Archives for the month of: May, 2018

The Network for Public Education Action Fund is pleased to endorse the candidacy of Adrienne Spinner for the Board of Education in Guilford County, North Carolina.

Adrienne Spinner has earned the Network for Public Education Action’s endorsement in the race for the District 4 seat on the Guilford County Board of Education.

As a parent and social activist, Adrienne has “a heart for children and advocacy.” She is a proud graduate of K-12 public schools and a public university, and believes that public schools are the backbone of the community.

Her top priority is to fight for increased funding. She wants to add additional teacher assistants, counselors, social workers, and other staff support to work with students. She also wants increased funding to raise teacher pay. Because of the lack of a living wage in North Carolina, many are choosing not to enter into a career in education. Adrienne told us that “raising teacher pay is a vital first step; afterwards, focus needs to be given to recruiting and retaining quality teachers.”

Adrienne will also push to reinstate North Carolina’s 100-school charter cap. She said that too much funding is being taken away from public education to support the growing number of charter schools in the state. Adrienne also disagrees with efforts to privatize education.

In North Carolina school board elections are partisan. On May 8th Adrienne will face a Democratic challenger in the primary election. Please help spread the word about Adrienne’s candidacy for the Guilford County Board of Education.

 

Kentucky Governor Matt Bevin is moving fast to smash public schools. First, he ousted several members of the state board of education, which promptly ousted the state commissioner of education. The board hired Wayne Lewis, an outspoken charter school advocate as interim state commissioner. 

Lewis announced that he recommends a state takeover of the state’s largest school district, Jefferson County, which includes Louisville. Lewis is an education professor, with no prior experience as a superintendent.

Lots of blah-blah about achievement gaps and test scores but no evident plan to fix any of the problems he describes. And no reference to any successful state takeovers in any other state.

This may be Gov. Bevin’s payback for teacher walkouts.

Prediction: This will not end well.

 

 

 

Linda Darling-Hammond writes here about the historic protests by teachers now sweeping through red states. 

She writes:

“A nation that under-educates its children in the 21st century cannot long survive as a world power. Prisons — which now absorb more of our tax resources than public higher education did in the 1980s — are filled with high school dropouts and those with low levels of literacy. We pay three times more for each prisoner than we invest in each child’s education annually. With an aging population and only three workers for every person on Social Security, the United States especially needs all young people to be well-educated enough to gain good work in the complex and rapidly changing economy they are entering. Without their ability to pay the taxes that support the rest of society, the social contract will dissolve

“Inadequate education funding has created the conditions that make teaching the daily struggle that has finally drawn teachers and families to the picket lines: unmanageable class sizes, inadequate resources and facilities, cuts to essential medical and mental-health school services and more. As child poverty, food insecurity and homelessness have climbed to among the highest levels in the industrialized world (more than one in five live in poverty and in 2014 one in 30 were homeless), schools have been left with fewer resources to address these needs and support student learning.”

 

Christine Langhoff, retired teacher in Massachusetts, writes:

 

The big news of the week of course, was the ruling by the MA Supreme Judicial Court that the cap on charters is constitutional. Coverage in the putative newspaper of record, The Boston Globe, sought to portray the decision as public schools and teachers hating on charters.

“The court fight escalated the long-running battle over charter schools, which are controversial because they do not have to be unionized, operate independently of local school districts, and are given more flexibility to set their curriculums, budgets, and staffing levels.”

https://www.bostonglobe.com/metro/2018/04/24/state-high-court-rejects-challenge-charter-school-cap/j6eoQGIp6JY2p0CxcZzLmO/story.html

Importantly, as Professor Cunningham points out, John Henry, The Globe’s owner and publisher, is Klarman’s business partner. Klarman, the billionaire hedge funder, contributed $3 million to the Yes on Question 2 faction. He also holds some $92 million in Puerto Rico’s debt, which bodes ill for the islanders as they face the impending, sweeping charterization of their public schools.

https://www.alternet.org/hedge-funder-puerto-rico-charter-schools

By contrast, Clive McFarlane, writing in the Worcester Telegram, unafflicted by allegiances among business partners, had this perspective:

“Mr. Nicolette (executive director of the Massachusetts Charter Public School Association) and other supporters will continue to point to the charter schools that are doing well, while highlighting the traditional public schools that are struggling.

But they won’t tell you about the attrition rates of students attending charter schools, that the top 11 and 17 of the top 20 schools statewide with the highest attrition rates are charter schools.

They won’t tell you that the top seven schools with the highest dropout rates (ranging from 21 percent to 54 percent) in the state are charter schools.

They won’t tell you that the top nine schools in the state with the highest churn rate (the percent of students leaving and arriving during the school year) are charter schools.”

http://www.telegram.com/news/20180425/clive-mcfarlane-states-high-court-rejects-argument-for-lifting-cap-on-charter-schools

The interests of the elite make it clear that though decisive victories against the charter industry have been won, the proponents are not about to walk away.
So, though we’ve won three times in the struggle to keep our “best in the nation” public schools here in Massachusetts, don’t count the charteristas out. Seems there’s a lot of money riding on them.

 

A new report assessed the needs of Arizona’s schools and concluded that the state must spend an additional $2 Billion to upgrade its schools. 

Arizona ranks 49th in the nation for teachers’ salariesand dead last for per-pupil spending.

“The Grand Canyon Institute (GCI), an independent, nonpartisan think tank, conducted its analysis based on educational goals defined in the Arizona Education Progress Meter. The goals were established by Expect More Arizona and The Center for the Future of Arizona….

“It’s been nearly 30 years since Arizona’s state legislature approved a tax increase. Individual tax rates have tumbled downward, and exemptions have increased. Meanwhile, corporate tax cuts have drastically reduced the revenue collected from businesses.”

Sadly, the Republican leadership is deeply indebted to ALEC and the Koch brothers, whose gospel is low taxes and low spending on public services. Last year, the rightwing bill mill ALEC rated Arizona the top-performing state in the nation, despite its abysmal teachers’ salaries and high poverty. On its annual report card, Arizona received a B-, the highest score awarded by ALEC, mainly because of its many school choice programs.

 

Arizona and Colorado adopted ALEC-inspired tax-cutting policies, writes Jan Resseger. Their chief victim was public schools and teachers. This was intentional, not an accidental consequence.

“Arizona and Colorado, where teachers walked out last Thursday and Friday, represent the two states where the gap is widest among all the fifty states.  In Arizona, public school teachers make only 62.8 percent and in Colorado 64.5 percent of the salaries of other college graduates. And in both states the cost of living is quickly rising….

”Here are some realities in Arizona, where teachers continued their strike yesterday. The Washington Post’s Moriah Balingit reports: “When adjusted for inflation, Arizona cut total state per-pupil funding by 37 percent between 2008 and 2015, more than any other state.  That has led to relatively low teacher salaries, crumbling school buildings, and the elimination of free full-day kindergarten in some districts… Low teacher pay has contributed to teacher shortages in Arizona. Some districts, unable to find qualified teaching candidates, have turned to emergency long-term substitutes who are required to hold only a high school diploma.

”Writing for Education Week, Daarel Burnete II adds: “Arizona is one of seven states that, in response to voter demands, has cut income taxes in the last decade, a revenue source schools rely on heavily. In 2016 alone, the state allowed $13.7 billion to go uncollected through a series of income, sales, and other tax exemptions, deductions, allowances, exclusions, or credits, according to the state’s department of revenue.  At the same time, Arizona has made among the most dramatic budget cuts in the nation to its schools, totaling 14 percent in the last decade alone… The paradox is that Arizona’s economy is in its best condition in years.  Its unemployment rate stands at 4.9 percent, and the state’s 100 largest corporations added more than 20,000 jobs last year alone.”

”Colorado’s capacity to fund its schools is complicated by an American Legislative Exchange Council backed Taxpayer Bill of Rights, a TABOR, adopted into Colorado’s state constitution in 1992. Here is a description about how Colorado’s TABOR affects school funding: “(W)hat it basically means is that lawmakers can’t raise your taxes without making you vote on it first. And it also limits how much of a ‘raise,’ so to speak, that the state gets each year. And, if the state happens to generate too much money, it can’t keep it. Instead, this goes back to taxpayers.”  TABOR and other tax freezes and limitations in Colorado mean that state’s allocation for school districts has declined steadily.

”The Center on Budget and Policy Priorities explains further that Colorado is the only state that has embedded a TABOR into its constitution despite attempts in other states, where voters have defeated passage of this kind of restrictive policy that is being promoted by far-right anti-tax interests. More than a decade after the TABOR was passed, Colorado’s revenue collapsed so completely that: “In 2005, Colorado voters approved a measure to suspend TABOR’s formula for five years to allow the state to rebuild its public services. Unfortunately, the suspension did not last long enough for the state to recover fully from the period that TABOR was in effect, and the Great Recession further undermined that effort.  TABOR continues to cause ongoing fiscal headaches for Colorado even as the economy improves.”

The citizens of these states must decide whether they want low taxes or a decent education system. Charters and vouchers are no substitute for adequate funding.

 

 

 

Teachers in North Carolina are planning to take a personal day to march in Raleigh on May 16, when the General Assembly reconvenes.

 

The Los Angeles Unified School District hired billionaire banker Austin Beutner as its next superintendent of schools at a meeting on April 20 and kept the decision secret until May 1.

The vote to hire Beutner was 4-3.

Board member Scott Schmerelson, a retired educator, voted no and issued this angry statement. 

Beutner was briefly publisher of the Los Angeles Times. He is close to billionaire Eli Broad. His investment company Evercore purchased American Media Inc., parent company of the National Enquirer, the supermarket tabloid. Beutner was a member of AMI’s board of directors. Ironically, his father was a top executive in Amway, the DeVos company in Michigan, where Beutner was born.

Schmerelson wrote an apology to the parents and educators who had been writing and emailing to express their views, not knowing that a decision was already made.

He wrote:

”I do not believe that Austin Beutner, who has absolutely no experience in the field of public education, is qualified to manage the largest school district in the nation with an elected Board. He has never taught in a public school, never managed a public school, has no instructional background, and has never worked for a school district of any size. The Board majority refused to exercise due diligence regarding Mr. Beutner’s lengthy and tangled business affairs including the disputed delivery of services and breach of a $3 million contract between LAUSD and Vision to Learn, an organization that he founded and continues to lead.”

I agree. Beutner is totally unqualified. The LAUSD board should be ashamed of this decision. They did not put students first. They put their campaign contributors first. They put students last.

 

Politico explains why some states can’t raise taxes to pay for education and other public services. Conservative Republicans, obeying their puppet masters at ALEC (funded by the Koch brother, the DeVos family, and major corporations) persuaded voters to change the laws to require a supermajority for any tax increases.

“TEACHER STRIKES HIT STATES WITH STRICT TAX HIKE REQUIREMENTS: In Arizona and Oklahoma – where tens of thousands of teachers have flooded state capitals in recent weeks to demand better pay and hundreds of millions of dollars in education funding – the state constitution makes it hard to raise taxes. Voters in both states approved constitutional amendments in 1992 that require a supermajority – much more than half – of the state legislature to impose new taxes or increase existing ones, as opposed to a simple majority.

“- A major lift in some states: It takes two-thirds of the state legislature in Arizona to impose new taxes or increase taxes. In Oklahoma, it takes 75 percent of the state legislature – one of the strictest requirements in the country. And while supermajorities aren’t the sole driver of education funding woes, critics argue that they lock in tax cuts year after year, making it difficult for states to address education funding shortfalls.

“- “This is a classic example of something that sounds good, but it’s a complete poison pill,” said Nick Johnson, senior vice president for state fiscal policy at the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. “Supermajorities just reduce the power of a state to do what it needs to do.” Johnson said the requirements also allow conservatives to “lock-in” their “advantage into the future.” Florida is considering such a proposal on the ballot this November.

“- CBPP notes that Arizona “cut personal income tax rates by 10 percent in 2006, cut corporate tax rates by 30 percent in 2011, reduced taxes on capital gains, and reduced taxes in other ways over the last couple of decades.” State education funding in Arizona is also down 14 percent since the recession hit, after adjusting for inflation. A coalition of Arizona public school advocates led by a progressive policy group is now pushing for a ballot measure to raise income taxes on wealthy Arizonans to help pay for public education.

“- Conservative organizations like the American Legislative Exchange Council have long-pushed for supermajority measures nationwide in an effort to curb “excessive government spending.” Jonathan Williams, ALEC’s vice president for the center for state fiscal reform, argued that supermajorities haven’t prohibited states from taking action when it comes to education funding. He pointed to Oklahoma, where the threat of massive teacher walkouts prompted state lawmakers to pass a rare tax hike in March that would fund a $6,100 pay raise. “When something becomes a necessity, these state lawmakers were able to hit even the most stringent of the supermajority thresholds,” Williams said.”

 

Betsy DeVos has spent decades advocating for school choice.

What a shock for her when she met the teachers of the year and they told her that charters and vouchers were defunding their schools.