In this insightful and harrowing article, we can see clearly the contours of a devilish plan, hatched in the corridors of ALEC and other corporate-controlled entities. The centerpiece of the plan is the destruction and privatization of public education, which all of us own and paid for with our taxes.
Read it and get involved. Join the Networkfor Public Education. Join your local advocacy group. Never despair. Don’t stop fighting.
It begins like this:
It was the strike heard ‘round the country.
West Virginia’s public school teachers had endured years of low pay, inadequate insurance, giant class sizes, and increasingly unlivable conditions—including attempts to force them to record private details of their health daily on a wellness app. Their governor, billionaire coal baron Jim Justice, pledged to allow them no more than an annual 1% raise—effectively a pay cut considering inflation—in a state where teacher salaries ranked 48th lowest out of 50 states. In February 2018, they finally revolted: In a tense, nine-day work stoppage, they managed to wrest a 5% pay increase from the state. Teachers in Oklahoma and Kentucky have now revolted in similar protests.
It’s the latest battle in a contest between two countervailing forces: one bent on reengineering America for the benefit of the wealthy, the other struggling to preserve dignity and security for ordinary people.
If the story turns out the way the Jim Justices desire, the children of a first-world country will henceforth be groomed for a third-world life.
Gordon Lafer, Associate Professor at the Labor Education and Research Center at the University of Oregon, and Peter Temin, Professor Emeritus of Economics at MIT, help illuminate why this is happening, who is behind it, and what’s at stake as the educational system that once united Americans and prepared them for a life of social and economic mobility is wiped out of existence.
The Plan: Lower People’s Expectations
When Lafer began to study the tsunami of corporate-backed legislation that swept the country in early 2011 in the wake of Citizens United—the 2010 Supreme Court decision that gave corporations the green light to spend unlimited sums to influence the political system—he wasn’t yet clear what was happening. In state after state, a pattern was emerging of highly coordinated campaigns to smash unions, shrink taxes for the wealthy, and cut public services. Headlines blamed globalization and technology for the squeeze on the majority of the population, but Lafer began to see something far more deliberate working behind the scenes: a hidden force that was well-funded, laser-focused, and astonishingly effective.
Lafer pored over the activities of business lobbying groups like the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC) – funded by giant corporations including Walmart, Amazon.com, and Bank of America—that produces “model legislation” in areas its conservative members use to promote privatization. He studied the Koch network, a constellation of groups affiliated with billionaire brothers Charles and David Koch. (Koch Industries is the country’s second-largest private company with business including crude oil supply and refining and chemical production). Again and again, he found that corporate-backed lobbyists were able to subvert the clear preferences of the public and their elected representatives in both parties. Of all the areas these lobbyists were able to influence, the policy campaign that netted the most laws passed, featured the most big players, and boasted the most effective organizations was public education. For these U.S. corporations, undermining the public school system was the Holy Grail.
After five years of research and the publication of The One Percent Solution, Lafer concluded that by lobbying to make changes like increasing class sizes, pushing for online instruction, lowering accreditation requirements for teachers, replacing public schools with privately-run charters, getting rid of publicly elected school boards and a host of other tactics, Big Business was aiming to dismantle public education.
The grand plan was even more ambitious. These titans of business wished to completely change the way Americans and their children viewed their life potential. Transforming education was the key.

Diane,
Thank you so much for this important post.
This is what I have been saying: “The elite want and need slaves.”
Thus, this two tiered everything.
LikeLiked by 1 person
And even within the lowest echelons a careful division between those trained for “manager” and those trained for “drone.”
LikeLike
Yes. The last two paragraphs are a telling summary of the unfolding agenda and the aims of corporate titans who fund ALEC as well as the US Chamber of Commerce.
LikeLike
Of course this is nothing knew . It is an extension of the Powell document and a near 50 year campaign. The “enemies of the free enterprise system were to be found in our institutions of higher education and the media”. Aligning k-12 with that goal of creating subservient worker drones became the goal of the Business Round Table in the late 80s .
So how do you fight back against the oligarchy and plutocracy. The problem is not the charter school operators or the ed reformers . The problem is the system those oligarchs are seeking to defend.
LikeLike
(new) . I love the edit button
LikeLike
All election campaigns publicly funded. Overturn Cit-United decision.
LikeLike
It’s worse, as Laura H. Chapman briefly explains in her reply to related INET article, “Heckman Study: Investment in Early Childhood Education Yields Substantial Gains for the Economy,” at http://disq.us/p/1s44jzh:
“Unfortunately the economic gains are, and will be the selling point for investments in preschool. Preschool programs are being funded by social impact bonds, also known as pay for success contracts. Investors expect a ROI of 5 to 7% from programs designed to screen out students whole would qualify for special education. The investors have an “intermediary” who represents their interests, often including the power to fire the “providers of service” if targets are not met. Among these are being academically prepared to enter Kindergarten and Grade one, read by grade three, and so on–for each cohort. Heckman’s research of economic outcomes is being used to sell SIBs . Unfortunately, the scope of preschool services offered by SIBs–a financial product–is not usually comparable to the range of services from the “high quality” programs that inform Heckman’s research. Another question is this: Why are the economic benefits lauded over all other benefits to children and families.”
LikeLike
No question we need to transform education but I believe John Dewey’s view is one that educators need to re-examine and aim for “industrial intelligence” to combat the vultures circling around our pubic schools. In “Vocational Education Learning to Earn” The Middle Works.10.303 and First published in School and Society 5 (1917): 331-35. Dewey explains: “[1] reorganization of existing schools as will give all pupils a genuine respect for useful work, [2] the ability to render service, and [3] a contempt for social parasites whether they are called tramps or leaders of “society.” [4] Instead of assuming that the problem is to add vocational training to an existing cultural elementary education, it will recognize frankly that the traditional elementary education is largely vocational, but that the vocations which it has in mind are too exclusively clerical, and too much of a kind which implies merely ability to take positions in which to carry out the plans of others; [5] make much of developing motor and manual skill, but not of a routine or automatic type. It will rather [6] utilize active and manual pursuits as the means of developing constructive, inventive and creative power of mind; …it will [7] select the materials and the technique of the trades not for the sake of producing skilled workers for hire in definite trades, but for the sake of securing industrial intelligence- [8] knowledge of the conditions and processes of present manufacturing, transportation and commerce–so that the individual may be able to make his own choices and his own adjustments, and be master, so far as in him lies, of his own economic fate;… it will be recognized that, for this purpose, [9] a broad acquaintance with science and skill in the laboratory control of materials and processes is more important than skill in trade operations; and [10] finally It will remember that the future employee is a consumer as well as a producer, that the whole tendency of society, so far as it is intelligent and wholesome, is [11] to an increase of the hours of leisure, and that an education which does nothing to enable individuals to consume wisely and to utilize leisure wisely is a fraud on democracy.”
LikeLike
What a refreshing post! I would love to see more discussions exploring the foundational goals of education. As to what you say here, I have to squint a little to re-imagine Dewey’s concept in today’s economic context. But I believe there is much to be said for making “do useful work”/ “make useful things” one of the foundational planks in the platform, especially for youngest learners. There is something innately socializing about it. Don’t get me wrong here, but you can see this principle operating in dog-training. (My mother used to say, ‘Anyone who is planning to rear a child should first raise a dog.’)
Sadly, the most pressing issue in education at the moment is fighting to re-capture democratic local control by the public and the professional role of the educator. But it’s equally important to discuss our visions for the future.
LikeLike
The wealthy want it all”
The wealthy want it all
A third or half won’t do
The wealthy want the Fall
And other seasons too
The wealthy want the land
And want the seven seas
They even do demand
The flowers, birds and bees
The wealthy will not rest
Until the earth is theirs
And manage to bequest
The planet to their heirs
LikeLike
Pale Blue Dot
A pale blue dot
In blackest void
They want the lot
The greedy boys
LikeLike
So maybe it’s poetic justice that the planet inherited by their heirs will be polluted beyond repair.
LikeLike
By then, they’ll have a rocket ship to blow this hotdog stand.
Elon Musk is already working on it.
But if we are lucky, they will leave sonner rather than later.
I would contribute toward the flight (as long as it is guaranteed one way)
LikeLike
The shape of things to come”
The shape of things to come
Is everywhere we look
To Appalachia from
The streets of Stony Brook
The shape of things to come
Is poverty and want
It’s water full of scum
And lead in drinking font
The shape of things to come
Is bridges falling down
It’s children in the slum
And homeless all around
The shape of things to come
Is neighborhood that’s gated
It’s people under thumb
And spying unabated
The shape of things to come
Has stared us in the face
Though most of us are numb
And caught up in the race
LikeLike
This is simply frightening! I’ve lately been looking at my teen children and wondering why I brought them into this crummy world. I had children later in life and grew up in the 70’s. Times then were much different and kinder. They were by no means perfect times, but the checks and balances in government were there to protect the people….yes, there were greedy people and dirty politicians, but the government was functional and working. It was the Clinton Era when everything seemed to go haywire and careen out of control…it was the tipping point which has now led to the woes we have today.
LikeLike
Youngster!!
LikeLike
“It was the Clinton Era when everything seemed to go haywire and careen out of control…”
Oh, things started to “careen out of control” before then. Some say the 60s-think Kennedy assasination/Vietnam, others say Nixon/Watergate, others say with Carter, still others say with Unca Ronnie and Iran/Contra–do you see the pattern??
LikeLike
Some might say it went out of control the day the Fondling Fathers like Jefferson wrote slavery into the Constitution so they could continue fondling their slaves.
Others would say it went out of control the day Christopher Clubbedus arrived in the New World.
I lean toward the latter.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Jefferson had NOTHING to do with the Constitution. He was the ambassador to France during the convention. Often a mistake made by people.
LikeLike
He didn’t sign the Constitution, but he pushed for the Bill of Rights, even as French ambassador, without which I believe we would have had nothing more than a new form of aristocratic rule, what with voters only directly electing the House of Reps back then. He was probably a Fondling Father, though. Who knows for sure? Politics started to get really ugly in 1800. And everything changed in 1865.
LikeLike
Jefferson was not a Fondling Father?
DAM. It’s such a great name.
LikeLike
Not my invention, by the way.
LikeLike
It looks like Jefferson is considered a Founding Father, even though he did not write the Constitution as Threatened rightly pointed out (thanks!)
Historian Richard B. Morris in 1973 identified the following seven figures as the key Founding Fathers: John Adams, Benjamin Franklin, Alexander Hamilton, John Jay, Thomas Jefferson, James Madison, and George Washington.
LikeLike
Maybe you’re right, but until the Clinton era, there were still actual “politicians” in government who kept things in check. It’s when business people started to get elected into higher office that the downward spiral began.
LikeLike
Though I have done no primary source research myself, the secondary sources I have read tell the story of a fascinated Thomas Jefferson sending copies of books discovered in Paris bookstores wrapped in oil cloth and bearing translations of Montesquieu, Beccaria, and other enlightenment thinkers to a waiting James Madison. The idea that Jefferson had nothing to do with the constitution is erroneous at best. Still, it would be a mistake to discount the federalist urge to control the masses as a motivation behind the constitution. Like other revolutions, the American success in throwing off the British was followed by arresting the movement toward decentralization.
LikeLike
Lisa M
I am afraid you have rose colored vision of politics prior to Clinton . What may be fair to say is that there were periods that politicians paid more attention to the needs of masses vs the American oligarchy..
LikeLike
I am very proud — and also surprised — that every teacher at my school except one signed on the dotted line to keep paying dues to the union after the Republican Supreme Kangaroo decides the Janus case to defund collective bargaining. I hope the little speech I gave at the meeting was rousing enough to play a part in their decisions. It was a humble moment of inspiration.
The wealthy of the world have always wanted it all. They have usually gotten it. Dual systems are usually overcome with bloody struggle. There have been moments of progression, though. Much of the 20th century was a step forward. The Labor Movement, the New Deal, the Civil Rights Movement, the Great Society… They are historical moments of inspiration.
From them, I draw inspiration. I think, as a relative youngster, I was born in the 1970’s, at the end of an era of progress. So I need to read books from the past. I need to draw inspiration from somewhere so I can keep giving little speeches at meetings and refusing to allow online curricula to enter my classroom. Daily blog posts and poems help too.
LikeLike
There were folks roving back & forth among govt, academia & business as far back as I can remember. When I started working at Bechtel in the ’70’s, George Schultz (an economist who had worked in both academia & as Nixon’s Sec’y of Labor before then) became our president for 8 yrs, then was tapped by Reagan in ’82 as Sec’y of State, & has been active in both biz & politics since then. Casper Weinberger was another notable govt figure whose career encompassed law & private sector businessman, later VP Bechtel, chairman Forbes mag. Alfred E Kahn, a labor relations & economics prof while I was at Cornell, was never a businessman, but arguably did more to bust unions & deregulate industry under Carter & Reagan than any businessman.
I saw the fin collapse of ’08 as Reagan’s chickens coming home to roost [buttressed by GHWBush & Clinton policies] — but I’m no historian, & I expect there was funny-biz going on in the late ’70’s as well. I had a peephole into biz as then-wife of a WallSt lawyer, & remember having a bad feeling about the manic rash of leveraged buyouts by corporate raiders.
LikeLike
Of course this is nothing new
The socio-political system of “finesse the issue of domination” feeds off of
political labeling. Political labeling is mostly pious word clouds. What
“Wizzer of Odds” DOESN’T use goody-goody marlarkey? Which one
doesn’t have tailors spinning the “unity of interests” clothes?
When the results (rich getting richer) clash with the proclamations,
used to articulate the function, AMPLIFY the proclamations.
The state loves it, and knows the “game” is still on.
LikeLike
There is a method to their madness. Keep the elite in power and diminish the middle class and poor. We the 99% must pay attention!
LikeLike
At the same time membership in a labor union is declining in the US at an alarming rate compared to other industrialized nations. Our rapid decline in union membership is due to a coordinated campaign by ALEC and billionaires to stamp out unions. Both political parties are infected with copious amounts of corporate cash and fealty to them. Our only hope is to end Citizens United and limit the amount of money in elections. https://www.vox.com/2014/9/1/6078697/decline-of-unions-united-states-worldwide-oecd
LikeLike
Yes. The fourth chart in the Vox article you linked is particularly telling. Citizens United along with Janus will create another huge jump in wealth inequality. As Noam Chomsky said (I’m paraphrasing), Americans no longer have a right to food and water, and soon their children won’t have a right to an education.
LikeLike
But Nestle has the right to that water, eh! 😦
LikeLike
To LCT above: in 2011, ALEC held its 40th birthday party at the very swanky Palmer House Hilton in Chicago. We had, for that time, what would be considered a substantial # of protesters outside of the hotel. (Did we receive any news coverage, even though Jesse Jackson was one of the speakers? Not even local.)
My friends & I full expected the ALEC revelers to eat least open a window & toss out some cake crumbs, w/the statement, “Let them eat cake!”
LikeLike
There are many who feel that teacher salaries/benefits are not unreasonable. See
https://www.city-journal.org/html/no-teachers-are-not-underpaid-15867.html
LikeLike