Now, here is a startling and welcome development. Dennis Kucinich, who is running for Governor of Ohio, has proposed a complete ban on campaign contributions by charter operators. If charter operators couldn’t give campaign contributions, they would not be able to buy legislators or other state officials. Since public schools can’t make campaign contributions, that would level the playing field.
Are the voters of Ohio sick of charter corruption yet?
Charter school officials would be banned from making campaign contributions under a sweeping plan unveiled today by Democratic gubernatorial candidate Dennis Kucinich.
The former congressman and Cleveland mayor also wants a statewide vote on a constitutional amendment that would allow local school boards to decide whether they even want charter schools, which are privately operated but funded with taxpayer dollars.
“Ohio public educational funding has been subverted by special interest groups and for-profit charter school management companies, who through campaign contributions have, in the past decade, normalized the privatization of public education funding, creating an often substandard, for-profit system ‘education’ system, using and misusing billions of dollars in public funds,” Kucinich said.
“The normalization of what is essentially a wholly corrupt system constitutes one of the greatest scandals in the history of the state of Ohio because billions of public funds have been diverted away from public education and have enriched private, for-profit enterprises.”
He pointed to the founder of ECOT, the online charter school forced to close last month, who gave hundreds of thousands of dollars to state lawmakers who enabled lax oversight and the diversion of money from local school districts to charter schools.
“Any local school board member, member of the General Assembly, or employee of the Ohio Department of Education who accepts any payment, gratuity, or campaign contribution with a value of more than one dollar, or any pecuniary benefit in excess of one dollar from the operator of a charter school or on behalf of such entities will be subject to forfeiting any state benefit, including salary and pension,” Kucinich said.
He said he will ask the legislature to return to the public election of all members of the state school board, which was the case from 1956 to 1996, when governors were given the power to appoint several board members. Ironically, just two days ago Gov. John Kasich pushed to allow the governor to choose the entire board, because voters have no idea of for whom they are voting.
Kucinich pledged to “shine a light on the corrupt system that allows millions of taxpayer dollars to flow into the pockets of profiteering private charter operators, and then, into the political campaign coffers of politicians, all at the expense of local taxpayers, Ohio’s children, and quality public education.”
His running mate, Akron City Councilwoman Tara Samples, worked as a paralegal and board liaison for White Hat Management, long one of the state’s leading charter-school operators under Akron industrialist and major Republican campaign donor David Brennan.

Let’s hope Ohio folks vote rationally and don’t drink the “KOOK AID.”
LikeLike
I would agree completely, but under Citizens United it will never fly. Free “speech”, y’know….
LikeLiked by 1 person
This proposal to restrict the right of individuals and corporations to free speech is patently unconstitutional. See Buckley v. Valeo (1976)
https://www.oyez.org/cases/1975/75-436
see also:
Citizens United v. F.E.C. (2009)
https://www.oyez.org/cases/2008/08-205
(I am a former Ohio resident). Mr. Kucinich is a state-wide joke in Ohio. He was mayor of Cleveland when the city was forced into bankruptcy. He was voted the 7th worst mayor in the USA. see
http://realchange.org/kucinich.htm
LikeLike
Buying politicians is free speech?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Until our nation has publicly-financed elections (FAT CHANCE!), individuals and corporations are going to be making donations to politicians to finance their campaigns. Without fund-raising, many people, mostly liberal/progressives would not be able to seek public office.
Politicians are going to have to grovel to the big-money people and big-money interests.
The people are the losers in this system.
For better or worse, that is the way that it is.
Until such time as the system is abandoned for publicly-financed campaigns, the people must remain vigilant.
Donations must be fully disclosed and every cent accounted for. Voters/citizens will have to inform themselves, and vote accordingly.
LikeLike
However corporations are owned by their share holders . Therefore any political donation on the part of the board is a violation of the free speech rights of those shareholders. Those who do not agree with the inherently political decisions of the Board of Directors .The fraction of return that is being stolen from those holders that oppose the decision is irrelevant.
You could make the argument that those shareholders could invest elsewhere . To which I would say that Mark Janus could work elsewhere . Let us stop pretending that court decisions are non political.
Political donations to a candidate are limited by election laws . Political donations to 501cs, the source of much dark money are a theft of tax dollars as that they are made tax free . Which lowers income and taxes owed . Therefore they deprive me of Government resources. I don’t see why I should be forced to subsidize anybodies political goals.
LikeLike
Great response! We need to overturn Citizens United or amend the Constitution.
LikeLike
From the article: His [Kucinich’s] running mate, Akron City Councilwoman Tara Samples, worked as a paralegal and board liaison for White Hat Management, long one of the state’s leading charter-school operators under Akron industrialist and major Republican campaign donor David Brennan.”
I’ve been a big fan of Kucinich over the years but his running mate is a curious choice; she was part of a charter school network supported by an oligarch. Has she done a 180 and recanted her support of charter schools? I guess so, since DK has made his opinions quite clear. I wish NJ would allow the residents of a district to vote on whether they want a charter school dumped on them or not. As it stands now, charter schools are forced on school districts without any input from the voters or taxpayers. The charter cheer leaders always talk about “choice.” So why not give the residents of a school district a CHOICE whether they even want a charter school in their district or not. As for me and if I had my druthers, I would not allow charter schools because they drain funds and resources from the REAL public schools.
LikeLike
My bet is that they are not forced on wealthier districts in NJ ,who would have lynch parties out for the necks of local politicians. Politicians who diverted tax dollars away from their essentially Private School Education inside a Public School setting would be jobless in short order.
LikeLike
Yes, wealthier districts have made loud noises against an impending charter offload on their district. Sometimes it works and they defeat the charter school and other times it doesn’t work because the charter school persists in requesting for its existence.
LikeLike
I zeroed in on the same issue: the running mate is huge problem for me, inanition to Kucinich’s ability to deliver better rhetoric than results in Cleveland.
LikeLike
This post is not an endorsement of Kucinich. I hope that his fierce focus on charter corruption encourages other candidates to do the same.
LikeLike
Some googling on this point told me that she had a very low-level position at White Hat and got downsized after about a year. Her background suggests, at worst, a willingness to bend whichever way the wind’s blowing. Kucinich’s platform will be her platform.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I don’t think prohibiting charter school operators from making campsign donations is going to fly. Why should that one industry be singled out for promoting its self-interest and no others? This is how our dysfunctional political system is currently structured. If Kucinich was calling for an overhaul of how elections are funded I’d be right with him. But if he believes publicly-funded charter schools should not exist, he should push for legislative action to get rid of them.
LikeLike