Archives for the month of: June, 2018

As widely anticipated, the US Supreme Court ruled 5-4 against a law in Illinois requiring non-members of public sector unions to pay fees for the benefits they receive from collective bargaining. This decision is expected to reduce the membership and revenues of unions, a long-sought goal of reactionaries.

The named plaintiff is Mark Janus. In Roman mythology, Janus is represented as two-faced.

From CNBC:

Supreme Court rules nonunion workers cannot be forced to pay fees to public sector unions
Tucker Higgins | @tuckerhiggins
Published 57 Mins Ago Updated 18 Mins Ago
CNBC.com

The Koch brothers must be celebrating!

The Supreme Court ruled 5-4 Wednesday in Janus v. AFSCME that non-union workers cannot be forced to pay fees to public sector unions.
The case concerns whether public employees can be forced to pay so-called “agency fees” to fund the work of public sector unions.
Experts said that a holding in favor of Janus would be the most significant court decision affecting collective bargaining rights in decades.

The Supreme Court ruled 5-4 Wednesday in Janus v. AFSCME that nonunion workers cannot be forced to pay fees to public sector unions.
The case, one of the most hotly anticipated of the term, is the second in two days to hand a major victory to conservatives, following Tuesday’s holding by the court that President Donald Trump’s travel ban is constitutional. Some experts have said that a holding in favor of the plaintiff, Mark Janus, would be the most significant court decision affecting collective bargaining in decades.

Janus, an employee at the Illinois Department of Healthcare and Human Services, asked the court last summer to overrule a 40-year-old Supreme Court decision. It found that public sector unions could require employees affected by their negotiations to pay so-called “agency fees,” which have also been called “fair share fees.”

Those fees, approved by the court in the 1977 case Abood v. Detroit Board of Education, cover collective bargaining costs, such as contract negotiations, but are meant to exclude political advocacy.

Janus argued that his $45 monthly fee to the American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees was unconstitutional. He said the fees infringed on his first amendment rights, and that, in the case of public employees whose contract negotiations are with the government, the fees were a form of political advocacy.

This is a gripping account of the move to privatize large numbers of public schools in San Antonio. This is the work of the business community and a neoliberal Democratic establishment mayor, determined to turn public schools over to Out-of-state charter chains.

https://therivardreport.com/charter-takeovers-erode-san-antonios-public-school-system/

“While school privatization “reformers” are backed by big money donors and corporations, opponents include San Antonio’s Our Schools Coalition of community members, teachers, and parents, the Movement for Black Lives, the Network for Public Education, and the NAACP – the nation’s oldest and largest civil rights organization.

“It’s big corporate money versus civil rights organizations, community groups, and teachers. The choice could hardly be starker. That’s why charter advocates pretend this argument is about teachers’ contracts and unions that are scared of change: if they were to tell the public the truth, they’d lose the argument before it started.

“Who supports [Superintendent] Martinez’s plans for charter collaboration in SAISD? San Antonio Charter Moms, an advocacy group for charter expansion, and what is loosely referred to as “the business community.”

“Parents, teachers, students, community groups do not.

“In fact, in order to hand over Stewart Elementary to a New York-based charter company, Martinez and his board drowned out debate, community and teacher input, and consultation.

“Parents, community members, and teachers repeatedly called on Martinez and the board of trustees to consult and partner with them in deciding the future of their neighborhood school. Again and again their calls were ignored by the district leaders whose job is to serve them and act in their interests. Again and again district leaders refused to consider alternatives to plans which had been devised behind the scenes ​many months earlier. While the Stewart community was excluded at every turn, Democracy Prep was being courted by district leaders.

“Stewart teachers, parents, and students were effectively dismissed and denied the chance to escape the State’s “improvement required” rating by a district leadership unwilling even to make its contract with Democracy Prep conditional on the school’s failure to meet standards.

“But last week, preliminary STAAR scores indicated that Stewart Elementary could obtain a passing, or “met standard” rating from the state, SAISD Deputy Superintendent Pauline Dow said. While final STAAR results and the State’s accountability ratings won’t be released until August, those of us trained on the state calculators for school performance are certain Stewart Elementary will finally emerge from its “improvement required” status.

“Regardless, Democracy Prep is slated to take over Stewart on July 1.

“A campus that could be safe from state sanction is being dismembered and sold off, all but two of its teachers leaving rather than work for the charter company with high teacher turnover rates (34 percent across all campuses last year), low expectations for teacher qualifications (as few as 44 percent of teachers being certified), and regressive and punitive disciplinary practices (28 percent suspension rate). Many students have opted to leave, even under district pressure to remain, and the campus’s future remains uncertain.

“It could have been a different story, and now we have proof that our most underperforming campuses can turn themselves around without the “expertise” of outside charter companies.

“San Antonio’s public schools are far from perfect, and we should move boldly to transform them into the schools our children deserve. But handing them over to private, profit-seeking entities isn’t the way to proceed. Powerful forces are doing everything they can to cash in on the privatization of public education in this country. They are desperately working to shape a narrative which – if they succeed – will have you fighting the people you should be supporting, and supporting the people you should be fighting.”

Ken Bernstein is a teacher of government and history. In this post, he reflects on the current political situation.

Ken says our nation is in grave danger. He sees the daily degradation of our laws and our Constitution. He is worried.

I have noticed that in recent days, the media has warned that we must not react too strongly when the president makes extreme statements. Taking a stand against Trump’s racism and xenophobia merely encourages his base, they say. The media say that those of us who are outraged by his behavior and his language are causing divisions in the country.

The question is whether we should normalize Trump’s words and deeds.

If we do, we change the nature of the country. Should we ignore his assault on civil liberties and civil rights? Should we ignore Trump’s claim that white nationalists and avowed members of the KKK include “some very fine people”? Should we ignore his statement that the free press is “the enemy of the people” (a term attributed to Stalin)? Should we ignore his attacks on Muslims, Mexicans, Canadians, the EU, and anyone else he doesn’t like? Should we ignore his policy of separating parents and children at the border and putting children into cages, then blaming it on Democrats? Should we ignore his bullying of McCain, Warren, Sanders, and anyone else who dares to disagree with him? How can we?

Trump ridicules people daily, in tweets and rallies. But no one dare respond for fear of alienating his base. Let’s be clear: He is the source of today’s vicious and uncivil climate.

That’s a bridge too far. For me. And for Ken Bernstein.

Reading this article, I couldn’t help but think of a song from “Camelot,” called “What Do the Simple Folk Do?” about Royalty speculating on how the peasants amuse themselves when they are feeling down. In the last stanza, Richard Burton and Julie Andrews agree that the simple folk sit around and wonder what the Royalty do.

What do the billionaires do when they educate their own children?

Elon Musk invented a school for his children.

In a corner of SpaceX’s headquarters in Hawthorne, California, a small, secretive group called Ad Astra is hard at work. These are not the company’s usual rocket scientists. At the direction of Elon Musk, they are tackling ambitious projects involving flamethrowers, robots, nuclear politics, and defeating evil AIs.

Those at Ad Astra still find time for a quick game of dodgeball at lunch, however, because the average age within this group is just 10 years old.

Ad Astra encompasses students, not employees. For the past four years, this experimental non-profit school has been quietly educating Musk’s sons, the children of select SpaceX employees, and a few high-achievers from nearby Los Angeles. It started back in 2014, when Musk pulled his five young sons out of one of Los Angeles’ most prestigious private schools for gifted children. Hiring one of his sons’ teachers, the CEO founded Ad Astra to “exceed traditional school metrics on all relevant subject matter through unique project-based learning experiences,” according to a previously unreported document filed with the US Internal Revenue Service (IRS).

“I just didn’t see that the regular schools were doing the things that I thought should be done,” he told a Chinese TV station in 2015. “So I thought, well let’s see what we can do. Maybe creating a school will be better.”

In an atmosphere closer to a venture capital incubator than a traditional school, today’s Ad Astra students undertake challenging technical projects, trade using their own currency, and can opt out of subjects they don’t enjoy. Children from 7 to 14 years old work together in teams, with few formal assessments and no grades handed out.

Ad Astra’s principal hopes that the school will revolutionize education in the same way Tesla has disrupted transportation, and SpaceX the rocket industry. But as Musk’s sons near graduation age, the future of Ad Astra is unclear. Will Musk maintain interest in the school once his children move on? And even if he does, can a school of fewer than 40 students ever be anything more than a high-tech crèche for already-privileged children?

Read on. If money is no object…the first things to go are grades and tests.

Listening to the news this morning, I heard Trump supporters cheering the Supreme Court Decision endorsing the (Muslim) Travel Ban. They said it protects our country. It supports national security.

As I recall, 15 of the 19 terrorists who participated in the atrocities of 9/11 were Saudis. Why isn’t Saudi Arabia on Trump’s list? Why isn’t Egypt on the list? Does it have anything to do with the locations of properties or investments of the Trump Organization?

Does anyone doubt that the sole intent of this ban was to make a symbolic gesture that is anti-Muslim? I thought Gorsuch was supposed to be the great defender of religious liberty? Guess not.

http://time.com/4629308/donald-trump-business-deals-world-map/

This was one of the super-best speeches as the annual Network for Public Education in Oakland last October.

The speaker is Yohuru Williams, dean of the University of St. Thomas in St. Paul-Minneapolis. You have probably seen him on public television. He is an inspirational speaker.

You can get more of the same on October 21-22 in Indianapolis, when NPE holds its sixth annual conference at the Marriott Hotel. We have a great lineup of speakers and workshops.

You can register now.

You have to watch Yohuru. You really do!

Defending the Early Years (DEY) has produced a 2-minute video featuring Boston preschool teacher Roberta Udoh explaining why play is crucial for young children and why the culture of testing is harming children at a point in their lives when play is most important.

Please watch and bear in mind that everyone of every age needs time to play.

Gary Rubinstein has a serious problem about people who use data to fib.

He just saw a newspaper article about a KIPP school in New York City where “96%” of the graduates were going to college. This seemed improbable so he did some digging, and of course it wasn’t true.

He writes:

One of the dirtiest tricks played by charter schools is when they claim to have a 100% graduation rate and a 100% college acceptance rate. The first use of this, to my knowledge, was when YES Prep used it to help secure $1 million from Oprah. Over the years, it is very common to see some charter school tout a similar statistic.

When I hear about one of these 100% schools, the first thing I ask is “Is this 100% of the starting cohort, or just the senior class?” It is always just the senior class. Then I ask “How many students are in the senior class?” When the number of graduating seniors is in the 30s, 20s, or even most recently in the case of Success Academy, 16, I ask “How big was the initial cohort?”

In The New York Post the other day, there was an article titled “Bronx charter school sending 96 percent of grads to college.” The school was the one KIPP high school in New York City. According to the article, there were 225 graduating seniors, which, at least, is much bigger than the graduating class of many of these 100% (or 96% in this case) stories.

But 96% of the graduating seniors is not 96% of the original cohort and The Post addresses this by saying “The network said 86 percent of the original freshman class stayed on through their senior year.”

The problem with this statistic is that KIPP is a 5th to 12th grade program, not a 9th to 12th grade program.

So the question is, what percent of the original fifth grade class remained to graduate? Not 96%. Not 86%. Read on.

Why must every statistic be inflated?

Chicago activist and blogger Mike Klonsky says that the biggest financial scandal in the city’s history could have been avoided by administering background checks for contractors.

The city’s superintendent is serving jail time for accepting bribes from a contractor. The contractor, Gary Solomon, is in prison too.

Had there been a background check, the city would never have done business with the contractor, writes Klonsky.

“Solomon, a former dean and teacher at suburban Niles West H.S., was accused by that district of sending sexually explicit e-mail messages to female students. Besides those messages, they said he attended a Cubs game with students during a school day when no field trip was planned. They accused him of keeping a journal on a school computer that described several unprofessional relationships with students.

“Finally, Solomon was forced out of Niles Township School District 219 under a cloud after he was accused by his bosses of “immoral and unprofessional” conduct, including allegations he kissed a female student, covered up students’ drug and alcohol use,and sent “sexually suggestive, predatory” emails to students, court records show.

“While no criminal charges were ever filed, Solomon was barred from ever teaching in the district again. Solomon resigned from his post as part of a settlement back in 2001 and began a consulting business with former Niles West student Thomas Vranas, one that also included a partnership with former Chicago schools CEO and current Chicago mayoral candidate Paul Vallas.”

That partnership went on to win large contracts in New Orleans and Chicago.

Vallas pins the blame on Ram Emanuel.

Who performed a background check? No one.

Harley-Davidson plans to open a plant in Europe because Trump’s tariffs will raise the price of a Harley by more that $2,000 for EU consumers.

Other industries will be hard hit and are planning to lay off workers.

The lobster industry, farmers, the nation’s largest nail company.

Think before you act.

Dealmaker-in-Chief Cuts Deal to Annihilate American Business – Vanity Fair

https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2018/06/dealmaker-in-chief-cuts-deal-to-annihilate-american-business