Archives for the month of: July, 2018

Denis Smith thinks it is time to bring back the Gong Show. Its host, Chuck Barris, has died but the need remains for someone to call out truly stupid behavior. “If only The Gong Show host, who described himself as the “King of Schlock, Baron of Bad Taste, and Ayatollah of Trasherola,” could pick up that giant mallet one last time,” Smith says.

He writes:

“Now, more than ever, we need Chuck Barris or a successor to gong Rep. Jim Jordan, the presumptive King of Schlock and Baron of Bad Taste.

“We’ll hold off on the Ayatollah part for now in anointing Jordan, though he might be in the running for that title as well. Enough schlock and bad taste are too much of the same, particularly when the subject is Jim Jordan.

“Jordan is certainly no angel. But now, while the country watched in disgust his antics on live television as he badgered two of the nation’s top law enforcement officials, we’ve seen him as a fool.

“Jim Jordan has been called uncivil many times. Indeed, his fellow Ohioan and former Speaker John Boehner famously described him last year as “A terrorist. A legislative terrorist.” Yet his performance yesterday during the hearing of the House Judiciary Committee has raised even more questions about his fitness for office.

“The coatless wonder from Urbana is still coatless, but we no longer have to wonder about what he really is besides being uncivil and a legislative terrorist.

“For starters, he is shameless. Add to that the rest of his GOP House committee colleagues, including Trey Gowdy of Benghazi fame, and Louie Gohmert, who sometimes blurts out asparagus thoughts in hearings.

“Good lord. That’s only the short list of lunatics. Even John Belushi would have difficulty recruiting such a crew for his Animal House frat.”

Jim Jordan was a wrestling coach at Ohio State before he was elected to Congress. Recent reports say he has been accused of ignoring complaints by wrestlers of sexual abuse by the team doctor. Jordan denies it. Watch out for #HimToo.

Do you have a candidate for the title of the dumbest member of Congress?

Dana Milbank of the Washington Post is one of my favorite columnists. My only disagreement with this column is that he thinks we are not threatened by fascism. I have concluded that Trump’s racist, corporatist ideology, meshed with his demogogic rhetoric, looks, sounds, and feels like fascism.

He wrote this great column.

In case it is behind a paywall:

Every 75 years or so in our history, Americans have renewed their commitment to freedom.


Divide our history into thirds, and you can see, at regular intervals, a rededication to our founding doctrine. In 1789, the framers drafted the Bill of Rights. Seventy-four years later, at the turning point in the Civil War, Abraham Lincoln called for “a new birth of freedom” to honor those who died.
Seventy-eight years after that, on the eve of U.S. entry into world war in 1941, Franklin D. Roosevelt declared the “four freedoms.”


That was 77 years ago, and we are due for another renewal. Neither fascism nor civil war threatens us, but Americans are united in fear. Much of the country fears the loss of basic freedoms under President Trump: free speech, press and religion, due process and control over their bodies. Trump, meanwhile, foments fears among his followers of crime, gangs, immigrants and civil servants. And Americans of all beliefs fear they are losing the American Dream and its promise of economic mobility.


Trump’s opponents are seemingly confused about how to respond in this election year. Do they appeal to whites or nonwhites, progressives or moderates, move to the left to rally the “base” or hew to the center to capture the swing voters? Should they make an economic argument or a social argument, target those concerned about jobs or those angry about the president?


These are false choices, though, because our salvation will be what it always has been. On this 242nd birthday of the United States, let’s rededicate ourselves to freedom:


Freedom from Trump’s constant attacks on women, immigrants, people of color, gay people and Muslims.


Freedom to work and live without discrimination, harassment and violence because of your gender, race or religion.


Freedom to get medical care when you or your children are sick.


Freedom to earn a living wage, to attend college or get job training, and to retire in security.


Freedom from a rigged economy in which the top 1 percent own more than the bottom 90 percent combined.

Freedom to marry whom you choose.


Freedom to make decisions about your own body.


Freedom to send your kids to school without fear for their safety.


Freedom to breathe clean air, to drink clean water, to live on a habitable planet.


Freedom to elect your leaders without the rich, or foreign governments, choosing them for you.


And freedom to speak, to protest and to publish without the threat of violence.


Not only do such ideas unify the left (far more than quibbling about, say, which form of universal health care is best or what exactly should be done with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement), but freedom appeals broadly to Americans regardless of politics. Ask us what it means to be American, and you will get one answer above all others: “to be free.”


Conservatives long claimed ownership of it. (Remember Operation Iraqi Freedom, Operation Enduring Freedom and freedom fries?) But Trump has essentially ceded the freedom agenda to his opponents. One measure, using a database of his speeches, tweets and ­Q&As, finds that he has used the word “freedom” 72 times this year (often dismissively, as in “we need freedom of the press, but . . .”). That’s far less than he has used, say, “respect” (252), “strong” (502), “win” (306), “border” (617), “taxes” (158), “Democrat” (560), “kill” (159), “country” (1,288), “illegal” (127), “crime” (250) and “great” (2,826).


IThis isn’t just a linguistic de-emphasis of freedom; Trump has made common cause with dictators and played down human rights abroad while starting a trade war with democratic allies. At home he has questioned due process for refugees, taken immigrant children from their parents, imposed a travel ban on several Muslim-majority nations and declared the media the enemy of the American people. He is now poised to shift the balance on the Supreme Court away from abortion rights and gay rights.


In a very real sense, the fight against Trump is a battle for freedom.


He hopes to make the midterm elections about sanctuary cities, MS-13, a socialist takeover, the “deep state,” a corrupt justice system and immigrants “invading and infesting’’ America. Rather than join him in the fear chamber, progressives and Democrats ought to respond with a variation of what FDR proposed for the world in a very different context in 1941, “freedom of speech and expression,” “freedom of every person to worship God in his own way,” “freedom from want” and — of new significance now — “freedom from fear.”


“This nation has placed its destiny in the hands and heads and hearts of its millions of free men and women,” Roosevelt said, “and its faith in freedom under the guidance of God.”
This faith sustained America through those dark times. It will not fail us in our 243rd year.
“

Thanks to Fred Smith for sending a sharper, clearer video of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.’s magnificent speech, “I Have a Dream.” In addition to its clarity, it also has captions.

In these troubled times, beware the reactionaries who claim that Dr. King wanted only a color-blind society, where children needed nothing more than to be judged by the content of their character, not the color of their skin. The March on Washington was a march for jobs, a march for basic freedoms, like the right to vote, and a march for justice and equality of opportunity. Dr. King reminded us that 100 years after the Emancipation Proclamation, black Americans were still not free. Given our nation’s embrace of mass incarceration, millions of black Americans are literally not free, and millions more worry about excessive use of force by police.

Today, as the Trump administration plans to abandon affirmative action and desegregation, the movement for equality has been dealt a grievous blow. As it is poised to appoint another justice to the Supreme Court, all the gains of the civil rights movement of the past six decades are in jeopardy.

The March was funded by a coalition of civil rights groups and labor unions.

Please note that Bayard Rustin, the great intellect and strategist of the civil rights movement, can be seen at King’s side. Rustin was a pacifist and a brilliant writer. He was gay, and he was frequently pushed aside or hidden for fear he would hurt the movement. He went to propison during World War 2 as a conscientious objector. He was no coward. He risked his life repeatedly in demonstrations and protests. He was a beloved friend, who performed a capella in my home in a fundraiser for the Young People’s Socialist League. I am proud to have known this great man.

Sing along as I soar over the Pacific Ocean.

This land belongs to you and me!

And we are gonna take it back from Betsy DeVos, Donald J. Trump, the Koch brothers, ALEC, and the other haters of democracy.

This song by Woody Guthrie is one of the best ever written about our beloved nation. He also wrote “Union Maid” (“I’m Sticking to the Union”), posted earlier. Woody Guthrie and Pete Seeger were national treasures, troubadours of democracy and the American spirit.

Who does it belong to?

Not the 1%.

This land belongs to you and me.

This is Pete Seeger explaining how to fight the Janus Decision.

Here is another version, a bit jumpy, but lively. A celebration of Pete Seeger’s 90th birthday.

One of the greatest speeches in American history was delivered by Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. on August 28,1963,on the Mall in Washington, D.C.

You can watch and listen here.

Much better than reading it is hearing it.

I was somewhere in the back of the crowd with my husband. I was 25 years old.

What would Dr. King say about Donald Trump and Jefferson Beauregard Sessions?

Abraham Lincoln delivered this brief speech to dedicate the battlefield at Gettysburg, Pennsylvania, on November 19, 1863. We are called today to save his vision that a government “of the people, by the people, for the people shall not perish from the earth.”


Four score and seven years ago our fathers brought forth on this continent, a new nation, conceived in Liberty, and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal.

Now we are engaged in a great civil war, testing whether that nation, or any nation so conceived and so dedicated, can long endure. We are met on a great battle-field of that war. We have come to dedicate a portion of that field, as a final resting place for those who here gave their lives that that nation might live. It is altogether fitting and proper that we should do this.

But, in a larger sense, we can not dedicate — we can not consecrate — we can not hallow — this ground. The brave men, living and dead, who struggled here, have consecrated it, far above our poor power to add or detract. The world will little note, nor long remember what we say here, but it can never forget what they did here. It is for us the living, rather, to be dedicated here to the unfinished work which they who fought here have thus far so nobly advanced. It is rather for us to be here dedicated to the great task remaining before us — that from these honored dead we take increased devotion to that cause for which they gave the last full measure of devotion — that we here highly resolve that these dead shall not have died in vain — that this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom — and that government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth.

This is what July 4, 2018, means to me.

Not hot dogs, mustard, and potato chips, but our obligation to fight for our democracy.

At the present time, we are losing it day by day.

The U.S. Supreme Court has recently approved state laws that purge voters from the voting rolls because they have not consistently voted. It is not difficult to determine whether voters have died or moved out of state. Meanwhile, a basic right is whittled away because it was not exercised.

The high court recently approved racial gerrymandering.

The high court approved a Muslim Ban disguised as a national security issue.

The high court in Janus struck a blow at labor unions, allowing free riders to collect benefits without paying any dues.

The high court will soon be dominated by five justices determined to overturn Roe V. Wade and gay rights.

The administration wants to destroy the healthcare on which millions of Americans rely.

The administration denies climate change and is repealing regulations that protect the environment, Our air, our water, our national parks.

Our president and attorney general callously initiated a policy of separating children from their parents at the Southern border, some as young as three months, and cruelly shipped them far away. More than 2,000 have not been returned to their parents. Children and families languish in cages. We have become a pariah among nations, known for our cruelty, belligerence, and stupidity.

The administration daily insults our allies and courts the friendship of dictators.

Now is the time to resist.

Now is the time to recall the brave history of dissent and protest.

The best way to demonstrate your love of country is to resist, protest, demonstrate, join with others who are committed to democracy, equal rights, and the rule of law.

We must together stop the precipitous descent into fascism and plutocracy.

We must pledge ourselves to fight for the America we love, the America put at risk by venal, malevolent, unethical, and greedy leaders.

I will post today a few of my favorite examples of patriotic resistance. You are invited to add your own.

Lawyers will appeal the recent decision that students do not have a right to basic literacy.

Politico writes:

MICHIGAN SCHOOL QUALITY ISSUES CONTINUE TO DOMINATE: Attorneys representing Detroit school children in a high-profile “right to read” lawsuit say they plan to appeal a federal judge’s ruling dismissing the case. The case, Gary B. v. Snyder, is a class action lawsuit filed on behalf of seven Michigan students that argued that a lack of certified teachers, books, school supplies and evidence-based curricula has led to dismal English proficiency rates.

— Judge Stephen J. Murphy III in U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, Southern Division, ruled on Friday that while the schools, as alleged, are “nothing short of devastating,” access to literacy is not a fundamental right.

— Mark Rosenbaum of Public Counsel, which helped represent the students, said in a statement that the court got it “tragically wrong.” Read more from Kimberly Hefling.

— Meanwhile, in Flint, Mich., mlive.com reports that public schools will be starting the school year this fall with water jugs — not drinking fountains — because water in the school buildings has not yet been deemed safe. The district has used bottled water for years because of the city’s water crisis.

http://go.politicoemail.com/?qs=4ffd7db1d8a57dfb7aad4995e3650f480681f4685f10e929101ce6653cd118e7113f30ff4925b12948f378b73d23a3f5