Eli Broad will go down in history–if at all–as a selfish billionaire who used his money to destroy public education wherever and whenever he could. He graduated from public schools in Michigan, but instead of gratitude, he wants to ruin the public schools that helped him succeed. He promotes privatization. He has an Academy for superintendents where they are taught top-down, undemocratic methods; most are failures. He should be ashamed of himself. But billionaires know no shame.
Rally and Protest to support STEM schools, defeat ‘boutique’ school bill AB 1217
LOS ANGELES – Educators, students, parents and graduates of district STEM schools will rally TODAY at 4 PM on the front steps of Helen Bernstein High School, home of a successful STEM program, to protest AB 1217, which is co-sponsored by Assemblymember Raul Bocanegra and State Senator Anthony Portantino. The proposed bill would give away local authority to a boutique, privately-run STEM school in downtown LA.
Assembly Bill 1217 is a secretive, last-minute bill to create a publicly funded but privately operated STEM school, bypassing the local School Board, parents, and educators. If approved, it would take about 800 students from LAUSD but would not operate under the district’s purview. Citing accountability and funding concerns, the California Department of Finance opposes AB 1217 (see attached report). The bill would take away essential per-pupil funding and resources from the 142 STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering and Math) programs already run in the Los Angeles Unified School District.
The backers of the bill include Billionaire Eli Broad, who for years has bankrolled various “some kids, not all kids” schemes to kill the public education system that serves all students in favor of unregulated, unaccountable charter school operators. Ironically, Broad and his cohorts, like the California Charter Schools Association, just spent millions of dollars to buy the LA School Board election — and now he is driving a heavy-handed attempt to circumvent the same board just a few months later. Read LA Times story.
“This bill is an insult to the STEM programs that are in existence at LAUSD schools,” said Ben Kim, who teaches AP Calculus and AP Statistics at the STEM Academy @Bernstein. “Our STEM schools are doing amazing work, despite operating on shoestring budgets. Why don’t they fund these programs before allowing a billionaire-backed school to open up, without proper oversight and accountability?”
TODAY’s protest follows a recent campus visit from newly elected board member Nick Melvoin, who praised the STEM @ Bernstein. The visit was then followed by a board vote to undercut funding at the same school, which is in his district. On Tuesday, Aug. 22, the LAUSD School Board voted 4-3 against George McKenna’s resolution opposing AB 1217. Divisive politics is what Nick Melvoin claimed to be avoiding as he voted along party lines, upholding the ‘billionaire bloc’ vote to deny local opposition to the state bill.
“The 4-3 school board vote shows that they are still beholden to their donors,” Kim said. “In their visit to our school, they tell us they support us. When it comes down to it, nice gestures mean nothing if they won’t fight for our public schools.”
Read Capital and Main story.
Speakers will include: UTLA President Alex Caputo-Pearl, Dr. Ruth Montes (STEM graduate), current STEM students and educators, community members and parents who will call on Portantino, Bocanegra and Melvoin to save LAUSD’s STEM programs and kill AB 1217.
PRESS AVAILABILITY (English and Spanish interviews available)
What: Rally against AB 1217
When: Monday, Aug. 28, 4 p.m. To 5 p.m.
Where: STEM Academy @ Helen Bernstein High School
1309 N. Wilton Place
Los Angeles CA 90028
UTLA, the nation’s second-largest teachers’ union local, represents more than 35,000 teachers and health & human services professionals who work in the Los Angeles Unified School District and in charter schools.

Terrific. This STEM craze is making me CRAZY.
LikeLike
Yvonne, I am so with you. Whatever happened to a well-rounded education?
LikeLike
Agreed! The whole STEM thing is based on the wrongheaded idea that job training is the only purpose of education, and the foolish assumption that in a few years, the only jobs available will be programming drones and robots, a childlike technophile fantasy. Dumb.
LikeLike
Two good arguments in yesterdays NYT Book Review section:
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/22/books/review/campus-confidential-jacques-berlinerblau.html?rref=collection%2Fsectioncollection%2Fbooks&action=click&contentCollection=books®ion=stream&module=stream_unit&version=search&contentPlacement=1&pgtype=sectionfront and
LikeLike
Pretty soon all the STEM folks will be like us Public School Teachers. WATCH! The yahoos who are pushing STEM want MORE people in this field so they can pay them peanuts.
Plus this attraction/addiction to STEM is, as far as I am concerned, really stupid.
LikeLike
Frankly, I don’t need more c*** via electronics. Every company wants to sell me something and I end up dumping more than I read. DELETE, DELETE, DELETE…and I would love to DELETE that DUMP and his worthless people.
But wait, the DEMS have no plan. The DEMS sold out public school teachers and our public schools. I would like to DELETE them, too.
LikeLike
I suspect that Eli Broad and other Democrats like Barack Obama probably got into the charter business for the right reasons thinking that they could run better schools for at-risk kids without teacher union involvement. I can even understand this because there are some union rules that seem ridiculous (although often it is the fault of a lazy principal who can’t be bothered to get rid of a teacher who should be gone.)
But what is unacceptable is that after years of seeing the high performing charters that claim to be in the business for at-risk students doing everything they can to rid themselves of so many at-risk kids, those reformers keep pretending that the difficulties of educating at-risk kids are simply more charters that are allowed to get rid of as many of them as they want.
That’s when you realize the reformers don’t actually care about the education of at-risk kids. If they did, they would approach this issue honesty.
I can’t understand why otherwise good people like Barack Obama and Bernie Sanders can’t bother to read up on this issue. I can understand why unethical people who have a very different agenda want to cover up anything that raises questions. I certainly distrust Eli Broad who is willing to reward the worst practices of charters with money for their “excellence” in shedding unworthy students. Is he corrupt and doing this so he never has to pay higher taxes to fund education, or is he just ignorant and surrounded by greedy sycophants who want to keep the money rolling and don’t care at all about at-risk kids harmed by their policies? I don’t know.
LikeLike
What is worse is Trump and DeVos are considering a federal voucher as part of Trump’s tax reform to further harm public schools. It will be modeled after Florida’s wasteful plan. It could help the wealthy reduce their tax contribution, but the quality of the education from these schools will be poor. The only thing that matters apparently is “choice.” http://time.com/4897741/betsy-devos-school-voucher-tax-overhaul/
LikeLike
Neoliberals believed competition would lift all boats… financial rewards would trickle down…
They were wrong.
LikeLike
I get it about neoliberals. I just don’t understand why Bernie Sanders is so lukewarm and even semi-supportive of “public charters” (whatever they are). If he and Elizabeth Warren would have loudly endorsed the NAACP’s moratorium, it would have had much more impact.
LikeLike
no link to Capital and Main story.
LikeLike
https://capitalandmain.com/proposed-state-run-stem-school-0808?utm_source=New+Members+Only+email+List&utm_campaign=5874d52271-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2017_08_22&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_4e19655952-5874d52271-&utm_source=New+Members+Only+email+List&utm_c
LikeLiked by 1 person
The current (Democratic) Governor of Virginia claims (correctly) that there are STEM Jobs in the Commonwealth, that have no applicants
see
http://wtvr.com/2017/07/24/virginia-computer-jobs/
LikeLike
Charles,
There are labor experts like Professor Hal Salzman of Rutgers University who say there is no shortage of STEM workers. American corporations want to pay Bangladesh wages.
LikeLike
Can you cite any sources, that there are no shortages of qualified engineers and scientists? I get calls and emails almost daily, asking me to apply for engineering positions.
And do you have any sources, that claim that engineering firms wish to pay the wages prevailing in Bangladesh? The positions which I encounter, begin around $80k and go up. If a person has a high-level security clearance, the jobs pay even better.
LikeLike
Charles,
Here is a source:
Click to access 03-17-15%20Salzman%20Testimony%20Updated.pdf
Most of the new jobs in next 10 years are low wage occupations
LikeLike
That hit the nail on the head.
LikeLike
The feds claim that there is both a shortage and a surplus of STEM workers. see
https://www.bls.gov/opub/mlr/2015/article/stem-crisis-or-stem-surplus-yes-and-yes.htm
All I know, is what I see here in Virginia.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Charles,
Inform yourself.
Read this from an expert:
Click to access 03-17-15%20Salzman%20Testimony%20Updated.pdf
LikeLike
Perhaps this could be read as: a shortage of STEM workers willing to be treated as low-paid interchangeable Walmart employees and a surplus of STEM workers looking for high pay, a chance for creative thought and a benefits package.
LikeLike
Q There is a glut of engineers looking for jobs. Did you read what I sent you? END Q
The Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor statistics, states that there is both a shortage of qualified engineers (in some fields), and a surplus of qualified STEM graduates in some fields.
In telecommunications, and computer systems, the demand is high, and the number of applicants is not keeping up. In some specialty fields, like petroleum engineering, the shortage is especially acute.
From the Department of Labor:
Q According to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, the average annual wage for petroleum engineers was $130,280 in May 2012. Most were employed in oil and gas extraction, where they earned an average of $144,810. END Q
Q The median annual Telecommunications Engineer I salary is $64,462, as of August 03, 2017, with a range usually between $57,642-$72,769, however this can vary widely depending on a variety of factors. END Q
Q A Computer Systems Engineer/Architect can get a pay level between 72000 to 108000 based on tenure and industry expertise. Computer Systems Engineers/Architects can get an average pay level of Ninety Seven Thousand dollars per year. END Q
I still do not get your comment about how if engineers are paid Bangladesh wages, that the shortage will be less.
LikeLike
Charles,
There is no shortage of American engineers. Period.
LikeLike
I am an engineer. I work in the Metro WashDC Area. There are some (not many) engineering/technical jobs here (and around the USA) that are not getting applicants. Whether the firms are offering adequate salaries, or for another reason, that is a fact.
There are some technical fields, that have a surplus of qualified professionals. When the space shuttle program closed down, Rockwell had to lay off many technicians and engineers.
Some (not all) firms go to the congress, and plead hardships, and request more H1B visas, to hire foreign engineers/technicians. Some of their statements are generally b****t, but some of their claims have legitimacy.
I think that we can agree, that the STEM field encompasses many different specialties and occupations. We can also agree with the US Department of Labor, that there are some fields that are in shortage and some fields, that are in surplus.
LikeLike
There is a glut in the STEM field. The reason that corporations want those visas is cheap labor. They don’t want to hire Americans. Your hero Trump got visas to import cooks, maids, and gardeners for his luxury resorts this summer because he could not find qualified American workers.
LikeLike
As Peter Greene likes to point out, just because I can’t find a Ferrari for $1.99 does not mean there is a shortage of Ferraris.
If Virginia companies are not receiving applications at the salary they are offering, doesn’t the wisdom of the market say that they should be offering a higher salary?
LikeLiked by 1 person
That also hit the nail on the head.
LikeLike
Econ 101, postulates that a shortage can be eliminated, when the equilibrium price is proffered. No doubt.
LikeLike
Right, when our engineers are paid the same as those in India–about $35,000 or less a year–then there will be no shortage.
LikeLiked by 1 person
saddest truth
LikeLike
bingo
LikeLike
Q Right, when our engineers are paid the same as those in India–about $35,000 or less a year–then there will be no shortage. END Q
I do not follow your reasoning. There are many engineering jobs here in VA(and elsewhere) which pay much higher than the figure you cite.
The Government bureau of labor statistics claims that there is both a surplus and a shortage at the same time. (see the article I cite)
For sensitive classified work, an engineer with a high-level security clearance, can command an impressive salary.
LikeLike
Charles,
There is a glut of engineers looking for jobs. Did you read what I sent you?
LikeLike
” Assembly Bill 1217 is a secretive, last-minute bill to create a publicly funded but privately operated STEM school, bypassing the local School Board, parents, and educators. If approved, it would take about 800 students from LAUSD but would not operate under the district’s purview.”
The legislators who put this bill forward are in Eli’s pocket. He paid for them. Their names need to be publicized.
STEM schools are proliferating well beyond any evidence that there are “future” job opportunities.
Some advocates for arts education signed on to a campaign promoting STEAM–adding some ART to science, technology, engineering, and mathematics.
That campaign reminds me of the era of the National Defense Education Act when arts educators claimed that more art in the curriculum would help us beat the Russians in what was then called “the space race.”
LikeLike
“The 4-3 school board vote shows that they are still beholden to their donors,” Kim said. “In their visit to our school, they tell us they support us. When it comes down to it, nice gestures mean nothing if they won’t fight for our public schools.”
This is pretty much the experience of every public school parent in the country- when they’re busy getting elected they “support” our schools and then when they’re in the offer absolutely nothing, except tests.
He should get used to it. His school is NOT a priority in ed reform. The back-up, the default, the unfashionable public school.
LikeLike
Meanwhile, the US Department of Education is visiting yet another private school:
“Still, Toohey said she would be happy to show off the work happening at Nelson Mandela, which primarily educates children in poverty and uses the phonics-focused Spalding Method for reading and language arts and the Singapore Math curriculum.
“It’s a good opportunity to educate her on how great our public schools are in Omaha and how there are other things happening,” Toohey said. “She won’t learn about things unless we open our door and show her.”
Ludicrous. They go to a private school to learn about public schools. Do they rescind your membership in The Movement if you actually support a US public school?
http://www.omaha.com/news/education/education-secretary-betsy-devos-might-come-to-omaha-though-no/article_b07b8424-8c1f-11e7-b94c-dfe57a744a51.html
LikeLike
What will likely to be the source from which privately-managed, non-union charter (or charter-ish) STEM schools will hire their teachers?
Encorps
This organization is headed up by Caprice Young, who manages California’s notorious Gulen charter schools.
This link BELOW includes an old email to Robert Skeels describing Encorps:
http://www.schoolsmatter.info/2011/10/when-capricious-young-says-no.html
x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x
ROBERT SKEELS:
Given how busy Young has been, and how wealthy she has gotten over the years, one would think she would take a break. Yet it turns out her insatiable lust for money and power never ceases, nor does her hatred of educators and organized labor. A reader sent me an email about her latest venture, and their analysis says so much about Young and the corporate school privatization putsch’s designs on deprofessionalizing teaching altogether.
=======================
Robert,
I looked up Caprice’s new job…. “CEO” of a newly-formed company… “EnCorps”.
I’m trying to piece this together, but it appears that the charters in L.A. and San Francisco are hard up for Math and Science teachers — or ones they can get away with paying slave wages to, Indeed, the charter bosses don’t want to have to deal with fullly-credentialed teachers, and their accompanying demands for a decent wage, decent benefits, decent job conditions, etc.
They want desperate, compliant, cheap labor that can teach those hard-to-place subjects of Math and Science.
Enter… EnCorps… a sort of Teach for America for career-changers with Math and Science backgrounds in the private sector, and who are desperate for any kind of work.
The FAQ’s page seems strikingly familiar to TFA… i.e. the questions being asked of candidates, are almost identical to the TFA application. Here it is:
http://www.EnCorpsteachers.org/FAQ
What’s bothersome is that having a teaching credential… not just in California, but anywhere in the country… ELIMINATES YOU FROM EVEN BEING CONSIDERED TO BE AN EnCorps FELLOW ???!!
WTF???!!!
It’s like an organization is out to recruit people to staff hospitals that are desperate for qualified doctors and nurses, but they then say that anyone with an M.D., or a B.S / M.S in nursing is then disqualified from being recruited into that same organization.
Check this out: (italic highlighting is mine, NAME REDACTED)
“Eligibility
“How do I know if I am eligible for EnCorps?”
“EnCorps Educators come to us from a diverse range of backgrounds. In order to meet basic eligibility requirements, a candidate must meet the following criteria:
“Must be a science, technology, engineering, or math (STEM) professional
” — Fully eligible to work in the United States
” — Able to pass a background check
“— Have a Bachelor’s degree with a GPA of 2.50 or higher
“— Not be in possession of a teaching credential (in California or any other state with a reciprocal agreement)”
A little farther down, it has the following FAQ’s:
“If I already have a teaching credential can I apply?”
“No. Our program is designed to assist math and science professionals in their transition to teaching careers. If you are already a credentialed teacher, you are Not eligible to apply.”
“If I am credentialed in another state can I apply?”
“No. California has reciprocal credential agreements with nearly all other states.”
And that’s a bad thing? Well, for these would-be charter school operators, it is. They’d have to pay those teachers competitive wages, and that ain’t gonna happen.
I mean there are thousands of fully-credentialed MATH/SCIENCE teachers without a job right now in California.
Other than cheaping out on the line item of salary, I’m at a total loss to come up with a good, defensible reason why an organization whose “mission” —to use their own words—is “focused on closing the achievement gap by recruiting math and science professionals” to teach “in high-need schools in low-income communities as our mission dictates” would then turn away those “professionals” most qualified and able to do so.
When you read on, however, you start to get an idea as to why. The goal of EnCorps ‘”Boot Camp” training program is to produce teachers who are “CEO’s of their classrooms”.
Ay carumba! as Bart Simpson would say.
There’s the market-based model at work.
However, if you’re a parent in a low-income community—or any community, for that matter—do you want your kids to be taught by:
1) fully-credentialed Math/Science teachers with possibly years/decades of actual teaching experience;
OR
2) totally inexperienced, uncredentialed people just out of a dubious, short “Boot Camp” that trained them into being “CEO’s of their classrooms”?
I don’t know about you, Robert, but that’s not a close call. Any fully-informed parent would be irate that their principal procured their Math/Science teachers from EnCorps instead of hiring the countless experienced, fully-credentialed teachers who are out there available to work at that parent’s school, with cost-cutting being the underlying reason.
Sincerely,
NAME REDACTED (Jack Covey, actually)
x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x
ROBERT SKEELS:
“CEO’s of their classrooms” indeed.
No experience required?
No, it’s required that you have no experience. We wouldn’t want the bevy of fully qualified experienced professionals applying for their old jobs back now would we? After all, these days all it takes is five weeks to become a master at anything. Right?
The board of the vile EnCorps, Inc. features the usual suspects, including charlatan Ted Mitchell of NewSchools Venture Fund. None of EnCorps board members or staff are strangers to the profitable school privatization faction. They are all about educating poor kids on the cheap.
Celebrated education professor and author Dr. Diane Ravitch once said:
“The Obama administration is using its unprecedented billions to advance a strategy of deregulation and deprofessionalization.”
It should be much more clear now who he’s doing that for.
LikeLike
I’m getting campaign emails from Democrats in Ohio all about how they passionately “support” public schools.
Enough. I want them to come through for once. I’m sick of public schools acting as a venue for their campaign appearances. They take the students and parents in this state who attend public schools for granted. These “adults” have to start adding some value.
LikeLike
I get them too and I let them know I don’t appreciate them coming late to the party.
LikeLike
Diane This just in also: “More Americans Give Top Grades to Public Schools”
By Sarah D. Sparks
August 28, 2017
“Americans’ support for public schools has risen in the last year—across the country and across the political spectrum—but the public also wants schools to go beyond academics to provide more career and student health supports, according to the 49th annual education poll by Phi Delta Kappa International.
The percentage of Americans rating K-12 education quality—at both the national and local levels—at an “A” or “B” is the highest it’s been since the 1980s.”
“That echoes the results of a Gallup opinion poll released last week, which found 47 percent of Americans completely or somewhat “satisfied” with… ”
https://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2017/08/28/more-americans-give-top-grades-to-public.html?cmp=soceml-twfdbltz-ewnow
LikeLike
Thank you for bringing this to our attention, CBK! Could it be that Diane’s message is finally starting to break through our online community?
LikeLike
GregB Yes–and Diane has “cred” and her support has been sustained over a long period of time. Don’t stop.
LikeLike
The need for more emphasis on STEM is incredibly suspect.
A 2004 RAND study “found no consistent and convincing evidence that the federal government faces current or impending shortages of STEM workers…there is little evidence of such shortages in the past decade or on the horizon.” The RAND study concluded “if the number of STEM positions or their attractiveness is not also increasing” –– and both are not –– then “measures to increase the number of STEM workers may create surpluses, manifested in unemployment and underemployment.”
A 2007 study by Lowell and Salzman found no STEM shortage. Indeed, Lowell and Salzman found that “the supply of S&E-qualified graduates is large and ranks among the best internationally. Further, the number of undergraduates completing S&E studies has grown, and the number of S&E graduates remains high by historical standards.” The “education system produces qualified graduates far in excess of demand.”
Lowell and Salzman concluded that “purported labor market shortages for scientists and engineers are anecdotal and also not supported by the available evidence…The assumption that difficulties in hiring is just due to supply can have counterproductive consequences: an increase in supply that leads to high unemployment, lowered wages, and decline in working conditions will have the long-term effect of weakening future supply.” Lowell and Salzman noted that “available evidence indicates an ample supply of students whose preparation and performance has been increasing over the past decades.”
Beryl Lieff Benderly wrote this stunning statement fairly recently in the Columbia Journalism Review:
“Leading experts on the STEM workforce, have said for years that the US produces ample numbers of excellent science students. In fact, according to the National Science Board’s authoritative publication Science and Engineering Indicators 2008, the country turns out three times as many STEM degrees as the economy can absorb into jobs related to their majors.”
So why the STEM emphasis by the likes of Bill Gates and Norm Augustine (former head of Lockheed Martin)? Benderly continues:
“Simply put, a desire for cheap, skilled labor, within the business world and academia, has fueled assertions—based on flimsy and distorted evidence—that American students lack the interest and ability to pursue careers in science and engineering, and has spurred policies that have flooded the market with foreign STEM workers. This has created a grim reality for the scientific and technical labor force: glutted job markets; few career jobs; low pay, long hours, and dismal job prospects for postdoctoral researchers in university labs; near indentured servitude for holders of temporary work visas.”
Benderly reports that an engineering professor at Rochester Institute of Technology told this to a Congressional committee a few summers back:
“Contrary to some of the discussion here this morning, the STEM job market is mired in a jobs recession…with unemployment rates…two to three times what we would expect at full employment….Loopholes have made it too easy to bring in cheaper foreign workers with ordinary skills…to directly substitute for, rather than complement, American workers. The programs are clearly displacing and denying opportunities to American workers.”
The STEM advocates keep claiming (falsely) that more STEM – like the Common Core, they say – is needed to make America economically competitive. But according to the World Economic Forum competitiveness rankings the US is – and has been – economically competitive. It currently ranks #3 in the world.
STEM, like the SAT and ACT and Advanced Placement, is largely a scam.
LikeLike