Please read this wonderful statement!
Willam Mathis is Vice-Chairman of the Vermont Board of Education and Managing Director of the National Education Policy Center.
Losing our Purpose, Measuring the Wrong Things.
“Above all things I hope the education of the common people will be attended to, convinced that on their good sense we may rely with the most security for the preservation of a due degree of liberty.”
■ Thomas Jefferson
“For our first 200 years, the paramount purpose for building and sustaining universal public education was to nurture democracy. Written into state constitutions, education was to consolidate a stew of different languages, religious affiliations, ethnic groups and levels of fortune into a working commonwealth.
“As Massachusetts’ constitutional framers wrote, “Wisdom, and knowledge, as well as virtue, diffused generally among the body of the people, (is) necessary for the preservation of their rights and liberties….”
In the nineteenth century, Horace Mann, father of the common schools movement, said “Education, then, beyond all other devices of human origin, is the great equalizer of the conditions of men – the balance-wheel of the social machinery.” Through the twentieth century, the popular view was that universal education would produce an equal and democratic society.
“Pulitzer Prize historian Lawrence Cremin and economist John Kenneth Galbraith viewed the GI bill’s educational entitlements as the key building blocks of the strongest democracy and economic power in world history.
“As a result, higher education became democratized and millions were lifted into the middle class. The nation was at the zenith of world influence and democratic parity.
“But our social progress is checkered. Residential segregation and unequal opportunities still blight our society, economy and schools. Unfortunately, rather than addressing politically unpopular root causes, it was far more convenient to demand schools solve these problems.
“The Shift in Educational Purposes – No serious effort was made to assure equal opportunities, for example. Thus, the achievement gap was finessed by blaming the victim.
“Instead of advancing democracy, our neediest schools were underfunded. The new purpose, test-based reform, appealed to conservatives because it sounded tough and punitive; to liberals because it illuminated the plainly visible problems; and it was cheap – the costs were passed on to the schools.
“Having high test scores was falsely linked to national economic performance. In hyperbolic overdrive, the 1983 Nation at Risk report thundered,”the educational foundations of our society are presently being eroded by a rising tide of mediocrity that threatens our very future as a Nation and a people.”
“After 35 years of this same Chicken Little jeremiad, the nation is still the premier economy of the world, leads the world in patents, registers record high stock prices, and is second in international manufacturing. (For the nation as a whole, the independent Bureau of Labor Statistics demonstrates that we do not have a math and science shortage).
“By declaring schools “failures,” public monies were increasingly diverted to private corporations. Yet, after a half-century of trials, there is no body of evidence that shows privatized schools are better or less expensive. Large-scale voucher programs actually show substantial score declines. The plain fact is that privatization, even at its best, does not have sufficient power to close the achievement gap — but it segregates. It imperils the unity of schools and society. This proposed solution works against the very democratic and equity principles for which public systems were formed.
“The Genius of American Civilization – As a nation, our genius is in when we work with common and united purpose. We came together and defined nationhood with the common schools movement. We recovered and rebuilt our society and our economy with the New Deal and the GI bill. Education became universal and we protected the poor and those with special needs with considerable success.
“Regrettably, we are still dealing with echoes of our great civil war, economic segregation is greater than what we saw in the gilded age, environmental catastrophes threaten entire species, economic uncertainty unsteadies many, health care is still unresolved, and our federal government’s lack of stability has reached crisis levels. We are torn by a new racism, bigotry and selfishness.
“If our purpose is a democratic and equitable society, test scores take us off-purpose. They distract our attention. Rather, our success is measured by how well we enhance health in our society, manifest civic virtues, behave as a society, and dedicate ourselves to the common good. Jefferson reminds us, “If the children are untaught, their ignorance and vices will in future life cost us much dearer in their consequences than it would have done in their correction by a good education.”
“The great balance wheel turns slowly. We must select leaders who embrace higher purposes and in John Dewey’s words, choose people who will expand our heritage of values, make the world more solid and secure, and more generously share it with those that come after us.”
William J. Mathis is vice-chair of the Vermont Board of Education and is the Managing Director of the National Education Policy Center. The views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any group with which he is affiliated.

Us Department of Education continues to completely exclude public school families from these taxpayer-funded “choice” promotional events:
It’s odd that they can’t find a single public school in the entire country to highlight, especially considering public schools serve 90% of families. Can that possibly be an oversight? How does a federal agency that supposedly serves “the public” ignore 90% of the public?
Has to be deliberate, excluding public school families. No way they accidentally forgot 90% of people.
LikeLike
There’s a mistake in his tweet. It should read:
“It is Alabama’s first tuition-free PRIVATE charter school.”
LikeLike
Before leaving to “be the river” with my youngest son (25), checking the site for one last time, well let’s just say the title caught of this post caught my eye, needless to say, eh! Y’all know this is coming!
We aren’t “measuring” squat. We aren’t measuring a damn thing.
The most misleading concept/term in education is “measuring student achievement” or “measuring student learning”. The concept has been misleading educators into deluding themselves that the teaching and learning process can be analyzed/assessed using “scientific” methods which are actually pseudo-scientific at best and at worst a complete bastardization of rationo-logical thinking and language usage.
There never has been and never will be any “measuring” of the teaching and learning process and what each individual student learns in their schooling. There is and always has been assessing, evaluating, judging of what students learn but never a true “measuring” of it.
But, but, but, you’re trying to tell me that the supposedly august and venerable APA, AERA and/or the NCME have been wrong for more than the last 50 years, disseminating falsehoods and chimeras??
Who are you to question the authorities in testing???
Yes, they have been wrong and I (and many others, Wilson, Hoffman etc. . . ) question those authorities and challenge them (or any of you other advocates of the malpractices that are standards and testing) to answer to the following onto-epistemological analysis:
The TESTS MEASURE NOTHING, quite literally when you realize what is actually happening with them. Richard Phelps, a staunch standardized test proponent (he has written at least two books defending the standardized testing malpractices) in the introduction to “Correcting Fallacies About Educational and Psychological Testing” unwittingly lets the cat out of the bag with this statement:
“Physical tests, such as those conducted by engineers, can be standardized, of course [why of course of course], but in this volume , we focus on the measurement of latent (i.e., nonobservable) mental, and not physical, traits.” [my addition]
Notice how he is trying to assert by proximity that educational standardized testing and the testing done by engineers are basically the same, in other words a “truly scientific endeavor”. The same by proximity is not a good rhetorical/debating technique.
Since there is no agreement on a standard unit of learning, there is no exemplar of that standard unit and there is no measuring device calibrated against said non-existent standard unit, how is it possible to “measure the nonobservable”?
THE TESTS MEASURE NOTHING for how is it possible to “measure” the nonobservable with a non-existing measuring device that is not calibrated against a non-existing standard unit of learning?????
PURE LOGICAL INSANITY!
The basic fallacy of this is the confusing and conflating metrological (metrology is the scientific study of measurement) measuring and measuring that connotes assessing, evaluating and judging. The two meanings are not the same and confusing and conflating them is a very easy way to make it appear that standards and standardized testing are “scientific endeavors”-objective and not subjective like assessing, evaluating and judging,
and that supposedly objective results are used to justify discrimination against many students for their life circumstances and inherent intellectual traits.
\
C’mon test supporters, have at the analysis, poke holes in it, tell me where I’m wrong!
I’m expecting that I’ll still be hearing the crickets and cicadas of tinnitus instead of reading any rebuttal or refutation.
Because there is no rebuttal/refutation!
Whatever is measured counts
Whatever counts is measured
And counting whatever measures
Is measuring whatever counts
SomeDam Poet.
LikeLike
Totally agree, Dwayne. Have a good trip.
LikeLike
This post reminds us of the democratic, unifying impact of public education. Vermont, unlike most other “sell out” states, understands the value of its public schools. They also take seriously their responsibility to their young people. Vermont has chosen not to jump on the foolhardy, marketplace bandwagon. The state leaders are good stewards of their precious, democratic public system, and they are willing to invest in the future of their young people. Perhaps Sanders’ misunderstanding of what is happening in privatization stems from the fact that Vermont refuses to use their young people as guinea pigs. They have chosen to protect and invest in the promise of a strong public system.
LikeLike
Bernie Sanders is on the Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee. He should have been knowledgeable about the depredations of charters and the fact they dissolve the line between public and private. Vermont gives vouchers to students if there is no public school in their town. That began in 1869.
LikeLike
True. But Hillary should also be knowledgeable about those issues, yet she continued to support “public charter schools” (sic).
LikeLike
Yes, she should have. But she was surrounded by too many people from CAP
LikeLike
Dienne, may I humbly offer a suggestion? Please, please stop with the “But Hillary…” posts. They do nothing but diminish the other positive, informed things you write and cause me to skip over anything you post. “But Hillary…” is now becoming the rhetorical equivalent of “Benghazi!”; a written form of dragging fingernails on a chalkboard. You might as well start posting things like “But Hubert Humphrey…” or “But Wendell Willkie…” since they are just as relevant.
LikeLike
Thank you, Greg.
LikeLike
I also thank Greg. It’s true that Hillary is weak on education but almost all the politicians D and R are one big fat disappointment on education. Education is only one issue, there are many other issues to be concerned about, like keeping the government out of the hands of a fascist con man. We would be so much better off with Hillary than the current occupant of the White House (no Gorsuch on the SCOTUS). It astounds me that so many smart progressive people can’t see this.
LikeLike
I am not totally versed in Vermont’s use of vouchers, but it is hardly the same as what is being touted nowadays. As a rural state with a small population, they try to meet the needs of their students with a range of strategies. No one is making big bucks off VT vouchers and the schools in which they are used are held to a high standard. Vermont has its struggles and not everyone agrees with the solutions they espouse. I know “gold coast” towns were incensed that the state decided to take a significant portion of money they raised over the foundation level to be distributed to less wealthy districts. I am way out of date with what the rules may be now, but at the time this rule was enacted, these wealthy communities started foundations to keep their dollars at home. Vermont is an example of why education policy and funding should not be controlled at the federal level. In some of the more populous states the tension between urban, suburban, and rural needs is quite obvious. It is difficult enough to even come close to satisfying intrastate needs without making it a federal function. The bureaucracy associated with education now is mind boggling. I shudder to think what it could become. All that being said Bernie should have been better informed on what has been going on in education in the last 20-30 years, especially since he had committee responsibilities, but he is far from alone in his ignorance. It is only now that some politicians seem to be hearing the message, especially at the federal level. Education has been treated like some of the public services people in suburban and urban areas are more used to receiving without much thought on their part. As long as the lights go on, no one worries too much about the power grid, but get a good storm and they notice. Too many people have paid little attention to what has been going on with public education. Maybe, just maybe, there is enough momentum now, that it will be harder for the power brokers to ignore.
LikeLike
You are absolutely right about VT’s leadership at the State level…. but I think Bernie Sanders knows a lot more about the ill effects of privatization than he has been given credit for. He is and has been an outspoken critic of the plutocrats and the billionaire oligarchs. He’s an unabashed democratic socialist in an era when most members of the Democratic Party don’t want to be branded as “liberal”. Here’s a link to Bernie’s response to the AFT questionnaire:
https://www.aft.org/election2016/candidate-questionnaire-bernie-sanders
He may not be an ideal Presidential candidate, but I would hope that most readers of this blog would appreciate his dogged determination to preserve our democracy.
LikeLike
I appreciate his dogged critique of the billionaire bandits. I just wish he would recognize that they are using their $$ to destroy public education. He could be our champion.
LikeLike
Preservation of Liberty? And here I was thinking the purpose of education was the preservation of Microsoft. Who knew?
LikeLike
Wonderful. It’s time to drive the numerologist quacks out of U.S. education.
LikeLike
I cringe every time I hear the mediocrity that is the CC$$ in ELA referred to as “higher standards.” I have characterized them as clearly the work of amateurs. The alternative explanation for them, that they are intentionally mediocre–that they are intended by elites as “standards for dummies”–is even more disturbing. Certainly, these are about command and control. Why anyone would think an intellectual monoculture more productive than an ecology, with its rich diversity, escapes me. It’s particularly bizarre that such centralized command and control via standardized [sic] testing would be championed by the Business Roundtable, the Chamber of Commerce, the American Enterprise Institute, the Hoover Institution, ALEC, and other traditional enemies of top-down regulatory fiat. I guess we’ve come to the point where the people in these organizations are comfortable with legislation of what can and cannot be taught and thought about, with running our schools via a Commoner’s Core Curriculum Commissariat and Ministry of Truth.
LikeLike
Thank you, Mr. Mathis. Outstanding.
LikeLike
“For our first 200 years, the paramount purpose for building and sustaining universal public education was to nurture democracy.” With that sentence alone, the heads of the libertarian privatizers will explode. Good!
LikeLike
I’m reading Nancy McLean’s “Democracy in Chains.” Above all else, the libertarians hate public schools.
LikeLike
Libertarians have NO PLAN.
LikeLike
Great article by Mathis! We all need to reread Dewey and also Zinn.
LikeLike
Am I the only one struck by the very different conception of education that Jefferson and the Founders had? They use the words WISDOM and KNOWLEDGE and VIRTUE as goals. These are not the goals of our schools now. Instead it’s now all about READING AND MATH SKILLS. This is not what the Founders had in mind. Should this alarm us? A quiet revolution has taken place in education, and what we see in schools today represents a radical break from tradition.
LikeLike
Excellent post. We all need to be aware of the degradation being imposed upon us. Thanks.
I think, however, that there has always been a segment that supported ‘public’ schools that expected to use the ‘product’ for it’s own profit. Unfortunately, that same segment is now turning schools into job-training facilities.
That is not to say that ‘shop’ classes are not valuable for all. I was forced to take ‘wood shop’, ‘electric shop’, ‘metal shop’ and ‘electric shop’ in ‘Junior High’. Funny thing is that those skills not only came in handy when designing and building an apparatus to calibrate photographic plates (astronomy), but also helped build an apparatus to measure the thermal diffusion coefficient of gasses at odd temperatures (lower than liquid nitrogen, but above liquid helium). So, I would advocate for ‘shop’ classes for everyone. I would also think that ‘home ec.’ could have saved me many mistakes in the kitchen, however that requirement was reserved for the other sex, and I lost the opportunity. (I recently made some cloths to contain fruit for pressing, and, WOW, could I have used “Home Economics!” I should have basted the edges, but only rolled them. As a result, they are probably only good for another two years or so before basting becomes a necessity).
However, all those old classes I remember were primarily designed to help the student develop life skills, not train them for any particular industry. Times have changed.
LikeLike
Did we not put these skills in the school so the students could learn them concurrently with good citizenship? Then citizenship became little more than knowing the pledge to the flag. Real citizenship demands knowing about the real function of government and its obligation to the citizens.
What I do not support is government training children to be employees for specific companies. You want a training program for your employees so you can earn money? It is you who should foot the bill. Can’t get people to work for you? Pay better wages. It is time for the business community to start paying the cost of training.
LikeLike
Yes, Ponderosa!!! Yes. Yes. Yes.
LikeLike