Two trustees of the Houston Independent School District strenuously object to the state’s plan to disrupt and takeover the district. It is no accident, they say, that such takeovers target predominantly black-and-brown districts. The state’s goal is to resegregate the district, while enriching charter chains that will swoop in to grab public schools.
The article was written by Board President Rhonda Skillern-Jones and Elizabeth Santos.
“Last month the Houston Independent School District Board of Trustees made a difficult decision. At risk of losing the elected positions for which we all campaigned passionately, we rejected an ultimatum created by state law: Privatize four historically black and brown schools or face a hostile state takeover of the entire district. We were elected to see to it that our public schools thrive, not facilitate their transfer to charter managers who can make money off our students.
Now the state is in a position to remove us from office because four schools have been on the “improvement required” list for at least five years.
Some of us reasonably felt that turning these four schools — Wheatley High School, Kashmere High School, Henry Middle School and Highland Heights Elementary — into charter schools would prevent even worse sanctions from the state. While that may have been true for this year, there was no guarantee that we would not face the same dilemma next year and each year after that for different campuses until our district became segregated into two different communities — those that have direct electoral control over their school leaders and those that do not. Such a system of haves and have-nots is simply unacceptable.
The charter vultures are circling.
Reblogged this on David R. Taylor-Thoughts on Education and commented:
As they should. This is a good read.
http://www.texasisd.com/pages/joes-commentaries/joes-commentary-the-threat-of-a-hostile-takeover-of-houston-isd-all-part-of
The unfair Texas law that allows a takeover of a district if one school is determined as “failing” by the STARR test is designed to cast a wide net of schools that can be served up to corporations for privatization. This is undemocratic law represents overreach by privatizers eager to grab more public funds.
“It is baffling that HISD taxpayers are required to foot the entire bill for their district and also forfeit $100 million in “recaptured” dollars — and growing — to supplement the state’s obligation to other districts, while at the same time facing the risk of being stripped of their right to elect their own governing board.”
Houston, Dallas and Austin, all districts that already have a number of charters, should challenge the validity of the recapture formula in court. These districts have already been subjected to charter drain, and now they are being declared “wealthy” because their cost per pupil is calculated higher due to imposed charter drain. Districts are penalized for already having charters. These districts are more losing state dollars while they raise taxes on city residents to operate schools or cult services. This formula is unfair and should be challenged.
Correction: cut services