undermine teamwork.
Deming’s ideas about process measurement were embraced throughout industry, but his exhortations on the importance of building a culture of trust were not.
That’s what makes Leander special. The school district adopted Deming’s ideas about using statistical analysis and teamwork to improve classroom pedagogy and school design, and even to jumpstart a student-led anti-bullying campaign. But to sustain its strategy and build a trust-based culture of the kind Deming advocated, Leander won a waiver from the state’s teacher-evaluation system.
As Gabor shows, wonderful things happen when teachers, students, and school administrators are trusted to make decisions.
She wonders whether this bright spot in American education, which should be a beacon for other districts, will survive a change in leadership. Stay tuned.
Jeannie Kaplan was twice elected to the school board in Denver. She has long been active in civil rights and education issues. She has been a persistent and vocal critic of school closings, choice, and boasting about paltry gains in test scores. She was ignored by the “Reformers” like Michael Bennett and Tom Boasberg. As “Reform” money poured into Denver elections, the grassroots candidates she favored were defeated time and again, and Denver’s school board became unanimous for disruption.
When she recently read a blunt admission by her fellow Coloradan Van Schoales that “reform as we know it, is over,” she was astonished, outraged, and not amused.
She summarized it in the title of her post: “OMG, ICYMI, SMDH.”
For a translation, open the link.
She begins:
Soooooo…it appears “The education reform movement as we have known it is over.” This from none other than “education reformer” extraordinaire, Van Schoales, writing in the May 6, 2019 Education Week: Education Reform as We Know It Is Over. What Have We Learned? Along his way to becoming the president of Colorado’s own reform-oriented “oversight” committee, A+ Colorado , Van has worked at Denver’s Piton Foundation and Education Reform Now (ERN), the advocacy arm of Democrats for Education Reform (DFER). He has also been integrally involved with starting and supporting local charter schools and drafting statewide education reform-oriented legislation. When Denver media has needed a quote to support “education reform” outcomes, whom have they called? Not Ghost Busters! No, their go-to guy has been Van Schoales. So his partial about face in his recent post in Education Week is quite surprising. In his words:
“There are three primary reasons that education reforms failed to live up to our expectations: too few teacher-led reforms, a lack of real community support from those most impacted, and a lack of focus on policy change for public schools across the board, not just the lowest of low-performing schools.”
Gee. Who knew?
If I weren’t so darn mad, I’d be shedding tears of laughter. If we hadn’t fought and fought and fought against “education reform” for the last 15 years, foretelling the recent conclusions of ed reformers,” the whole education reform movement could be viewed as a bad joke. If we the taxpayers hadn’t spent hundreds of millions of dollars and if we the people hadn’t lost at least a generation of students and teachers to the chaos and churn and complete lack of common sense of “education reform,” we could all be lifting a glass of whatever to toasting “we told you so.” If only the past 15 years could have been a bad dream, and we could all be like Dorothy and wake up in our safe places, wiping out the nightmare. But alas, that is not the case. And even with these mea culpas coming from unexpected places, most reformers are still unwilling to fully accept the disasters they have wrought upon community after community, most of which just happen to be populated primarily by people of color.
Jackie Goldberg won the empty seat on the Los Angeles school board, the one vacated by convicted charter school operator Ref Rodriguez.
Her election is a rebuff to Eli Broad and the other billionaires who tried to buy the school board.
She is knowledgeable and experienced and will be a great asset to the board.
She was a classroom teacher for nearly 20 years. She was previously elected to the school board, she was a member of the state legislature and chair of the education committee.
What a win for public education and the children!