Bill Black, a specialist in white-collar crime, discusses Betsy DeVos’ plan to dismantle the U.S. Department of Education team investigating fraud at those predatory for-profit colleges and to staff the Department with veterans of the institutions under investigation. Like many people, I have described her actions as “putting the fox in charge of the henhouse.” Black says it is far worse than that. The right metaphor, he says, is putting the vampire in charge of the blood bank. What is happening now is not just a policy dispute; it is a deliberate program to protect institutional behavior that should be treated as criminal fraud. The victims are college students who are poor and middle-class, who have every right to expect that the government will protect them against fraud, not enable the fraud.
This is only a part of the interview. Open the link and read the rest.
GREGORY WILPERT: It’s The Real News Network. I’m Greg Wilpert, coming to you from Quito, Ecuador. The U.S. Department of Education, under the leadership of Education Secretary Betsy DeVos, is halting investigations into fraudulent practices of for-profit colleges, according to a report that the New York Times released last Sunday. The Obama administration’s Education Department had placed a special team in charge of investigating false advertising, deceptive recruitment practices, and false job placement claims at for-profit colleges. One of the most prominent investigations was the DeVry Education Group, recently renamed Adtalem Global Education, which is one of the largest for-profit educational companies in the world, with nearly two billion dollars in annual revenues.
Joining me to analyze the consequences of abandoning these investigations into for-profit colleges is Bill Black. Bill is a white-collar criminologist, former financial regulator, and associate professor of economics and law at the University of Missouri, Kansas City. He’s also the author of the book, The Best Way to Rob a Bank Is to Own One. Thanks for joining us again, Bill.
BILL BLACK: Thank you.
GREGORY WILPERT: So, one interesting aspect of the story is that Education Secretary, Betsy DeVos, hired several people from for-profit education institutions to work in the Department of Education. These include Robert Eitel, her senior counselor, Diane Auer Jones, a senior advisor on post-secondary education, and Carlos Muñiz, as the department’s general counsel. What’s going on here? Shouldn’t these appointments be considered conflict of interest and ring all kinds of ethics bills?
BILL BLACK: So first, ten seconds of personal privilege to welcome into the world, three hours ago, Heidi Weaver, our new granddaughter. Second, I made the easiest prediction of my life, after Trump was elected, that Warren Harding and Ulysses Grant could rest easy in the history books because there would no longer be a debate about the most corrupt administration in U.S. history. It would clearly be the Trump administration. There’s been a lot of focus on Scott Pruitt over at the EPA, in terms of corruption. But Betsy DeVos is giving him a consistent run for the money, just more under the radar.
So, here’s the background. First, out of the great financial crisis of 2008, one of the extraordinary things was that the most devastated people, in terms of loss of wealth, were not folks without college degrees, but actually folks with college degrees, who were either Latinx or Black. If you were Latinx, your average loss of wealth during the financial crisis, if you had a college degree, was nearly eighty percent. And it was roughly sixty percent if you were Black. That reversed the pattern for whites, where if you had a college degree, your percentage loss of wealth was lower than whites who had no college degree.
Now, part of that, of course, is the mortgage markets- being put into predatory mortgages at the worst possible time, at the peak of the bubble. But another thing, major thing, in terms of Blacks and Latinos, is that they are- disproportionately, they go to for-profit universities. And for-profit universities, characteristically- and this isn’t just recently, this goes back to World War II era, just after World War II when for-profit colleges first became a substantial deal.
And here’s the triple-whammy you get. One, they are much more expensive than regular universities. Two, you get a- statistically, a much, much worse education. That means your prospects in terms of jobs are far worse. And third, you’re left in massive debt because of the combination of the first two things. So that, instead of being the route to success, it is, as those overall statistics I cited, been an enormously good way of losing extraordinary amount of wealth between the mortgage markets and these for-profit universities.
So, long before the Obama administration came in, people have been writing about the really high incidents of fraud in these for-profit universities. The GAO actually sent undercover investigators that pretended to be people applying for college, which is, of course, really easy to send in testers of that kind. In every single case- so, I think they send them into the eight largest. In every single case, the supposed student was induced to do something that would be a false representation, which is to say, a crime.
In three of the eight cases, at least, the college counselor for the for-profit university consciously, expressly told them to lie and how to lie. Subsequent investigations under the Obama administration have documented the widespread layers of fraud, and for-profit universities have finally begun to experience what they should, which is that it’s very difficult- it’s more difficult to con people, and the government was finally cracking down. And that was- the problem was finally being reduced, and indeed there was some remedy at the federal level.
Because, after all, these are students had been induced by fraud to get into situations where they were literally driven bankrupt by the combination of expenses, debts, and limited increased employment prospects. And as viewers will, I hope, remember, the Republicans changed the bankruptcy laws so that student debt is not dischargeable in bankruptcy. So this, you know, is a cloud that stays over your entire life if it forces you into bankruptcy, from which you make never economically recover.
So, finally there was some recognition at the federal level that it was completely inappropriate to allow these entities to drive you bankrupt through what had been fraudulent misrepresentations to the students. And all for-profit universities live- I mean, and I mean almost totally live on federal grants to the students for education. Without those federal grants, no major chain of for-profit universities could exist. So, we’re really subsidizing all of these fraudulent entities through federal grants. And you would think an administration that A, promised to drain the swamp, and B, to stop these kind of rip-offs of the public sector, would crack down. But of course, none of us is surprised at this point to learn that it’s exactly the opposite.
The metaphor usually used is that DeVos has put the fox in charge of the chicken coop. But it’s really more- the way these for-profit universities operate, it’s more like you would put the vampires in charge of the blood bank, because they are basically sopping up the lifeblood of middle and working-class, and even poor people, through this device of the for-profit fraudulent rip-offs. And Betsy DeVos is now ensuring that the vampires can do this with absolute impunity from the laws.
I read any and everything that Black writes. He knows what he is talking about. From wiki: “Black was a central figure in exposing Congressional corruption during the Savings and Loan Crisis. He took the notes during the Keating Five meeting that were later published in the press, and brought the event to national attention and a congressional investigation. According to Bill Moyers,
“The former Director of the Institute for Fraud Prevention now teaches Economics and Law at the University of Missouri, Kansas City. During the savings and loan crisis, it was Black who accused then-house speaker Jim Wright and five US Senators, including John Glenn and John McCain, of doing favors for the S&L’s in exchange for contributions and other perks. The senators got off with a slap on the wrist, but so enraged was one of those bankers, Charles Keating — after whom the senate’s so-called “Keating Five” were named — he sent a memo that read, in part, ‘get Black — kill him dead.’ Metaphorically, of course. Of course.”[5]”
I’ve said this before.
A significant number of the victims of the for-profit college vermin that Devos is now, — and has been for a long while — aiding and abetting are …
… male and female veterans of Iraq and Afghanistan, as well as their spouses and widows/widowers …
These are people who have already come back suffering from severe — and perhaps permanent — mental and/or physical damage in services of our country … and Devos is now helping the absolute scum of the earth predators to victimize them even further. Predatory college victims — veterans and non-veterans alike — are conned into emptying out their family’s financial resources, or go into permanent debt (non-dischargeable through bankruptcy) for totally useless degrees. Suicides among those victims are non uncommon.
When you add this to the mix, the evil in play here is truly horrifying.
Here’s John Oliver on for-profit college scams and the student debt arising from them:
Now that I think about it, perhaps what I highlighted above is why Secretary Devos has that $1 million/month security detail (paid by your and my taxes, by the way):
https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/education/the-cost-of-betsy-devoss-security-detail-1-million-per-month/2017/04/07/efa01488-1ade-11e7-9887-1a5314b56a08_story.html
This country better find it’s soul and morals.
I have one word: FRAUDS. Using people who are AT-RISK no less and telling them lies. Good Ameri-DUH.
Thanks, Jack. Glad there is a John Oliver.
People need to know about “Propaganda Techniques.”
Are the people of America even aware of “Propaganda Techniques” being used on them anymore?
Politicians are masters of deceit and so are the BIG MONEY folks. Everywhere I look, people are being scammed and don’t know they are being scammed. This “Pay-to-Play” monied environment is SICK and is a CANCER.
https://classroom.synonym.com/what-are-the-seven-techniques-of-propaganda-12080912.html
Name Calling
Using negative or discriminatory words, propagandists arouse suspicion and prejudice. The goal is to create an overall dislike of a group of people, so verbally attacking their beliefs, institutions, leaders or religion is fair game. Name calling is often used in ridiculing cartoons or writing.
Glittering Generalities
Using slogans or simple catchphrases, propagandists make generalized statements attractive to their audience. Usually these statements involve ideas of love, honor, glory, peace, family values, freedom, patriotism–anything general enough to inspire pride. These statements usually say very little, so they cannot be proved or disproved.
Transfer
A transfer associates a revered symbol with an idea the propagandist wants to promote. If an idea can be linked with, say, a flag, it has a greater chance of winning popular approval. The stir of emotions makes it difficult for people to clear their minds and think critically.
Testimonial
A testimonial makes an association between a respected or authoritative person and the cause. The hope is that the respected person will lead others to follow his ideas. It is similar to a celebrity endorsement of a product.
Plain Folks
The goal of this technique is to convince the audience that the spokesman is like them and shares their woes and concerns. Using plain language and mannerisms, he is able to build trust by his followers.
Bandwagon
This technique capitalizes on the human drive to be part of a crowd, a member of the winning team. By creating the illusion that widespread support exists, the propagandist hopes those who are on the fence will join the cause. If they refuse, this technique seeks to make them feel isolated.
Card Stacking
By using only those facts that support their ideas, propagandists can make it seem that their way is the only correct way. The aim of card stacking is for the audience to assume these facts are conclusive. By “stacking cards against the truth,” propagandists can control the beliefs of their audience.
There is the TEACH grant program, with fraud built in.
DeVos is supposed to be looking at this.
https://www.npr.org/sections/ed/2018/05/22/605248637/education-department-launches-top-to-bottom-review-of-teachers-grant-program
State attorneys general can do a lot to make up for the federal government not doing their job on this issue so if you have an opportunity to elect one of those ask them if they will prosecute fraud.
We can also advise young people or returning college students that this corruption and capture exists so they should probably not rely on advice or information from the US Department of Education regarding college. They simply don’t have the tools or information to gauge credibility or reliability so they should assume the worst because the cost of a mistake is so high. Tens of thousands of dollars in debt is life-altering.
If they’re first generation college students they should find a person who knows the ropes and is acting in their interest. There are a lot of college graduates who can help them, voluntarily, maybe not in their families but they exist.
RE: 1st para, yes & our (NJ) State Atty Gen has already said they will pursue regardless – BUT (per continuation of article):
“GREGORY WILPERT: …The New Jersey attorney general complained on Thursday that the Department of Education… is not even sharing information with states…
BILL BLACK: ..Only at the federal level can you shut down these fraudulent operations through a single action where they operate, which is typical, these chains of for-profit schools often operate in many states, sometimes all fifty states. [The Dept of ]Education also has… all of the key data, because they go at the federal level, and they can and should share that with… state regulators and prosecutors.”
So reading between the lines, DOEd already amassed data in multiple cases under Obama admin, but Trump admin has shut all investigations down & won’t share data collected – so states have to start from zero! As a ‘donor’ state, NJ has probably already pd for this data twice over but fed won’t share?! Grrr. Hope our Atty-Gen files lawsuit for it.
The public can also start asking these public employees to show us what value they return.
It’s kind of interesting that their ideological beliefs forbid them performing their basic duties but that’s not a defensible position as far as the value we get from employing them.
There’s no point in having them if they opt out of any more of the work they’re paid to do.
Why is this not surprising? One thing after another. So very MANY things under the Trump administration to make our country “GRATE” again. Someone said that Trump is the one person who can make George W. Bush look not so bad.
Gordon,
Glad to see you are back on the blog again. WordPress constantly kicks regulars off, with no explanation.
Diane, I sent this article to Gordon by copy/paste. He has tried to respond to other articles but most the time they aren’t accepted. Today he said it went through.
He tried to become a regular subscriber but hasn’t figured out how to do that.
WordPress blocked Gordon
Thanks Diane for the intro to Bill Black as well as to this site “Naked Capitalism” (subscribed!).
What a long way overpriced inside-the-matchbook-cover correspondence courses have come! (Remember those?) Their current incarnation proliferates thanks to shady govt tax-backed loans, ensuring naive participants get not only a bum deal, but decades of debt to boot.
An old story on steroids, American as snake-oil remedies. I agree with this from comment thread to article: “To paraphrase Pinckney, ‘Millions for defense but not one cent for education or healthcare!’ This is not a Republican sickness; it’s bipartisan. It’s simply American. Guns, not butter. Bombs, not books….and so on.”